Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera

Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prosthetic regurgitation and predicts outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to provide a simple, reproducible, and point-of-care assessment of peri-prosthetic aortic regurgitation (periAR) during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to decipher the impact of this peri-procedural parameter on outcome. BACKGROUND Because periAR after TAVI might be associated with adverse outcome, precise quantification of periAR is of paramount importance but remains technically challenging. METHODS The severity of periAR was prospectively evaluated in 146 patients treated with the Medtronic CoreValve (Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis by echocardiography, angiography, and measurement of the aortic regurgitation (AR) index, which is calculated as ratio of the gradient between diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) to systolic blood pressure (SBP): [(DBP - LVEDP)/SBP] × 100. RESULTS After TAVI, 53 patients (36.3%) showed no signs of periAR and 71 patients (48.6%) showed only mild periAR, whereas 18 patients (12.3%) and 4 patients (2.7%) suffered from moderate and severe periAR, respectively. The AR index decreased stepwise from 31.7 ± 10.4 in patients without periAR, to 28.0 ± 8.5 with mild periAR, 19.6 ± 7.6 with moderate periAR, and 7.6 ± 2.6 with severe periAR (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients with AR index <25 had a significantly increased 1-year mortality risk compared with patients with AR index ≥25 (46.0% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.001). The AR index provided additional prognostic information beyond the echocardiographically assessed severity of periAR and independently predicted 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 6.4; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS The assessment of the AR index allows a precise judgment of periAR, independently predicts 1-year mortality after TAVI, and provides additional prognostic information that is complementary to the echocardiographically assessed severity of periAR.

MicroRNA Expression in Circulating Microvesicles Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially regulated and selectively packaged in microvesicles (MVs). We evaluated whether circulating vascular and endothelial miRNAs in patients with stable coronary artery disease have prognostic value for the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events. Methods and Results Ten miRNAs involved in the regulation of vascular performance—miR‐126, miR‐222, miR‐let7d, miR‐21, miR‐20a, miR‐27a, miR‐92a, miR‐17, miR‐130, and miR‐199a—were quantified in plasma and circulating MVs by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 181 patients with stable coronary artery disease. The median duration of follow‐up for major adverse CV event–free survival was 6.1 years (range: 6.0–6.4 years). Events occurred in 55 patients (31.3%). There was no significant association between CV events and plasma level of the selected miRNAs. In contrast, increased expression of miR‐126 and miR‐199a in circulating MVs was significantly associated with a lower major adverse CV event rate. In univariate analysis, above‐median levels of miR‐126 in circulating MVs were predictors of major adverse CV event–free survival (hazard ratio: 0.485 [95% CI: 0.278 to 0.846]; P=0.007) and percutaneous coronary interventions (hazard ratio: 0.458 [95% CI: 0.222 to 0.945]; P=0.03). Likewise, an increased level of miR‐199a in circulating MVs was associated with a reduced risk of major adverse CV events (hazard ratio: 0.518 [95% CI: 0.299 to 0.898]; P=0.01) and revascularization (hazard ratio: 0.439 [95% CI: 0.232 to 0.832]; P=0.01) in univariate analysis. miRNA expression analysis in plasma compartments revealed that miR‐126 and miR‐199a are present mainly in circulating MVs. MV‐sorting experiments showed that endothelial cells and platelets were found to be the major cell sources of MVs containing miR‐126 and miR‐199a, respectively. Conclusion MVs containing miR‐126 and miR‐199a but not freely circulating miRNA expression predict the occurrence of CV events in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Impact of Paravalvular Leakage on Outcome in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the aortic regurgitation (AR) index as a new hemodynamic parameter in an independent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cohort and validate its application. BACKGROUND Increasing evidence associates more-than-mild periprosthetic aortic regurgitation (periAR) with increased mortality and morbidity; therefore precise evaluation of periAR after TAVI is essential. The AR index has been proposed recently as a simple and reproducible indicator for the severity of periAR and predictor of associated mortality. METHODS The severity of periAR was evaluated by echocardiography, angiography, and periprocedural measurement of the dimensionless AR index = ([diastolic blood pressure - left ventricular end-diastolic pressure]/systolic blood pressure) × 100. A cutoff value of 25 was used to identify patients at risk. RESULTS One hundred twenty-two patients underwent TAVI by use of either the Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) (79.5%) or the Edwards-SAPIEN bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (20.5%). The AR index decreased stepwise from 29.4 ± 6.3 in patients without periAR (n = 26) to 28.0 ± 8.5 with mild periAR (n = 76), 19.6 ± 7.6 with moderate periAR (n = 18), and 7.6 ± 2.6 with severe periAR (n = 2) (p < 0.001). Patients with AR index <25 had a significantly increased 1-year mortality rate compared with patients with AR index ≥ 25 (42.3% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001). Even in patients with none/mild periAR, the 1-year mortality risk could be further stratified by an AR index <25 (31.3% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The validity of the AR index could be confirmed in this independent TAVI cohort and provided prognostic information that was complementary to the severity of AR.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome predicts increased mortality in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS The outcome of patients undergoing surgical or interventional therapy is unfavourably influenced by severe systemic inflammation. We assessed the impact of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) on the outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and fifty-two high-risk patients (mean age: 80.5 ± 6.5 years, mean logistic EuroSCORE: 30.4 ± 8.1%) with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVI. Proinflammatory cytokines [interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8)], and acute phase reactants [C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT)] were measured at baseline and 1, 4, 24, 48, 72 h, and 7 days after TAVI. Sixty-one of 152 patients developed SIRS during the first 48 h after TAVI. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients were characterized by leucocytosis ≥12 × 10(9)/L (83.6 vs. 12.1%; P < 0.001), hyperventilation (80.3 vs. 35.2%; P < 0.001), tachycardia (37.7 vs. 9.9%; P < 0.001), and fever (31.1 vs. 3.3%; P < 0.001) compared with patients without SIRS. Furthermore, the occurrence of SIRS was characterized by a significantly elevated release of IL-6 and IL-8 with subsequent increase in the leucocyte count, CRP, and PCT. Major vascular complications [odds ratio (OR) 5.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-19.6; P = 0.018] and the number of ventricular pacing runs (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8; P = 0.025) were independent predictors of SIRS. The occurrence of SIRS was related to 30-day and 1-year mortality (18.0 vs. 1.1% and 52.5 vs. 9.9%, respectively; P < 0.001) and independently predicted 1-year mortality risk (hazard ratio: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.9-9.9; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SIRS may occur after TAVI and is a strong predictor of mortality. The development of SIRS could be easily identified by a significant increase in the leucocyte count shortly after TAVI.

Novel approaches for prevention of stroke related to transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a therapeutical option in patients with aortic stenosis. The methodology has evolved rapidly throughout the last decade. Nowadays, peri-procedural circulatory support, surgical vascular access, general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation are mainly reserved for selected patients. However, numerous challenges need to be addressed in order to further improved outcome of this distinct cohort: patient selection in general, vascular access strategies, long-term valve performance and paravalvular leakage. Another key issue is the risk of cerebrovascular events related to TAVI. In this article, the authors review the current literature on the risk of cerebrovascular events, the underlying mechanisms, the diagnostic read-outs of cerebral injury and their prognostic value, and ultimately discuss conceivable concepts for prevention of stroke associated with TAVI.

An Exceptional Case of Frame Underexpansion With a Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve Despite Predilation

![Figure][1] [Video 1][2] Lateral view of the CoreValve prosthesis with an atypical vertical line suggesting stent frame underexpansion. ![Figure][1] [Video 2][3] Orthogonal view of the CoreValve prosthesis (right anterior oblique: 82°, cranial: 40°) showing severe frame