Mark Carol

MR-spectroscopy guided target delineation for high-grade gliomas☆

PURPOSE Functional/metabolic information provided by MR-spectroscopy (MRSI) suggests MRI may not be a reliable indicator of active and microscopic disease in malignant brain tumors. We assessed the impact MRSI might have on the target volumes used for radiation therapy treatment planning for high-grade gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-four patients (22 Grade III; 12 Grade IV astrocytomas) were evaluated; each had undergone MRI and MRSI studies before surgery. MRI data sets were contoured for T1 region of contrast enhancement (T1), region of necrosis, and T2 region of hyperintensity (T2). The three-dimensional MRSI peak parameters for choline (Cho) and N-acetylaspartate (NAA), acquired by a multivoxel technique, were categorized based on an abnormality index (AI), a quantitative assessment of tissue metabolite levels. The AI data were aligned to the MRI and displayed as three-dimensional contours. AI vs. T conjoint and disjoint volumes were compared. RESULTS For both grades, although T2 estimated the region at risk of microscopic disease as being as much as 50% greater than by MRSI, metabolically active tumor still extended outside the T2 region in 88% of patients by as many as 28 mm. In addition, T1 suggested a lesser volume and different location of active disease compared to MRSI. CONCLUSION The use of MRSI to define target volumes for RT treatment planning would increase, and change the location of, the volume receiving a boost dose as well as reduce the volume receiving a standard dose. Incorporation of MRSI into the treatment-planning process may have the potential to improve control while reducing complications.

COMPARISON OF INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY WITH CONVENTIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR COMPLEX-SHAPED TUMORS

PURPOSE Conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for 9 patients were compared based on characterization of plan quality and effects on the oncology department. METHODS AND MATERIALS These clinical cases, treated originally with conformal radiotherapy (CRT), required extraordinary effort to produce conformal treatment plans using nonmodulated, shaped noncoplanar fields with multileaf collimators (MLCs). IMRT plans created for comparison included rotational treatments with slit collimator, and fixed-field MLC treatments using equispaced coplanar, and noncoplanar fields. Plans were compared based upon target coverage, target conformality, dose homogeneity, monitor units (MU), user-interactive planning time, and treatment delivery time. The results were subjected to a statistical analysis. RESULTS IMRT increased target coverage an average of 36% and conformality by 10%. Where dose escalation was a goal, IMRT increased mean dose by 4-6 Gy and target coverage by 19% with the same degree of conformality. Rotational IMRT was slightly superior to fixed-field IMRT. All IMRT techniques increased integral dose and target dose heterogeneity. IMRT planning times were significantly less, whereas MU increased significantly; estimated delivery times were similar. CONCLUSION IMRT techniques increase dose and target coverage while continuing to spare organs-at-risk, and can be delivered in a time frame comparable to other sophisticated techniques.

Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors

PURPOSE The goal of modulated-beam conformal therapy is to reduce the dose to healthy tissue and sensitive structures around a uniformly irradiated target volume. Multiple intensity-modulated fields offer improved tissue-sparing dose distributions. New computer-based systems for planning and delivering such treatments may soon be available from different commercial sources that will make the formulation of an intensity-modulated treatment plan and its execution widely available at any treatment facility that has the resources to acquire the necessary equipment. This work reports on a study of the integration of two such systems. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment planning was done using a commercially available inverse planning algorithm based on simulated annealing. The plans arbitrarily assumed nine coplanar x-ray beams at nonopposed gantry angles. Intensity modulation was computed for each beam. The modulated field at each gantry angle was broken down into a series of uniform (nonmodulated) subfields, which could be delivered as a sequence to produce the desired dose distribution. Because a large number of subfields was delivered, a multileaf collimator (MLC) was used for field shaping. This allowed rapid and accurate field shaping for treatments made up of several hundred subfields. Computer control of the MLC and linear accelerator allowed delivery of doses less than .01 Gy per subfield. Treatment was delivered on a prototype, computer-controlled accelerator and MLC system. Resulting dose distributions were analyzed using film and an anatomically specific, homogeneous phantom. RESULTS The treatment plans were evaluated using dose-volume histogram analysis. The plans provided acceptably uniform irradiation of the target volume without exceeding dose tolerances for nearby critical structures. The plans were successfully delivered by a prototype dynamic MLC. The time needed to deliver a sequence of subfields at one gantry angle ranged from 0.7 to 2.0 min. Isodoses from film agreed reasonably well with planned isodose distributions. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to plan and deliver fixed gantry, modulated-beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors with systems being developed commercially. The planned dose distributions exhibit significant potential for sparing closely spaced normal tissue structures in the head and neck.

The field-matching problem as it applies to the peacock three dimensional conformal system for intensity modulation

PURPOSE Intensity modulated beam systems have been developed as a means of creating a high-dose region that closely conforms to the prescribed target volume while also providing specific sparing of organs at risk within complex treatment geometries. The slice-by-slice treatment paradigm used by one such system for delivering intensity modulated fields introduces regions of dose nonuniformity where each pair of treatment slices abut. A study was designed to evaluate whether or not the magnitude of the nonuniformity that results from this segmental delivery paradigm is significant relative to the overall dose nonuniformity present in the intensity modulation technique itself. An assessment was also made as to the increase in nonuniformity that would result if errors were made in indexing during treatment delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment plans were generated to simulate correctly indexed and incorrectly indexed treatments of 4, 10, and 18 cm diameter targets. Indexing errors of from 0.1 to 2.0 mm were studied. Treatment plans were also generated for targets of the same diameter but of lengths that did not require indexing of the treatment couch. RESULTS The nonuniformity that results from the intensity modulation delivery paradigm is 11-16% for targets where indexing is not required. Correct indexing of the couch adds an additional 1-2% in nonuniformity. However, a couch indexing error of as little as 1 mm can increase the total nonuniformity to as much as 25%. All increases in nonuniformity from indexing are essentially independent of target diameter. CONCLUSIONS The dose nonuniformity introduced by the segmental strip delivery paradigm is small relative to the nonuniformity present in the intensity modulation paradigm itself. A positioning accuracy of better than 0.5 mm appears to be required when implementing segmental intensity modulated treatment plans.

Initial clinical experience with the peacock intensity modulation of a 3-D conformal radiation therapy system

Peacock is a 3-D conformal treatment planning and delivery system for conformal radiation therapy which delivers intensity-modulated fields. A group of 13 patients were treated between March and February, 1995. Patient age ranged from 10 to 74. Six of the patients had previously received radiation therapy. Target volume was from 2.5 to 70 cm3: all treatments were fractionated, using single table angle plan with 270 degrees of rotation. A removable invasive cranial screw fixation device was used in all cases. Treated isodose line averaged 85%; conformality index was better than 2, with 0-5% of critical structure volume exceeding dose limits. Setup time averaged 8 min per fraction: treatment time ranged from 10 to 80 min. There were two equipment failures in 200 fractions/1,000 gantry rotations. Patient position averaged about 1 mm within initial setup. Follow-up has revealed no complications from the radiation.

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiosurgery with gamma knife radiosurgery for challenging skull base lesions.

PURPOSE To quantitatively compare intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) using 3-mm mini-multileaf collimation with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) plans for irregularly shaped skull base lesions in direct proximity to organs at risk (OAR). METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten challenging skull base lesions originally treated with GKRS were selected for comparison with IMRS using inverse treatment planning and 3-mm mini-multileaf collimation operating in step-and-shoot delivery mode. The lesions ranged in volume from 1.6 to 32.2 cm(3) and were treated with 9-20 GK isocenters (mean 13.2). The IMRS plans were designed with the intent to, at minimum, match the GKRS plans with regard to OAR sparing and target coverage. For each case, IMRS plans were generated using 9 coplanar, 11 equally spaced noncoplanar, and 11 OAR-avoidant noncoplanar beams; the best of these approaches with respect to target conformality, sparing of OAR, and maintaining coverage was selected for comparison with the original GKRS plan. RESULTS Assuming no patient motion or setup error, IMRS provided comparable target coverage and sparing of OAR and an improved conformity index at the prescription isodose contour but sometimes less conformity at lower isodose contours compared with the actual GKRS plan. All IMRS plans produced less target dose heterogeneity and shorter estimated treatment times compared with the GKRS plans. CONCLUSION Compared with GKRS for complex skull base lesions, IMRS plans using a 3-mm mini-multileaf collimator achieved comparable or sometimes improved target coverage, conformity, and critical structure sparing with shorter estimated treatment times.