Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark R. Burkhardt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark R. Burkhardt.


Science of The Total Environment | 2000

Occurrence of sulfonylurea, sulfonamide, imidazolinone, and other herbicides in rivers, reservoirs and ground water in the Midwestern United States, 1998.

William A. Battaglin; Edward T. Furlong; Mark R. Burkhardt; C.J. Peter

Sulfonylurea (SU), sulfonamide (SA), and imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides are relatively new classes of chemical compounds that function by inhibiting the action of a plant enzyme, stopping plant growth, and eventually killing the plant. These compounds generally have low mammalian toxicity, but plants demonstrate a wide range in sensitivity to SUs, SAs, and IMIs with over a 10,000-fold difference in observed toxicity levels for some compounds. SUs, SAs, and IMIs are applied either pre- or post-emergence to crops commonly at 1/50th or less of the rate of other herbicides. Little is known about their occurrence, fate, or transport in surface water or ground water in the USA. To obtain information on the occurrence of SU, SA, and IMI herbicides in the Midwestern United States, 212 water samples were collected from 75 surface-water and 25 ground-water sites in 1998. These samples were analyzed for 16 SU, SA and IMI herbicides by USGS Methods Research and Development Program staff using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Samples were also analyzed for 47 pesticides or pesticide degradation products. At least one of the 16 SUs, SAs or IMIs was detected above the method reporting limit (MRL) of 0.01 microg/l in 83% of 130 stream samples. Imazethapyr was detected most frequently (71% of samples) followed by flumetsulam (63% of samples) and nicosulfuron (52% of samples). The sum of SU, SA and IMI concentrations exceeded 0.5 microg/l in less than 10% of stream samples. Acetochlor, alachlor, atrazine, cyanazine and metolachlor were all detected in 90% or more of 129 stream samples. The sum of the concentration of these five herbicides exceeded 50 microg/l in approximately 10% of stream samples. At least one SU, SA, or IMI herbicide was detected above the MRL in 24% of 25 ground-water samples and 86% of seven reservoir samples.


Science of The Total Environment | 2000

Routine determination of sulfonylurea, imidazolinone, and sulfonamide herbicides at nanogram-per-liter concentrations by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Edward T. Furlong; Mark R. Burkhardt; Paul M. Gates; Stephen L. Werner; William A. Battaglin

Sulfonylurea (SU), imidazolinone (IMI), and sulfonamide (SA) herbicides are new classes of low-application-rate herbicides increasingly used by farmers. Some of these herbicides affect both weed and crop species at low dosages and must be carefully used. Less is known about the effect of these compounds on non-crop plant species, but a concentration of 100 ng/l in water has been proposed as the threshold for possible plant toxicity for most of these herbicides. Hence, analytical methods must be capable of detecting SUs, IMIs, and SAs at concentrations less than 100 ng/l in ambient water samples. The authors developed a two-cartridge, solid-phase extraction method for isolating 12 SU, 3 IMI, and 1 SA herbicides by using high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-MS) to identify and quantify these herbicides to 10 ng/l. This method was used to analyze 196 surface- and ground-water samples collected from May to August 1998 throughout the Midwestern United States, and more than 100 quality-assurance and quality-control samples. During the 16 weeks of the study, the HPLC/ESI-MS maintained excellent calibration linearity across the calibration range from 5 to 500 ng/l, with correlation coefficients of 0.9975 or greater. Continuing calibration verification standards at 100-ng/l concentration were analyzed throughout the study, and the average measured concentrations for individual herbicides ranged from 93 to 100 ng/l. Recovery of herbicides from 27 reagent-water samples spiked at 50 and 100 ng/l ranged from 39 to 92%, and averaged 73%. The standard deviation of recoveries ranged from 14 to 26%, and averaged 20%. This variability reflects multiple instruments, operators, and the use of automated and manual sample preparation. Spiked environmental water samples had similar recoveries, although for some herbicides, the sample matrix enhanced recoveries by as much as 200% greater than the spiked concentration. This matrix enhancement was sample- and compound-dependent. Concentrations of herbicides in unspiked duplicate environmental samples were typically within 25% of each other. The results demonstrate the usefulness of HPLC/ESI-MS for determining low-application-rate herbicides at ambient concentrations.


Trends in Analytical Chemistry | 1996

Determination of nitroaromatic explosives and their degradation products in unsaturated-zone water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array, mass spectrometric, and tandem mass spectrometric detection

Paul M. Gates; Edward T. Furlong; Thomas F. Dorsey; Mark R. Burkhardt

Abstract Mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry, coupled by a thermospray interface to a high-performance liquid chromatography system and equipped with a photodiode array detector, were used to determine the presence of nitroaromatic explosives and their degradation products in USA unsaturated-zone water samples. Using this approach, the lower limits of quantitation for explosives determined by mass spectrometry in this study typically ranged from 10 to 100 ng/l.


International Journal of Phytoremediation | 2001

Plant-uptake of uranium : hydroponic and soil system studies

Anu Ramaswami; Paul Carr; Mark R. Burkhardt

ABSTRACT Limited information is available on screening and selection of terrestrial plants for uptake and translocation of uranium from soil. This article evaluates the removal of uranium from water and soil by selected plants, comparing plant performance in hydroponic systems with that in two soil systems (a sandy-loam soil and an organic-rich soil). Plants selected for this study were Sunflower (Helianthus giganteus), Spring Vetch (Vicia sativa), Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa), Juniper (Juniperus monosperma), Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea), and Bush Bean (Phaseolus nanus). Plant performance was evaluated both in terms of the percent uranium extracted from the three systems, as well as the biological absorption coefficient (BAC) that normalized uranium uptake to plant biomass. Study results indicate that uranium extraction efficiency decreased sharply across hydroponic, sandy and organic soil systems, indicating that soil organic matter sequestered uranium, rendering it largely unavailable for plant uptake. These results indicate that site-specific soils must be used to screen plants for uranium extraction capability; plant behavior in hydroponic systems does not correlate well with that in soil systems. One plant species, Juniper, exhibited consistent uranium extraction efficiencies and BACs in both sandy and organic soils, suggesting unique uranium extraction capabilities.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2006

Survey of Organic Wastewater Contaminants in Biosolids Destined for Land Application

Chad A. Kinney; Edward T. Furlong; Steven D. Zaugg; Mark R. Burkhardt; Stephen L. Werner; Jeffery D. Cahill; Gretchen R. Jorgensen


Environmental Science & Technology | 2008

Bioaccumulation of Pharmaceuticals and Other Anthropogenic Waste Indicators in Earthworms from Agricultural Soil Amended With Biosolid or Swine Manure

Chad A. Kinney; Edward T. Furlong; Dana W. Kolpin; Mark R. Burkhardt; Steven D. Zaugg; Stephen L. Werner; Joseph P. Bossio; Mark J. Benotti


Water-Resources Investigations Report | 2002

Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory - Determination of Wastewater Compounds by Polystyrene-Divinylbenzene Solid-Phase Extraction and Capillary-Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Steven D. Zaugg; Steven G. Smith; Michael P. Schroeder; Larry B. Barber; Mark R. Burkhardt


Analytica Chimica Acta | 2005

Pressurized liquid extraction using water/isopropanol coupled with solid-phase extraction cleanup for industrial and anthropogenic waste-indicator compounds in sediment

Mark R. Burkhardt; Rhiannon C. ReVello; Steven G. Smith; Steven D. Zaugg


Analytica Chimica Acta | 2005

Pressurized liquid extraction using water/isopropanol coupled with solid-phase extraction cleanup for semivolatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), and alkylated PAH homolog groups in sediment

Mark R. Burkhardt; Steven D. Zaugg; Teresa L. Burbank; Mary C. Olson; Jana L. Iverson


Open-File Report | 1996

Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory; determination of pesticides in water by Carbopak-B solid-phase extraction and high-preformance liquid chromatography

Stephen L. Werner; Mark R. Burkhardt; Sabrina N. DeRusseau

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark R. Burkhardt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward T. Furlong

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven D. Zaugg

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen L. Werner

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara J. Mahler

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chad A. Kinney

Colorado State University–Pueblo

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer T. Wilson

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter C. Van Metre

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher C. Fuller

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dana W. Kolpin

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge