Markus J. van Roosmalen
Utrecht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Markus J. van Roosmalen.
Genome Biology | 2011
Wigard P. Kloosterman; Marlous Hoogstraat; Oscar Paling; Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki; Ivo Renkens; Joost S. Vermaat; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Stef van Lieshout; Isaac J. Nijman; Wijnand M. Roessingh; Ruben van 't Slot; Jose van de Belt; Victor Guryev; Marco J. Koudijs; Emile E. Voest; Edwin Cuppen
BackgroundStructural rearrangements form a major class of somatic variation in cancer genomes. Local chromosome shattering, termed chromothripsis, is a mechanism proposed to be the cause of clustered chromosomal rearrangements and was recently described to occur in a small percentage of tumors. The significance of these clusters for tumor development or metastatic spread is largely unclear.ResultsWe used genome-wide long mate-pair sequencing and SNP array profiling to reveal that chromothripsis is a widespread phenomenon in primary colorectal cancer and metastases. We find large and small chromothripsis events in nearly every colorectal tumor sample and show that several breakpoints of chromothripsis clusters and isolated rearrangements affect cancer genes, including NOTCH2, EXO1 and MLL3. We complemented the structural variation studies by sequencing the coding regions of a cancer exome in all colorectal tumor samples and found somatic mutations in 24 genes, including APC, KRAS, SMAD4 and PIK3CA. A pairwise comparison of somatic variations in primary and metastatic samples indicated that many chromothripsis clusters, isolated rearrangements and point mutations are exclusively present in either the primary tumor or the metastasis and may affect cancer genes in a lesion-specific manner.ConclusionsWe conclude that chromothripsis is a prevalent mechanism driving structural rearrangements in colorectal cancer and show that a complex interplay between point mutations, simple copy number changes and chromothripsis events drive colorectal tumor development and metastasis.
Genome Research | 2015
Wigard P. Kloosterman; Laurent C. Francioli; Tobias Marschall; Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa; Abdel Abdellaoui; Eric-Wubbo Lameijer; Matthijs Moed; Vyacheslav Koval; Ivo Renkens; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Pascal P. Arp; Lennart C. Karssen; Bradley P. Coe; Robert E. Handsaker; E. Suchiman; Edwin Cuppen; Djie Tjwan Thung; Mitch McVey; Michael C. Wendl; Cornelia M. van Duijn; Morris A. Swertz; Gert-Jan B. van Ommen; P. Eline Slagboom; Dorret I. Boomsma; Alexander Schönhuth; Evan E. Eichler; Victor Guryev
Small insertions and deletions (indels) and large structural variations (SVs) are major contributors to human genetic diversity and disease. However, mutation rates and characteristics of de novo indels and SVs in the general population have remained largely unexplored. We report 332 validated de novo structural changes identified in whole genomes of 250 families, including complex indels, retrotransposon insertions, and interchromosomal events. These data indicate a mutation rate of 2.94 indels (1-20 bp) and 0.16 SVs (>20 bp) per generation. De novo structural changes affect on average 4.1 kbp of genomic sequence and 29 coding bases per generation, which is 91 and 52 times more nucleotides than de novo substitutions, respectively. This contrasts with the equal genomic footprint of inherited SVs and substitutions. An excess of structural changes originated on paternal haplotypes. Additionally, we observed a nonuniform distribution of de novo SVs across offspring. These results reveal the importance of different mutational mechanisms to changes in human genome structure across generations.
Genome Research | 2014
Marlous Hoogstraat; Mirjam S. de Pagter; Geert A. Cirkel; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Timothy T. Harkins; Karen Duran; Jennifer Kreeftmeijer; Ivo Renkens; Petronella O. Witteveen; Clarence Lee; Isaac J. Nijman; Tanisha Guy; Ruben van 't Slot; Trudy N. Jonges; Martijn P. Lolkema; Marco J. Koudijs; Ronald P. Zweemer; Emile E. Voest; Edwin Cuppen; Wigard P. Kloosterman
Intra-tumor heterogeneity is a hallmark of many cancers and may lead to therapy resistance or interfere with personalized treatment strategies. Here, we combined topographic mapping of somatic breakpoints and transcriptional profiling to probe intra-tumor heterogeneity of treatment-naïve stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer. We observed that most substantial differences in genomic rearrangement landscapes occurred between metastases in the omentum and peritoneum versus tumor sites in the ovaries. Several cancer genes such as NF1, CDKN2A, and FANCD2 were affected by lesion-specific breakpoints. Furthermore, the intra-tumor variability involved different mutational hallmarks including lesion-specific kataegis (local mutation shower coinciding with genomic breakpoints), rearrangement classes, and coding mutations. In one extreme case, we identified two independent TP53 mutations in ovary tumors and omentum/peritoneum metastases, respectively. Examination of gene expression dynamics revealed up-regulation of key cancer pathways including WNT, integrin, chemokine, and Hedgehog signaling in only subsets of tumor samples from the same patient. Finally, we took advantage of the multilevel tumor analysis to understand the effects of genomic breakpoints on qualitative and quantitative gene expression changes. We show that intra-tumor gene expression differences are caused by site-specific genomic alterations, including formation of in-frame fusion genes. These data highlight the plasticity of ovarian cancer genomes, which may contribute to their strong capacity to adapt to changing environmental conditions and give rise to the high rate of recurrent disease following standard treatment regimes.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2016
Petra ter Brugge; Petra Kristel; Eline van der Burg; Ute Boon; Michiel de Maaker; Esther H. Lips; Lennart Mulder; Julian R. de Ruiter; Catia Moutinho; Heidrun Gevensleben; Elisabetta Marangoni; Ian Majewski; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Wigard P. Kloosterman; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Karen Duran; Frans B. L. Hogervorst; Nicholas C. Turner; Manel Esteller; Edwin Cuppen; Jelle Wesseling; Jos Jonkers
BACKGROUND Although BRCA1-deficient tumors are extremely sensitive to DNA-damaging drugs and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, recurrences do occur and, consequently, resistance to therapy remains a serious clinical problem. To study the underlying mechanisms, we induced therapy resistance in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of BRCA1-mutated and BRCA1-methylated triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS A cohort of 75 mice carrying BRCA1-deficient breast PDX tumors was treated with cisplatin, melphalan, nimustine, or olaparib, and treatment sensitivity was determined. In tumors that acquired therapy resistance, BRCA1 expression was investigated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting. Next-generation sequencing, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and Target Locus Amplification (TLA)-based sequencing were used to determine mechanisms of BRCA1 re-expression in therapy-resistant tumors. RESULTS BRCA1 protein was not detected in therapy-sensitive tumors but was found in 31 out of 42 resistant cases. Apart from previously described mechanisms involving BRCA1-intragenic deletions and loss of BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, a novel resistance mechanism was identified in four out of seven BRCA1-methylated PDX tumors that re-expressed BRCA1 but retained BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. In these tumors, we found de novo gene fusions that placed BRCA1 under the transcriptional control of a heterologous promoter, resulting in re-expression of BRCA1 and acquisition of therapy resistance. CONCLUSIONS In addition to previously described clinically relevant resistance mechanisms in BRCA1-deficient tumors, we describe a novel resistance mechanism in BRCA1-methylated PDX tumors involving de novo rearrangements at the BRCA1 locus, demonstrating that BRCA1-methylated breast cancers may acquire therapy resistance via both epigenetic and genetic mechanisms.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 2015
Mirjam S. de Pagter; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Annette F. Baas; Ivo Renkens; Karen Duran; Ellen van Binsbergen; Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki; Ron Hochstenbach; Lars T. van der Veken; Edwin Cuppen; Wigard P. Kloosterman
Chromothripsis represents an extreme class of complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) with major effects on chromosomal architecture. Although recent studies have associated chromothripsis with congenital abnormalities, the incidence and pathogenic effects of this phenomenon require further investigation. Here, we analyzed the genomes of three families in which chromothripsis rearrangements were transmitted from a mother to her child. The chromothripsis in the mothers resulted in completely balanced rearrangements involving 8-23 breakpoint junctions across three to five chromosomes. Two mothers did not show any phenotypic abnormalities, although 3-13 protein-coding genes were affected by breakpoints. Unbalanced but stable transmission of a subset of the derivative chromosomes caused apparently de novo complex copy-number changes in two children. This resulted in gene-dosage changes, which are probably responsible for the severe congenital phenotypes of these two children. In contrast, the third child, who has a severe congenital disease, harbored all three chromothripsis chromosomes from his healthy mother, but one of the chromosomes acquired de novo rearrangements leading to copy-number changes. These results show that the human genome can tolerate extreme reshuffling of chromosomal architecture, including breakage of multiple protein-coding genes, without noticeable phenotypic effects. The presence of chromothripsis in healthy individuals affects reproduction and is expected to substantially increase the risk of miscarriages, abortions, and severe congenital disease.
Cancer Research | 2017
Wigard P. Kloosterman; Robert R. J. Coebergh van den Braak; Mark Pieterse; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Christina Stangl; Ronne Brunekreef; Zarina S. Lalmahomed; Salo Ooft; Anne van Galen; Marcel Smid; Armel Lefebvre; Fried J. T. Zwartkruis; John W.M. Martens; John A. Foekens; Katharina Biermann; Marco J. Koudijs; Jan N. M. IJzermans; Emile E. Voest
Genomic rearrangements that give rise to oncogenic gene fusions can offer actionable targets for cancer therapy. Here we present a systematic analysis of oncogenic gene fusions among a clinically well-characterized, prospectively collected set of 278 primary colon cancers spanning diverse tumor stages and clinical outcomes. Gene fusions and somatic genetic variations were identified in fresh frozen clinical specimens by Illumina RNA-sequencing, the STAR fusion gene detection pipeline, and GATK RNA-seq variant calling. We considered gene fusions to be pathogenically relevant when recurrent, producing divergent gene expression (outlier analysis), or as functionally important (e.g., kinase fusions). Overall, 2.5% of all specimens were defined as harboring a relevant gene fusion (kinase fusions 1.8%). Novel configurations of BRAF, NTRK3, and RET gene fusions resulting from chromosomal translocations were identified. An R-spondin fusion was found in only one tumor (0.35%), much less than an earlier reported frequency of 10% in colorectal cancers. We also found a novel fusion involving USP9X-ERAS formed by chromothripsis and leading to high expression of ERAS, a constitutively active RAS protein normally expressed only in embryonic stem cells. This USP9X-ERAS fusion appeared highly oncogenic on the basis of its ability to activate AKT signaling. Oncogenic fusions were identified only in lymph node-negative tumors that lacked BRAF or KRAS mutations. In summary, we identified several novel oncogenic gene fusions in colorectal cancer that may drive malignant development and offer new targets for personalized therapy. Cancer Res; 77(14); 3814-22. ©2017 AACR.
Nature Communications | 2017
Mircea Cretu Stancu; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Ivo Renkens; Marleen M Nieboer; Sjors Middelkamp; Joep de Ligt; Giulia Pregno; Daniela Giachino; Giorgia Mandrile; Jose Espejo Valle-inclan; Jerome Korzelius; Ewart de Bruijn; Edwin Cuppen; Michael E. Talkowski; Tobias Marschall; Jeroen de Ridder; Wigard P. Kloosterman
Despite improvements in genomics technology, the detection of structural variants (SVs) from short-read sequencing still poses challenges, particularly for complex variation. Here we analyse the genomes of two patients with congenital abnormalities using the MinION nanopore sequencer and a novel computational pipeline—NanoSV. We demonstrate that nanopore long reads are superior to short reads with regard to detection of de novo chromothripsis rearrangements. The long reads also enable efficient phasing of genetic variations, which we leveraged to determine the parental origin of all de novo chromothripsis breakpoints and to resolve the structure of these complex rearrangements. Additionally, genome-wide surveillance of inherited SVs reveals novel variants, missed in short-read data sets, a large proportion of which are retrotransposon insertions. We provide a first exploration of patient genome sequencing with a nanopore sequencer and demonstrate the value of long-read sequencing in mapping and phasing of SVs for both clinical and research applications.The detection of structural variants can be difficult with short-read sequencing technology, especially when variants are highly complex. Here, the authors use a MinION nanopore sequencer to analyse two patient genomes and develop NanoSV to map known and novel structural variants in long read data.
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2016
Saskia N. van der Crabben; Marije P Hennus; Grant A. McGregor; Deborah I. Ritter; Sandesh C.S. Nagamani; Owen S. Wells; Magdalena Harakalova; Ivan K. Chinn; Aaron Alt; Lucie Vondrová; Ron Hochstenbach; Joris M. van Montfrans; Suzanne W. J. Terheggen-Lagro; Stef van Lieshout; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Ivo Renkens; Karen Duran; Isaac J. Nijman; Wigard P. Kloosterman; Eric A.M. Hennekam; Jordan S. Orange; Peter M. van Hasselt; David A. Wheeler; Jan Paleček; Alan R. Lehmann; Antony W. Oliver; Laurence H. Pearl; Sharon E. Plon; Johanne M. Murray; Gijs van Haaften
The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family of proteins supports mitotic proliferation, meiosis, and DNA repair to control genomic stability. Impairments in chromosome maintenance are linked to rare chromosome breakage disorders. Here, we have identified a chromosome breakage syndrome associated with severe lung disease in early childhood. Four children from two unrelated kindreds died of severe pulmonary disease during infancy following viral pneumonia with evidence of combined T and B cell immunodeficiency. Whole exome sequencing revealed biallelic missense mutations in the NSMCE3 (also known as NDNL2) gene, which encodes a subunit of the SMC5/6 complex that is essential for DNA damage response and chromosome segregation. The NSMCE3 mutations disrupted interactions within the SMC5/6 complex, leading to destabilization of the complex. Patient cells showed chromosome rearrangements, micronuclei, sensitivity to replication stress and DNA damage, and defective homologous recombination. This work associates missense mutations in NSMCE3 with an autosomal recessive chromosome breakage syndrome that leads to defective T and B cell function and acute respiratory distress syndrome in early childhood.
Cell Reports | 2014
Sebastiaan van Heesch; Marieke Simonis; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Harrison Brand; Ewart W. Kuijk; Kim L. de Luca; Nico Lansu; A. Koen Braat; Androniki Menelaou; Wensi Hao; Jeroen Korving; Simone Snijder; Lars T. van der Veken; Ron Hochstenbach; Alida C. Knegt; Karen Duran; Ivo Renkens; Najla Alekozai; Myrthe Jager; Sarah Vergult; Björn Menten; Ewart de Bruijn; Sander Boymans; Elly F. Ippel; Ellen van Binsbergen; Michael E. Talkowski; Klaske D. Lichtenbelt; Edwin Cuppen; Wigard P. Kloosterman
Genomic rearrangements are a common cause of human congenital abnormalities. However, their origin and consequences are poorly understood. We performed molecular analysis of two patients with congenital disease who carried de novo genomic rearrangements. We found that the rearrangements in both patients hit genes that are recurrently rearranged in cancer (ETV1, FOXP1, and microRNA cluster C19MC) and drive formation of fusion genes similar to those described in cancer. Subsequent analysis of a large set of 552 de novo germline genomic rearrangements underlying congenital disorders revealed enrichment for genes rearranged in cancer and overlap with somatic cancer breakpoints. Breakpoints of common (inherited) germline structural variations also overlap with cancer breakpoints but are depleted for cancer genes. We propose that the same genomic positions are prone to genomic rearrangements in germline and soma but that timing and context of breakage determines whether developmental defects or cancer are promoted.
European Journal of Human Genetics | 2014
Sarah Vergult; Ellen van Binsbergen; Tom Sante; Silke Nowak; Olivier Vanakker; Kathleen Claes; Bruce Poppe; Nathalie Van der Aa; Markus J. van Roosmalen; Karen Duran; Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki; Marielle Swinkels; Marie-José H. van den Boogaard; Mieke M. van Haelst; Filip Roelens; Franki Speleman; Edwin Cuppen; Geert Mortier; Wigard P. Kloosterman; Björn Menten
Recently, microarrays have replaced karyotyping as a first tier test in patients with idiopathic intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital abnormalities (ID/MCA) in many laboratories. Although in about 14–18% of such patients, DNA copy-number variants (CNVs) with clinical significance can be detected, microarrays have the disadvantage of missing balanced rearrangements, as well as providing no information about the genomic architecture of structural variants (SVs) like duplications and complex rearrangements. Such information could possibly lead to a better interpretation of the clinical significance of the SV. In this study, the clinical use of mate pair next-generation sequencing was evaluated for the detection and further characterization of structural variants within the genomes of 50 ID/MCA patients. Thirty of these patients carried a chromosomal aberration that was previously detected by array CGH or karyotyping and suspected to be pathogenic. In the remaining 20 patients no causal SVs were found and only benign aberrations were detected by conventional techniques. Combined cluster and coverage analysis of the mate pair data allowed precise breakpoint detection and further refinement of previously identified balanced and (complex) unbalanced aberrations, pinpointing the causal gene for some patients. We conclude that mate pair sequencing is a powerful technology that can provide rapid and unequivocal characterization of unbalanced and balanced SVs in patient genomes and can be essential for the clinical interpretation of some SVs.