Martin James

Validating a new non-penetrating sham acupuncture device: two randomised controlled trials

For clinical trials of acupuncture, it would be desirable to have a sham procedure that is indistinguishable from the real treatment, yet inactive. A sham needle has been designed which telescopes instead of penetrating the skin. The Park Sham Device involves an improved method of supporting the sham needle and requires validation. The objective of these studies was to test whether the sham procedure using the new device was 1) indistinguishable from the same procedure using real needles in acupuncture naïve subjects, and 2) inactive, where the specific needle sensation (de qi) is taken as a surrogate measure of activity. The studies were designed as subject and assessor blind, randomised controlled trials. Study 1) included 58 patients enrolled in a clinical trial of acupuncture for acute stroke. Study 2) included 63 healthy, acupuncture naïve, adult volunteers. The interventions used were real or sham acupuncture using the Park Sham Device. Study 1) was set in a district general hospital, and study 2) in a university laboratory. The outcome measure in study 1) was the form of treatment that patients believed they had received. In study 2) the outcome measure was experience of de qi, as judged by three acupuncture experts. No patient in either group(study 1) believed he or she had been treated with the sham needle. In 40 volunteers (study 2) for whom experts achieved consensus, the relative risk of experiencing de qi with real acupuncture to that with sham acupuncture was 15.38 (95% CI 2.26 to 104.86). The inter-rater reliability of all 13 experts (study 2), calculated from their judgements on 10 subjects selected by randomisation, was 0.52 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.61). In conclusion, the results suggest that the procedure using the new device is indistinguishable from the same procedure using real needles in acupuncture naïve subjects, and is inactive, where the specific needle sensation (de qi) is taken as a surrogate measure of activity. It is therefore a valid control for acupuncture trials. The findings also lend support to the existence of de qi, a major concept underlying traditional Chinese acupuncture.

Controlling hypertension and hypotension immediately post-stroke (CHHIPS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial

BACKGROUND Raised blood pressure is common after acute stroke and is associated with an adverse prognosis. We sought to assess the feasibility, safety, and effects of two regimens for lowering blood pressure in patients who have had a stroke. METHODS Patients who had cerebral infarction or cerebral haemorrhage and were hypertensive (systolic blood pressure [SBP] >160 mm Hg) were randomly assigned by secure internet central randomisation to receive oral labetalol, lisinopril, or placebo if they were non-dysphagic, or intravenous labetalol, sublingual lisinopril, or placebo if they had dysphagia, within 36 h of symptom onset in this double-blind pilot trial. The doses were titrated up if target blood pressure was not reached. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the National Research Register, number N0484128008. FINDINGS 179 patients (mean age 74 [SD 11] years; SBP 181 [SD 16] mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95 [SD 13] mm Hg; median National Institutes of Health stroke scale [NIHSS] score 9 [IQR 5-16] points) were randomly assigned to receive labetolol (n=58), lisinopril (n=58), or placebo (n=63) between January, 2005, and December, 2007. The primary outcome--death or dependency at 2 weeks--occurred in 61% (69) of the active and 59% (35) of the placebo group (relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.80-1.33; p=0.82). There was no evidence of early neurological deterioration with active treatment (RR 1.22, 0.33-4.54; p=0.76) despite the significantly greater fall in SBP within the first 24 h in this group compared with placebo (21 [17-25] mm Hg vs 11 [5-17] mm Hg; p=0.004). No increase in serious adverse events was reported with active treatment (RR 0.91, 0.69-1.12; p=0.50) but 3-month mortality was halved (9.7%vs 20.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.2-1.0; p=0.05). INTERPRETATION Labetalol and lisinopril are effective antihypertensive drugs in acute stroke that do not increase serious adverse events. Early lowering of blood pressure with lisinopril and labetalol after acute stroke seems to be a promising approach to reduce mortality and potential disability. However, in view of the small sample size, care must be taken when these results are interpreted and further evaluation in larger trials is needed.

Effects of antihypertensive treatment after acute stroke in the Continue Or Stop post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study (COSSACS): a prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial

BACKGROUND Up to 50% of patients with acute stroke are taking antihypertensive drugs on hospital admission. However, whether such treatment should be continued during the immediate post-stroke period is unclear. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of continuing or stopping pre-existing antihypertensive drugs in patients who had recently had a stroke. METHODS The Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study (COSSACS) was a UK multicentre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial. Patients were recruited at 49 UK National Institute for Health Research Stroke Research Network centres from January 1, 2003, to March 31, 2009. Patients aged over 18 years who were taking antihypertensive drugs were enrolled within 48 h of stroke and the last dose of antihypertensive drug. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by secure internet central randomisation to either continue or stop pre-existing antihypertensive drugs for 2 weeks. Patients and clinicians who randomly assigned patients were unmasked to group allocation. Clinicians who assessed 2-week outcomes and 6-month outcomes were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was death or dependency at 2 weeks, with dependency defined as a modified Rankin scale score greater than 3 points. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register, number ISRCTN89712435. FINDINGS 763 patients were assigned to continue (n=379) or stop (n=384) pre-existing antihypertensive drugs. 72 of 379 patients in the continue group and 82 of 384 patients in the stop group reached the primary endpoint (relative risk 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.14; p=0.3). The difference in systolic blood pressure at 2 weeks between the continue group and the stop group was 13 mm Hg (95% CI 10-17) and the difference in diastolic blood pressure was 8 mm Hg (6-10; difference between groups p<0.0001). No substantial differences were observed between groups in rates of serious adverse events, 6-month mortality, or major cardiovascular events. INTERPRETATION Continuation of antihypertensive drugs did not reduce 2-week death or dependency, cardiovascular event rate, or mortality at 6 months. Lower blood pressure levels in those who continued antihypertensive treatment after acute mild stroke were not associated with an increase in adverse events. These neutral results might be because COSSACS was underpowered owing to early termination of the trial, and support the continuation of ongoing research trials. FUNDING The Health Foundation and The Stroke Association.

Cardiac Baroreceptor Sensitivity Is Impaired After Acute Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The blood pressure (BP) fall and increased BP variability after acute stroke have been previously described. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms producing these findings are unclear but may include abnormalities of cardiac baroreceptor reflex arc and/or changes in sympathetic nervous system activity. To date, evidence of impaired cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) after stroke is limited to patients with chronic disease as determined by invasive methodology. Therefore, it was proposed to assess cardiac BRS and sympathovagal balance with the use of novel noninvasive techniques after acute stroke. METHODS Thirty-seven acute stroke patients underwent simultaneous surface electrocardiographic and noninvasive beat-to-beat BP recording. Cardiac BRS was assessed by power spectral analysis techniques, and sympathovagal balance was determined from the ratio of the low- to high-frequency powers for pulse interval variability. The responses were compared with a control group matched for age, sex, and BP. RESULTS Median cardiac BRS was significantly lower in stroke patients than in control subjects (high-frequency alpha-index, 4.89 versus 6.50 ms/mm Hg; P = .007; combined alpha-index, 4.65 versus 5.46 ms/mm Hg; P = .02). Median normalized high- but not low-frequency power of systolic BP variability was significantly greater in stroke patients (11.0 versus 6.7 normalized units; P < .001), probably reflecting differences in the mechanical effects of respiration on BP in stroke patients. No significant differences were observed in the power spectrum of pulse interval variability between stroke patients and control subjects. Patients with tight hemisphere strokes, however, had a significant reduction in median high-frequency pulse interval power compared with patients with left hemisphere strokes (8 versus 20 normalized units; P = .03), which may reflect a change in sympathovagal balance in favor of increased sympathetic tone in this group. CONCLUSIONS The impairment of cardiac BRS may be important in explaining the increased BP variability after stroke. There was no significant difference in surrogate measures of sympathovagal activity between acute stroke patients and control subjects, but right hemisphere stroke patients had a significant alteration in the sympathovagal balance of pulse interval variability compared with left hemisphere stroke patients. This sympathetic predominance in right hemisphere strokes may be important in the development of cardiac arrhythmias after stroke. The prognostic implications of these findings need to be further explored.

Pulse Pressure and Resistance Artery Structure in the Elderly

There has been recent interest in the possibility that resistance vessel structural adaptation in hypertension may be more closely related to pulse pressure than to other blood pressure parameters. We investigated the relation between blood pressure and resistance vessel structure in a group of subjects from an age group (older than 60 years) in which a widening of pulse pressure is a typical finding and characterized blood pressure parameters using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. We studied resistance vessels retrieved from biopsies of skin and subcutaneous fat taken from the gluteal region of 32 subjects under local anesthesia (age, 70 +/- 1 years [mean +/- SEM], 21 of whom were hypertensive and 11 normotensive. Media-lumen ratio was higher in the hypertensive than the normotensive subjects (18.6 +/- 1.6% versus 12.8 +/- 1.2%, P < .01) and correlated with age (r = .44, P < .05), clinic systolic pressure (r = .35, P < .05), 24-hour systolic pressure (r = .40, P < .05), and 24-hour pulse pressure (r = .56, P < .001). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis identified clinic and 24-hour pulse pressure as the only significant predictors of media-lumen ratio independent of age, other parameters of clinic blood pressure, and blood pressure variability (R2 = 41%, P < .05). These findings confirm those from animal models of hypertension in demonstrating the importance of pulse pressure in relation to cardiovascular structural adaptation and have important implications for the goals of treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

Arterial Baroreceptor-Cardiac Reflex Sensitivity in the Elderly

Uncertainty still remains regarding the differing effects of blood pressure and age on baroreceptor-cardiac reflex sensitivity in elderly individuals; these differences are at least partly due to the differing methods and subject groups used in previous studies. We sought to resolve these issues by examining baroreflex sensitivity in 54 subjects aged 70 +/- 1 years (mean +/- SE; range, 60 to 81) divided into groups with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension (CH group, n = 16), isolated systolic hypertension (ISH group, n = 16), or normotension (NT group, n = 22). Baroreflex sensitivity was quantified from the pulse interval and blood pressure responses to the Valsalva maneuver and pressor (phenylephrine) and depressor (sodium nitroprusside) stimuli. Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly reduced in the two hypertensive groups but did not differ between them (Valsalva maneuver: CH group, 1.9 +/- 0.3 ms/mm Hg; ISH group, 2.8 +/- 0.5; NT group, 4.4 +/- 0.4; phenylephrine: CH group, 3.1 +/- 0.6; ISH group, 3.5 +/- 0.7; NT group, 7.7 +/- 1.0; sodium nitroprusside CH group, 2.1 +/- 0.3; ISH group, 3.6 +/- 0.8; NT group, 5.4 +/- 0.3; all P < .05 for comparison with the NT group). Thus, this study demonstrated reductions in baroreflex sensitivity with hypertension in elderly subjects consistent across all methods but with no difference between subjects with combined hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension matched for similar systolic pressure. Baroreflex sensitivity was related only to the level of systolic pressure independent of diastolic pressure or age. If elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension have a greater reduction in large-artery compliance than combined hypertensive subjects with similar systolic pressure, this does not appear to lead to further reductions in baroreflex sensitivity in these individuals.

Maximizing the Population Benefit From Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke A Modeling Study of In-Hospital Delays

Background and Purpose— To maximize the benefits of thrombolysis, it is necessary not only to treat more patients, but to deliver treatment as early as possible. The aims of our study were to prospectively evaluate the clinical benefit from reducing delays in the emergency stroke pathway at our district hospital and examine outcomes from scenarios that include extension of the alteplase license. Methods— We developed a discrete-event simulation from prospective data for patients with stroke arriving at our large district hospital. We modeled current practice and assessed the impact on stroke outcomes of measures to reduce in-hospital delays to alteplase treatment and of extensions to the European license for alteplase from 3 to 4.5 hours and to people aged >80 years. Results— Extension of the time window to 4.5 hours increases the thrombolysis rate by 4%, yielding an additional 2 patients per year with minimal or no disability at 3 months. Time window extension is most effective when combined with a system of prealerts, achieving a thrombolysis rate of 15% and an additional 8 patients per year with minimal or no disability, increasing to 13 patients per year with extension of the license to patients >80 years. Conclusions— If implemented alone, extension of the time window for alteplase has only a modest additional population disability benefit, but this benefit can be increased 5-fold if time window extension is combined with substantial reductions to in-hospital delays.

Weekly variation in health-care quality by day and time of admission: a nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care.

BACKGROUND Studies in many health systems have shown evidence of poorer quality health care for patients admitted on weekends or overnight than for those admitted during the week (the so-called weekend effect). We postulated that variation in quality was dependent on not only day, but also time, of admission, and aimed to describe the pattern and magnitude of variation in the quality of acute stroke care across the entire week. METHODS We did this nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study using data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. We included all adult patients (aged >16 years) admitted to hospital with acute stroke (ischaemic or primary intracerebral haemorrhage) in England and Wales between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Our outcome measure was 30 day post-admission survival. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for 13 indicators of acute stroke-care quality by fitting multilevel multivariable regression models across 42 4-h time periods per week. FINDINGS The study cohort comprised 74,307 patients with acute stroke admitted to 199 hospitals. Care quality varied across the entire week, not only between weekends and weekdays, with different quality measures showing different patterns and magnitudes of temporal variation. We identified four patterns of variation: a diurnal pattern (thrombolysis, brain scan within 12 h, brain scan within 1 h, dysphagia screening), a day of the week pattern (stroke physician assessment, nurse assessment, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and assessment of communication and swallowing by a speech and language therapist), an off-hours pattern (door-to-needle time for thrombolysis), and a flow pattern whereby quality changed sequentially across days (stroke-unit admission within 4 h). The largest magnitude of variation was for door-to-needle time within 60 min (range in quality 35-66% [16/46-232/350]; coefficient of variation 18·2). There was no difference in 30 day survival between weekends and weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·95-1·13), but patients admitted overnight on weekdays had lower odds of survival (0·90, 0·82-0·99). INTERPRETATION The weekend effect is a simplification, and just one of several patterns of weekly variation occurring in the quality of stroke care. Weekly variation should be further investigated in other health-care settings, and quality improvement should focus on reducing temporal variation in quality and not only the weekend effect. FUNDING None.

The reproducibility of cardiac baroreceptor activity assessed non-invasively by spectral and sequence techniques

Baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) is increasingly used as a prognostic indicator in cardiovascular disease. Traditionally it has been measured using invasive techniques with pharmacological manipulation of blood pressure (BP). With the advent of newer methods to measure pulse interval and beat-to-beat changes in BP it is now possible, using sophisticated mathematical modelling techniques, to calculate cardiac BRS non-invasively. However, there are virtually no data on the reproducibility of these newer techniques and what factors may affect the repeatability of these measurements. We studied 39 subjects, aged 22–82 years, with a supine systolic BP range 97–160 mmHg and a diastolic BP range 57–94 mmHg on two occasions between 1 week and 6 months apart. Cardiac BRS was measured by power spectral analysis using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT), sequence analysis (using up, down and combined sequences) and from phase IV of the Valsalva manoeuvre. There was no significant difference between visits for any of the methods for measuring cardiac BRS. Mean BRS values were similar for FFT (16.7±11.2 ms/mmHg) and sequence analysis (15.8±11.4 ms/mmHg); however, results using phase IV of the Valsalva manoeuvre were significantly lower (8.1±2.9 ms/mmHg,p<0.0001). The coefficient of variation for the five measures of cardiac BRS varied from 16.8% for Valsalva-derived values to 26.1% for ‘down’ sequence analysis. However, in ten subjects BRS could not be calculated from the Valsalva manoeuvre. None of the independent variables tested (including age, BP levels and time between testing) significantly influenced the degree of repeatability. In summary, there appears to be little difference between these non-invasive methods in their degree of reproducibility. These techniques would seem suitable for longitudinal studies of changes in cardiac BRS and overcome many of the problems associated with the invasive pharmacological methods.

Does telephone follow-up improve blood pressure after minor stroke or TIA?

BACKGROUND hypertension is a common risk factor for stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and there is good evidence that blood pressure (BP) control prevents recurrent stroke. We investigated whether telephone follow-up (TFU) improved risk factor management in hypertensive patients after stroke/TIA. METHODS we conducted a randomised controlled trial and assigned hypertensive patients within 1 month of stroke or TIA to receive usual care (n = 27) or usual care plus regular TFU (n = 29). Primary outcome was the difference in 12 h ambulatory systolic BP change from baseline to 6 months (DeltaSBP) in both groups. TFU at 7 days, 1, 2 and 4 months included patient-focussed education and goal setting. RESULTS mean baseline BP was 145/83 mm Hg (standard deviation (SD) 21/14). There was no significant difference in DeltaSBP over 6 months with TFU. Median DeltaSBP was 0 mm Hg (interquartile range 19.5) in the TFU group and 3.0 mm Hg (20) fall in the usual care group (P = 0.29). Post hoc analysis showed that statin use increased from baseline to 6 months (P = 0.02) and cholesterol was significantly lower at 6 months in all patients (mean reduction 0.95 mmol/l; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION our study found TFU that promoted patient-led management of risk factors did not improve BP control over 6-month follow-up in primary care after stroke/TIA.