Martin Rowley
Keele University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martin Rowley.
Journal of Further and Higher Education | 2008
Martin Rowley; James Hartley; Derek Larkin
Single‐honours psychology students at an English university were asked about their expectations and experiences at the start and the end of their first year. Students without a pre‐university (A‐level) qualification in psychology (n = 37: 22%) felt less well‐prepared for studying psychology than students with an A‐level qualification (n = 132: 78%) at the beginning of the year. Both groups felt equally confident about their understanding of psychology at the end of it. Specific difficulties with research methods, statistics and the scientific nature of the course were common to both groups, and both groups reported considerably more difficulties with studying at the end of the year than they did at the start. Some possible ways of alleviating these difficulties are discussed.
Behavior Research Methods | 2011
John Allbutt; Jonathan Ling; Martin Rowley; Mohammed Shafiullah
Correlational research investigating the relationship between scores on self-report imagery questionnaires and measures of social desirable responding has shown only a weak association. However, researchers have argued that this research may have underestimated the size of the relationship because it relied primarily on the Marlowe–Crowne scale (MC; Crowne & Marlowe, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354, 1960), which loads primarily on the least relevant form of social desirable responding for this particular context, the moralistic bias. Here we report the analysis of data correlating the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; Marks, Journal of Mental Imagery, 19, 153–166, 1973) with the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR; Paulhus, 2002) and the MC scale under anonymous testing conditions. The VVIQ correlated significantly with the Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Agency Management (AM) BIDR subscales and with the MC. The largest correlation was with SDE. The ability of SDE to predict VVIQ scores was not significantly enhanced by adding either AM or MC. Correlations between the VVIQ and BIDR egoistic scales were larger when the BIDR was continuously rather than dichotomously scored. This analysis indicates that the relationship between self-reported imagery and social desirable responding is likely to be stronger than previously thought.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology | 2011
Sarah R. Beck; Kerry L. McColgan; Elizabeth J. Robinson; Martin Rowley
Childrens well-documented tendency to behave as if they know more than they do about uncertain events is reduced under two conditions: when the outcome of a chance event has yet to be determined and when one unknown outcome has occurred but is difficult to imagine. In Experiment 1, in line with published findings, 5- and 6-year-olds (N=61) preferred to guess the unknown location of a known object when the object was in place rather than before its location had been determined. There was no such preference when the objects identity was unknown. In Experiment 2, 29 5- and 6-year-olds were more likely to correctly mark both possible locations when an already hidden objects identity was unknown rather than known. We conclude that childrens vivid imaginations can lead them to underestimate uncertainty in a similar way to imagination inflation or fluency effects in adults.
British Journal of Psychology | 2009
Elizabeth J. Robinson; J. E. C. Pendle; Martin Rowley; Sarah R. Beck; Kerry L. McColgan
An established finding is that adults prefer to guess before rather than after a chance event has happened. This is interpreted in terms of aversion to guessing when relatively incompetent: After throwing, the fall could be known. Adults (N=71, mean age 18;11, N=28, mean age 48;0) showed this preference with imagined die-throwing as in the published studies. With live die-throwing, children (N=64, aged 6 and 8 years; N=50, aged 5 and 6 years) and 15-year-olds (N=93, 46) showed the opposite preference, as did 17 adults. Seventeen-year-olds (N=82) were more likely to prefer to guess after throwing with live rather than imagined die-throwing. Reliance on imagined situations in the literature on decision-making under uncertainty ignores the possibility that adults imagine inaccurately how they would really feel: After a real die has been thrown, adults, like children, may feel there is less ambiguity about the outcome.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | 2011
Adam J. L. Harris; Martin Rowley; Sarah R. Beck; Elizabeth J. Robinson; Kerry L. McColgan
Adults and children have recently been shown to prefer guessing the outcome of a die roll after the die has been rolled (but remained out of sight) rather than before it has been rolled. This result is contrary to the predictions of the competence hypothesis (Heath & Tversky, 1991), which proposes that people are sensitive to the degree of their relative ignorance and therefore prefer to guess about an outcome it is impossible to know, rather than one that they could know, but do not. We investigated the potential role of agency in guessing preferences about a novel game of chance. When the experimenter controlled the outcome, we replicated the finding that adults and 5- to 6-year-old children preferred to make their guess after the outcome had been determined. For adults only, this preference reversed when they exerted control over the outcome about which they were guessing. The adult data appear best explained by a modified version of the competence hypothesis that highlights the notion of control or responsibility. It is proposed that potential attributions of blame are related to the guessers role in determining the outcome. The child data were consistent with an imagination-based account of guessing preferences.
Child Development | 2006
Elizabeth J. Robinson; Martin Rowley; Sarah R. Beck; Daniel J. Carroll; Ian A. Apperly
Developmental Psychology | 2007
Robin Banerjee; Nicola Yuill; Christina Larson; Kate Easton; Elizabeth J. Robinson; Martin Rowley
Social Development | 2007
Martin Rowley; Elizabeth J. Robinson
Psychology, Learning and Teaching | 2008
Martin Rowley; James Hartley; Lucy R. Betts; Elizabeth J. Robinson
Archive | 2006
Elizabeth J. Robinson; Martin Rowley; Sarah R. Beck; Daniel J. Carroll; Ian A. Apperly