Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Martina M. Morrin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Martina M. Morrin.


Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2000

Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions

Martina M. Morrin; Richard J. Farrell; Vassilios Raptopoulos; James B. McGee; Ronald Bleday; Jonathan B. Kruskal

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of computed tomographic colonography to diagnose colorectal masses, stage colorectal cancers, image the proximal colon in obstructing colorectal lesions, and evaluate the anastomoses in patients with previous colorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively performed computed tomographic colonography examinations in 34 patients (20 males; mean age, 64.2; range, 19–91 years): 20 patients had colorectal masses (defined at endoscopy as intraluminal masses 2 cm or larger), 7 patients had benign obstructing colorectal strictures, and 7 patients had a prior colorectal resection. Final tumor staging was available in all 16 patients who had colorectal cancers and 15 patients were referred after incomplete colonoscopy. The ability of computed tomographic colonography to stage colorectal cancers, identify synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal masses, and image the proximal colon in patients with obstructing colorectal lesions was assessed. RESULTS: Computed tomographic colonography identified all colorectal masses, but overcalled two masses in patients who were either poorly distended or poorly prepared. Computed tomographic colonography correctly staged 13 of 16 colorectal cancers (81 percent) and detected 16 of 17 (93 percent) synchronous polyps. Computed tomographic colonography overstaged two Dukes Stage A cancers and understaged one Dukes Stage C cancer. A total of 97 percent (87/90) of all colonic segments were adequately visualized at computed tomographic colonography in patients with obstructing colorectal lesions compared with 60 percent (26/42) of segments at barium enema (P<0.01). Colonic anastomoses were visualized in all nine patients, but in one patient, computed tomographic colonography could not distinguish between local tumor recurrence and surgical changes. CONCLUSION: Computed tomographic colonography can accurately identify all colorectal masses but may overcall stool as masses in poorly distended or poorly prepared colons. Computed tomographic colonography has an overall staging accuracy of 81 percent for colorectal cancer and is superior to barium enema in visualizing colonic segments proximal to obstructing colorectal lesions.


Gastroenterology | 2003

Computerized tomographic colonography: Performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting

C. Daniel Johnson; Alicia Y. Toledano; Benjamin A. Herman; Abraham H. Dachman; Elizabeth G. McFarland; Matthew Barish; James A. Brink; Randy D. Ernst; Joel G. Fletcher; Robert A. Halvorsen; Amy K. Hara; Kenneth D. Hopper; Robert E. Koehler; David Lu; Michael Macari; Robert L. MacCarty; Frank H. Miller; Martina M. Morrin; Erik K. Paulson; Judy Yee; Michael E. Zalis

BACKGROUND & AIMS No multicenter study has been reported evaluating the performance and interobserver variability of computerized tomographic colonography. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of computerized tomographic colonography for detecting clinically important colorectal neoplasia (polyps >or=10 mm in diameter) in a multi-institutional study. METHODS A retrospective study was developed from 341 patients who had computerized tomographic colonography and colonoscopy among 8 medical centers. Colonoscopy and pathology reports provided the standard. A random sample of 117 patients, stratified by criterion standard, was requested. Ninety-three patients were included (47% with polyps >or=10 mm; mean age, 62 years; 56% men; 84% white; 40% reported colorectal symptoms; 74% at increased risk for colorectal cancer). Eighteen radiologists blinded to the criterion standard interpreted computerized tomography colonography examinations, each using 2 of 3 different software display platforms. RESULTS The average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for identifying patients with at least 1 lesion >or=10 mm was 0.80 (95% lower confidence bound, 0.74). The average sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% lower confidence bound, 68%) and 73% (95% lower confidence bound, 66%), respectively. Per-polyp sensitivity was 75%. A trend was observed for better performance with more observer experience. There was no difference in performance across software display platforms. CONCLUSIONS Computerized tomographic colonography performance compared favorably with reported performance of fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema. A prospective study evaluating the performance of computerized tomography colonography in a screening population is indicated.


Gastroenterology Clinics of North America | 2001

DIVERTICULAR DISEASE IN THE ELDERLY

Richard J. Farrell; James J. Farrell; Martina M. Morrin

Diverticular disease is common among the elderly. Because of the advanced age and muted symptoms and signs of many of those affected, diagnosis can be difficult. Consequently, great demands are placed on the physician to diagnose and treat clinically evident diverticular disease. Endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical advances have increased the availability of more definitive therapies for patients with complicated diverticular disease and diverticular hemorrhage.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1999

Oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance ventilation imaging of the human lung at 0.2 and 1.5 T.

Klaus W. Stock; Qun Chen; Martina M. Morrin; Hiroto Hatabu; Robert R. Edelman

Lung ventilation imaging using inhaled oxygen as a contrast medium was performed using both a 0.2 and a 1.5 T clinical magnetic resonance (MR) scanner in eight volunteers. Signal‐to‐noise‐ratios (SNRs) of the ventilation images as well as T1 values of the lung acquired with inhalation of 100% oxygen and room air were calculated. The SNR was 9.7 ± 3.0 on the 0.2 T MR system and 69.5 ± 28.8 on the 1.5 T system (P < 0.001). The mean T1 value on the 0.2 T MR system with subjects breathing room air was 632 ± 54 msec; with 100% oxygen, it was 586 ± 41 msec (P < 0.01). At 1.5 T, the mean values were 904 ± 99 msec and 790 ± 114 msec, respectively (P < 0.0001). We conclude that MR oxygen‐enhanced ventilation imaging of the lung is feasible with an open configured 0.2 T MR system. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;9:838–841.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2010

Limited-Preparation CT Colonography in Frail Elderly Patients: A Feasibility Study

Aoife N. Keeling; Michael M. Slattery; Sum Leong; Eoghan McCarthy; Maja Susanto; Michael J. Lee; Martina M. Morrin

OBJECTIVE Full colonic preparation can be onerous and may be poorly tolerated in frail elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the image quality and diagnostic yield of limited-preparation CT colonography (CTC) in elderly patients with suspected colorectal cancer who were deemed medically unfit or unsuitable for colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A prospective study was performed of 67 elderly patients with reduced functional status referred for CTC. Participants were prescribed a limited bowel preparation consisting of a low-residue diet for 3 days, 1 L of 2% oral diatrizoate meglumine (Gastrografin) 24 hours before CTC, and 1 L of 2% oral Gastrografin over the 2 hours immediately before CTC. No cathartic preparation was administered. All colonic segments were graded from 1 to 5 for image quality (1, unreadable; 2, poor; 3, equivocal; 4, good; 5, excellent) and reader confidence. Clinical and conventional colonoscopy follow-up findings were documented, and all colonic and extracolonic pathologic findings were documented. RESULTS Overall image quality and reader confidence in the evaluation of the colon was rated good or excellent in 84% of the colonic segments. Colonic abnormalities were identified in 12 patients (18%), including four colonic tumors, two polyps, and seven colonic strictures. Incidental extraintestinal findings were detected in 43 patients (64%), including nine patients with lesions radiologically consistent with malignancy. CONCLUSION Limited-preparation low-dose CTC is a feasible and useful minimally invasive technique with which to evaluate the colon and exclude gross pathology (mass lesions and polyps > 1 cm) in elderly patients with diminished performance status, yielding good to excellent image quality.


Radiographics | 2010

Current Status of MR Colonography

Eavan Thornton; Martina M. Morrin; Judy Yee

The search for an acceptable colorectal cancer screening examination has led to the development of virtual colonoscopy, which includes both computed tomographic (CT) colonography and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. As indicated by the much larger number of published studies on CT colonography than on MR colonography, multidetector CT appears to be more suitable for colorectal screening than does MR colonography, in part reflecting the ease and speed of performing CT, as well as the increased spatial resolution, decreased cost, and wider availability of CT colonography. The main advantage of MR colonography over CT colonography is that it does not use ionizing radiation, which has important implications for colorectal cancer screening. The use of dark-lumen MR colonography to screen patients for colorectal cancer as well as other abdominopelvic disease could make it more attractive than CT. With the integration of 3.0-T MR colonography, fecal tagging, and parallel imaging into research and clinical settings, new MR colonography protocols must be optimized. Future MR colonography research should address issues such as image characteristics, presence of artifacts, management of specific absorption rate, and hardware-related modifications.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2010

Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? Lessons from the national CT colonography trial

Joel G. Fletcher; Mei Hsiu Chen; Benjamin A. Herman; C. Daniel Johnson; Alicia Y. Toledano; Abraham H. Dachman; Amy K. Hara; Jeff L. Fidler; Christine O. Menias; Kevin J. Coakley; Mark D. Kuo; Karen M. Horton; Jugesh I. Cheema; Revathy B. Iyer; Bettina Siewert; Judy Yee; Richard G. Obregon; Peter Zimmerman; Robert A. Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Martina M. Morrin

OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to describe the experience of the National CT Colonography Trial with radiologist training and qualification testing at CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate this experience with subsequent performance in a prospective screening study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Ten inexperienced radiologists participated in a 1-day educational course, during which partial CTC examinations of 27 cases with neoplasia and full CTC examinations of 15 cases were reviewed using primary 2D and 3D search. Subsequently 15 radiologists took a qualification examination composed of 20 CTC cases. Radiologists who did not pass the first qualification examination attended a second day of focused retraining of 30 cases, which was followed by a second qualification examination. The results of the initial and subsequent qualification tests were compared with reader performance in a large prospective screening trial. RESULTS All radiologists took and passed the qualification examinations. Seven radiologists passed the qualification examination the first time it was offered, and eight radiologists passed after focused retraining. Significantly better sensitivities were obtained on the second versus the first examination for the retrained radiologists (difference = 16%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in sensitivities between the groups who passed the qualification examination the first time versus those who passed the second time in the prospective study (88% vs 92%, respectively; p = 0.612). In the prospective study, the odds of correctly identifying diseased cases increased by 1.5 fold for every 50-case increase in reader experience or formal training (p < 0.025). CONCLUSION A significant difference in performance was observed among radiologists before formalized training, but testing and focused retraining improved radiologist performance, resulting in an overall high sensitivity across radiologists in a subsequent, prospective screening study.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2010

Imaging features of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Joanna P. Ti; Ali Al-Aradi; Peter J. Conlon; Michael J. Lee; Martina M. Morrin

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to present the spectrum of radiologic findings of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). CONCLUSION Although a rare diagnosis, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in patients undergoing CAPD has a high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is often delayed because clinical features are insidious and nonspecific. Radiologic imaging may be helpful in the early diagnosis of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis and in facilitating timely intervention for CAPD patients with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2005

Is true FISP imaging reliable in the evaluation of venous thrombosis

Ivan Pedrosa; Martina M. Morrin; Laura Oleaga; Jovanna Baptista; Neil M. Rofsky

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis using gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images and correlative imaging as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five MR examinations were retrospectively reviewed independently by two radiologists to rule out thrombosis in the central veins of the body. The presence of venous thrombus was assessed separately in 80 veins using true FISP and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. Diagnosis was confirmed by another imaging technique (sonography, CT, and/or conventional venography) in all positive cases. Negative examinations were confirmed using imaging, clinical follow-up, or both. RESULTS Venous thrombosis was present in 25 veins in 18 patients. True FISP images had a lower sensitivity (66%) and specificity (70.9%) for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis than gadolinium-enhanced MR images (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION True FISP images have lower sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis than gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo images. True FISP images should not be used exclusively for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.


Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine | 2001

State-of-the-art ultrasonography is as accurate as helical computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography for detecting unresectable periampullary cancer.

Martina M. Morrin; Jonathan B. Kruskal; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Karen Weisinger; Richard J. Farrell; Michael L. Steer; Robert A. Kane

To compare the ability of state‐of‐the‐art ultrasonography with that of helical computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography in detecting unresectable periampullary cancer. In most patients periampullary cancer is unresectable because of either distant metastasis or local vascular involvement. The advent of gray scale and color Doppler ultrasonography has improved the ability of ultrasonography to detect vascular involvement.

Collaboration


Dive into the Martina M. Morrin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard J. Farrell

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan B. Kruskal

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vassilios Raptopoulos

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judy Yee

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivan Pedrosa

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil M. Rofsky

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacob Sosna

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge