Mary Helen Huls
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mary Helen Huls.
Cancer Gene Therapy | 2015
Harjeet Singh; Judy S. Moyes; Mary Helen Huls; L J N Cooper
T cells can be reprogrammed to redirect specificity to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) through the enforced expression of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). The prototypical CAR is a single-chain molecule that docks with TAA expressed on the cell surface and, in contrast to the T-cell receptor complex, recognizes target cells independent of human leukocyte antigen. The bioprocessing to generate CAR+ T cells has been reduced to clinical practice based on two common steps that are accomplished in compliance with current good manufacturing practice. These are (1) gene transfer to stably integrate the CAR using viral and nonviral approaches and (2) activating the T cells for proliferation by crosslinking CD3 or antigen-driven numeric expansion using activating and propagating cells (AaPCs). Here, we outline our approach to nonviral gene transfer using the Sleeping Beauty system and the selective propagation of CD19-specific CAR+ T cells on AaPCs.
Vox Sanguinis | 2004
Helen E. Heslop; Stephen Gottschalk; Catherine M. Bollard; Karin Straathof; Mary Helen Huls; Brenner Mk; Cliona M. Rooney
Over the past few years there have been increasing number of studies evaluating T-cell therapies in the treatment of malignancies and viral infections. Initial studies focused on the use of unmanipulated cell populations primarily after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [1]. More recently there has been increasing interest in the use of cell populations, which have been more extensively manipulated ex vivo , antigen specific T cells in particular. With advances in molecular biology a number of novel immunogenic tumour proteins have been identified by screening tumour-derived expression libraries or tumour cells using autologous sera [2]. This methodology of antigen identification and the mapping of specific epitopes recognized by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, has made possible new strategies designed to generate tumour and viral specific T cells and provided approaches to augment T-cell responses [3].
Molecular Therapy | 2016
Harjeet Singh; Mary Helen Huls; Matthew J. Figliola; Ling Zhang; Tiejuan Mi; Sourindra Maiti; Gabrielle Romain; Simon Olivares; Shihuang Su; Lenka V. Hurton; Navin Varadarajan; Laurence J.N. Cooper; Partow Kebriaei
Non-viral gene transfer using the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon/transposase system has been successfully tested in humans to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) to redirect T-cell specificity to CD19. This system has been modified to (i) improve the design of the CD19-specific CAR and (ii) reduce the time in culture to 14 days. Our previous clinical trials infused T cells expressing a 2nd generation CAR (designated CD19RCD28) with an IgG4-Fc stalk that activated via chimeric CD28 and CD3ζ. To evaluate the length of extracellular domain on function, we tested four CD19-specific CARs with two long [IgG4-Fc (CD19RCD28) and EQ (L235E and N297Q) mutant IgG4-Fc (CD19R*CD28)], medium (CD8α hinge, CD19RCD8CD28) and short (12aa IgG1 hinge, CD19R12aaCD28) stalks which all signaled through chimeric CD28 and CD3ζ endodomains. Generation of our T cells is based on electro-transfer of CARs coded by the SB system and antigen-specific stimulation through activating and K562-derived propagating cells (AaPC) in the presence of exogenous cytokines. After electro-transfer of SB-derived DNA plasmids, T cells were selectively propagated with either a new two-weekly (2x) or standard four-weekly (4x) additions of AaPC. All genetically modified T cells were capable of specific lysis of CD19+ tumor targets and producing IFN-γ in response to CD19+ stimulator cells. Serial killing was tested using massively parallel microscopy to observe single T cells and we observed that CDl9RCD8CD28+ T cells exhibited superior ability to partake in multiple killing events. CAR+ T cells were further tested in vivo for their ability to control CD19+ leukemia in a mouse model of minimal residual disease as well as established disease (Figure A and BFigure A and B). We found that T cells expressing modified CARs (CD19R*CD28, CD19RCD8CD28, CD19R12aaCD28) with reduced ability to bind to Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) were able to control leukemia more efficiently in mice compared to T cells expressing CD19RCD28. The CD19RCD8CD28 CAR was superior in controlling disease in the model of minimal residual disease compared with the CAR design evaluated in our prior clinical trials. T cells expressing CD19R*CD28 and CD19RCD8CD28 were then evaluated in 2x stimulation cycle. Both the 4x CAR+ T cells had similar CAR expression (>70%) whereas the 2x CAR+ T cells exhibited reduced CAR expression (~40%). The 2x CAR+ T cells expressed markers associated with less differentiated state of naive-like and memory T cells when compared to 4x CAR+ T cells, which was supported by measurement of mRNA species using bar-coded probes. The efficacy of the CAR+ T cells was tested in mice bearing established CD19+ leukemia and we observed superior survival in mice receiving the 2x CAR+ T cells compared with the 4x CAR+ T cells (Figure CFigure C). These data depict that length of extracellular domain and its associated binding to FcγR improves T-cell effector functions and that decreasing the time in culture can improve control of leukemia in vivo. These data support the use of cDl9RCD8CD28 testing in a next-generation clinical trial (IND# 16474).View Large Image | Download PowerPoint Slide
Blood | 2015
Partow Kebriaei; Stefan O. Ciurea; Mary Helen Huls; Harjeet Singh; Simon Olivares; Shihuang Su; Matthew J. Figliola; Pappanaicken R Kumar; Bipulendu Jena; Marie-Andree Forget; Sonny Ang; Rineka Jackson; Tingting Liu; Ian McNiece; Gabriela Rondon; Perry B. Hackett; Hagop M. Kantarjian; Dean A. Lee; Uday Popat; Amin M. Alousi; Betul Oran; Nina Shah; Chitra Hosing; David Marin; Katayoun Rezvani; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Richard E. Champlin
Blood | 2009
Harjeet Singh; Hillary N Gibbons; Simon Olivares; Matthew J. Figliola; Margaret J. Dawson; Mary Helen Huls; Dean A. Lee; Partow Kebriaei; Richard E. Champlin; Laurence J.N. Cooper
Blood | 2016
Lenka V. Hurton; Harjeet Singh; Kirsten Switzer; Tiejuan Mi; Leo G. Flores; Aaron Orozco; Sourindra Maiti; Shihuang Su; Amer Najjar; Mary Helen Huls; Partow Kebriaei; Richard E. Champlin; Laurence J.N. Cooper
Blood | 2009
Cecele J. Denman; Lisa M. Kopp; Vladimir Senyukov; Sarah Hagemeister; Jennifer L. Johnson; Maria Aparecida Lima da Silva; Harjeet Singh; Lenka V. Hurton; Simon Olivares; Mary Helen Huls; Richard E. Champlin; Laurence J.N. Cooper; Dean A. Lee
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2009
Harjeet Singh; Mary Helen Huls; Margaret J. Dawson; Tiejuan Mi; Dean A. Lee; Partow Kebriaei; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Perry B. Hackett; Carl H. June; Richard E. Champlin; Laurence J.N. Cooper
Blood | 2016
Krina Patel; Simon Olivares; Harjeet Singh; Lenka V. Hurton; Mary Helen Huls; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash; Partow Kebriaei; Richard E. Champlin; Laurence J.N. Cooper
Journal of Immunology | 2005
Karin Straathof; Ann M. Leen; Elizabeth Buza; Graham S. Taylor; Mary Helen Huls; Helen E. Heslop; Cliona M. Rooney; Catherine M. Bollard