Mary Horn

Physiological and performance responses to nicotinic-acid ingestion during exercise

The purpose of this study was to assess how selected physiological and performance responses are affected when the normal increase in plasma free fatty acid concentration during exercise is blunted by ingesting nicotinic acid. On four occasions, 10 subjects cycled at 68 +/- 1% VO2peak for 120 min followed by a timed 3.5-mile performance task. Every 15 min during exercise, subjects ingested 3.5 ml.kg LBM-1 of one of four beverages: 1) water placebo (WP), 2) WP + 280 mg nicotinic acid.l-1 (WP + NA), 3) 6% carbohydrate-electrolyte beverage (CE), and 4) CE + NA. Ingestion of nicotinic acid (WP + NA and CE + NA) blunted the rise in FFA associated with WP and CE; in fact, NA ingestion effectively prevented FFA from rising above rest values. The low FFA levels with NA feeding were associated with a 3- to 6-fold increase in concentrations of human growth hormone throughout exercise. The mean performance time for CE (10.7 min) was significantly less than for WP (12.2 min) and WP + NA (12.8 min), but did not differ from CE + NA (11.4 min). The results indicate that blunting the normal rise in FFA alters the hormonal response to exercise and reduces the capacity to perform high-intensity exercise.

EFFECT OF EXERCISE AND FLUID CONSUMPTION ON SALIVARY FLOW AND pH

Recent claims have been made regarding the putative erosive effects of regularly ingesting low-pH beverages on the integrity of tooth enamel. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fluid consumption during exercise affects the bodys defenses against enamel erosion: saliva flow and salivary pH. Males and females (n=50) exercised in the heat (26.7 degrees C, 40 % RH) for 75 min on four occasions. Within each session, subjects consumed ad-lib either water, a sports drink (Gatorade), diluted orange juice, or a homemade sports drink, with the latter three fluids all having low pH values (3.0 to 4.0). Prior to and following exercise, subjects performed a standard stimulated saliva collection procedure. Immediately following collection, saliva flow rate and pH were determined for each sample. Repeated-measures ANOVA were used to evaluate the data. Compared to pre-exercise salivary flow rates (2.6+/- 0.8 ml/min), the post-exercise rate was not different when consuming the sports drink (2.6+/- 0.9 ml/min), but decreased when water or the homemade sports drink was ingested (2.4+/- 0.9 ml/min; p<0.05). A time-by-drink interaction (p<0.05) revealed slight differences in saliva pH after exercise, depending on the beverage consumed; post-exercise saliva pH was highest for water (7.2+/- 0.2) and lowest for the homemade sports drink (7.1+/- 0.2), with the sports drink and diluted orange juice values falling in between. The results suggest that minimal changes occur in saliva pH and the rate of stimulated saliva flow with beverage consumption during exercise. Subsequent research is needed to determine whether maintenance of saliva production by drinking beverages during exercise influences the bodys defenses against dental erosion via saliva production.