Masami Ueta

Ribosome binding proteins YhbH and YfiA have opposite functions during 100S formation in the stationary phase of Escherichia coli

During the stationary phase of Escherichia coli growth, ribosomal structure changes drastically. Proteins RMF, YhbH, YfiA and SRA are expressed and bind to ribosome particles. In a process named ‘ribosomal hibernation,’ RMF binding induces the dimerization and subsequent inactivation of 70S ribosomes. Here, we examined the functions of YhbH and YfiA in the formation of 70S dimers using deletion mutants of YhbH and YfiA. The yfiA deletion mutant expressed YhbH and RMF in the stationary phase and formed a greater number of 100S particles than the wild‐type, showing that YhbH promotes and stabilizes 100S formation. In contrast, the yhbH deletion mutant expressed YfiA and RMF and produced no 70S dimers, suggesting that YfiA prevents 70S dimer formation. Thus, YhbH and YfiA have opposite functions in 70S dimer formation. YhbH and YfiA share 40% sequence homology, suggesting that their binding sites overlap and they compete for a region proximal to the P‐ and A‐sites on 30S subunits. In the yhbH and yfiA double deletion mutant, which expresses only RMF, 70S dimers were observed as 90S particles. Since 100S particles were seen in the yfiA deletion mutant containing RMF and YhbH, YhbH probably converts immature 90S ribosomes into mature 100S particles.

The involvement of a PPR protein of the P subfamily in partial RNA editing of an Arabidopsis mitochondrial transcript.

C-to-U RNA editing (i.e., alteration of a C in the genomic sequence to U in the transcript) has been confirmed widely in angiosperm organellar genomes. During the C-to-U RNA editing event, incomplete edited transcripts have been observed at many sites in the steady-state mRNA population (partial editing). Here, by using coexpression analysis and the surveillance of whole editing status on the mitochondrial genome, we have revealed that a pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein classified into the P subfamily (PPR596) has site-specific influence on the efficiency of C-to-U RNA editing events at partial editing sites on the Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial genome. Previous works have revealed that PPR proteins classified into the PLS subfamily containing the E or E and DYW motif are involved in RNA editing as trans-factors; they are believed to recruit deaminase at editing sites. In contrast with the mutant analyses of PLS-subfamily PPR proteins, the editing efficiency at rps3eU1344SS was revealed to be significantly increased in ppr596 mutants. Our study implies P-subfamily PPR protein is involved in the control of the degree of partial editing.

Formation of 100S ribosomes in Staphylococcus aureus by the hibernation promoting factor homolog SaHPF

In the stationary growth phase of Escherichia coli, the 70S ribosomes are dimerized by the ribosome modulation factor (RMF) and hibernation promoting factor (HPF) proteins to form 100S ribosomes, which lose translational activity. In this study we found 100S ribosomes in the gram‐positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus, which has an HPF homolog (named SaHPF) but no RMF homolog. Unlike in E. coli, 100S ribosomes exist in all growth phases of S. aureus, with the highest levels at the transition from the exponential phase to the stationary phase. To find the key factors involved in 100S formation, we analyzed proteins associated with crude ribosomes using radical‐free and highly reducing 2‐D PAGE and MALDI TOF/MS. Only the SaHPF levels changed in parallel with the changes in 100S levels. SaHPF bound preferentially to 70S components in 100S ribosomes, with a molar ratio of 1 : 1 relative to the 70S, but some SaHPF was also detected in free 70S ribosomes. High‐salt washing of the crude ribosomes released SaHPF and dissociated the 100S ribosomes to their 70S components. When these 70S components were incubated with purified SaHPF in vitro, they re‐associated to form 100S. These results suggest that SaHPF is a key protein involved in 100S ribosome formation in S. aureus.

Conservation of two distinct types of 100S ribosome in bacteria

In bacteria, 70S ribosomes (consisting of 30S and 50S subunits) dimerize to form 100S ribosomes, which were first discovered in Escherichia coli. Ribosome modulation factor (RMF) and hibernation promoting factor (HPF) mediate this dimerization in stationary phase. The 100S ribosome is translationally inactive, but it dissociates into two translationally active 70S ribosomes after transfer from starvation to fresh medium. Therefore, the 100S ribosome is called the ‘hibernating ribosome’. The gene encoding RMF is found widely throughout the Gammaproteobacteria class, but is not present in any other bacteria. In this study, 100S ribosome formation in six species of Gammaproteobacteria and eight species belonging to other bacterial classes was compared. There were several marked differences between the two groups: (i) Formation of 100S ribosomes was mediated by RMF and short HPF in Gammaproteobacteria species, similar to E. coli, whereas it was mediated only by long HPF in the other bacterial species; (ii) RMF/short HPF‐mediated 100S ribosome formation occurred specifically in stationary phase, whereas long HPF‐mediated 100S ribosome formation occurred in all growth phases; and (iii) 100S ribosomes formed by long HPF were much more stable than those formed by RMF and short HPF.

Activities of Escherichia coli ribosomes in IF3 and RMF change to prepare 100S ribosome formation on entering the stationary growth phase.

The canonical ribosome cycle in bacteria consists of initiation, elongation, termination, and recycling stages. After the recycling stage, initiation factor 3 (IF3) stabilizes ribosomal dissociation by binding to 30S subunits for the next round of translation. On the other hand, during the stationary growth phase, it has been elucidated that Escherichia coli ribosomes are dimerized (100S ribosome formation) by binding ribosome modulation factor (RMF) and hibernation promoting factor (HPF), leading to a hibernation stage. This indicates that 100S ribosomes are formed after these factors are scrambled for ribosomes concomitantly with transition from the log phase to the stationary phase. In this study, to elucidate the ribosomal events before 100S ribosome formation, the relationships between protein factors (RMF and HPF) involved in 100S ribosome formation and IF3 involved in initiation complex formation were examined. As a result of in vitro assays, it was found that ribosomal dissociation activity by IF3 fell, and that ribosomal dimerization activity by RMF and HPF was elevated more when using stationary‐phase ribosomes than when using log‐phase ribosomes. This suggests that ribosomes change into forms which are hard to bind with IF3 and easy to form 100S ribosomes by RMF and HPF concomitantly with transition from the log phase to the stationary phase.

YqjD Is an Inner Membrane Protein Associated with Stationary-Phase Ribosomes in Escherichia coli

Here, we provide evidence that YqjD, a hypothetical protein of Escherichia coli, is an inner membrane and ribosome binding protein. This protein is expressed during the stationary growth phase, and expression is regulated by stress response sigma factor RpoS. YqjD possesses a transmembrane motif in the C-terminal region and associates with 70S and 100S ribosomes at the N-terminal region. Interestingly, E. coli possesses two paralogous proteins of YqjD, ElaB and YgaM, which are expressed and bind to ribosomes in a similar manner to YqjD. Overexpression of YqjD leads to inhibition of cell growth. It has been suggested that YqjD loses ribosomal activity and localizes ribosomes to the membrane during the stationary phase.

Ribosomal protein L31 in Escherichia coli contributes to ribosome subunit association and translation, whereas short L31 cleaved by protease 7 reduces both activities

Ribosomes routinely prepared from Escherichia coli strain K12 contain intact (70 amino acids) and short (62 amino acids) forms of ribosomal protein L31. By contrast, ribosomes prepared from ompT mutant cells, which lack protease 7, contain only intact L31, suggesting that L31 is cleaved by protease 7 during ribosome preparation. We compared ribosomal subunit association in wild‐type and ompT − strains. In sucrose density gradient centrifugation under low Mg2+, 70S content was very high in ompT − ribosomes, but decreased in the wild‐type ribosomes containing short L31. In addition, ribosomes lacking L31 failed to associate ribosomal subunits in low Mg2+. Therefore, intact L31 is required for subunit association, and the eight C‐terminal amino acids contribute to the association function. In vitro translation was assayed using three different systems. Translational activities of ribosomes lacking L31 were 40% lower than those of ompT − ribosomes with one copy of intact L31, indicating that L31 is involved in translation. Moreover, in the stationary phase, L31 was necessary for 100S formation. The strain lacking L31 grew very slowly. A structural analysis predicted that the L31 protein spans the 30S and 50S subunits, consistent with the functions of L31 in 70S association, 100S formation, and translation.