Mathias Wellmann

Tunnel Positioning of Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Anatomic and Radiographic Findings

Background The interest in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions has recently reawakened. Hypothesis The center of the femoral posterolateral (PL) bundle and the center of the femoral anteromedial (AM) bundle are not within the same plane and change their orientation throughout passive knee flexion. Additionally, the tibial center of the AM bundle is aligned with the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the center of the PL bundle lies at the recommended tibial tunnel position for single-bundle ACL reconstruction reconstruction, 7 to 9 mm anterior to the posterior cruciate ligament. Study Design Descriptive laboratory study. Materials In 20 human cadaveric knees (age range, 45–87 years) the distances from the center of the AM and PL bundle to the articular cartilage were measured. Radiographic analyses were performed using the techniques of Bernard and Hertel at the femur as well as the method by Stäubli and Rauschning at the tibia. Results The center of the AM bundle was at a point 5.3 mm (± 0.7) from the roof of the notch and 5.7 mm (± 0.5) from the intercondylar line. The center of the PL bundle is located at 6.5 mm from the shallow cartilage margin and 5.8 mm from the inferior cartilage margin. On the tibia, the center of the AM bundle is aligned with the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, while the center of the PL bundle was located 11.2 mm (± 1.2) posterior and 4.1 mm (± 0.6) medial to the anterior insertion of the lateral meniscus. Radiographically, the center of the PL bundle is anterior along Blumensaats line and lower in the femoral notch along the height of the condyles than the center of the AM bundle. At the tibia, the center of the AM bundle is at 30% and the PL bundle is located at 44% using the method of Stäubli and Rauschning. Conclusion The center of the femoral PL bundle is shallow and inferior to the AM bundle. On the tibia, the AM bundle lies anterior when compared with the typical single-bundle ACL tunnel that reflects the PL bundle. Clinical Relevance To imitate the anatomy of the intact ACL, it is mandatory to place the tunnels exactly within the femoral origin and tibial insertion of the ACL.

Open Shoulder Repair of Osseous Glenoid Defects Biomechanical Effectiveness of the Latarjet Procedure Versus a Contoured Structural Bone Graft

Background To address glenoid bone deficiency, 2 competing surgical approaches are currently recommended: transplantation of a structural bone graft or the coracoid transfer according to Latarjet. Nonetheless, no clear advantages for either procedure are evident. Hypothesis The Latarjet procedure will provide an equivalent beneficial effect on glenohumeral stability as the placement of an intra-articular bone graft. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Stability testing of 8 cadaveric shoulders was performed in a dynamic shoulder simulator under 4 different conditions: (1) anteroinferior capsulotomy, (2) anteroinferior glenoid defect, (3) transplantation of a contoured bone graft, and (4) Latarjet procedure. Translational movement of the humeral head in response to a load of 25 N was evaluated in the anterior and anteroinferior directions. Results The Latarjet procedure significantly reduced translation by 354% relative to the glenoid defect condition at 30° of abduction and by 374% at 60° of abduction. In comparison, the bone graft significantly reduced translation by 179% at 30° of abduction and by 159% at 60° of abduction. The effect of the bone graft was lowest in external rotation at 60° of abduction where a decrease of translation of 133% was observed. Comparing both reconstruction techniques, the Latarjet procedure resulted in significantly less anterior and anteroinferior translation at 60° of abduction. Conclusion Biomechanically, the Latarjet procedure outperforms the bone graft in reducing translation in anteroinferior glenoid bone defects. The advantage of the Latarjet procedure is particularly evident at 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Clinical Relevance On the basis of the results of this biomechanical study, the authors recommend the Latarjet procedure for restoring stability in shoulders with a significant glenoid bone defect.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Repairs for Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Background The conventional coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a single polydioxanone loop has been shown to have some pivotal disadvantages. Hypothesis A minimally invasive flip button/polydioxanone repair provides similar biomechanical properties to the conventional polydioxanone cerclage around the coracoid. However, the authors expected a difference in linear stiffness, ultimate load, and permanent elongation between suture anchor repairs and polydioxanone repairs. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods The tensile fixation strength of 4 different minimally invasive repairs was tested in a porcine metatarsal model: (1) 1.3-mm single polydioxanone cerclage with a subcoracoidal flip button fixation, (2) 1.3-mm single polydioxanone cerclage, (3) Twinfix Ti 3.5-mm/Ultrabraid 2-suture anchor, and (4) Twinfix Ti 5.0-mm/Ultrabraid 2-suture anchor. The testing protocol included cyclic superoinferior loading and a subsequent load to failure trial. Results The flip button repair (646 N) and the conventional polydioxanone banding (663 N) revealed significant higher ultimate loads than did the suture anchor repairs (295 and 331 N, respectively; P < .001), whereas no significant differences were found for the elongation behavior under cyclic loading. Conclusion There was no significant difference between the 2 polydioxanone repairs. The ultimate load of the flip button procedure reaches the level of the native coracoclavicular ligament complex as it has been quantified in the literature. Clinical Relevance Although the biomechanical results comparing a minimally invasive flip button procedure versus a conventional polydioxanone cerclage are similar, the authors recommend the flip button procedure because of its minimally invasive approach and the secure subcoracoidal fixation technique with a minimized risk of anterior loop dislocation and neurovascular damage.

Biomechanical Evaluation of an Augmented Coracoacromial Ligament Transfer for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to establish and biomechanically evaluate an augmented coracoacromial ligament (CAL) transfer technique that eliminates the biomechanical drawbacks of the conventional Weaver-Dunn procedure and restores the intact joint kinematics. METHODS The acromioclavicular joints of 12 human shoulder specimens were tested for anterior, posterior, and superior translation during cyclic loading as well as for stiffness and ultimate tensile strength in a subsequent load-to-failure protocol. After luxation, the specimens were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: CAL transfer and polyester-augmented CAL transfer. For the coracoclavicular augmentation, a strong 1-mm polyester loop was intertwined between 2 flip buttons for coracoid and clavicle fixation. Only the medial half of the CAL was transferred and fixed in a medialized position at the clavicle. RESULTS Translational testing showed significantly higher anterior (12.1 mm), posterior (9 mm), and superior (13.4 mm) translation for the CAL transfer technique as compared with the native joint (5.4 mm, 3.3 mm, and 3.4 mm, respectively) and the modified augmented CAL transfer procedure (6.2 mm, 4.2 mm, and 3.6 mm, respectively) (P < .05). No significant differences were found between the intact acromioclavicular joint and the augmented CAL transfer regarding anterior and superior translation. Posterior translation was significantly higher for the augmented CAL transfer compared with the native joints (P = .033), but the quantitative difference was small (0.8 mm). CONCLUSIONS The augmented CAL transfer using the medial half of the CAL and supplementing it with a strong 1-mm polyester loop intertwined between 2 flip buttons for coracoid and clavicle fixation has been shown to restore anterior and superior translation of the native acromioclavicular joint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The promising biomechanical in vitro results must be interpreted in the context of clinical investigations regarding the risk of bony erosion resulting from the use of permanent suture material.

Effect of Coracoacromial Ligament Resection on Glenohumeral Stability Under Active Muscle Loading in an In Vitro Model

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not the coracoacromial ligament (CAL) has a relevant effect in stabilizing the humeral head under active rotator cuff and deltoid loading compared to passive loading conditions without muscular stabilization. METHODS Nine human cadaver shoulders were tested in a dynamic shoulder simulator. Forces of the rotator cuff muscles and the middle deltoid muscle were applied using servohydraulic cylinders, while glenohumeral motion was imposed in closed-loop force-control by a sensor-guided robot. Translational movement was measured with the CAL intact and resected under two different testing conditions: (1) simulated physiologic muscle force loading and (2) the passive drawer test, with loads applied in anterior, anterio-inferior, and anterio-superior directions in different glenohumeral positions. RESULTS The resection of the CAL caused a significant increase in anterior and superior translation during translational testing and muscle force loading. However, the passive testing mode revealed differences in translation from 2.4 to 4.4 mm. The differences were quantitatively minor under muscle loading conditions, ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS CAL resection induces an increased glenohumeral translation under passive loading conditions without muscular stabilization, whereas the effect under rotator cuff and deltoid loading was defined to be quantitatively small. CLINICAL RELEVANCE A resection of the CAL should be critically discussed in shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears. In contrast, in muscularly intact shoulders, the release of the CAL evokes a light increase of translation, the clinical relevance of which is questionable.

Arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization with an iliac bone graft and capsular repair: a novel technique.

Several surgical approaches have been described for the treatment of recurrent posterior shoulder instability. Many authors have performed posterior bone block procedures with good results not only in the presence of glenoid bone loss or dysplasia but also in the case of capsular hyperlaxity and poor soft-tissue quality. Open techniques often require an extensive approach with the disadvantage of a poor cosmetic result and possible insufficiency of the deltoid muscle. Furthermore, the treatment of concomitant pathologies and the correct placement of the bone graft are difficult. Therefore we describe an all-arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization technique with an iliac bone graft and capsular repair that is intended to improve the pre-existing open procedure. The key steps of the operation are the precise placement and screw fixation of the bone block at the posterior glenoid under arthroscopic control and the subsequent posterior capsular refixation and plication using 2 suture anchors to create an extra-articular graft position.

The influence of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair on restoring baseline glenohumeral translation and increased biceps loading after simulated SLAP tear and the effectiveness of SLAP repair after long head of biceps tenotomy

HYPOTHESIS Biomechanical studies have shown increased glenohumeral translation and loading of the long head biceps (LHB) tendon after superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears. This may explain some of the typical clinical findings, including the prevalence of humeral chondral lesions, after SLAP lesions. The first hypothesis was that SLAP repair could restore the original glenohumeral translation and reduce the increased LHB load after SLAP lesions. The second hypothesis was that SLAP repair after LHB tenotomy could significantly reduce the increased glenohumeral translation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Biomechanical testing was performed on 21 fresh frozen human cadaveric shoulders with an intact shoulder girdle using a sensor-guided industrial robot to apply 20 N of compression in the joint and 50 N translational force at 0°, 30°, and 60° of abduction. LHB loading was measured by a load-cell with 5 N and 25 N preload. Type IIC SLAP lesions were created arthroscopically, and a standardized SLAP repair was done combined with or without LHB tenotomy. RESULTS No significant difference of glenohumeral translation and increased LHB load in SLAP repair compared with the intact shoulder was observed under 5 N and 25 LHB preload, except for anterior translation under 25 N LHB preload. After LHB tenotomy after SLAP lesions, no significant difference of translation was observed with or without SLAP repair. CONCLUSIONS SLAP repair without associated LHB tenotomy helps normalize glenohumeral translation and LHB loading. The stabilizing effect of the SLAP complex is dependent on the LHB. After biceps tenotomy, SLAP repair does not affect glenohumeral translation.

Biomechanical Effectiveness of an Arthroscopic Posterior Bankart Repair Versus an Open Bone Block Procedure for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Background: The most effective surgical treatment for traumatic posterior shoulder instability remains unclear. Hypothesis: An arthroscopic posterior Bankart repair is as effective as an open posterior bone block–capsulorrhaphy procedure regarding the restoration of humeral displacement with posterior and inferior forces. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Biomechanical testing of 16 human shoulders was performed in 3 testing conditions: after ventilation (intact joint), after creation of a posteroinferior Bankart lesion with an additional cut of the posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament, and after surgical shoulder stabilization. The shoulder stabilization was performed either by an open posterior bone block procedure and glenoid-based T-capsulorrhaphy or by an arthroscopic Bankart repair. Testing was performed in 2 positions—the sulcus test position and the jerk test position—with a passive humerus load of 50 N applied in the posterior, posteroinferior, and inferior directions. Results: After the arthroscopic repair, there was no significant difference between the translation and the intact state for all tested directions. The bone block repair–capsulorrhaphy caused a significant decrease of posterior translation (sulcus test and jerk test positions) and posteroinferior translation (jerk test position). But the resulting posterior and posteroinferior translation was even significantly lower than the translation measured for the intact joints. However, the reduction of inferior translation, compared with that of the defect condition, was not significant after the bone block repair (sulcus test and jerk test positions). Compared with that of the intact joint, inferior translation after the bone block repair was significantly higher. Conclusion: The posterior bone block repair–capsulorrhaphy overcorrects posterior translation and does not effectively restore inferior stability, whereas the arthroscopic posterior Bankart repair restores posterior and inferior laxity of the intact joint. Clinical Relevance: An arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair more precisely restores posterior and inferior glenohumeral joint laxity and is therefore recommended as the first choice of treatment.

Repetitive recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 injections improve the callus microarchitecture and mechanical stiffness in a sheep model of distraction osteogenesis

Evidence suggests that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) increases the mechanical integrity of callus tissue during bone healing. This effect may be either explained by an increase of callus formation or a modification of the trabecular microarchitecture. Therefore the purpose of the study was to evaluate the potential benefit of rhBMP-2 on the trabecular microarchitecture and on multidirectional callus stiffness. Further we asked, whether microarchitecture changes correlate with optimized callus stiffness. In this study a tibial distraction osteogenesis (DO) model in 12 sheep was used to determine, whether percutaneous injection of rhBMP-2 into the distraction zone influences the microarchitecture of the bone regenerate. After a latency period of 4 days, the tibiae were distracted at a rate of 1.25 mm/day over a period of 20 days, resulting in total lengthening of 25 mm. The operated limbs were randomly assigned to one treatment groups and one control group: (A) triple injection of rhBMP-2 (4 mg rhBMP-2/injection) and (B) no injection. The tibiae were harvested after 74 days and scanned by µCT (90 µm/voxel). In addition, we conducted a multidirectional mechanical testing of the tibiae by using a material testing system to assess the multidirectional strength. The distraction zones were tested for torsional stiffness and bending stiffness antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) direction, compression strength and maximum axial torsion. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by students t-test and Regression analysis using power functions with a significance level of P<0.05. Triple injections of rhBMP-2 induced significant changes in the trabecular architecture of the regenerate compared with the control: increased trabecular number (Tb.N.) (treatment group 1.73 mm/1 vs. control group 1.2 mm/1), increased cortical bone volume fraction (BV/TV) (treatment group 0.68 vs. control group 0.47), and decreased trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) (treatment group 0.18 mm vs. control group 0.43 mm). The analyses of the mechanical strength of regenerated bone showed significant differences between treatment group (A) and the control group (B). The bending stiffness anterior-posterior (treatment group 17.48 Nm vs. control group 8.3 Nm), medial-lateral (treatment group 18,9 Nm vs. control group 7.92 Nm) and the torsional stiffness (treatment group 41.17N/° vs. control group 16.41N/°) are significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group. The regression analyses revealed significant non-linear relationships between BV/TV, TB.N., Tb.Sp. and all mechanical properties. Maximal correlation coefficients were found for the Tb.Sp. vs. the bending stiffness AP and ML with R2=0.69 and R2=0.70 (P<0.0001). There was no significant relation between Connectivity and the compression strength and the maximum axial torque. This study suggests that rhBMP-2 optimizes the trabecular microarchitecture of the regenerate, which might explain the advanced mechanical integrity of newly formed bone under rhBMP-2 treatment.

Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis

Background and purpose Humeral resurfacing has shown promising results for osteoarthritis, but revisions for glenoid erosion have been reported frequently. We investigated the hypothesis that preoperative glenoid wear and postoperative progress of glenoid erosion would influence the clinical outcome. Methods We reviewed 61 resurfacing hemiarthroplasties (55 patients) for primary osteoarthritis. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 had undergone revision arthroplasty. This left 50 shoulders in 44 patients (mean age 66 years) that were followed for mean 30 (12–44) months. Complications, revisions, and the age- and sex-related Constant score were assessed. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening and glenoid erosion according to Walch. Results Of the 50 shoulders that were functionally assessed, the average age- and sex-related Constant score was 73%. In patients with preoperative type-B2 glenoids, at 49% it was lower than in type-A1 glenoids (81%, p = 0.03) and in type-B1 glenoids (84%, p = 0.02). The average age- and sex-related Constant score for patients with type-A2 glenoids (60%) was lower than for type-A1 and -B1 glenoids and higher than for type-B2 glenoids, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the total population of 61 shoulders, the radiographs showed postoperative glenoid erosion in 38 cases and no humeral prosthetic loosening. Revision arthroplasty was performed in 11 cases after 28 (7–69) months. The implant size had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. The size was considered to be adequate in 28 of the 50 functionally assessed shoulders. In 21 cases, the implant size was too large and in 1 case it was too small. Interpretation We found frequent postoperative glenoid erosion and a high rate of revision arthroplasty after humeral resurfacing for primary osteoarthritis. Oversizing of the implants was common, but it had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. Inferior results were found in the presence of increased eccentric preoperative glenoid wear. Total shoulder arthroplasty should be considered in these patients.