Meine van Noordwijk
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Meine van Noordwijk.
International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management | 2017
Sacha Amaruzaman; Beria Leimona; Meine van Noordwijk; Betha Lusiana
ABSTRACT Gaps exist between aspirations of ‘green agriculture’, which protects biodiversity and ecosystem services, and the reality on the ground. Using Q-methodology, we explored expert opinion in Indonesia on the contributing factors to the gaps. Q-methodology indicated three dominant discourses on ‘green agriculture’ and groups of experts who prioritize them: (1) endorsers of regulations and innovations; (2) providers of resources for access to capital, technology and knowledge; and (3) proponents of green economy (GE) and land-use planning (LUP). Group 1 pointed out the importance of endorsing incentives to reduce the gap, while Group 2 reckoned that building smallholders’ capacity and providing them with access to capital, technology, and knowledge are needed to green agricultural practices. Group 3 described the importance of integrating environmental value into the gross domestic product and earmarking sources derived from environmental levies for greening the agricultural sector. All discourses recognized the importance of scientific policy formulation. Groups 1 and 3 agreed that non-synchronization of LUP between national and local governments highly contributes to the gap. Groups 2 and 3 perceived that ecosystem services from the agricultural sector have not been sufficiently understood to promote green agricultural development. By simultaneously addressing the gaps on each level and understanding how each factor contributes to the gap, we propose a set of recommendations to improve the implementation of green agriculture in Indonesia by creating a platform that all three groups can recognize and support. EDITED BY Dagmar Mithöfer
Cogent Environmental Science | 2015
N. Khasanah; Meine van Noordwijk; Harti Ningsih
Abstract The carbon (C) footprint of palm oil production is needed to judge emissions from potential biofuel use. Relevance includes wider sustainable palm oil debates. Within life cycle analysis, aboveground C debt is incurred if the vegetation replaced had a higher C stock than oil palm plantations. Our study included 25 plantations across Indonesia, in a stratified study design representing the range of conditions in which oil palm is grown. From allometric equations for palm biomass and observed growth rates, we estimated the time-averaged aboveground C stock for 25-year rotation and 95%-confidence interval to be 42.07 (42.04–42.10) Mg C ha−1 for plantations managed by company on mineral soils, 40.03 (39.75–40.30) Mg C ha−1 for plantations managed by company on peat, and 37.76 (37.42–38.09) Mg C ha−1 for smallholder oil palm on mineral soils. Oil palm can be established C debt-free on mineral soils with aboveground C stocks below these values; neutrality of mineral soil C pools was documented in a parallel study. Acknowledging variation in shoot:root ratios, the types of vegetation that can be converted debt-free to oil palm include grasslands and shrub, but not monocultural rubber plantations, rubber agroforest, and similar secondary or logged-over forests of higher C stock.
Carbon Management | 2018
Sarah Carter; Bas Arts; Ken E. Giller; Cinthia Soto Golcher; Kasper Kok; Jessica de Koning; Meine van Noordwijk; Pytrik Reisdma; Mariana C. Rufino; Giulia Salvini; Louis Verchot; Eva Wollenberg; Martin Herold
ABSTRACT Successfully meeting the mitigation and adaptation targets of the Paris Climate Agreement (PA) will depend on strengthening the ties between forests and agriculture. Climate-smart land use can be achieved by integrating climate-smart agriculture (CSA) and REDD+. The focus on agriculture for food security within a changing climate, and on forests for climate change mitigation and adaptation, can be achieved simultaneously with a transformational change in the land-use sector. Striving for both independently will lead to competition for land, inefficiencies in monitoring and conflicting agendas. Practical solutions exist for specific contexts that can lead to increased agricultural output and forest protection. Landscape-level emissions accounting can be used to identify these practices. Transdisciplinary research agendas can identify and prioritize solutions and targets for integrated mitigation and adaptation interventions. Policy coherence must be achieved at a number of levels, from international to local, to avoid conflicting incentives. Transparency must lastly be integrated, through collaborative design of projects, and open data and methods. Climate-smart land use requires all these elements, and will increase the likelihood of successful REDD+ and CSA interventions. This will support the PA as well as other initiatives as part of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions | 2017
David Ellison; Cindy E. Morris; Bruno Locatelli; Douglas Sheil; Jane Maslow Cohen; Daniel Murdiyarso; Victoria Gutierrez; Meine van Noordwijk; Irena F. Creed; Jan Pokorny; David Gaveau; D. V. Spracklen; Aida Bargués Tobella; Ulrik Ilstedt; Adriaan J. Teuling; Solomon Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot; David C. Sands; Bart Muys; Bruno Verbist; Elaine Springgay; Yulia Sugandi; Caroline A Sullivan
European Journal of Agronomy | 2017
Lotte Woittiez; Mark T. van Wijk; Maja Slingerland; Meine van Noordwijk; Ken E. Giller
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability | 2014
Meine van Noordwijk; L. Brussaard
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2018
Aritta Suwarno; Meine van Noordwijk; Hans-Peter Weikard; Desi Suyamto
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2017
Meine van Noordwijk; Lisa Tanika; Betha Lusiana
Global Change Biology | 2017
Mulugeta Mokria; Aster Gebrekirstos; Abrham Abiyu; Meine van Noordwijk; Achim Bräuning
Agricultural Systems | 2017
Meine van Noordwijk