Mia MacCollin

A novel moesin-, ezrin-, radixin-like gene is a candidate for the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is a dominantly inherited disorder characterized by the occurrence of bilateral vestibular schwannomas and other central nervous system tumors including multiple meningiomas. Genetic linkage studies and investigations of both sporadic and familial tumors suggest that NF2 is caused by inactivation of a tumor suppressor gene in chromosome 22q12. We have identified a candidate gene for the NF2 tumor suppressor that has suffered nonoverlapping deletions in DNA from two independent NF2 families and alterations in meningiomas from two unrelated NF2 patients. The candidate gene encodes a 587 amino acid protein with striking similarity to several members of a family of proteins proposed to link cytoskeletal components with proteins in the cell membrane. The NF2 gene may therefore constitute a novel class of tumor suppressor gene.

Diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis

The neurofibromatoses are a diverse group of genetic conditions that share a predisposition to the development of tumors of the nerve sheath. Schwannomatosis is a recently recognized third major form of neurofibromatosis (NF) that causes multiple schwannomas without vestibular tumors diagnostic of NF2. Patients with schwannomatosis represent 2.4 to 5% of all patients requiring schwannoma resection and approximately one third of patients with schwannomatosis have anatomically localized disease with tumors limited to a single limb or segment of spine. Epidemiologic studies suggest that schwannomatosis is as common as NF2, but that familial occurrence is inexplicably rare. Patients with schwannomatosis overwhelmingly present with pain, and pain remains the primary clinical problem and indication for surgery. Diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis are needed for both clinicians and researchers, but final diagnostic certainly will await the identification of the schwannomatosis locus itself.

Schwannomatosis A clinical and pathologic study

Schwannomas are benign nerve sheath tumors that most commonly occur singularly in otherwise normal individuals.Multiple schwannomas in a single patient are most often seen in neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), but several recent reports suggest that schwannomatosis may also be a distinct clinical entity. We studied the clinical, radiographic, and pathologic features of 14 patients with multiple schwannomas who did not have vestibular schwannoma diagnostic of NF2. Most patients had peripheral nerve tumors that presented with pain. Many also had spinal nerve root and cranial nerve tumors. Three had multiple tumors limited to a single limb. We found that these 14 individuals did not exhibit phenotypic overlap with the neurofibromatoses. Only 1 of 14 patients had a positive family history. We conclude that patients with multiple schwannomas, who do not have vestibular schwannoma, comprise a distinct clinical problem, but further molecular genetic analysis is needed to define the pathophysiology of this disorder. NEUROLOGY 1996;46 1072-1079

Survey of Somatic Mutations in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) Hamartomas Suggests Different Genetic Mechanisms for Pathogenesis of TSC Lesions

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), an autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in either TSC1 or TSC2, is characterized by the development of hamartomas in a variety of organs. Concordant with the tumor-suppressor model, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is known to occur in these hamartomas at loci of both TSC1 and TSC2. LOH has been documented in renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs), but loss of the wild-type allele in cortical tubers appears to be very uncommon. Analysis of second, somatic events in tumors for which the status of both TSC1 and TSC2 is known is essential for exploration of the pathogenesis of TSC-lesion development. We analyzed 24 hamartomas from 10 patients for second-hit mutations, by several methods, including LOH, scanning of all exons of both TSC1 and TSC2, promoter methylation of TSC2, and clonality analysis. Our results document loss of the wild-type allele in six of seven AMLs, without evidence of the inactivation of the second allele in many of the other lesions, including tumors that appear to be clonally derived. Laser-capture microdissection further demonstrated loss of the second allele in all three cellular components of an AML. This study thus provides evidence that, in both TSC1 and TSC2, somatic mutations resulting in the loss of wild-type alleles may not be necessary in some tumor types-and that other mechanisms may contribute to tumorigenesis in this setting.

Molecular study of frequency of mosaicism in neurofibromatosis 2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is a severe autosomal dominant disorder that predisposes to multiple tumours of the nervous system. About half of all patients are founders with clinically unaffected parents. The purpose of the present study was to examine the extent to which mosaicism is present in NF2 founders. A total of 233 NF2 founders with bilateral vestibular schwannomas (BVS) were screened by exon scanning. NF2 mutations were detected in the blood samples of 122 patients (52%). In 10 of the 122 cases, the ratio of mutant to normal alleles was obviously less than 1, suggesting mosaicism. Tumour specimens were available from 35 of the 111 subjects in whom no mutation could be detected in blood specimens. Mutational analysis by exon scanning detected typical NF2 mutations in 21 of the 35 tumours. In nine subjects, the alterations found in tumours could be confirmed to be the constitutional mutation based on finding of identical mutations in pathologically and/or anatomically distinct second tumours. In six other subjects with only a single tumour available, allelic loss of the NF2 gene was found in addition to the mutation in each tumour, suggesting that either the mutation or the deletion of the NF2 gene is probably the constitutional genetic alteration. Our results suggest that failure to find constitutional mutations in blood specimen from these 15 patients was not because of the limitation of the applied screening technique, but the lack of the mutations in their leucocytes, best explained by mosaicism. Extrapolating the rate (15/35 = 43%) of mosaicism in these 35 cases to the 111 NF2 founders with no constitutional NF2 mutations found in their blood, we inferred 48 mosaic subjects (111 × 0.429). Adding the 10 mosaic cases detected directly in blood specimens, we estimate the rate of mosaicism to be 24.8% (58/233) in our cohort of 233 NF2 founders with bilateral vestibular schwannomas.

Frequency and distribution of NF2 mutations in schwannomas

Sporadic and inherited schwannomas were scanned for the nature, frequency, and distribution of mutations in the NF2 locus encoding the merlin tumor suppressor protein on 22q. Of 58 tumors, 47% displayed loss of heterozygosity for NF2, leaving a total of 89 NF2 alleles to be examined. Pathogenic alterations were identified in 62 of these alleles, including 36 frameshifts with premature termination, 14 nonsense mutations, and 12 changes presumed to affect splicing. Effects of ten of the latter were confirmed in the NF2 transcript and indicated that activation of cryptic splice sites in coding sequence is another frequent mechanism leading to truncation of merlin. The mutations were relatively evenly distributed across both the protein 4.1 superfamily (exons 1–9) and the α‐helical (exons 10–15) domains of merlin, but they did not occur at all in exons 16 and 17, which encode the proteins alternative COOH‐termini. The data support the “two‐hit” tumor suppressor model for formation of schwannomas and indicate that loss of merlin function can be achieved by truncation at various locations in the protein. However, the absence of mutations in exons 16 and 17 suggests that an inactivating mutation affecting only one of the merlins alternative termini may not be sufficient to eliminate tumor suppressor function. Genes Chromosom Cancer 17:45–55 (1996).

Alterations in the SMARCB1 (INI1) tumor suppressor gene in familial schwannomatosis

Schwannomatosis is a third major form of neurofibromatosis that has recently been linked to mutations in the SMARCB1 (hSnf5/INI1) tumor suppressor gene. We analyzed the coding region of SMARCB1 by direct sequencing and multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in genomic DNA from 19 schwannomatosis kindreds. Microsatellite markers in the SMARCB1 region were developed to determine loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in associated tumors. We detected four alterations in conserved splice acceptor or donor sequences of exons 3, 4 and 6. Two alterations that likely affect splicing were seen in introns 4 and 5. An additional four alterations of unclear pathogenicity were found to segregate on the affected allele in eight families including two non‐conservative missense alterations in three families. No constitutional deletions or duplications were detected by MLPA. Nine of 13 tumors examined showed partial LOH of the SMARCB1 region consistent with ‘second hits.’ Alterations were detected in tumors both with and without somatic NF2 gene changes. These findings support the hypothesis that SMARCB1 is a tumor suppressor for schwannomas in the context of familial disease. Further work is needed to determine its role in other multiple and single tumor syndromes.

Familial schwannomatosis: Exclusion of the NF2 locus as the germline event

Background: Schwannomatosis is a recently recognized disorder, defined as multiple pathologically proven schwannomas without vestibular tumors diagnostic of neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2). Some investigators have questioned whether schwannomatosis is merely an attenuated form of NF2. Methods: The authors identified eight families in which a proband met their diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis. Archived and prospectively acquired tumor specimens were studied by mutational analysis at the NF2 locus, loss of heterozygosity analysis along chromosome 22, and fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of NF2 and the more centromeric probe BCR. Linkage analysis could be performed in six of eight families. Results: Clinical characterization of these kindreds showed that no affected family member harbored a vestibular tumor. Molecular analysis of 28 tumor specimens from 17 affected individuals in these kindreds revealed a pattern of somatic NF2 inactivation incompatible with our current understanding of NF2 as an inherited tumor suppressor gene syndrome. Linkage analysis excluded the NF2 locus in two kindreds, and showed a maximum lod score of 6.60 near the more centromeric marker D22S1174. Conclusions: Schwannomatosis shows clinical and molecular differences from NF2 and should be considered a third major form of neurofibromatosis. Further work is needed to identify the inherited genetic element responsible for familial schwannomatosis.

Immunohistochemical analysis supports a role for INI1/SMARCB1 in hereditary forms of schwannomas, but not in solitary, sporadic schwannomas

The INI1/SMARCB1 protein product (INI1), a component of a transcription complex, was recently implicated in the pathogenesis of schwannomas in two members of a single family with familial schwannomatosis. Tumors were found to have both constitutional and somatic mutations of the SMARCB1 gene and showed a mosaic pattern of loss of INI1 expression by immunohistochemistry, suggesting a tumor composition of mixed null and haploinsufficient cells. To determine if this finding could be extended to all tumors arising in familial schwannomatosis, and how it compares with other multiple schwannoma syndromes [sporadic schwannomatosis and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)] as well as to sporadic, solitary schwannomas, we performed an immunohistochemistry analysis on 45 schwannomas from patients with multiple schwannoma syndromes and on 38 solitary, sporadic schwannomas from non‐syndromic patients. A mosaic pattern of INI1 expression was seen in 93% of tumors from familial schwannomatosis patients, 55% of tumors from sporadic schwannomatosis, 83% of NF2‐associated tumors and only 5% of solitary, sporadic schwannomas. These results confirm a role for INI1/SMARCB1 in multiple schwannoma syndromes and suggest that a different pathway of tumorigenesis occurs in solitary, sporadic tumors.

Characterization and expression of the human A2a adenosine receptor gene.

Abstract: The actions of the neurotransmitter adenosine are mediated by a family of high‐affinity, G protein‐coupled receptors. We have characterized the gene for the human A2a subtype of adenosine receptor (hA2aR) and determined levels of A2aR mRNA in human brain regions and nonneural tissues. Human genomic Southern blot analysis demonstrates the presence of a single gene encoding the hA2aR located on chromosome 22. Two overlapping cosmids containing the hA2aR gene were isolated from a chromosome 22 library and characterized. Southern blot and sequence analyses demonstrate that the hA2aR gene spans ∼9–10 kb with a single intron interrupting the coding sequence between the regions encoding transmembrane domains III and IV. The sequence of the hA2aR gene diverged from the reported cDNA structure in the 5′ untranslated region. This divergence appears to result from an artifact in the construction of the original cDNA library. By northern blot analysis, high expression of the hA2aR gene was identified in the caudate nucleus with low levels of expression in other brain regions. High expression was also seen in immune tissues; lesser A2aR expression was detected in heart and lung. The gene for the A2a subtype of receptor for the neurotransmitter adenosine falls in the class of intron containing G protein‐coupled receptor genes. Expression in the basal ganglia is consistent with a role for the hA2aR in motor control. Activation of the A2aR may also regulate immune responses and cardiopulmonary function.