Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael E. Rome is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael E. Rome.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2010

Lipid activation of the signal recognition particle receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting

Vinh Q. Lam; David Akopian; Michael E. Rome; Doug Henningsen; Shu-ou Shan

Phospholipid binding leads to accelerated assembly of the bacterial SRP receptor FtsY and SRP, allowing cargo proteins to be delivered to target membranes more efficiently.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

Precise timing of ATPase activation drives targeting of tail-anchored proteins.

Michael E. Rome; Meera Rao; William M. Clemons; Shu-ou Shan

The localization of tail-anchored (TA) proteins, whose transmembrane domain resides at the extreme C terminus, presents major challenges to cellular protein targeting machineries. In eukaryotic cells, the highly conserved ATPase, guided entry of tail-anchored protein 3 (Get3), coordinates the delivery of TA proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. How Get3 uses its ATPase cycle to drive this fundamental process remains unclear. Here, we establish a quantitative framework for the Get3 ATPase cycle and show that ATP specifically induces multiple conformational changes in Get3 that culminate in its ATPase activation through tetramerization. Further, upstream and downstream components actively regulate the Get3 ATPase cycle to ensure the precise timing of ATP hydrolysis in the pathway: the Get4/5 TA loading complex locks Get3 in the ATP-bound state and primes it for TA protein capture, whereas the TA substrate induces tetramerization of Get3 and activates its ATPase reaction 100-fold. Our results establish a precise model for how Get3 harnesses the energy from ATP to drive the membrane localization of TA proteins and illustrate how dimerization-activated nucleotide hydrolases regulate diverse cellular processes.


Nature Structural & Molecular Biology | 2014

Crystal structure of ATP-bound Get3–Get4–Get5 complex reveals regulation of Get3 by Get4

Harry B. Gristick; Meera Rao; Justin W. Chartron; Michael E. Rome; Shu-ou Shan; William M. Clemons

Correct localization of membrane proteins is essential to all cells. Chaperone cascades coordinate the capture and handover of substrate proteins from the ribosomes to the target membranes, yet the mechanistic and structural details of these processes remain unclear. Here we investigate the conserved GET pathway, in which the Get4–Get5 complex mediates the handover of tail-anchor (TA) substrates from the cochaperone Sgt2 to the Get3 ATPase, the central targeting factor. We present a crystal structure of a yeast Get3–Get4–Get5 complex in an ATP-bound state and show how Get4 primes Get3 by promoting the optimal configuration for substrate capture. Structure-guided biochemical analyses demonstrate that Get4-mediated regulation of ATP hydrolysis by Get3 is essential to efficient TA-protein targeting. Analogous regulation of other chaperones or targeting factors could provide a general mechanism for ensuring effective substrate capture during protein biogenesis.


The EMBO Journal | 2012

Tail-anchor targeting by a Get3 tetramer: the structure of an archaeal homologue.

Christian Suloway; Michael E. Rome; William M. Clemons

Efficient delivery of membrane proteins is a critical cellular process. The recently elucidated GET (Guided Entry of TA proteins) pathway is responsible for the targeted delivery of tail‐anchored (TA) membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. The central player is the ATPase Get3, which in its free form exists as a dimer. Biochemical evidence suggests a role for a tetramer of Get3. Here, we present the first crystal structure of an archaeal Get3 homologue that exists as a tetramer and is capable of TA protein binding. The tetramer generates a hydrophobic chamber that we propose binds the TA protein. We use small‐angle X‐ray scattering to provide the first structural information of a fungal Get3/TA protein complex showing that the overall molecular envelope is consistent with the archaeal tetramer structure. Moreover, we show that this fungal tetramer complex is capable of TA insertion. This allows us to suggest a model where a tetramer of Get3 sequesters a TA protein during targeting to the membrane.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Differential gradients of interaction affinities drive efficient targeting and recycling in the GET pathway.

Michael E. Rome; Un Seng Chio; Meera Rao; Harry B. Gristick; Shu-ou Shan

Significance Ensuring the accuracy of protein interaction cascades is a challenge in many cellular processes. This challenge is faced by the guided entry of tail-anchored (TA) protein (GET) pathway, in which the targeting factor Get3 must sequentially interact with three effector proteins to deliver an essential class of TA proteins to the membrane. Using fluorescence probes that quantitatively interrogate individual Get3–effector interactions, we show here that Get3 adopts discrete conformational states in response to substrate and nucleotide binding; these conformational states allow Get3 to generate differential gradients of interaction energies with distinct effectors, thus driving its cyclic and ordered interaction cascade. These results also explain why multiple effector proteins are needed for TA targeting and uncover a previously unidentified mechanism for recycling Get3 from the membrane. Efficient and accurate localization of membrane proteins requires a complex cascade of interactions between protein machineries. This requirement is exemplified in the guided entry of tail-anchored (TA) protein (GET) pathway, where the central targeting factor Get3 must sequentially interact with three distinct binding partners to ensure the delivery of TA proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. To understand the molecular principles that provide the vectorial driving force of these interactions, we developed quantitative fluorescence assays to monitor Get3–effector interactions at each stage of targeting. We show that nucleotide and substrate generate differential gradients of interaction energies that drive the ordered interaction of Get3 with successive effectors. These data also provide more molecular details on how the targeting complex is captured and disassembled by the ER receptor and reveal a previously unidentified role for Get4/5 in recycling Get3 from the ER membrane at the end of the targeting reaction. These results provide general insights into how complex protein interaction cascades are coupled to energy inputs in biological systems.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2015

Mechanism of Assembly of a Substrate Transfer Complex during Tail-anchored Protein Targeting

Harry B. Gristick; Michael E. Rome; Justin W. Chartron; Meera Rao; Sonja Hess; Shu-ou Shan; William M. Clemons

Background: Get4/5 is required for the efficient transfer of tail-anchored proteins to Get3. Results: The Get3·Get4/5 complex forms an intermediate mediated by electrostatic interactions. Conclusion: The rapid association of the Get3·Get4/5 intermediate complex is followed by a conformational change to the stable inhibited structure dominated by hydrophobic interactions. Significance: These results provide insight into the mechanism of tail-anchored protein targeting. Tail-anchored (TA) proteins, defined as having a single transmembrane helix at their C terminus, are post-translationally targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by the guided entry of TA proteins (GET) pathway. In yeast, the handover of TA substrates is mediated by the heterotetrameric Get4/Get5 complex (Get4/5), which tethers the co-chaperone Sgt2 to the targeting factor, the Get3 ATPase. Binding of Get4/5 to Get3 is critical for efficient TA targeting; however, questions remain about the formation of the Get3·Get4/5 complex. Here we report crystal structures of a Get3·Get4/5 complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 2.8 and 6.0 Å that reveal a novel interface between Get3 and Get4 dominated by electrostatic interactions. Kinetic and mutational analyses strongly suggest that these structures represent an on-pathway intermediate that rapidly assembles and then rearranges to the final Get3·Get4/5 complex. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the Get3·Get4/5 complex is dominated by a single Get4/5 heterotetramer bound to one monomer of a Get3 dimer, uncovering an intriguing asymmetry in the Get4/5 heterotetramer upon Get3 binding. Ultrafast diffusion-limited electrostatically driven Get3·Get4/5 association enables Get4/5 to rapidly sample and capture Get3 at different stages of the GET pathway.


Biophysical Journal | 2013

Precise Timing of ATPase Activation Drives Targeting of Tail-Anchored Proteins

Meera Rao; Michael E. Rome; William M. Clemons; Shu-ou Shan

The localization of tail-anchored (TA) proteins, whose transmembrane domain resides at the extreme C terminus, presents major challenges to cellular protein targeting machineries. In eukaryotic cells, the highly conserved ATPase, guided entry of tail-anchored protein 3 (Get3), coordinates the delivery of TA proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. How Get3 uses its ATPase cycle to drive this fundamental process remains unclear. Here, we establish a quantitative framework for the Get3 ATPase cycle and show that ATP specifically induces multiple conformational changes in Get3 that culminate in its ATPase activation through tetramerization. Further, upstream and downstream components actively regulate the Get3 ATPase cycle to ensure the precise timing of ATP hydrolysis in the pathway: the Get4/5 TA loading complex locks Get3 in the ATP-bound state and primes it for TA protein capture, whereas the TA substrate induces tetramerization of Get3 and activates its ATPase reaction 100-fold. Our results establish a precise model for how Get3 harnesses the energy from ATP to drive the membrane localization of TA proteins and illustrate how dimerization-activated nucleotide hydrolases regulate diverse cellular processes.


Cell | 2013

Cand1 Promotes Assembly of New SCF Complexes through Dynamic Exchange of F Box Proteins

Nathan W. Pierce; J. Eugene Lee; Xing Liu; Michael J. Sweredoski; Robert L. Graham; Elizabeth A. Larimore; Michael E. Rome; Ning Zheng; Bruce E. Clurman; Sonja Hess; Shu-ou Shan; Raymond J. Deshaies


Structure | 2014

The Mitochondrial Fission Receptor MiD51 Requires ADP as a Cofactor

Oliver C. Losón; Raymond Liu; Michael E. Rome; Shuxia Meng; Jens T. Kaiser; Shu-ou Shan; David C. Chan


The FASEB Journal | 2014

Regulation of mitochondrial fission by MiD51 (757.1)

Oliver Losn; Michael E. Rome; Jens T. Kaiser; Shu-ou Shan; David C. Chan

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael E. Rome's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shu-ou Shan

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Meera Rao

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William M. Clemons

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David C. Chan

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harry B. Gristick

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jens T. Kaiser

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Justin W. Chartron

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oliver Losn

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sonja Hess

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce E. Clurman

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge