Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael J. Spelman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael J. Spelman.


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics

Thomas L. Delworth; Anthony J. Broccoli; Anthony Rosati; Ronald J. Stouffer; V. Balaji; John A. Beesley; William F. Cooke; Keith W. Dixon; John P. Dunne; Krista A. Dunne; Jeffrey W. Durachta; Kirsten L. Findell; Paul Ginoux; Anand Gnanadesikan; C. T. Gordon; Stephen M. Griffies; Rich Gudgel; Matthew J. Harrison; Isaac M. Held; Richard S. Hemler; Larry W. Horowitz; Stephen A. Klein; Thomas R. Knutson; Paul J. Kushner; Amy R. Langenhorst; Hyun-Chul Lee; Shian Jiann Lin; Jian Lu; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly

Abstract The formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled climate models developed at NOAAs Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) are described. The models were designed to simulate atmospheric and oceanic climate and variability from the diurnal time scale through multicentury climate change, given our computational constraints. In particular, an important goal was to use the same model for both experimental seasonal to interannual forecasting and the study of multicentury global climate change, and this goal has been achieved. Two versions of the coupled model are described, called CM2.0 and CM2.1. The versions differ primarily in the dynamical core used in the atmospheric component, along with the cloud tuning and some details of the land and ocean components. For both coupled models, the resolution of the land and atmospheric components is 2° latitude × 2.5° longitude; the atmospheric model has 24 vertical levels. The ocean resolution is 1° in latitude and longitude, wi...


Journal of Climate | 1991

Transient Responses of a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model to Gradual Changes of Atmospheric CO2. Part I. Annual Mean Response

Syukuro Manabe; Ronald J. Stouffer; Michael J. Spelman; K. Bryan

An improved method for surface treatment of metallic materials is described herein. The improvement exists in that a surface treatment agent and a metallic material to be treated are placed in a treating device, heating of the metallic material to be treated up to a specific upper limit temperature higher than a transformation point of the metallic material and cooling of the metallic material down to a specific lower limit temperature lower than the transformation point are alternately and repeatedly carried out, an appropriate stress is applied to the material when it takes the lower limit temperature, and after an appropriate number of temperature cycles the applied stress is released when the material takes the lower limit temperature.


Journal of Climate | 2006

Investigating the Causes of the Response of the Thermohaline Circulation to Past and Future Climate Changes

Ronald J. Stouffer; Jieyi Yin; Jonathan M. Gregory; Keith W. Dixon; Michael J. Spelman; William J. Hurlin; Andrew J. Weaver; Michael Eby; Gregory M. Flato; Hiroyasu Hasumi; Aixue Hu; Johann H. Jungclaus; Igor V. Kamenkovich; Anders Levermann; Marisa Montoya; S. Murakami; S. Nawrath; Akira Oka; W. R. Peltier; D. Y. Robitaille; Andrei P. Sokolov; Guido Vettoretti; S. L. Weber

The Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) is an important part of the earth’s climate system. Previous research has shown large uncertainties in simulating future changes in this critical system. The simulated THC response to idealized freshwater perturbations and the associated climate changes have been intercompared as an activity of World Climate Research Program (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project/Paleo-Modeling Intercomparison Project (CMIP/PMIP) committees. This intercomparison among models ranging from the earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMICs) to the fully coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) seeks to document and improve understanding of the causes of the wide variations in the modeled THC response. The robustness of particular simulation features has been evaluated across the model results. In response to 0.1-S v( 1 Sv 10 6 m 3 s 1 ) freshwater input in the northern North Atlantic, the multimodel ensemble mean THC weakens by 30% after 100 yr. All models simulate some weakening of the THC, but no model simulates a complete shutdown of the THC. The multimodel ensemble indicates that the surface air temperature could present a complex anomaly pattern with cooling south of Greenland and warming over the Barents and Nordic Seas. The Atlantic ITCZ tends to shift southward. In response to 1.0-Sv freshwater input, the THC switches off rapidly in all model simulations. A large cooling occurs over the North Atlantic. The annual mean Atlantic ITCZ moves into the Southern Hemisphere. Models disagree in terms of the reversibility of the THC after its shutdown. In general, the EMICs and AOGCMs obtain similar THC responses and climate changes with more pronounced and sharper patterns in the AOGCMs.


Journal of Climate | 2012

GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

John P. Dunne; Jasmin G. John; Alistair J. Adcroft; Stephen M. Griffies; Robert Hallberg; Elena Shevliakova; Ronald J. Stouffer; William F. Cooke; Krista A. Dunne; Matthew J. Harrison; John P. Krasting; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly; Peter J. Phillipps; Lori T. Sentman; Bonita L. Samuels; Michael J. Spelman; Michael Winton; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Niki Zadeh

AbstractThe authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon–climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences...


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part II: The Baseline Ocean Simulation

Anand Gnanadesikan; Keith W. Dixon; Stephen M. Griffies; V. Balaji; Marcelo Barreiro; J. Anthony Beesley; William F. Cooke; Thomas L. Delworth; Rüdiger Gerdes; Matthew J. Harrison; Isaac M. Held; William J. Hurlin; Hyun-Chul Lee; Zhi Liang; Giang Nong; R. C. Pacanowski; Anthony Rosati; Joellen L. Russell; Bonita L. Samuels; Qian Song; Michael J. Spelman; Ronald J. Stouffer; Colm Sweeney; Gabriel A. Vecchi; Michael Winton; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Fanrong Zeng; Rong Zhang; John P. Dunne

The current generation of coupled climate models run at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) as part of the Climate Change Science Program contains ocean components that differ in almost every respect from those contained in previous generations of GFDL climate models. This paper summarizes the new physical features of the models and examines the simulations that they produce. Of the two new coupled climate model versions 2.1 (CM2.1) and 2.0 (CM2.0), the CM2.1 model represents a major improvement over CM2.0 in most of the major oceanic features examined, with strikingly lower drifts in hydrographic fields such as temperature and salinity, more realistic ventilation of the deep ocean, and currents that are closer to their observed values. Regional analysis of the differences between the models highlights the importance of wind stress in determining the circulation, particularly in the Southern Ocean. At present, major errors in both models are associated with Northern Hemisphere Mode Waters and outflows from overflows, particularly the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea.


Journal of Physical Oceanography | 1990

Transient Response of a Global Ocean-Atmosphere Model to a Doubling of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

Syukuro Manabe; Kirk Bryan; Michael J. Spelman

Abstract The transient response of climate to an instantaneous increase in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has been investigated by a general circulation model of the coupled ocean-atmosphere-land system with global geography and annual mean insulation. An equilibrium climate of the coupled model is perturbed by an abrupt doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide. The evolution of the model climate during the 60-year period after the doubling is compared with the result from a control integration of the model without the doubling. The increase of surface air temperature in middle and high latitudes is slower in the Southern Hemisphere than the Northern Hemisphere The large thermal inertia of the ocean-dominated hemisphere is partly responsible for this difference. The effective thermal inertia of the oceans becomes particularly large in high southern latitudes. Owing to the absence of meridional barriers at the latitudes of the Drake Passage. a wind-driven. deep cell meridional circulatio...


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part IV: Idealized Climate Response

Ronald J. Stouffer; Anthony J. Broccoli; T. Delworth; Keith W. Dixon; Rich Gudgel; Isaac M. Held; Richard S. Hemler; Thomas R. Knutson; Hyun-Chul Lee; M. D. Schwarzkopf; Brian J. Soden; Michael J. Spelman; Michael Winton; Fanrong Zeng

Abstract The climate response to idealized changes in the atmospheric CO2 concentration by the new GFDL climate model (CM2) is documented. This new model is very different from earlier GFDL models in its parameterizations of subgrid-scale physical processes, numerical algorithms, and resolution. The model was constructed to be useful for both seasonal-to-interannual predictions and climate change research. Unlike previous versions of the global coupled GFDL climate models, CM2 does not use flux adjustments to maintain a stable control climate. Results from two model versions, Climate Model versions 2.0 (CM2.0) and 2.1 (CM2.1), are presented. Two atmosphere–mixed layer ocean or slab models, Slab Model versions 2.0 (SM2.0) and 2.1 (SM2.1), are constructed corresponding to CM2.0 and CM2.1. Using the SM2 models to estimate the climate sensitivity, it is found that the equilibrium globally averaged surface air temperature increases 2.9 (SM2.0) and 3.4 K (SM2.1) for a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentrati...


Science | 1982

Transient climate response to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide.

K. Bryan; F. G. Komro; Syukuro Manabe; Michael J. Spelman

The oceans role in the delayed response of climate to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide has been studied by means of a detailed three-dimensional climate model. A near-equilibrium state is perturbed by a fourfold, stepfunction increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The rise in the sea surface temperature was initially much more rapid in the tropics than at high latitudes. However, the fractional response, as normalized on the basis of the total difference between the high carbon dioxide and normal carbon dioxide climates, becomes almost uniform at all latitudes after 25 years. Because of the influence of a more rapid response over continents, the normalized response of the zonally averaged surface air temperature is faster and becomes nearly uniform with respect to latitude after only 10 years.


Journal of Physical Oceanography | 1975

A Global Ocean-Atmosphere Climate Model. Part I. The Atmospheric Circulation

Syukuro Manabe; Kirk Bryan; Michael J. Spelman

Abstract A joint ocean-atmosphere model covering the entire globe has been constructed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) of NOAA. This model differs from the earlier version of the joint model of Bryan and Manabe both in global domain and inclusion of realistic rather than idealized topography. This part of the paper describes the structure of the atmospheric portion of the joint model and discusses the atmospheric circulation and climate that emerges from the time integration of the model. The details of the oceanic part are given by Bryan et al. (1974), hereafter referred to as Part II. The atmospheric part of the model incorporates the primitive equations of motion in a spherical coordinate system. The numerical problems associated with the treatment of mountains are minimized by using the “sigma” coordinate system in which pressure, normalized by surface pressure, is the vertical coordinate. For vertical finite differencing, nine levels are chosen so as to represent the planetary bou...


Geophysical Research Letters | 1999

The influence of transient surface fluxes on North Atlantic overturning in a coupled GCM Climate Change Experiment

Keith W. Dixon; Thomas L. Delworth; Michael J. Spelman; Ronald J. Stouffer

The mechanism by which the model-simulated North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) weakens in response to increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing is investigated through the use of a set of five multi-century experiments. Using a coarse resolution version of the GFDL coupled climate model, the role of various surface fluxes in weakening the THC is assessed. Changes in net surface freshwater fluxes (precipitation, evaporation, and runoff from land) are found to be the dominant cause for the models THC weakening. Surface heat flux changes brought about by rising GHG levels also contribute to THC weakening, but are of secondary importance. Wind stress variations have negligible impact on the THCs strength in the transient GHG experiment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael J. Spelman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald J. Stouffer

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keith W. Dixon

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kirk Bryan

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen M. Griffies

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas L. Delworth

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John P. Dunne

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Winton

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas R. Knutson

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge