Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Winton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Winton.


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics

Thomas L. Delworth; Anthony J. Broccoli; Anthony Rosati; Ronald J. Stouffer; V. Balaji; John A. Beesley; William F. Cooke; Keith W. Dixon; John P. Dunne; Krista A. Dunne; Jeffrey W. Durachta; Kirsten L. Findell; Paul Ginoux; Anand Gnanadesikan; C. T. Gordon; Stephen M. Griffies; Rich Gudgel; Matthew J. Harrison; Isaac M. Held; Richard S. Hemler; Larry W. Horowitz; Stephen A. Klein; Thomas R. Knutson; Paul J. Kushner; Amy R. Langenhorst; Hyun-Chul Lee; Shian Jiann Lin; Jian Lu; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly

Abstract The formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled climate models developed at NOAAs Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) are described. The models were designed to simulate atmospheric and oceanic climate and variability from the diurnal time scale through multicentury climate change, given our computational constraints. In particular, an important goal was to use the same model for both experimental seasonal to interannual forecasting and the study of multicentury global climate change, and this goal has been achieved. Two versions of the coupled model are described, called CM2.0 and CM2.1. The versions differ primarily in the dynamical core used in the atmospheric component, along with the cloud tuning and some details of the land and ocean components. For both coupled models, the resolution of the land and atmospheric components is 2° latitude × 2.5° longitude; the atmospheric model has 24 vertical levels. The ocean resolution is 1° in latitude and longitude, wi...


Journal of Climate | 2011

The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3

Leo J. Donner; Bruce Wyman; Richard S. Hemler; Larry W. Horowitz; Yi Ming; Ming Zhao; Jean-Christophe Golaz; Paul Ginoux; Shian-Jiann Lin; M. Daniel Schwarzkopf; John Austin; Ghassan Alaka; William F. Cooke; Thomas L. Delworth; Stuart M. Freidenreich; Charles T. Gordon; Stephen M. Griffies; Isaac M. Held; William J. Hurlin; Stephen A. Klein; Thomas R. Knutson; Amy R. Langenhorst; Hyun-Chul Lee; Yanluan Lin; Brian I. Magi; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly; Vaishali Naik; Mary Jo Nath; Robert Pincus

AbstractThe Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) has developed a coupled general circulation model (CM3) for the atmosphere, oceans, land, and sea ice. The goal of CM3 is to address emerging issues in climate change, including aerosol–cloud interactions, chemistry–climate interactions, and coupling between the troposphere and stratosphere. The model is also designed to serve as the physical system component of earth system models and models for decadal prediction in the near-term future—for example, through improved simulations in tropical land precipitation relative to earlier-generation GFDL models. This paper describes the dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component (AM3) of this model. Relative to GFDL AM2, AM3 includes new treatments of deep and shallow cumulus convection, cloud droplet activation by aerosols, subgrid variability of stratiform vertical velocities for droplet activation, and atmospheric chemistry driven by emiss...


Journal of Climate | 2012

GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

John P. Dunne; Jasmin G. John; Alistair J. Adcroft; Stephen M. Griffies; Robert Hallberg; Elena Shevliakova; Ronald J. Stouffer; William F. Cooke; Krista A. Dunne; Matthew J. Harrison; John P. Krasting; Sergey Malyshev; P. C. D. Milly; Peter J. Phillipps; Lori T. Sentman; Bonita L. Samuels; Michael J. Spelman; Michael Winton; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Niki Zadeh

AbstractThe authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon–climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences...


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part II: The Baseline Ocean Simulation

Anand Gnanadesikan; Keith W. Dixon; Stephen M. Griffies; V. Balaji; Marcelo Barreiro; J. Anthony Beesley; William F. Cooke; Thomas L. Delworth; Rüdiger Gerdes; Matthew J. Harrison; Isaac M. Held; William J. Hurlin; Hyun-Chul Lee; Zhi Liang; Giang Nong; R. C. Pacanowski; Anthony Rosati; Joellen L. Russell; Bonita L. Samuels; Qian Song; Michael J. Spelman; Ronald J. Stouffer; Colm Sweeney; Gabriel A. Vecchi; Michael Winton; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Fanrong Zeng; Rong Zhang; John P. Dunne

The current generation of coupled climate models run at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) as part of the Climate Change Science Program contains ocean components that differ in almost every respect from those contained in previous generations of GFDL climate models. This paper summarizes the new physical features of the models and examines the simulations that they produce. Of the two new coupled climate model versions 2.1 (CM2.1) and 2.0 (CM2.0), the CM2.1 model represents a major improvement over CM2.0 in most of the major oceanic features examined, with strikingly lower drifts in hydrographic fields such as temperature and salinity, more realistic ventilation of the deep ocean, and currents that are closer to their observed values. Regional analysis of the differences between the models highlights the importance of wind stress in determining the circulation, particularly in the Southern Ocean. At present, major errors in both models are associated with Northern Hemisphere Mode Waters and outflows from overflows, particularly the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea.


Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2000

A Reformulated Three-Layer Sea Ice Model

Michael Winton

A model is presented that provides an efficient approximation to sea ice thermodynamics for climate studies. Semtner’s three-layer framework is used, but the brine content of the upper ice is represented with a variable heat capacity as is done in more physically based models. A noniterative fully implicit time-stepping scheme is used for calculation of ice temperature. The results of the new model are compared to those of Semtner’s original model.


Journal of Climate | 2010

Probing the Fast and Slow Components of Global Warming by Returning Abruptly to Preindustrial Forcing

Isaac M. Held; Michael Winton; Ken Takahashi; Thomas L. Delworth; Fanrong Zeng; Geoffrey K. Vallis

Abstract The fast and slow components of global warming in a comprehensive climate model are isolated by examining the response to an instantaneous return to preindustrial forcing. The response is characterized by an initial fast exponential decay with an e-folding time smaller than 5 yr, leaving behind a remnant that evolves more slowly. The slow component is estimated to be small at present, as measured by the global mean near-surface air temperature, and, in the model examined, grows to 0.4°C by 2100 in the A1B scenario from the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES), and then to 1.4°C by 2300 if one holds radiative forcing fixed after 2100. The dominance of the fast component at present is supported by examining the response to an instantaneous doubling of CO2 and by the excellent fit to the model’s ensemble mean twentieth-century evolution with a simple one-box model with no long times scales.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2006

Amplified arctic climate change : What does surface albedo feedback have to do with it?

Michael Winton

[2] Polar amplification of CO2 forced warming is a common feature of climate change simulations. In transient simulations, southern hemisphere warming is retarded by the large heat uptake of the Southern Ocean, leaving the Arctic as the global location with the largest warming. This aspect of the global warming pattern has often been linked to surface albedo feedback (SAF) – the extra absorption of shortwave radiation as ice melts and the surface becomes less reflective. It is the goal of this paper to place the SAF in the context of other feedbacks and forcings that affect Arctic amplification. [3] Important work on this topic was done by Hall [2004] who showed, by disabling SAF in the GFDL climate model, that it accounts for part but not all of the polar amplification. Vavrus [2004] performed similar experiments with the GENESIS2 climate model to evaluate the role of cloud changes under doubled CO2. He found that the cloud fraction changes enhanced the warming at all latitudes but by a fractionally greater amount in the Arctic, therefore enhancing Arctic amplification. The high-latitude response to increased CO2 was found to be quite variable amongst the group of 15 CMIP climate models studied by Holland and Bitz [2003]. Using correlations, they identified a number of processes that contributed to the variation of Arctic amplification amongst the models. They found that models with larger increases in ocean heat transport, larger increases in cloud cover, and thinner control climate sea ice tended to have larger Arctic amplification. They proposed that thinner sea ice would lead to an increased ice-albedo feedback. However, Flato and CMIP Modelling Groups [2004] found that in the Southern Hemisphere, thinner ice was associated with reduced warming in the CMIP models. In the Southern Hemisphere, Flato and CMIP Modelling Groups [2004] found some tendency for models with more extensive ice to produce greater warming while in the Northern Hemisphere there was a tendency toward the opposite relationship. These studies emphasize the complexity of Arctic amplification and the multiplicity of processes that contribute to it. [4] In this paper the conventional energy balance method of global climate sensitivity analysis is applied to both global and Arctic regions. Two forcings and three feedbacks are diagnosed in each region. A comparison is then made of the impact of differences in the forcings and feedbacks between the two regions on the Arctic amplification. The simulations analyzed come from the archive of climate model results made for the IPCC fourth assessment report (AR4). The twelve AR4 models used here were chosen because they supplied the necessary data to calculate the SAF using a method developed by Winton [2005b]. Details on the twelve models and the SAF analysis method are given by Winton [2005a].


Journal of Physical Oceanography | 1993

Thermohaline Oscillations Induced by Strong Steady Salinity Forcing of Ocean General Circulation Models

Michael Winton; E. S. Sarachik

Abstract A series of numerical experiments is conducted with a three-dimensional ocean general circulation model and a two-dimensional counterpart both designed for efficient integration over diffusive (millennial) time scales. With strong steady salinity fluxes (salting at low latitudes and freshening at high), basin mean temperature and several other diagnostics show a series of self-sustaining oscillations. The oscillations termed deep decoupling oscillations, exhibit halocline catastrophes at regular intervals, followed by warming deep decoupled phases (when the deep overturning is weak), cooling flushes, and in the lower range of salinity forcing, a coupled phase when the deep ocean advective/diffusive heat balance is almost, but not quite, met. It is suggested that oscillations arise when a steady overturning circulation encounters a contradiction: the poleward salt and heat transport needed to maintain convection in the polar ocean requires more overturning than is consistent with the reduced therm...


Journal of Climate | 2011

The GFDL CM3 Coupled Climate Model: Characteristics of the Ocean and Sea Ice Simulations

Stephen M. Griffies; Michael Winton; Leo J. Donner; Larry W. Horowitz; Stephanie M. Downes; Riccardo Farneti; Anand Gnanadesikan; William J. Hurlin; Hyun-Chul Lee; Zhi Liang; Jaime B. Palter; Bonita L. Samuels; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Bruce Wyman; Jianjun Yin; Niki Zadeh

AbstractThis paper documents time mean simulation characteristics from the ocean and sea ice components in a new coupled climate model developed at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). The GFDL Climate Model version 3 (CM3) is formulated with effectively the same ocean and sea ice components as the earlier CM2.1 yet with extensive developments made to the atmosphere and land model components. Both CM2.1 and CM3 show stable mean climate indices, such as large-scale circulation and sea surface temperatures (SSTs). There are notable improvements in the CM3 climate simulation relative to CM2.1, including a modified SST bias pattern and reduced biases in the Arctic sea ice cover. The authors anticipate SST differences between CM2.1 and CM3 in lower latitudes through analysis of the atmospheric fluxes at the ocean surface in corresponding Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations. In contrast, SST changes in the high latitudes are dominated by ocean and sea ice effects absen...


Journal of Climate | 2010

Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change

Michael Winton; Ken Takahashi; Isaac M. Held

Abstract This article proposes a modification to the standard forcing–feedback diagnostic energy balance model to account for 1) differences between effective and equilibrium climate sensitivities and 2) the variation of effective sensitivity over time in climate change experiments with coupled atmosphere–ocean climate models. In the spirit of Hansen et al. an efficacy factor is applied to the ocean heat uptake. Comparing the time evolution of the surface warming in high and low efficacy models demonstrates the role of this efficacy in the transient response to CO2 forcing. Abrupt CO2 increase experiments show that the large efficacy of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s Climate Model version 2.1 (CM2.1) sets up in the first two decades following the increase in forcing. The use of an efficacy is necessary to fit this model’s global mean temperature evolution in periods with both increasing and stable forcing. The intermodel correlation of transient climate response with ocean heat uptake efficac...

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Winton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen M. Griffies

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Rosati

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald J. Stouffer

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas L. Delworth

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isaac M. Held

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bonita L. Samuels

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John P. Dunne

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Hallberg

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge