Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen M. Griffies is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen M. Griffies.


Journal of Climate | 2006

GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part II: The Baseline Ocean Simulation

Anand Gnanadesikan; Keith W. Dixon; Stephen M. Griffies; V. Balaji; Marcelo Barreiro; J. Anthony Beesley; William F. Cooke; Thomas L. Delworth; Rüdiger Gerdes; Matthew J. Harrison; Isaac M. Held; William J. Hurlin; Hyun-Chul Lee; Zhi Liang; Giang Nong; R. C. Pacanowski; Anthony Rosati; Joellen L. Russell; Bonita L. Samuels; Qian Song; Michael J. Spelman; Ronald J. Stouffer; Colm Sweeney; Gabriel A. Vecchi; Michael Winton; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Fanrong Zeng; Rong Zhang; John P. Dunne

The current generation of coupled climate models run at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) as part of the Climate Change Science Program contains ocean components that differ in almost every respect from those contained in previous generations of GFDL climate models. This paper summarizes the new physical features of the models and examines the simulations that they produce. Of the two new coupled climate model versions 2.1 (CM2.1) and 2.0 (CM2.0), the CM2.1 model represents a major improvement over CM2.0 in most of the major oceanic features examined, with strikingly lower drifts in hydrographic fields such as temperature and salinity, more realistic ventilation of the deep ocean, and currents that are closer to their observed values. Regional analysis of the differences between the models highlights the importance of wind stress in determining the circulation, particularly in the Southern Ocean. At present, major errors in both models are associated with Northern Hemisphere Mode Waters and outflows from overflows, particularly the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea.


Journal of Climate | 2011

The GFDL CM3 Coupled Climate Model: Characteristics of the Ocean and Sea Ice Simulations

Stephen M. Griffies; Michael Winton; Leo J. Donner; Larry W. Horowitz; Stephanie M. Downes; Riccardo Farneti; Anand Gnanadesikan; William J. Hurlin; Hyun-Chul Lee; Zhi Liang; Jaime B. Palter; Bonita L. Samuels; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Bruce Wyman; Jianjun Yin; Niki Zadeh

AbstractThis paper documents time mean simulation characteristics from the ocean and sea ice components in a new coupled climate model developed at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). The GFDL Climate Model version 3 (CM3) is formulated with effectively the same ocean and sea ice components as the earlier CM2.1 yet with extensive developments made to the atmosphere and land model components. Both CM2.1 and CM3 show stable mean climate indices, such as large-scale circulation and sea surface temperatures (SSTs). There are notable improvements in the CM3 climate simulation relative to CM2.1, including a modified SST bias pattern and reduced biases in the Arctic sea ice cover. The authors anticipate SST differences between CM2.1 and CM3 in lower latitudes through analysis of the atmospheric fluxes at the ocean surface in corresponding Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations. In contrast, SST changes in the high latitudes are dominated by ocean and sea ice effects absen...


Journal of Climate | 2010

Spatial variability of sea level rise in twenty-first century projections

Jianjun Yin; Stephen M. Griffies; Ronald J. Stouffer

Abstract A set of state-of-the-science climate models are used to investigate global sea level rise (SLR) patterns induced by ocean dynamics in twenty-first-century climate projections. The identified robust features include bipolar and bihemisphere seesaws in the basin-wide SLR, dipole patterns in the North Atlantic and North Pacific, and a beltlike pattern in the Southern Ocean. The physical and dynamical mechanisms that cause these patterns are investigated in detail using version 2.1 of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Coupled Model (CM2.1). Under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A1B scenario, the steric sea level changes relative to the global mean (the local part) in different ocean basins are attributed to differential heating and salinity changes of various ocean layers and associated physical processes. As a result of these changes, water tends to move from the ocean interior to continental shelves. In the North At...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2009

Improving Oceanic Overflow Representation in Climate Models: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team

Sonya Legg; Bruce P. Briegleb; Yeon S. Chang; Eric P. Chassignet; Gokhan Danabasoglu; Tal Ezer; Arnold L. Gordon; Stephen M. Griffies; Robert Hallberg; Laura Jackson; William G. Large; Tamay M. Özgökmen; Hartmut Peters; Jim Price; Ulrike Riemenschneider; Wanli Wu; Xiaobiao Xu; Jiayan Yang

Abstract Oceanic overflows are bottom-trapped density currents originating in semienclosed basins, such as the Nordic seas, or on continental shelves, such as the Antarctic shelf. Overflows are the source of most of the abyssal waters, and therefore play an important role in the large-scale ocean circulation, forming a component of the sinking branch of the thermohaline circulation. As they descend the continental slope, overflows mix vigorously with the surrounding oceanic waters, changing their density and transport significantly. These mixing processes occur on spatial scales well below the resolution of ocean climate models, with the result that deep waters and deep western boundary currents are simulated poorly. The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team was established by the U.S. Climate Variability and Prediction (CLIVAR) Program to accelerate the development and implementation of improved representations of overflows within large-scale climate models, bringing together climate model dev...


Journal of Climate | 2015

Impacts on Ocean Heat from Transient Mesoscale Eddies in a Hierarchy of Climate Models

Stephen M. Griffies; Michael Winton; Whit G. Anderson; Rusty Benson; Thomas L. Delworth; Carolina O. Dufour; John P. Dunne; Paul Goddard; Adele K. Morrison; Anthony Rosati; Andrew T. Wittenberg; Jianjun Yin; Rong Zhang

AbstractThe authors characterize impacts on heat in the ocean climate system from transient ocean mesoscale eddies. Their tool is a suite of centennial-scale 1990 radiatively forced numerical climate simulations from three GFDL coupled models comprising the Climate Model, version 2.0–Ocean (CM2-O), model suite. CM2-O models differ in their ocean resolution: CM2.6 uses a 0.1° ocean grid, CM2.5 uses an intermediate grid with 0.25° spacing, and CM2-1deg uses a nominal 1.0° grid.Analysis of the ocean heat budget reveals that mesoscale eddies act to transport heat upward in a manner that partially compensates (or offsets) for the downward heat transport from the time-mean currents. Stronger vertical eddy heat transport in CM2.6 relative to CM2.5 accounts for the significantly smaller temperature drift in CM2.6. The mesoscale eddy parameterization used in CM2-1deg also imparts an upward heat transport, yet it differs systematically from that found in CM2.6. This analysis points to the fundamental role that ocea...


Nature Communications | 2015

An extreme event of sea-level rise along the Northeast coast of North America in 2009–2010

Paul Goddard; Jianjun Yin; Stephen M. Griffies; Shaoqing Zhang

The coastal sea levels along the Northeast Coast of North America show significant year-to-year fluctuations in a general upward trend. The analysis of long-term tide gauge records identified an extreme sea-level rise (SLR) event during 2009-10. Within this 2-year period, the coastal sea level north of New York City jumped by 128u2009mm. This magnitude of interannual SLR is unprecedented (a 1-in-850 year event) during the entire history of the tide gauge records. Here we show that this extreme SLR event is a combined effect of two factors: an observed 30% downturn of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during 2009-10, and a significant negative North Atlantic Oscillation index. The extreme nature of the 2009-10 SLR event suggests that such a significant downturn of the Atlantic overturning circulation is very unusual. During the twenty-first century, climate models project an increase in magnitude and frequency of extreme interannual SLR events along this densely populated coast.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Enhanced warming of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean under climate change

Vincent S. Saba; Stephen M. Griffies; Whit G. Anderson; Michael Winton; Michael A. Alexander; Thomas L. Delworth; Jonathan A. Hare; Matthew J. Harrison; Anthony Rosati; Gabriel A. Vecchi; Rong Zhang

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment of projected global and regional ocean temperature change is based on global climate models that have coarse (∼100 km) ocean and atmosphere resolutions. In the Northwest Atlantic, the ensemble of global climate models has a warm bias in sea surface temperature due to a misrepresentation of the Gulf Stream position; thus, existing climate change projections are based on unrealistic regional ocean circulation. Here we compare simulations and an atmospheric CO2 doubling response from four global climate models of varying ocean and atmosphere resolution. We find that the highest resolution climate model (∼10 km ocean, ∼50 km atmosphere) resolves Northwest Atlantic circulation and water mass distribution most accurately. The CO2 doubling response from this model shows that upper-ocean (0–300 m) temperature in the Northwest Atlantic Shelf warms at a rate nearly twice as fast as the coarser models and nearly three times faster than the global average. This enhanced warming is accompanied by an increase in salinity due to a change in water mass distribution that is related to a retreat of the Labrador Current and a northerly shift of the Gulf Stream. Both observations and the climate model demonstrate a robust relationship between a weakening Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and an increase in the proportion of Warm-Temperate Slope Water entering the Northwest Atlantic Shelf. Therefore, prior climate change projections for the Northwest Atlantic may be far too conservative. These results point to the need to improve simulations of basin and regional-scale ocean circulation.


Journal of Climate | 2010

Evaluating the uncertainty induced by the virtual salt flux assumption in climate simulations and future projections.

Jianjun Yin; Ronald J. Stouffer; Michael J. Spelman; Stephen M. Griffies

Abstract The unphysical virtual salt flux (VSF) formulation widely used in the ocean component of climate models has the potential to cause systematic and significant biases in modeling the climate system and projecting its future evolution. Here a freshwater flux (FWF) and a virtual salt flux version of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Climate Model version 2.1 (GFDL CM2.1) are used to evaluate and quantify the uncertainties induced by the VSF formulation. Both unforced and forced runs with the two model versions are performed and compared in detail. It is found that the differences between the two versions are generally small or statistically insignificant in the unforced control runs and in the runs with a small external forcing. In response to a large external forcing, however, some biases in the VSF version become significant, especially the responses of regional salinity and global sea level. However, many fundamental aspects of the responses differ only quantitatively between the two versi...


Ocean Modeling in an Eddying Regime | 2013

Formulating the Equations of Ocean Models

Stephen M. Griffies; Alistair Adcroft

the purpose of this chapter is to formulate the equations of ocean models and to outline solution methods. Global ocean climate models, including those representing mesoscale eddies, are traditionally based on the hydrostatic primitive equations. We nonetheless discuss extensions to the more fundamental non-hydrostatic equations, which are used in certain fine resolution process studies, such as for convection and mixing, and increasingly for coastal and regional modeling. the target audience for this chapter includes students and researchers interested in fundamental physical and numerical aspects of ocean models. We thus aim to present a reasonably concise yet thorough accounting of the rationalization required to pose the problem of ocean modeling. We take a first principles perspective to allow readers with little background in ocean fluid mechanics to follow the full development. this goal necessitates starting from the basics as we develop the model equations and methods. For this purpose, much material was culled from various research papers and textbooks, such as Gill [1982], Pedlosky [1987], Lion et al. [1992], Marshall et al. [1997], Haidvogel and Beckmann [1999], Griffies et al. [2000a], Griffies [2004, 2005], Vallis [2006], Higdon [2006], and Muller [2006]. Our presentation focuses on developing the fluid mechanics of the ocean and weaves into this discussion elements appropriate for the formulation of ocean models. We begin with a discussion of ocean fluid kinematics in Section 2 where we introduce mass conservation as well as the notions of dia-surface transport. Section 3 then focuses on tracer budgets, which follow quite naturally from mass budgets, only with the introduction of possible nontrivial fluxes of tracer which occur in the absence of mass fluxes. Section 4 introduces a dynamical description that arises from the use of Newton’s Second Law of Motion applied to continuous fluid parcels. Section 5 presents the equation of state for density and discusses the material evolution of density. Section 6 derives some energetic properties of the equations of motion, with energetics providing a guiding principle for developing certain numerical solution methods. Section 7 introduces notions of non-equilibrium thermodynamics, a subject which forms the basis for establishing budgets of heat within the ocean. Section 8 linearizes the dynamical equations to deduce various linear modes of motion fundamental to ocean dynamics. these motions also have direct relevance to the development of methods used to solve the ocean equations. they furthermore motivate certain approximations or filters used to simplify the supported dynamical modes, with certain approximations described in Section 9. Section 10 presents an overview of vertical coordinates. The Formulating the Equations of Ocean Models


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2017

Climate Process Team on Internal Wave-Driven Ocean Mixing

Jennifer A. MacKinnon; Zhongxiang Zhao; Caitlin B. Whalen; Amy F. Waterhouse; David S. Trossman; Oliver M. T. Sun; Louis C. St. Laurent; Harper L. Simmons; Kurt L. Polzin; Robert Pinkel; Andy Pickering; Nancy J. Norton; Jonathan D. Nash; Ruth Musgrave; Lynne M. Merchant; Angélique Mélet; Benjamin D. Mater; Sonya Legg; William G. Large; Eric Kunze; Jody M. Klymak; Markus Jochum; Steven R. Jayne; Robert Hallberg; Stephen M. Griffies; Stephen Diggs; Gokhan Danabasoglu; Eric P. Chassignet; Maarten C. Buijsman; Frank O. Bryan

Diapycnal mixing plays a primary role in the thermodynamic balance of the ocean and, consequently, in oceanic heat and carbon uptake and storage. Though observed mixing rates are on average consistent with values required by inverse models, recent attention has focused on the dramatic spatial variability, spanning several orders of magnitude, of mixing rates in both the upper and deep ocean. Away from ocean boundaries, the spatio-temporal patterns of mixing are largely driven by the geography of generation, propagation and dissipation of internal waves, which supply much of the power for turbulent mixing. Over the last five years and under the auspices of US CLIVAR, a NSF- and NOAA-supported Climate Process Team has been engaged in developing, implementing and testing dynamics-based parameterizations for internal-wave driven turbulent mixing in global ocean models. The work has primarily focused on turbulence 1) near sites of internal tide generation, 2) in the upper ocean related to wind-generated near inertial motions, 3) due to internal lee waves generated by low-frequency mesoscale flows over topography, and 4) at ocean margins. Here we review recent progress, describe the tools developed, and discuss future directions.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen M. Griffies's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gokhan Danabasoglu

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald J. Stouffer

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Hallberg

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew T. Wittenberg

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Winton

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas L. Delworth

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bonita L. Samuels

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge