Nathalie Lassau

Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Antitumor Activity of SU11248, a Novel Oral Multitarget Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE To establish the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended dose of sunitinib, a novel oral multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antitumor properties, in patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sunitinib was given orally for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients received doses ranging from 15 to 59 mg/m2 (ranging from 50 mg every other day to 150 mg/d). Dose-limiting toxicities reported at the maximum-tolerated doses > or = 75 mg/d were reversible grade 3 fatigue, grade 3 hypertension, and grade 2 bullous skin toxicity. Therefore, the recommended dose was 50 mg/d. At this dose, the main adverse effects were sore mouth, edema, and thrombocytopenia. Hair discoloration and yellow coloration of the skin were observed at doses > or = 50 mg/d. Pharmacokinetic data indicate that potentially active target plasma concentrations > or = 50 ng/mL can be achieved with moderate interpatient variability and a long half-life compatible with a single daily dosing. Six objective responses were observed in three renal cell carcinomas, one neuroendocrine tumor, one stromal tumor, and one unknown primary adenocarcinoma patient. At higher doses (> or = 75 mg/d), tumor responses were often associated with reduced intratumoral vascularization and central tumor necrosis, eventually resulting in organ perforation or fistula. CONCLUSION At the dose of 50 mg/d (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off), sunitinib displays manageable toxicity. Antitumor activity supports further studies in patients with renal cell carcinoma, gastrointestinal, neuroendocrine, and stromal tumors. Future studies may consider including prospective imaging techniques such as high frequency ultrasound to monitor tumor density.

The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications

Authors F. Piscaglia1, C. Nolsøe2, C. F. Dietrich3, D. O. Cosgrove4, O. H. Gilja5, M. Bachmann Nielsen6, T. Albrecht7, L. Barozzi8, M. Bertolotto9, O. Catalano10, M. Claudon11, D. A. Clevert12, J. M. Correas13, M. D’Onofrio14, F. M. Drudi15, J. Eyding16, M. Giovannini17, M. Hocke18, A. Ignee19, E. M. Jung20, A. S. Klauser21, N. Lassau22, E. Leen23, G. Mathis24, A. Saftoiu25, G. Seidel26, P. S. Sidhu27, G. ter. Haar28, D. Timmerman29, H. P. Weskott30

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver – Update 2012

Initially, a set of guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004 dealing only with liver applications. A second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some non-liver applications. Time has moved on, and the need for international guidelines on the use of CEUS in the liver has become apparent. The present document describes the third iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using contrast specific imaging techniques. This joint WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative has implicated experts from major leading ultrasound societies worldwide. These liver CEUS guidelines are simultaneously published in the official journals of both organizing federations (i.e., Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology for WFUMB and Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for EFSUMB). These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of all currently clinically available ultrasound contrast agents (UCA). They are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis and improve the management of patients worldwide.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated with Imatinib: Monitoring Response with Contrast-Enhanced Sonography

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography with perfusion software as a predictor of early tumor response to imatinib (Glivec) in c-kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS Thirty patients (59 tumors) with metastases or a recurrence from a GIST were prospectively included in a single-center imaging trial. Contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography was performed with an Aplio scanner the day before (day-1) starting oral treatment (400 mg) and at days 1, 7, 14, 60, 90, and 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year. The percentage of contrast uptake (Levovist or Sonovue) before treatment and at the different stages of follow-up was evaluated by two radiologists. Digitized quantification was performed using Photoshop software. To define the benchmark standard, all patients were rated as responders or nonresponders at 2 and 6 months by a board consisting of oncologists and radiologists who had all clinical and imaging data at their disposal. Changes in the percentage of contrast uptake at each sonographic examination were compared statistically. RESULTS A total of 185 examinations were performed. Forty-four lesions in 24 patients were completely evaluated at 2 months, and 29 lesions in 15 patients were completely evaluated at 6 months. Initial contrast uptake at day 1 was predictive of the future response. A strong correlation was found between the decline in tumor contrast uptake at days 7 and 14 and tumor response (p < 10(-4)). CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography is a noninvasive imaging technique that allows the early prediction of tumor response in c-kit-positive GIST treated with Glivec.

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Early Evaluation of Response to Bevacizumab Therapy at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced US with Quantification—Preliminary Results

PURPOSE To investigate whether there is any correlation between standard efficacy endpoints-specifically, tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival-and tumor perfusion parameters measured by using dynamic contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients provided written informed consent before their enrollment. Between June 3, 2005, and September 28, 2007, 42 patients (33 men, nine women; median age, 62 years; age range, 23-84 years) participated in this phase II study of single-agent bevacizumab treatment. Tumor response (based on RECIST [response evaluation criteria in solid tumors]) at 2 months was assessed in 37 patients, and progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed in all 42 patients. Dynamic contrast-enhanced US (ie, dynamic US) was performed before treatment (day 0); on days 3, 7, 14, and 60 after treatment; and every 2 months thereafter. Tumor perfusion parameters were estimated quantitatively from contrast material uptake curves constructed from raw linear data. The changes in dynamic US functional parameters between day 0 and the later time points were compared between treatment responders and nonresponders by using nonparametric tests. Given multiple comparisons, P < .001 indicated significance. RESULTS The percentage decrease in several dynamic US parameters between day 0 and day 3 showed trends toward correlation with (a) tumor response in terms of total area under the time-intensity curve (AUC) (P = .02), AUC during wash in (P = .04), AUC during washout (P = .02), and time to peak intensity (P = .03); (b) progression-free survival in terms of time to peak intensity (P = .028); and (c) overall survival in terms of AUC (P = .002) and AUC during washout (P = .003). CONCLUSION Dynamic US can be used to quantify dynamic changes in tumor vascularity as early as 3 days after bevacizumab administration in patients with HCC. These early changes in tumor perfusion may be predictive of tumor response at 2 months, progression-free survival, and overall survival, and they may be potential surrogate measures of the effectiveness of antiangiogenic therapy in patients with HCC.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib: Early Evaluation of Treatment Response Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Purpose: To determine the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) as a prognostic tool for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving sunitinib and to identify DCE-US parameters that correlate with early treatment response. Experimental Design: Thirty-eight patients received 50 mg/d sunitinib on schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off treatment). After two cycles, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were used to classify patients as responders or nonresponders. DCE-US evaluations were done before treatment and at day 15; variations between days 0 and 15 were calculated for seven DCE-US functional parameters and were compared for responders and nonresponders. The correlation between DCE-US parameters and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. Results: The ratio between DCE-US examinations at baseline and day 15 significantly correlated with response in five of the seven DCE-US parameters. Two DCE-US parameters (time to peak intensity and slope of the wash-in) were significantly associated with DFS; time to peak intensity was also significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: DCE-US is a useful tool for predicting the early efficacy of sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Robust correlations were observed between functional parameters and classic assessments, including DFS and OS. Clin Cancer Res; 16(4); 1216–25

Phase I Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with IFN α-2a in Patients with Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma or Malignant Melanoma

Purpose: To determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy, and to evaluate biomarkers, of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib plus IFN α-2a in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or melanoma. Experimental Design: Patients received 28-day cycles of continuous, oral sorafenib twice daily and s.c. IFN thrice weekly: sorafenib 200 mg twice daily plus IFN 6 million IU (MIU) thrice weekly (cohort 1); and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus IFN 6 MIU thrice weekly (cohort 2); or plus IFN 9 MIU thrice weekly (cohort 3). Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Results: Thirteen patients received at least one dose of sorafenib plus IFN (12 RCC; one melanoma). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached [only one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 asthenia)]. Most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were grade 2 or less in severity, including fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, alopecia, and hand-foot skin reaction. One (7.7%) RCC patient achieved partial response and eight (61.5%) had stable disease (including the melanoma patient). Good responders assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography had increased progression-free survival and overall survival, relative to poor responders. IFN had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib. There were no significant changes in absolute values of lymphocytes, levels of proangiogenic cytokines, or inhibition of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase in T cells or natural killer cells, with combination therapy. Conclusions: This sorafenib combination was well tolerated, with preliminary antitumor activity in advanced RCC and melanoma patients. There were no drug-drug interactions and the recommended dose for future studies is sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus IFN 9 MIU.

Evaluation of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo.

Lassau N, Koscielny S, Opolon P, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo. Invest Radiol 2001;36:50–55. rationale and objectives.To evaluate contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) aimed at quantifying angiogenesis in vivo. methods.Eight colon tumors xenografted into mice were studied with CDUS both without and after injection of SHU 508A. The number of intratumor vessels and pedicles visualized with CDUS and the value of the acoustic intensity quantified by computer were compared with the evaluation of angiogenesis by study of digitized histological slides. results.SHU 508A increased the number of intratumor vessels and pedicles depicted by CDUS, which could also be quantified by acoustic intensity. The comparison of CDUS and digitized histological slide studies showed that the detection threshold after SHU 508A administration allowed visualization of small vessels (40 &mgr;m in diameter). The “hot spots” seen on histology were superimposable onto vessels seen with CDUS. Regions in which no vessels were detected by CDUS corresponded to regions in which vascularization was absent by histological analysis. conclusion.Injection of SHU 508A significantly increased vessel detection with CDUS.

Phase II study of oral masitinib mesilate in imatinib-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST)

BACKGROUND Masitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with greater in vitro activity and selectivity for the wild-type c-Kit receptor and its juxtamembrane mutation than imatinib, without inhibiting kinases of known toxicities. This phase II study evaluated masitinib as a first-line treatment of advanced GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS Imatinib-naïve patients with advanced GIST received oral masitinib at 7.5mg/kg/d. Efficacy end-points included response rate (RR) at 2 months, best response according to RECIST, metabolic response rate, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rate (OS). RESULTS Thirty patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 34 months. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were rash (10%) and neutropaenia (7%). Two patients withdrew due to treatment-related adverse events. At 2 months, RR was 20% according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) and 86% according to FDG-PET response criteria. Best responses were a complete response in 1/30 patient (3.3%), partial response in 15/30 patients (50%), stable disease in 13/30 patients (43.3%) and progressive disease in 1/30 patient (3.3%); (DCR: 96.7%). Median time-to-response was 5.6 months (0.8-23.8 months). Estimated median PFS was 41.3 months with PFS rate of 59.7% [37.9; 76.0] and 55.4 [33.9; 72.5] at 2 and 3 years, respectively. The OS at 2 and 3 years was stable at 89.9% [71.8; 96.6]. CONCLUSIONS Masitinib appears to be effective as a first-line treatment of advanced GIST with comparable results to imatinib in terms of safety and response. PFS and in particular OS data show promise that masitinib may provide sustainable benefits. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant a phase III clinical trial.

Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Objectives:To evaluate the early tumor vasculature disrupting effects of the AVE8062 molecule and the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) in the quantitative assessment of these effects. Material and Methods:AVE8062 was administered at a single dose (41 mg/kg) to 40 melanoma-bearing nude mice, which were all imaged before and after drug administration (5 + 15 minutes, 1, 6, and 24 hours). Using an ultrasound scanner (Aplio, Toshiba), intratumor vessels were counted in power Doppler mode and tumor microvasculature was assessed in a specific harmonic mode associated with a perfusion and quantification software for contrast-uptake quantification (Sonovue, Bracco). The peak intensity (PI), time-to-PI (TPI), and full-width at half maximum (FWHM) were extracted from the time-intensity curves expressed as linear raw data. Histologic analysis evaluated microvessel density (MVD) and necrosis at each time point studied. Statistical significance was estimated (paired sum rank and Mann–Whitney tests) to evaluate drug activity and to compare its efficacy at the different time points. Results:In power Doppler mode, intratumoral vessels depletion started 15 minutes postinjection (32%, P = 0.004) and the decrease was maximal at 6 hours (51%, P = 0.002). PI decreased by 3.5- and 45.7-fold at 1 and 6 hours, respectively, compared with preinjection values (P = 0.016 and P = 0.008). The decrease at 6 hours was significantly different from the variation at 1 hour (P = 0.0012) and at 24 hours (P = 0.0008). TPI and FWHM showed a significant increase exclusively at 6 hours (P = 0.0034, P = 0.0039). Histology revealed significantly decreased MVD and increased necrosis at 24 hours (P < 0.01). Conclusion:DCE-US allowed quantitative in vivo evaluation of the functional effects of AVE8062, which was found most effective on tumoral microvasculature 6 hours after its administration. A clinical phase-1 study of AVE8062 is ongoing using the same ultrasonography methodology before and 6 and 24 hours postadministration.