Nicholas Oettle

The effects of unsteady on-road flow conditions on cabin noise

On-road, a vehicle experiences unsteady flow conditions due to turbulence in the natural wind, moving through the unsteady wakes of other road vehicles and travelling through the stationary wakes generated by roadside obstacles. There is increasing concern about potential differences between steady flow conditions that are typically used for development and the transient conditions that occur on-road. This work considers whether steady techniques are able to predict the unsteady results measured on-road, the impact of this unsteadiness on the noise perceived in the cabin and whether minor changes made to the geometry of the vehicle could affect this. Both external aerodynamic and acoustic measurements were taken using a full-size vehicle combined with measurements of the noise inside the cabin. Data collection took place on-road under a range of wind conditions to accurately measure the response of the vehicle to oncoming flow unsteadiness, with steady-state measurements taking place in full-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnels. Overall it was demonstrated that, using a variety of temporal and spectral approaches, steady techniques were able to predict unsteady on-road results well enough to assess cabin noise by correctly taking into account the varying on-road flow conditions. Aerodynamic admittance values remained less than unity in the sideglass region of the vehicle, with the exception of the the region nearest the A-pillar. The reducing unsteady energy at frequencies greater than 10 Hz, combined with the corresponding roll-off in admittance, implies that unsteady frequencies below 10 Hz affect the vehicle most, where the response remains quasi-steady. Quasi-steady cabin noise simulations allowed a subjective assessment of the predicted unsteady cabin noise, where the impact of cabin noise modulations were quantified and found to be important to perception. Minor geometry changes affected the sensitivity of cabin noise to changes in yaw angle, altering modulation and therefore having an important impact on the unsteady wind noise perceived on-road.

The Effects of Unsteady On-Road Flow Conditions on Cabin Noise: Spectral and Geometric Dependence

The in-cabin sound pressure level response of a vehicle in yawed wind conditions can differ significantly between the smooth flow conditions of the aeroacoustic wind tunnel and the higher turbulence, transient flow conditions experienced on the road. Previous research has shown that under low turbulence conditions there is close agreement between the variation with yaw of in-cabin sound pressure level on the road and in the wind tunnel. However, under transient conditions, sound pressure levels on the road were found to show a smaller increase due to yaw than predicted by the wind tunnel, specifically near the leeward sideglass region. The research presented here investigates the links between transient flow and aeroacoustics. The effect of small geometry changes upon the aeroacoustic response of the vehicle has been investigated. It was found that sideglass pressures showed close agreement at all turbulence levels while surface sound pressure levels also showed similar behaviour under a wide range of on-road flow conditions. While the overall sideglass sound pressure level changed under the various yaw conditions, the change in shape of the frequency spectrum was less significant. Geometry changes made to a base vehicle reduced the sensitivity of the in-cabin noise to on-road turbulence, showing that shape-change can modify sensitivity to on-road turbulence.

Evaluation of the Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Response of a Vehicle to Transient Flow Conditions

A vehicle on the road encounters an unsteady flow due to turbulence in the natural wind, unsteady wakes of other vehicles and as a result of traversing through the stationary wakes of roadside obstacles. Unsteady effects occurring in the sideglass region of a vehicle are particularly relevant to wind noise. This is a region close to the driver and dominated by separated flow structures from the A-pillar and door mirrors, which are sensitive to unsteadiness in the onset flow. Since the sideglass region is of particular aeroacoustic importance, the paper seeks to determine what impact these unsteady effects have on the sources of aeroacoustic noise as measured inside the passenger compartment, in addition to the flow structures in this region. Data presented were obtained during on-road measurement campaigns using two instrumented vehicles, as well as from aeroacoustic wind tunnel tests. Conventional admittance functions relating oncoming flow yaw angle to cabin noise response are generally not suitable due to the non-linear steady state characteristics obtained in the wind tunnel, i.e. the cabin noise does not vary with yaw angle in a linear fashion under steady-state conditions. Therefore two alternative approaches were used based on instantaneous conditions to determine a quasi-steady predicted cabin noise time-history. These techniques demonstrated that the cabin noise response to oncoming flow unsteadiness remained generally quasi-steady up to fluctuation frequencies of approximately 2 to 5 Hz, where above this smaller flow scales have a progressively smaller impact on cabin noise fluctuations. Therefore, with a measurement of both the cabin noise in the steady environment of the wind tunnel and the unsteady onset flow conditions, the fluctuations (and thus the modulation) of the wind noise under these unsteady conditions is able to be predicted.

Assessing the Aeroacoustic Response of a Vehicle to Transient Flow Conditions from the Perspective of a Vehicle Occupant

On-road, a vehicle experiences unsteady flow conditions due to turbulence in the natural wind, moving through the unsteady wakes of other road vehicles and travelling through the stationary wakes generated by roadside obstacles. Separated flow structures in the sideglass region of a vehicle are particularly sensitive to unsteadiness in the onset flow. These regions are also areas where strong aeroacoustic effects can exist, in a region close to the passengers of a vehicle. The resulting aeroacoustic response to unsteadiness can lead to fluctuations and modulation at frequencies that a passenger is particularly sensitive towards. Results presented by this paper combine on-road measurement campaigns using instrumented vehicles in a range of different wind environments and aeroacoustic wind tunnel tests. A new cabin noise simulation technique was developed to predict the time-varying wind noise in a vehicle using the cabin noise measured in the steady environment of the wind tunnel, and a record of the unsteady onset conditions on the road, considering each third-octave band individually. The simulated cabin noise predicted using this quasi-steady technique was compared against direct on-road cabin noise measurements recorded under the same flow conditions to assess the response of the vehicle to oncoming flow unsteadiness. The technique predicted the modulation of the wind noise under unsteady on-road conditions with good fidelity. This is because the cabin noise response to oncoming flow unsteadiness remained generally quasi-steady up to fluctuation frequencies of approximately 2 to 5 Hz, with fluctuations at higher scales having a progressively smaller impact, and because most of the onset flow fluctuation energy on the road occurs at frequencies below this threshold. The relative impact of the baseline level of cabin noise and the sensitivity of the cabin noise to changes in yaw angle were assessed in terms of occupant perception and this highlighted the importance of modulation. This can provide guidance when assessing the on-road wind noise performance of vehicle geometry modifications and of different vehicles.

Interactions between underbody aerodynamics and aeroacoustics

Research has shown that lack of ground effect simulation in the wind tunnel could result in different flow conditions from those experienced by the vehicle on the road, influencing aerodynamic noise inside the cabin. The focus of this work is the influence of moving ground and rotating wheels on both aeroacoustic and aerodynamic measures for a typical European luxury saloon. The acoustic influence due to moving ground and rotating wheels including both flow effects and the background noise contribution of the associated equipment is investigated. Results demonstrate a significant underbody influence in cabin noise up to 5 dBA and confirm the feasibility of using a moving ground plane for aeroacoustic measurements, in contrast to moving ground and rotating wheels which can mask acoustic changes.

Automotive aeroacoustics: An overview:

Vehicle aeroacoustic performance has a major influence on customer perception and also has importance for safety and comfort. Wind noise performance was once differentiated by the quality of sealing. Today, achieving competitive wind noise performance also depends on minimising aeroacoustic noise sources generated by the vehicle form, and on attenuation in the noise pathway from sources on the exterior to the vehicle interior. The reduction in noise transmission, especially through glazed surfaces, will continue to play an important role in controlling cabin noise, with a particular emphasis on achieving attenuation efficiently in terms of component mass. The human brain is not only sensitive towards the level of steady broadband noise, but distinctive features such as tonality or modulation draw the attention of the vehicle occupant and impact negatively on perception. Complex indices are often required to define good wind noise performance. This includes the consideration of multiple frequency bands and effects of the range of yaw angles experienced on-road. A key to achieving future vehicle refinement is bringing together an understanding of unsteady onset flow conditions, their impact on cabin sound pressure level and modulation and, in turn, the impact of noise level and modulation on psychoacoustic perception.

The Effects of Unsteady Flow Conditions on Vehicle in Cabin and External Noise Generation

A vehicle driving on the road experiences unsteady flow conditions which are not generally reproduced in the development environment. This paper investigates the potential importance of this difference to aeroacoustics and hence to occupant perception and proposes a methodology to enable better ranking of designs by taking account of wind noise modulation.Two approaches of reproducing the effects of unsteady wind on aeroacoustics were investigated: an active wind tunnel Turbulence Generation System (TGS) and a quasi-steady approach based on measurements at a series of fixed yaw angles. A number of tools were used to investigate the onset flow and its impacts, including roof-mounted probe, acoustic heads and surface microphones. External noise measurements help to reveal the response of separate exterior noise sources to yaw.The noise experienced by the driver or passenger ear facing the side-glass is dominated by increased sound pressure levels when the adjacent side-glass is the leeward side of the vehicle with some non-linear effects as leeward yaw produces first accelerated flow and then separation.In part because of non-linearity in response to yaw, a challenging parameter for a wind tunnel simulation of dynamic yaw is achieving a wide enough variation in yaw angle and this work suggests that considering an appropriate range of yaw angles is more important than capturing the dynamics.In terms of passenger perception, the most important effect of a time-varying onset flow was demonstrated to be the modulation of wind noise rather than the increase in time-averaged cabin noise. For the case considered, at 130 km/h, the impact of wind-noise modulation was found to be equivalent to an extra 1-2 dBA in terms of passenger perception, while the increment in time-averaged cabin noise would be only 0.2 dBA.