Nithya Rajagopalan

Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Current Approaches and Pharmacologic Agents in Development

As one of the leading causes of blindness, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has remained at the epicenter of clinical research in ophthalmology. During the past decade, focus of researchers has ranged from understanding the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the angiogenic cascades to developing new therapies for retinal vascular diseases. Anti-VEGF agents such as ranibizumab and aflibercept are becoming increasingly well-established therapies and have replaced earlier approaches such as laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy. Many other new therapeutic agents, which are in the early phase clinical trials, have shown promising results. The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the available treatment modalities for neovascular AMD and then focus on promising new therapies that are currently in various stages of development.

Sirolimus for Retinal and Uveitic Diseases

Chronic inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ocular diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, uveitis and age-related macular degeneration. Activation and proliferation of naïve T cells may result in pathological changes responsible for significant visual morbidity. Sirolimus (earlier termed rapamycin) is a novel drug that inhibits cellular kinases and, thereby, inhibits T-cell proliferation. Preclinical studies in experimental models have shown promising results with the use of this pharmacological agent in various ocular conditions. Subsequently, early phase I/II studies have provided encouraging safety and efficacy data. This chapter focuses on the mechanisms of action, preclinical study results and data from human clinical trials of sirolimus in human eye diseases. Key highlights from ongoing phase III clinical trials are also provided. Sirolimus, thus, appears to be an important addition to the armamentarium of steroid-sparing therapeutic agents that act on various steps in the inflammatory pathway.

Aspiration in injections: should we continue or abandon the practice?

Aspiration during any kind of injection is meant to ensure that the needle tip is at the desired location during this blind procedure. While aspiration appears to be a simple procedure, it has generated a lot of controversy concerning the perceived benefits and indications. Advocates and opponents of aspiration both make logically sound claims. However, due to scarcity of available data, there is no evidence that this procedure is truly beneficial or unwarranted. Keeping in view the huge number of injections given worldwide, it is important that we draw attention to key questions regarding aspiration that, up till now, remain unanswered. In this review, we have attempted to gather and present literature on aspiration both from published and non-published sources in order to provide not only an exhaustive review of the subject, but also a starting point for further studies on more specific areas requiring clarification. A literature review was conducted using the US National Institute of Healths PubMed service (including Medline), Google Scholar and Scopus. Guidelines provided by the World Health Organization, Safe Injection Global Network, International Council of Nursing, Center for Disease Control, US Federal Drug Agency, UK National Health Services, British Medical Association, Europe Nursing and Midwifery Council, Public Health Agency Canada, Pakistan Medical Association and International Organization of Standardization recommendations 7886 parts 1-4 for sterile hypodermics were reviewed for relevant information. In addition, curricula of several medical/-nursing schools from India, Nigeria and Pakistan, the US pharmacopeia Data from the WHO Program for International Drug Monitoring network in regard to adverse events as a result of not aspirating prior to injection delivery were reviewed. Curricula of selected major medical/nursing schools in India, Nigeria and Pakistan, national therapeutic formularies, product inserts of most commonly used drugs and other possible sources of information regarding aspiration and injections were consulted as well.

Structural Characteristics of Retinal Layers Adjacent to Geographic Atrophy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To compare the anatomy of different retinal layers adjacent to areas of geographic atrophy (GA) to those of eyes with no known ocular diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans from eyes with GA were retrospectively reviewed. Two scans with no findings suggestive of GA changes on OCT were selected from immediately above and/or below the edge of the lesions. Thickness values of the retinal layers were calculated and compared to values obtained from normal subjects. RESULTS Forty-four eyes (30 patients) were compared to 20 healthy eyes. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), inner nuclear layer (INL), and full retinal thickness (FRT) values were significantly lower in patients compared to healthy subjects. Thicknesses of all other layers were not significantly different. CONCLUSION Clinically appearing, non-involved RPE and INL layers of eyes with GA demonstrate significant thinning compared to corresponding layers in eyes with no known ocular diseases.