Noora Perkola
Finnish Environment Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Noora Perkola.
Science of The Total Environment | 2011
Sanna Vaalgamaa; Anssi V. Vähätalo; Noora Perkola; Sami Huhtala
Potential of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) to degrade via indirect photolysis in aquatic solution under conditions representing surface water was studied. Globally distributed and bioaccumulative PFOA does not absorb solar radiation by itself, but may be potentially photochemically transformed by the natural sensitizers such as dissolved organic matter (DOM), nitrate or ferric iron. Reaction solutions containing purified water, fulvic acid (representing DOM), nitrate, ferric iron or sea water from the Baltic Sea were spiked with PFOA and irradiated with an artificial sun (290-800 nm). In comparison similar samples were also irradiated under UV radiation at 254 nm in order to study the direct photolysis. UV radiation at 254 nm decomposed PFOA to perfluoroheptanoic-, perfluorohexanoic- and perfluoropentanoic acids. The samples irradiated with an artificial sun contained no decomposition products and no decrease in PFOA concentration was observed. According to the detection limit of the products and typical solar radiation at the surface of ocean, the photochemical half-life for PFOA was estimated to be at least 256 years at the depth of 0 m, >5000 years in the mixing layer of open ocean and >25,000 years in coastal ocean. This is significantly more than the previously reported photochemical half-life of PFOA (>0.96 years).
Water Research | 2016
Pia Välitalo; Noora Perkola; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Markus Sillanpää; Jochen Kuckelkorn; Anna Mikola; Henner Hollert; Eija Schultz
Effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a major source of estrogenic compounds to the aquatic environment. In the present work, estrogenic activities of effluents from eight municipal WWTPs in Finland were studied. The main objectives of the study were to quantify the concentrations of selected estrogenic compounds, to evaluate their contribution to estrogenic potency and to test the feasibility of the commercial bioassays for wastewater analysis. The effluent samples were analyzed by two in vitro tests, i.e. ERα-CALUX(®) and ELISA-E2, and by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for six estrogenic compounds: estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), 17α-estradiol and bisphenol A (BPA). Estrogenic effects were found in all of the effluent samples with both of the bioassays. The concentrations measured with ELISA-E2 (8.6-61.6 ng/L) were clearly higher but exhibited a similar pattern than those with chemical analysis (E2 <limit of quantification - 6.8 ng/L) and ERα-CALUX(®) (0.8-29.7 ng E2 EEQ/L). Due to the concentrations under limit of quantification, the evaluation of the chemical contribution to estrogenic potency was possible only for E1 and BPA, which contributed less than 10% to the observed effects, except in one sample with a high BPA contribution (17%). The contribution of E2 was significant in two samples where it was detected (28% and 67%). The results demonstrated that more comprehensive information on potential estrogenic activity of wastewater effluents can be achieved by using in vitro biotests in addition to chemical analysis and their use would be beneficial in monitoring and screening purposes.
Science of The Total Environment | 2016
Maiju Happonen; Harri Koivusalo; Olli Malve; Noora Perkola; Janne Juntunen; Timo Huttula
Transport of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was simulated in the beginning of River Kokemäenjoki in Finland using one-dimensional SOBEK river model. River Kokemäenjoki is used as a raw water source for an artificial groundwater recharge plant, and the raw water intake plant is located near the downstream end of the model application area. Measured surface water and wastewater concentrations were used to determine the PFOA input to the river and to evaluate the simulation results. The maximum computed PFOA concentrations in the river at the location of the raw water intake plant during the simulation period Dec. 1, 2011-Feb. 16, 2014 were 0.92 ng/l and 3.12 ng/l for two alternative modeling scenarios. These concentration values are 2.3% and 7.8%, respectively, of the 40 ng/l guideline threshold value for drinking water. The current annual median and maximum PFOA loads to the river were calculated to be 3.9 kg/year and 10 kg/year respectively. According to the simulation results, the PFOA load would need to rise to a level of 57 kg/year for the 40 ng/l guideline value to be exceeded in river water at the raw water intake plant during a dry season. It is thus unlikely that PFOA concentration in raw water would reach the guideline value without the appearance of new PFOA sources. The communal wastewater treatment plants in the study area caused on average 11% of the total PFOA load. This raises a concern about the origin of the remaining 89% of the PFOA load and the related risk factors.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2017
Heidi S. J. Ahkola; Sirkku Tuominen; Sanja Karlsson; Noora Perkola; Timo Huttula; Sami Saraperä; Aki Artimo; Taina Korpiharju; Lauri Äystö; Päivi Fjäder; Timo Assmuth; Kirsi Rosendahl; Taina Nystén
Anthropogenic chemicals in surface water and groundwater cause concern especially when the water is used in drinking water production. Due to their continuous release or spill-over at waste water treatment plants, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are constantly present in aquatic environment and despite their low concentrations, APIs can still cause effects on the organisms. In the present study, Chemcatcher passive sampling was applied in surface water, surface water intake site, and groundwater observation wells to estimate whether the selected APIs are able to end up in drinking water supply through an artificial groundwater recharge system. The API concentrations measured in conventional wastewater, surface water, and groundwater grab samples were assessed with the results obtained with passive samplers. Out of the 25 APIs studied with passive sampling, four were observed in groundwater and 21 in surface water. This suggests that many anthropogenic APIs released to waste water proceed downstream and can be detectable in groundwater recharge. Chemcatcher passive samplers have previously been used in monitoring several harmful chemicals in surface and wastewaters, but the path of chemicals to groundwater has not been studied. This study provides novel information on the suitability of the Chemcatcher passive samplers for detecting APIs in groundwater wells.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2013
Noora Perkola; Pirjo Sainio
Environmental Pollution | 2014
Noora Perkola; Pirjo Sainio
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2016
Noora Perkola; Sanna Vaalgamaa; Joonas Jernberg; Anssi V. Vähätalo
Archive | 2013
Jukka Mehtonen; Jaakko Mannio; Kirsti Kalevi; Sami Huhtala; Jari Nuutinen; Noora Perkola; Pirjo Sainio; Jenna Pihlajamäki; Ville Kasurinen; Jani Koponen; Raija Paukku; Panu Rantakokko
Environmental Health Perspectives | 2018
Amélie Ritscher; Zhanyun Wang; Martin Scheringer; Justin M. Boucher; Lutz Ahrens; Urs Berger; Sylvain Bintein; Stephanie K. Bopp; Daniel Borg; Andreas M. Buser; Ian T. Cousins; Jamie C. DeWitt; Tony Fletcher; Christopher F. Green; Dorte Herzke; Christopher P. Higgins; Jun Huang; Hayley Hung; Thomas P. Knepper; Christopher Lau; Eeva Leinala; Andrew B. Lindstrom; Jinxia Liu; Mark A. Miller; Koichi Ohno; Noora Perkola; Yali Shi; Line Småstuen Haug; Xenia Trier; Sara Valsecchi
Archive | 2015
Noora Perkola; Janne Juntunen; Sirkku Tuominen; Taina Nystén; Kirsi Rosendahl; Timo Huttula; Tarja Pitkänen; Ari Kauppinen; Jaana Kusnetsov; Anna-Maria Hokajärvi; Päivi Meriläinen; Ilkka T. Miettinen; Maiju Happonen