Olatz Zuloaga

Stir-bar sorptive extraction: A view on method optimisation, novel applications, limitations and potential solutions

Introduced in 1999 as a novel solventless sample preparation method, stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) has become a popular analytical technique for the pre-concentration of organic compounds into a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated stir-bar. In the last 10 years, hundreds of applications in the environmental, food and biomedical fields can be found in the literature. However, only PDMS-coated stir-bars are commercially available, which reduces the applicability of SBSE to the extraction of the non-polar compounds due to the poor extractability of more polar analytes. In this review, a view on method optimisation, limitations, potential solutions such as in-house coatings and derivatisation and novel applications in multi-residue analysis and passive sampling are revised.

MultiSimplex optimisation of the solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls and phthalates from water samples

Solid-phase microextraction coupled to GC-MS was optimised for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalate esters and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water samples. A 30-microm polydimethylsiloxane fiber was immersed in a 30-ml water sample that contained the analytes of interest (PAHs, PCBs and phthalate esters) and the variables studied were extraction time (15-60 min), extraction temperature (30-90 degrees C), desorption time (1-5 min), desorption temperature (220-270 degrees C) and the addition of sodium chloride (0-9 g). The MultiSimplex programme based on the simplex algorithm was used to establish the optimal conditions. MultiSimplex allowed the simultaneous study of the variables mentioned above and considered the answers of all types of compounds studied in this work. Thus, the optimal conditions obtained allowed the simultaneous determination of PAHs, phthalate esters and PCBs. Furthermore, the accuracy and repeatability of the developed method were calculated from water samples spiked at known concentrations of the analytes. Finally, the optimised method was used to analyse water samples from different sampling points of the Urdaibai and Nerbioi-Ibaizabal estuaries (Biscay, Spain).

Selective determination of estrogenic compounds in water by microextraction by packed sorbents and a molecularly imprinted polymer coupled with large volume injection-in-port-derivatization gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

A fully automated protocol consisting of microextraction by packed sorbents (MEPS) coupled with large volume injection-in-port-derivatization-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (LVI-derivatization-GC-MS) was developed to determine endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) such as alkylphenols, bisphenol A, and natural and synthetic hormons in river and waste water samples. During method optimization, the extraction parameters as ion strength of the water sample, the MEPS extraction regime, the volume of organic solvent used for the elution/injection step, the type of elution solvents and the selectivity of the sorbents were studied. For optimum in-port-derivatization, 10 μL of the derivatization reagent N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)triufloroacetamide with 1% of trimethylchlorosilane (BSTFA+1% TMCS) was used. 17β-Estradiol-molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) and silica gel (modified with C-18) sorbents were examined for the enrichment of the target analytes from water samples and the obtained results revealed the high selectivity of the MIP material for extraction of substances with estrogen-like structures. Recovery values for most of the analytes ranged from 75 to 109% for the C18 sorbent and from 81 to 103% for the MIP material except for equilin (on C18 with only 57-66% recovery). Precision (n=4) of the entire analysis protocol ranged between 4% and 22% with both sorbents. Limits of detection (LODs) were at the low ngL(-1) level (0.02-87, C18 and 1.3-22, MIP) for the target analytes.

Distribution and bioaccumulation of PAHs in the UNESCO protected natural reserve of Urdaibai, Bay of Biscay.

Along 10 campaigns, from June 2002 to September 2004, the concentrations of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were measured in sediments and oysters (Crassostrea sp.) taken from four sites in the Unesco protected natural reserve of Urdaibai (Basque Country, Bay of Biscay). Total PAH concentration ranged from 0.7 to 140 microg kg(-1) (dw) in the case of sediments, and from 300 to 1400 microg kg(-1) (dw) in the case of oysters. During this study, the coast of the Bay of Biscay was severely affected by the Prestige oil spill (November 2002). Presumably, as a consequence of this accident, both spatial and temporal variations of the PAHs, as well as the sources of the PAHs were affected by the oil spill, and this effect was observed in the total concentrations and, especially, in several diagnostic ratios and in multivariate data analysis. Finally, both BAF (bioaccumulation factor) and BSAF (biota-sediment accumulation factor) parameters were calculated to conclude that particulate matter seems to be the most favourable uptake pathway of PAHs in oysters from this estuary.

Comparison of accelerated solvent extraction with microwave-assisted extraction and Soxhlet for the extraction of chlorinated biphenyls in soil samples

Abstract The extraction and determination of chlorinated biphenyls (CBs) in soils and solid wastes is an ongoing subject of study. This is an overview article that compares the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) techniques. The extraction of CBs by ASE has been optimised taking into account the variation of pressure, temperature and extraction time by means of experimental design and the Simplex approach. The recoveries obtained under the optimum conditions are compared and discussed with those obtained from MAE and Soxhlet extractions.

Simultaneous speciation of methylmercury and butyltin species in environmental samples by headspace-stir bar sorptive extraction-thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

In this work, making use of experimental designs, headspace-stir bar sorptive extraction (HS-SBSE) followed by thermal desorption (TD) coupled to a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the simultaneous determination of mercury and tin organometallic compounds present in surface water, sediment and biological tissue was optimized. All solid samples require a previous extraction typically done with diluted HCl or KOH/methanol solutions, and the derivatization, in all the cases, of the organometallic compounds with NaBEt(4). As a consequence, the preconcentration step was carried out in a 0.1 mol L(-1) HOAc/NaOAc buffer solution, with 0.1% (m/v) of NaBEt(4), without the addition of NaCl as a salting out reagent, and with the stir bar (20 mm x 1 mm) located in the headspace (HS). In addition, the desorption step required the following conditions: 250 degrees C (desorption temperature), 15 min (desorption time), 14.1 psi (approximately 97.2 kPa) (vent pressure) and 75 mL min(-1) (vent flow). Finally, to assure the extraction of all the analytes under equilibrium, 5h are required. Inorganic mercury (Hg(2+)) and tripropyltin (TPrT) were used as internal standards to correct for variations in the extraction, derivatization and detection steps. The resulting method provides precise (4-17%) and accurate (against four certified reference materials) results in the ng L(-1) and pg g(-1) range concentrations with recoveries within 80-120% for water samples. The proposed methodology is currently applied in the speciation analysis of specimens obtained in different estuarine sites of the Basque Coast.

Simultaneous preconcentration of a wide variety of organic pollutants in water samples. Comparison of stir bar sorptive extraction and membrane-assisted solvent extraction.

Stir bar soptive extraction (SBSE) coupled to thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) and membrane-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) coupled to large volume injection-programmed temperature vaporisation-GC-MS (LVI-PTV-GC-MS) were optimised for the simultaneous determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), phthalate esters (PEs), nonylphenols (NPs), polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in water samples. In the case of SBSE-TD, variables affecting the extraction (extraction time, addition of sodium chloride or methanol and sample volume) and desorption (cryofocusing temperature, desorption time and temperature, vent pressure and desorption flow) were fitted for the simultaneous determination. The extraction solvent nature (n-hexane, cyclohexane, n-heptane, ethyl acetate, toluene, dichloromethane or cyclohexane:ethyl acetate mixtures), as well as the addition of methanol (0-30%) and sodium chloride (0-20%), the extraction temperature (30-60 degrees C), shaking speed (250-750 rpm) and extraction time (5-150 min) were studied for the simultaneous membrane-assisted preconcentration. Finally, PTV-LVI variables such as injection volume (100-600 microL), injection speed (10-40 microL s(-1)), vent pressure (0-12.7 psi), vent time (0.05-0.8 min), vent flow (30-80 mL min(-1)), cryofocusing temperature (20-70 degrees C), split flow (20-100 mL min(-1)) and split time (1-5 min) were optimised. The optimisation was carried out by means of experimental design approaches in most of the cases. Precision (approximately 3-19% for both SBSE-TD and MASE-LVI-PTV), accuracy (approximately 80-120% for both SBSE-TD and MASE-LVI-PTV), limits of detection (LoDs) (0.1-222 ng L(-1) for MASE-LVI-PTV and 0.03-20.4 ng L(-1) for SBSE-TD in dependence of substance) and linearity (from 25 ng L(-1) up to at least 500 ng L(-1) for both procedures) were established for both procedures. Finally, the developed methods were applied to the determination of the free concentrations of PAHs, PCBs, PEs, NPs, PBBs and PBDEs in natural water samples (estuarine water and sea water) from the Bilbao estuary (Northern Spain) and comparable results were obtained with both procedures.

Comparison of microwave-assisted extraction and Soxhlet extraction for phenols in soil samples using experimental designs

A study and comparison of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and Soxhlet extraction for five phenols (phenol, 2-chlorophenol, 2-methylphenol, 2-nitrophenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol) in soils was carried out in order to establish a comparative analysis between the two techniques under their optimum conditions. The optimisation of both the MAE and Soxhlet extraction methods was achieved using experimental designs. The parameters studied were pressure inside the extraction vessel, extraction time, percentage of microwave power, solvent volume and percentage (v/v) of acetone in an acetone–hexane mixture for MAE and extraction time and percentage (v/v) of acetone in an acetone–hexane mixture for Soxhlet extraction. The simplex method was also used for obtaining the optimum conditions in some cases. The extracts were analysed by GC–MS or GC–FID.

Solid-phase extraction combined with large volume injection-programmable temperature vaporization-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the multiresidue determination of priority and emerging organic pollutants in wastewater.

In the present work the simultaneous extraction for the multiresidue determination in wastewater samples of organic compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalate esters (PEs), alkylphenols (APs), bisphenol A (BPA) or hormones included in different lists of priority and emerging pollutants because of their action as endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) was developed. Different solid phase extraction (SPE) variables such as the nature of the solid phase (Oasis-HLC, C18 and Lichrolut), the sample volume, the addition of MeOH and NaCl, the pH of the water phase and the volume of the eluent solvent were optimized in order to analyze simultaneously the priority and emerging families of pollutants mentioned above. Good recoveries were obtained for Milli-Q water (80-120%), however, since the use of deuterated analogues and dilution of the sample did not correct the matrix effect, additional SPE clean-up step using Florisil® cartridges was necessary to obtain good results for wastewater samples (80-125%). In order to improve the limits of detection (LODs), large volume injection (LVI) using programmable temperature vaporizer (PTV) coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was also optimized. Since analytes losses in the case of the most volatile congeners occurred during the derivatization step and no separation of the derivatized and the non-derivatized analytes was possible during SPE elution, two different injections were optimized for each analyte group. LODs were in good agreement with those found in the literature and relative standard deviations (RSDs) were in the 10-25% range for Milli-Q and 12-30% for wastewater samples. The method was finally applied to the determination of target analytes in three different wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs, Bakio, Gernika and Galindo (Spain)) and in one water purification plant (WPP) in Zornotza (Spain).

Optimisation and comparison of microwave-assisted extraction and Soxhlet extraction for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil samples using an experimental design approach

Optimisation of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) for the extraction of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from soil samples has been accomplished using an experimental design approach. Variables studied have been: percentage of acetone (v/v) in an acetone:n-hexane mixture, solvent volume, extraction time, microwave power and pressure inside the extraction vessel. Five samples of a certified soil (CRM 481) have been extracted under the optimum conditions of the developed method and the results have been compared to those obtained by Soxhlet extraction. Good recoveries (>95%) have been obtained for all the PCBs studied. All extracts have been analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and an optimum determination method for the electron impact mass spectrometric (EIMS) has also been developed.