Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P. J. Telford is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P. J. Telford.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2012

Modelling future changes to the stratospheric source gas injection of biogenic bromocarbons

R. Hossaini; M. P. Chipperfield; S. Dhomse; C. Ordóñez; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; N. L. Abraham; A. T. Archibald; Peter Braesicke; P. J. Telford; N. J. Warwick; X. Yang; J. A. Pyle

Simulations with a chemistry-climate model (CCM) show a future increase in the stratospheric source gas injection (SGI) of biogenic very short-lived substances (VSLS). For 2000, the modelled SGI of bromine from VSLS is similar to 1.7 parts per trillion (pptv) and largest over the tropical West Pacific. For 2100, this increases to similar to 2.0 and similar to 2.7 pptv when the model is forced with Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. The increase is largely due to stronger tropical deep convection transporting more CHBr3 to the lower stratosphere. For CH2Br2, CHBr2Cl, CH2BrCl and CHBrCl2, changes to primary oxidant OH determines their SGI contribution. Under RCP 4.5 (moderate warming), OH increases in a warmer, more humid troposphere. Under RCP 8.5 (extreme warming) OH decreases significantly due to a large methane increase, allowing greater SGI of bromine from these VSLS. Potentially enhanced VSLS emissions in the future would further increase these estimates. Citation: Hossaini, R., et al. (2012), Modelling future changes to the stratospheric source gas injection of biogenic bromocarbons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20813, doi:10.1029/2012GL053401.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Evaluation of simulated photolysis rates and their response to solar irradiance variability

Timofei Sukhodolov; E. Rozanov; William T. Ball; A. F. Bais; K. Tourpali; A. I. Shapiro; P. J. Telford; S. P. Smyshlyaev; Boris Fomin; R. Sander; Sébastien Bossay; Slimane Bekki; Marion Marchand; M. P. Chipperfield; S. Dhomse; Joanna D. Haigh; Thomas Peter; W. Schmutz

The state of the stratospheric ozone layer and the temperature structure of the atmosphere are largely controlled by the solar spectral irradiance (SSI) through its influence on heating and photolysis rates. This study focuses on the uncertainties in the photolysis rate response to solar irradiance variability related to the choice of SSI data set and to the performance of the photolysis codes used in global chemistry-climate models. To estimate the impact of SSI uncertainties, we compared several photolysis rates calculated with the radiative transfer model libRadtran, using SSI calculated with two models and observed during the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) satellite mission. The importance of the calculated differences in the photolysis rate response for ozone and temperature changes has been estimated using 1D radiative-convective-photochemical model. We demonstrate that the main photolysis reactions, responsible for the solar signal in the stratosphere, are highly sensitive to the spectral distribution of SSI variations. Accordingly, the ozone changes and related ozone-temperature feedback are shown to depend substantially on the SSI dataset being used, which highlights the necessity of obtaining accurate SSI variations. To evaluate the performance of photolysis codes, we compared the results of eight, widely used, photolysis codes against two reference schemes. We show that, in most cases, absolute values of the photolysis rates and their response to applied SSI changes agree within 30%. However, larger errors may appear in specific atmospheric regions because of differences, for instance, in the treatment of Rayleigh scattering, quantum yields or absorption cross-sections.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018

Simulating the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycleforcing with the UM-UKCA model: the role of detection method andnatural variability

Ewa Monika Bednarz; Amanda C. Maycock; P. J. Telford; Peter Braesicke; N. Luke Abraham; J. A. Pyle

The 11-year solar cycle forcing is recognised as a potentially important atmospheric forcing; however, there remain uncertainties in characterising the effects of the solar variability on the atmosphere from observations and models. Here we 15 present the first detailed assessment of the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle in the UM-UKCA chemistryclimate model using an ensemble of integrations over the recent past. Comparison of the model simulations is made with observations and reanalysis. Importantly, in contrast to the majority of previous studies of the solar cycle impacts, we pay particular attention to the role of detection method by comparing the results diagnosed using both a composite and a multiple linear regression method. We show that stratospheric solar responses diagnosed using both techniques largely agree with 20 each other within the associated uncertainties; however, the results show that apparently different signals can be identified by the methods in the troposphere and in the tropical lower stratosphere. Lastly, we focus on the role of internal atmospheric variability on the detection of the 11-year solar responses by comparing the results diagnosed from individual model ensemble members (as opposed to those diagnosed from the full ensemble). We show overall agreement between the ensemble members in the tropical and mid-latitude mid-stratosphere-to-lower-mesosphere, but larger apparent differences at 25 NH high latitudes during the dynamically active season. Our results highlight the need for long data sets for confident detection of solar cycle impacts in the atmosphere, as well as for more research on possible interdependence of the solar cycle forcing with other atmospheric forcings and processes (e.g. QBO, ENSO... etc.). Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-129 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 26 February 2018 c


Geoscientific Model Development | 2008

Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 2: The Troposphere

F. M. O'Connor; C. E. Johnson; Olaf Morgenstern; N. L. Abraham; Peter Braesicke; Mohit Dalvi; Gerd Folberth; Michael G. Sanderson; P. J. Telford; Apostolos Voulgarakis; P. J. Young; Guang Zeng; W. J. Collins; J. A. Pyle


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Observations of the eruption of the Sarychev volcano and simulations using the HadGEM2 climate model

James M. Haywood; Andy Jones; Lieven Clarisse; John E. Barnes; P. J. Telford; Nicolas Bellouin; Olivier Boucher; Paul Agnew; Cathy Clerbaux; Pierre-François Coheur; D. A. Degenstein; Peter Braesicke


web science | 2011

Impacts of HOx regeneration and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene: Consequences for the composition of past, present and future atmospheres

A. T. Archibald; J. G. Levine; N. L. Abraham; Michael Cooke; P. M. Edwards; Dwayne E. Heard; Michael E. Jenkin; A. Karunaharan; R. C. Pike; Paul S. Monks; Dudley E. Shallcross; P. J. Telford; L. K. Whalley; J. A. Pyle


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2007

Technical Note: Description and assessment of a nudged version of the new dynamics Unified Model

P. J. Telford; Peter Braesicke; Olaf Morgenstern; J. A. Pyle


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014

Aerosol microphysics simulations of the Mt.~Pinatubo eruption with the UM-UKCA composition-climate model

S. Dhomse; K. M. Emmerson; G. W. Mann; Nicolas Bellouin; Kenneth S. Carslaw; M. P. Chipperfield; R. Hommel; N. L. Abraham; P. J. Telford; Peter Braesicke; Mohit Dalvi; C. E. Johnson; F. M. O'Connor; Olaf Morgenstern; J. A. Pyle; Terry Deshler; Joseph M. Zawodny; Larry W. Thomason


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2013

Constraints on aerosol processes in climate models from vertically-resolved aircraft observations of black carbon

Zak Kipling; P. Stier; Joshua P. Schwarz; A. E. Perring; J. R. Spackman; G. W. Mann; C. E. Johnson; P. J. Telford


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2011

Global multi-year O 3 -CO correlation patterns from models and TES satellite observations

Apostolos Voulgarakis; P. J. Telford; A. M. Aghedo; Peter Braesicke; G. Faluvegi; N. L. Abraham; Kevin W. Bowman; J. A. Pyle; Drew T. Shindell

Collaboration


Dive into the P. J. Telford's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Pyle

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Braesicke

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olaf Morgenstern

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

X. Yang

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. R. Russo

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge