P. J. Telford
University of Cambridge
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. J. Telford.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
R. Hossaini; M. P. Chipperfield; S. Dhomse; C. Ordóñez; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; N. L. Abraham; A. T. Archibald; Peter Braesicke; P. J. Telford; N. J. Warwick; X. Yang; J. A. Pyle
Simulations with a chemistry-climate model (CCM) show a future increase in the stratospheric source gas injection (SGI) of biogenic very short-lived substances (VSLS). For 2000, the modelled SGI of bromine from VSLS is similar to 1.7 parts per trillion (pptv) and largest over the tropical West Pacific. For 2100, this increases to similar to 2.0 and similar to 2.7 pptv when the model is forced with Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. The increase is largely due to stronger tropical deep convection transporting more CHBr3 to the lower stratosphere. For CH2Br2, CHBr2Cl, CH2BrCl and CHBrCl2, changes to primary oxidant OH determines their SGI contribution. Under RCP 4.5 (moderate warming), OH increases in a warmer, more humid troposphere. Under RCP 8.5 (extreme warming) OH decreases significantly due to a large methane increase, allowing greater SGI of bromine from these VSLS. Potentially enhanced VSLS emissions in the future would further increase these estimates. Citation: Hossaini, R., et al. (2012), Modelling future changes to the stratospheric source gas injection of biogenic bromocarbons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20813, doi:10.1029/2012GL053401.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Timofei Sukhodolov; E. Rozanov; William T. Ball; A. F. Bais; K. Tourpali; A. I. Shapiro; P. J. Telford; S. P. Smyshlyaev; Boris Fomin; R. Sander; Sébastien Bossay; Slimane Bekki; Marion Marchand; M. P. Chipperfield; S. Dhomse; Joanna D. Haigh; Thomas Peter; W. Schmutz
The state of the stratospheric ozone layer and the temperature structure of the atmosphere are largely controlled by the solar spectral irradiance (SSI) through its influence on heating and photolysis rates. This study focuses on the uncertainties in the photolysis rate response to solar irradiance variability related to the choice of SSI data set and to the performance of the photolysis codes used in global chemistry-climate models. To estimate the impact of SSI uncertainties, we compared several photolysis rates calculated with the radiative transfer model libRadtran, using SSI calculated with two models and observed during the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) satellite mission. The importance of the calculated differences in the photolysis rate response for ozone and temperature changes has been estimated using 1D radiative-convective-photochemical model. We demonstrate that the main photolysis reactions, responsible for the solar signal in the stratosphere, are highly sensitive to the spectral distribution of SSI variations. Accordingly, the ozone changes and related ozone-temperature feedback are shown to depend substantially on the SSI dataset being used, which highlights the necessity of obtaining accurate SSI variations. To evaluate the performance of photolysis codes, we compared the results of eight, widely used, photolysis codes against two reference schemes. We show that, in most cases, absolute values of the photolysis rates and their response to applied SSI changes agree within 30%. However, larger errors may appear in specific atmospheric regions because of differences, for instance, in the treatment of Rayleigh scattering, quantum yields or absorption cross-sections.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Ewa Monika Bednarz; Amanda C. Maycock; P. J. Telford; Peter Braesicke; N. Luke Abraham; J. A. Pyle
The 11-year solar cycle forcing is recognised as a potentially important atmospheric forcing; however, there remain uncertainties in characterising the effects of the solar variability on the atmosphere from observations and models. Here we 15 present the first detailed assessment of the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle in the UM-UKCA chemistryclimate model using an ensemble of integrations over the recent past. Comparison of the model simulations is made with observations and reanalysis. Importantly, in contrast to the majority of previous studies of the solar cycle impacts, we pay particular attention to the role of detection method by comparing the results diagnosed using both a composite and a multiple linear regression method. We show that stratospheric solar responses diagnosed using both techniques largely agree with 20 each other within the associated uncertainties; however, the results show that apparently different signals can be identified by the methods in the troposphere and in the tropical lower stratosphere. Lastly, we focus on the role of internal atmospheric variability on the detection of the 11-year solar responses by comparing the results diagnosed from individual model ensemble members (as opposed to those diagnosed from the full ensemble). We show overall agreement between the ensemble members in the tropical and mid-latitude mid-stratosphere-to-lower-mesosphere, but larger apparent differences at 25 NH high latitudes during the dynamically active season. Our results highlight the need for long data sets for confident detection of solar cycle impacts in the atmosphere, as well as for more research on possible interdependence of the solar cycle forcing with other atmospheric forcings and processes (e.g. QBO, ENSO... etc.). Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-129 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 26 February 2018 c
Geoscientific Model Development | 2008
F. M. O'Connor; C. E. Johnson; Olaf Morgenstern; N. L. Abraham; Peter Braesicke; Mohit Dalvi; Gerd Folberth; Michael G. Sanderson; P. J. Telford; Apostolos Voulgarakis; P. J. Young; Guang Zeng; W. J. Collins; J. A. Pyle
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
James M. Haywood; Andy Jones; Lieven Clarisse; John E. Barnes; P. J. Telford; Nicolas Bellouin; Olivier Boucher; Paul Agnew; Cathy Clerbaux; Pierre-François Coheur; D. A. Degenstein; Peter Braesicke
web science | 2011
A. T. Archibald; J. G. Levine; N. L. Abraham; Michael Cooke; P. M. Edwards; Dwayne E. Heard; Michael E. Jenkin; A. Karunaharan; R. C. Pike; Paul S. Monks; Dudley E. Shallcross; P. J. Telford; L. K. Whalley; J. A. Pyle
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2007
P. J. Telford; Peter Braesicke; Olaf Morgenstern; J. A. Pyle
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
S. Dhomse; K. M. Emmerson; G. W. Mann; Nicolas Bellouin; Kenneth S. Carslaw; M. P. Chipperfield; R. Hommel; N. L. Abraham; P. J. Telford; Peter Braesicke; Mohit Dalvi; C. E. Johnson; F. M. O'Connor; Olaf Morgenstern; J. A. Pyle; Terry Deshler; Joseph M. Zawodny; Larry W. Thomason
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2013
Zak Kipling; P. Stier; Joshua P. Schwarz; A. E. Perring; J. R. Spackman; G. W. Mann; C. E. Johnson; P. J. Telford
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2011
Apostolos Voulgarakis; P. J. Telford; A. M. Aghedo; Peter Braesicke; G. Faluvegi; N. L. Abraham; Kevin W. Bowman; J. A. Pyle; Drew T. Shindell