P. Sugathan
Panjab University, Chandigarh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. Sugathan.
Physical Review C | 2006
K. Kalita; S. Nath; H. Majumdar; Mandira Sinha; R. Singh; P. Sugathan; N. Madhavan; P. Basu; A. Jhingan; R. Bhattacharya; S. Verma; T. Varughese; A. K. Sinha; V.V. Parkar; A. Shrivastava; J. J. Das; A. Chatterjee; S. Barua; S. Kailas; K. Mahata
Quasi-elastic-scattering and transfer reaction cross-section measurements were made for the {sup 7}Be+{sup 27}Al system at E{sub lab}=17, 19, and 21 MeV in the angular range {theta}{sub c.m.}=12 deg. An optical model (OM) analysis of the quasi-elastic scattering data was carried out. The fusion cross sections were derived at these energies by subtraction of the integrated transfer cross sections from the reaction cross sections obtained from the fits to quasi-elastic-scattering data. These fusion cross sections were found to be consistent with those obtained from the coupled-channels calculations. Elastic scattering and fusion cross sections were measured for the {sup 7}Li+{sup 27}Al system at E{sub lab}=10, 13, 16, 19, and 24 MeV. For elastic scattering the angular coverages were in the {theta}{sub lab}=12 deg. - 72 deg. range and for fusion the {alpha}-evaporation spectra from the compound nucleus were measured in the angular range {theta}{sub lab}=52 deg. - 132 deg. (142 deg. at 10 MeV). The elastic-scattering angular distributions were subjected to OM analysis. The {alpha}-evaporation spectra were reproduced with the statistical model calculations, and the fusion cross sections were extracted from them. The fusion cross sections were also extracted by subtraction of the integrated inelastic-scattering cross sections from the reaction cross sectionsmorexa0» obtained from the OM fits to the elastic-scattering data, and these fusion data were found to be consistent. The CCDEF calculations describe these data quite well. A comparison of the fusion data for the {sup 7}Be+{sup 27}Al and {sup 7}Li+{sup 27}Al systems shows a similar and consistent behavior.«xa0less
Physical Review C | 2007
Rajesh Kumar; S. K. Chamoli; I. M. Govil; A. Dhal; R. K. Sinha; L. Chaturvedi; Z. Naik; C. R. Praharaj; S. Muralithar; R. P. Singh; N. Madhavan; P. Sugathan; Jyotirmoy Das; R. K. Bhowmik
High spin states in {sup 52}Cr have been populated by means of the reaction {sup 27}Al({sup 28}Si,3p){sup 52}Cr at a beam energy of 70 MeV and studied with an array, consisting of eight Compton-suppressed clover germanium detectors. Eleven new {gamma} rays have been assigned to {sup 52}Cr and placed in the level scheme. The level structure of {sup 52}Cr has been extended up to E{sub x}{approx_equal}10 MeV. Spins and parities have been assigned to many of the levels on the basis of directional correlations and linear polarization measurements. The band structures are discussed in the framework of cranked Woods-Saxon and deformed Hartree-Fock (HF) models. Both the oblate and prolate orbits are considered for J projection in the HF model. The K=0{sup +} band is properly understood if we consider the J projection from both prolate and oblate orbits and collectivity shown by the K=4{sup +} band to be accounted for by taking the J projection from prolate HF configurations. Thus there is prolate and oblate shape coexistence in {sup 52}Cr.
REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation | 2009
Hardev Singh; K. S. Golda; Santanu Pal; Ranjeet; S. Mandal; Akhil Jhingan; R. P. Singh; P. Sugathan; P. D. Shidling; M. B. Chatterjee; S. K. Datta; G. Viesti; B. R. Behera; Gulzar Singh; I. M. Govil
The pre- and post-scission neutron multiplicities are measured for {sup 19}F+{sup 209}Bi reaction at E{sub lab} = 100, 104, 108, 112 and 116 MeV. The measured value of pre-scission neutron multiplicity was found to be increasing with the excitation energy. The comparison of experimental values with the statistical model calculations shows that the measured values are much larger than the model predictions. This difference in excess yield over the model predictions amounts to the survival time of 80{+-}5x10{sup -21} s for the {sup 228}U compound nucleus before it undergoes fission.
Physical Review C | 2006
K. Kalita; S. Verma; R. Singh; J. J. Das; A. Jhingan; N. Madhavan; S. Nath; T. Varughese; P. Sugathan; V.V. Parkar; K. Mahata; A. Shrivastava; A. Chatterjee; S. Kailas; S. Barua; P. Basu; H. Majumdar; Mandira Sinha; R. Bhattacharya; A. K. Sinha
Quasi-elastic-scattering and transfer reaction cross-section measurements were made for the {sup 7}Be+{sup 27}Al system at E{sub lab}=17, 19, and 21 MeV in the angular range {theta}{sub c.m.}=12 deg. An optical model (OM) analysis of the quasi-elastic scattering data was carried out. The fusion cross sections were derived at these energies by subtraction of the integrated transfer cross sections from the reaction cross sections obtained from the fits to quasi-elastic-scattering data. These fusion cross sections were found to be consistent with those obtained from the coupled-channels calculations. Elastic scattering and fusion cross sections were measured for the {sup 7}Li+{sup 27}Al system at E{sub lab}=10, 13, 16, 19, and 24 MeV. For elastic scattering the angular coverages were in the {theta}{sub lab}=12 deg. - 72 deg. range and for fusion the {alpha}-evaporation spectra from the compound nucleus were measured in the angular range {theta}{sub lab}=52 deg. - 132 deg. (142 deg. at 10 MeV). The elastic-scattering angular distributions were subjected to OM analysis. The {alpha}-evaporation spectra were reproduced with the statistical model calculations, and the fusion cross sections were extracted from them. The fusion cross sections were also extracted by subtraction of the integrated inelastic-scattering cross sections from the reaction cross sectionsmorexa0» obtained from the OM fits to the elastic-scattering data, and these fusion data were found to be consistent. The CCDEF calculations describe these data quite well. A comparison of the fusion data for the {sup 7}Be+{sup 27}Al and {sup 7}Li+{sup 27}Al systems shows a similar and consistent behavior.«xa0less
Physical Review C | 2006
K. Kalita; S. Verma; R. Singh; J. J. Das; A. Jhingan; N. Madhavan; S. Nath; T. Varughese; P. Sugathan; V.V. Parkar; K. Mahata; A. Shrivastava; A. Chatterjee; S. Kailas; S. Barua; P. Basu; H. Majumdar; Mandira Sinha; R. Bhattacharya
Quasi-elastic-scattering and transfer reaction cross-section measurements were made for the {sup 7}Be+{sup 27}Al system at E{sub lab}=17, 19, and 21 MeV in the angular range {theta}{sub c.m.}=12 deg. An optical model (OM) analysis of the quasi-elastic scattering data was carried out. The fusion cross sections were derived at these energies by subtraction of the integrated transfer cross sections from the reaction cross sections obtained from the fits to quasi-elastic-scattering data. These fusion cross sections were found to be consistent with those obtained from the coupled-channels calculations. Elastic scattering and fusion cross sections were measured for the {sup 7}Li+{sup 27}Al system at E{sub lab}=10, 13, 16, 19, and 24 MeV. For elastic scattering the angular coverages were in the {theta}{sub lab}=12 deg. - 72 deg. range and for fusion the {alpha}-evaporation spectra from the compound nucleus were measured in the angular range {theta}{sub lab}=52 deg. - 132 deg. (142 deg. at 10 MeV). The elastic-scattering angular distributions were subjected to OM analysis. The {alpha}-evaporation spectra were reproduced with the statistical model calculations, and the fusion cross sections were extracted from them. The fusion cross sections were also extracted by subtraction of the integrated inelastic-scattering cross sections from the reaction cross sectionsmorexa0» obtained from the OM fits to the elastic-scattering data, and these fusion data were found to be consistent. The CCDEF calculations describe these data quite well. A comparison of the fusion data for the {sup 7}Be+{sup 27}Al and {sup 7}Li+{sup 27}Al systems shows a similar and consistent behavior.«xa0less
Physical Review C | 2006
P. D. Shidling; N. M. Badiger; Subrata Nath; Ravi Kumar; A. Jhingan; R. P. Singh; P. Sugathan; S. Muralithar; N. Madhavan; Aloka Sinha; Santanu Pal; S. Kailas; S. Verma; K. Kalita; S. Mandal; R. Singh; B. R. Behera; K. M. Varier; M. C. Radhakrishna
Physical Review C | 2008
Hardev Singh; K. S. Golda; Santanu Pal; Ranjeet; Rohit Sandal; B. R. Behera; Gulzar Singh; Akhil Jhingan; R. P. Singh; P. Sugathan; M. B. Chatterjee; S. K. Datta; Ajay Kumar; G. Viesti; I. M. Govil
Physics Letters B | 2008
P. D. Shidling; N. Madhavan; Vs Ramamurthy; S. Nath; N. M. Badiger; Santanu Pal; Aloka Sinha; A. Jhingan; S. Muralithar; P. Sugathan; S. Kailas; B. R. Behera; R. Singh; K. M. Varier; M. C. Radhakrishna
Pramana | 2014
P. Sugathan; Akhil Jhingan; K. S. Golda; T. Varughese; S. Venkataramanan; N Saneesh; Vavilapalli Satyanarayana; Shashi Kant Suman; Jiju Antony; Ruby Shanti; K. P. Singh; Savita Saini; Asheesh Gupta; A. Kothari; P Barua; Rajesh Kumar; J. Zacharias; R. P. Singh; B. R. Behera; S. Mandal; I. M. Govil; R. K. Bhowmik
European Physical Journal A | 2010
S. Verma; J. J. Das; A. Jhingan; K. Kalita; S. Barua; K. S. Golda; N. Madhavan; P. Sugathan; S. Nath; T. Varughese; J. Gehlot; S. Mandal; Ranjit; P. K. Sahu; B. John; B. K. Nayak; V. Jha; A. Saxena; S. K. Datta; R. Singh