Palangie T

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: Preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6

The aim of this study was to assess a potential advantage in survival by neoadjuvant as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. 414 premenopausal patients with T2-T3 N0-N1 M0 breast cancer were randomised to receive either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil), followed by local-regional treatment (group I) or four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after primary irradiation +/- surgery (group II). Surgery was limited to those patients with a persisting mass after irradiation, and aimed to be as conservative as possible. 390 patients were evaluable. With a median follow-up of 54 months, we observed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.039) in survival in favour of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. A similar trend was seen when the time to metastatic recurrence was evaluated (P = 0.09). At this stage, no difference in disease-free interval or local recurrence between these two groups could be observed. The mean total dose of chemotherapy administered was similar in both groups. On average, group I had more intensive chemotherapy regimes (doxorubicin P = 0.02) but fewer treatment courses (P = 0.008) as compared to the treated patients in group II. Haematological tolerance was reduced when chemotherapy succeeded to exclusive irradiation. Breast conservation was identical for both groups at the end of primary treatment (82 and 77% for groups I and II, respectively). Of the 191 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant treatment arm, 65% had an objective response (> 50% regression) following four cycles of chemotherapy. The objective response rate to primary irradiation (55 Gy) was 85%. Improved survival figures in the neoadjuvant treatment arm could be the result of the early initiation of chemotherapy, but we cannot exclude that this difference might be attributable to a slightly more aggressive treatment. So far, the trend in favour of decreased metastases was not statistically significant. The local control appeared similar in both subgroups.

BREAST TUMOUR RESPONSE TO PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY PREDICTS LOCAL AND DISTANT CONTROL AS WELL AS SURVIVAL

The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate correlations between clinical response to chemotherapy and outcome in a subgroup analysis of premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery, treated with primary chemotherapy (n = 200) from a previously published trial (Scholl S.M., Fourquet A., Asselain B, et al. Eur J Cancer 1994, 30A, 645-652). Objective response rates amounted to 65% following four courses. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, comparing seven parameters, the following variables were associated with poor survival: clinically involved nodes [N1b:RR: 2.7 (95% CI 1.3-5.3)], the failure to respond to chemotherapy [D:RR: 2.62 (95% CI 1.3-5)] and a raised S phase fraction [SPF > 5%: RR: 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-5)]. Parameters associated with increased metastatic recurrence rates, by order of entry in the model, were: young age [< 35: RR: 2.46 (95% CI 1.2-5)], large clinical tumour size [T3: RR: 2.02 (95% CI 1.2-3.4)], poor histological grade (SBR III: RR: 1.93 (95% CI 1.1-3.3)] and the failure to respond to chemotherapy [D: RR: 1.91 (95% CI 1-3.4)]. The assessment of both tumour cell proliferation rates as well as possibly drug resistance markers (although not available in the present study) should be helpful in selecting patients likely to benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. The most accurate predictor of response in the present study appeared to be the response to chemotherapy treatment itself.

Meningeal Carcinomatosis in Patients with Breast Carcinoma Clinical Features, Prognostic Factors, and Results of a High- Dose Intrathecal Methotrexate Regimen

This retrospective study evaluates the results of a regimen of high‐dose intrathecal methotrexate and the prognostic factors for response in patients with meningeal metastases from breast carcinoma.

Prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer and therapeutic implications

223 inflammatory breast cancer patients were diagnosed at the Institut Curie between 1977 and 1987. Patients received chemotherapy and radiation treatment according to three consecutive randomised trials. Five- and 10- year survival rates were 41 and 32%, respectively. Disease-free interval rates were 25.5% at 5 years and 19% at 10 years. Parameters significantly linked with a pejorative prognosis in a multivariate analysis were: diffuse erythema, lymph node involvement, chest wall adherence, and age above 50 years. When therapeutic response parameters were included in the multivariate analysis, the five most important prognostic factors in order of significance were complete tumour regression after completion of induction treatment (at 8 months), complete regression of inflammatory symptoms after 3 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited erythema at presentation and, less significantly, complete regression of inflammatory symptoms at 8 months and tumour regression at 3 months. In conclusion, patients who achieved a rapid and complete remission had a better prognosis than patients who had an incomplete response to chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy and reversal or prevention of drug resistance will be evaluated in future trials. Detailed information on the biology of this disease should allow the design of new strategies aiming to improve patient management.

Prognostic factors for survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: the role of clinical response

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess predictive factors for clinical response to preoperative chemotherapy and prognostic factors for survival. From 1981 to 1992, 936 patients with T2-T3, N0-N1 breast cancer who received 2-6 months (median 4) of preoperative chemotherapy were selected from the Institute Curie database. Preoperative treatment was followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 8.5 years (range 7-211 months). The objective response rate before surgery and/or radiotherapy was 58.3%. In stepwise multivariate analysis (Cox model), favourable prognostic factors for survival were the absence of pathological axillary lymph node involvement (Relative Risk (RR) 1.54; P=0.0004), low histological tumour grade (RR=1.54; P=0.0017), clinical response to preoperative chemotherapy (RR=1.45, P=0.0013), positive progesterone receptor (PR) status (RR=1.56; P=0.0001), smaller tumour size (RR=1.37; P=0.005) and lack of clinical lymph node involvement (RR=1.42; P=0.007). The association of clinical tumour response with survival is independent of the baseline characteristics of the tumour. Clinical response could be used as a surrogate marker for evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before assessment of the pathological response.

Clinical phase II trial of recombinant dna interferon (interferon alfa 2b) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma

Twenty‐four patients with historically proven metastatic malignant melanoma were included in a Phase II trial of human DNA recombinant interferon (rDNA IFNα2). They were given 10 × 106 IU of IFNα2 subcutaneously three times a week until progression of disease or major intolerance developed. Twenty‐ two patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. General manifestations of intolerance were seen in all the patients. Hematologic toxicity was seen in six patients and therapy had to be interrupted in one patient. Mild liver toxicity was seen in most patients after 2 weeks of treatment. These manifestations disappeared within 2 weeks after treatment was discontinued. A partial response was seen in four cases lasting 2, 4, 4, and 5 months, respectively. There were two complete responses (one skin, one lymph node metastasis) lasting 20 and 6 weeks, respectively. These results indicate a potential role for rDNA IFNα2 in treating patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. However, further trials are required to determine the optimal dose and schedule of administration and modalities of combination. Cancer 58:215–218, 1986.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and repeated stem-cell support for inflammatory breast cancer patients: does impact on quality of life jeopardize feasibility and acceptability of treatment?

PURPOSE This study was designed to investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients enrolled onto the High-Dose Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Study Group trial (PEGASE 02), a French pilot multicenter trial of the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) aimed at evaluating (1) toxicity and feasibility of sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and stem-cell support and (2) response to HDC in terms of pathologic response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS QOL measures were performed at inclusion and four times subsequently up to 1 year using an ad hoc side-effect questionnaire (19 physical symptoms) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). RESULTS Of the 95 patients entered, the overall QOL questionnaire completion compliance was 75.6%. During cycle 3 of HDC, the number of symptoms was high (mean +/- SD QOL score, 10 +/- 3), with fatigue, hair loss, appetite loss, nausea, change in taste, vomiting, fever, and weight loss reported by more than 60% of patients. Toxicity and distress associated with HDC were reflected in the decline of four EORTC QLQ-C30 scores: global QOL (P =.001), and physical, role, and social functioning (P <.001 for all statistics). However, QOL deterioration disappeared after treatment completion, except for physical functioning (P =.025). One year after inclusion, most QOL scores returned to baseline, and both emotional functioning and global QOL scores were even higher than baseline (P =.030 and P =.009, respectively). CONCLUSION If it is confirmed that improvements in pathologic response rates with HDC effectively translate into increased probabilities of survival for IBC patients, adoption of such treatment as PEGASE 02 will not involve crucial choices between length of life and QOL and should not be delayed for QOL arguments.

ERBB2 overexpression in breast carcinomas : no positive correlation with complete pathological response to preoperative high-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy

The predictive value of ERBB2 amplification/expression to doxorubicin use is controversial. Preoperative chemotherapy, followed by the pathological assessment of tumour response to treatment provide optimal conditions for the evaluation of the predictive value of biological parameters. We report here data on the predictive value of ERBB2 in a series of 54 cases of breast cancer treated by preoperative high-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Our series consisted of 26 women presenting an inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and of 28 women with poor prognosis primary cancer (PPPC). Patients received a total of four cycles with doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2) for IBC or 70 mg/m(2) for PPPC) and cyclophosphamide (6 g/m(2) for IBC or 1400 mg/m(2) for PPPC), every 21 days. ERBB2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (clone CB11) performed on a tumour biopsy taken before chemotherapy. All patients underwent surgery as a second step of treatment, and the tumour response was assessed on pathological specimens. A complete pathological response was observed in 24 of the 54 cases (44%) (95% confidence interval (CI), 31-57). Pathological complete response was positively correlated with high histological grade (P=0. 02) and with the absence of oestrogen (P=0.003) or progesterone (P=0. 02) receptor expression. ERBB2 overexpression was found in 18 of the 54 cases (33%). A complete pathological response was observed in 33% of these cases (6/18). This figure was not significantly different from the 50% rate of complete response observed for tumours with no detectable ERBB2 expression (18/36). In this small series, ERBB2 overexpression was not a significant predictive marker of the pathological response to high-dose doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

Resection of pulmonary metastases in osteosarcoma. A retrospective analysis of 44 patients

Between 1977 and 1985,44 patients with osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastases were treated at Institut Curie and Marie‐Lannelongue. Twenty patients were able to undergo operations according to our criteria. Of 17 patients who immediately after surgery were clinically and radiologically free of disease, six are alive with no evidence of disease and one suffered recurrent pulmonary disease; their 5‐year survival is 37%. In 24 patients, various schemes for aggressive chemotherapy for measurable lung disease could be assessed. Only one patient had a complete response; there was one partial response, and three patients experienced stabilization of their disease for 6 to 8 months. Of five patients who had second line postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, four relapsed within 2 months of stopping treatment. Surgical resection of lung metastases appears definitely to improve the outcome in osteosarcoma patients. Chemotherapy offers no advantage in treating bulk disease, but the prevention of new micrometastatic disease remains a possibility and should be assessed in randomised multicenter trials.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: correlation between response and relapse?

The aim of this analysis was to assess how the clinical response to chemotherapy corresponded to long-term prognosis in patients of less than 35 years of age. A retrospective analysis was made of response and survival data of 609 premenopausal patients who had been treated by four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into three age groups (group 1, < or = 35 years; group 2, 35-40 years; group 3, > or = 41 years). Objective and complete clinical response rates were significantly higher in the youngest patients (below 35 yrs: P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively) in stark contrast to a particularly poor outcome of this subpopulation. Five-year local recurrence rates were 31% in the youngest patients, compared with 26% and 16% in groups 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.0007). Group 1 patients also had significantly higher 5-year metastatic relapse rates (41% versus 35% and 28%; P = 0.007) and 5-year survival figures were 70%, 82% and 84% for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P = 0.002). Finally, stratification by age and by response revealed that, whilst the outcome of the youngest patients was highly dependent on their response to primary chemotherapy, complete responders showed disease-free survival rates at 5 years that were lower than these of older patients, whatever their response. Despite a seemingly better control of the primary tumour by chemotherapy, the patients in the youngest age group remained at a high risk for local and metastatic relapse. This apparent paradox may be in part attributable to rapid disease progression of micrometastatic tumour subpopulations that are refractory to chemotherapy.