P. Beuzeboc

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: Preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6

The aim of this study was to assess a potential advantage in survival by neoadjuvant as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. 414 premenopausal patients with T2-T3 N0-N1 M0 breast cancer were randomised to receive either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil), followed by local-regional treatment (group I) or four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after primary irradiation +/- surgery (group II). Surgery was limited to those patients with a persisting mass after irradiation, and aimed to be as conservative as possible. 390 patients were evaluable. With a median follow-up of 54 months, we observed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.039) in survival in favour of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. A similar trend was seen when the time to metastatic recurrence was evaluated (P = 0.09). At this stage, no difference in disease-free interval or local recurrence between these two groups could be observed. The mean total dose of chemotherapy administered was similar in both groups. On average, group I had more intensive chemotherapy regimes (doxorubicin P = 0.02) but fewer treatment courses (P = 0.008) as compared to the treated patients in group II. Haematological tolerance was reduced when chemotherapy succeeded to exclusive irradiation. Breast conservation was identical for both groups at the end of primary treatment (82 and 77% for groups I and II, respectively). Of the 191 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant treatment arm, 65% had an objective response (> 50% regression) following four cycles of chemotherapy. The objective response rate to primary irradiation (55 Gy) was 85%. Improved survival figures in the neoadjuvant treatment arm could be the result of the early initiation of chemotherapy, but we cannot exclude that this difference might be attributable to a slightly more aggressive treatment. So far, the trend in favour of decreased metastases was not statistically significant. The local control appeared similar in both subgroups.

BREAST TUMOUR RESPONSE TO PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY PREDICTS LOCAL AND DISTANT CONTROL AS WELL AS SURVIVAL

The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate correlations between clinical response to chemotherapy and outcome in a subgroup analysis of premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery, treated with primary chemotherapy (n = 200) from a previously published trial (Scholl S.M., Fourquet A., Asselain B, et al. Eur J Cancer 1994, 30A, 645-652). Objective response rates amounted to 65% following four courses. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, comparing seven parameters, the following variables were associated with poor survival: clinically involved nodes [N1b:RR: 2.7 (95% CI 1.3-5.3)], the failure to respond to chemotherapy [D:RR: 2.62 (95% CI 1.3-5)] and a raised S phase fraction [SPF > 5%: RR: 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-5)]. Parameters associated with increased metastatic recurrence rates, by order of entry in the model, were: young age [< 35: RR: 2.46 (95% CI 1.2-5)], large clinical tumour size [T3: RR: 2.02 (95% CI 1.2-3.4)], poor histological grade (SBR III: RR: 1.93 (95% CI 1.1-3.3)] and the failure to respond to chemotherapy [D: RR: 1.91 (95% CI 1-3.4)]. The assessment of both tumour cell proliferation rates as well as possibly drug resistance markers (although not available in the present study) should be helpful in selecting patients likely to benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. The most accurate predictor of response in the present study appeared to be the response to chemotherapy treatment itself.

Prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer and therapeutic implications

223 inflammatory breast cancer patients were diagnosed at the Institut Curie between 1977 and 1987. Patients received chemotherapy and radiation treatment according to three consecutive randomised trials. Five- and 10- year survival rates were 41 and 32%, respectively. Disease-free interval rates were 25.5% at 5 years and 19% at 10 years. Parameters significantly linked with a pejorative prognosis in a multivariate analysis were: diffuse erythema, lymph node involvement, chest wall adherence, and age above 50 years. When therapeutic response parameters were included in the multivariate analysis, the five most important prognostic factors in order of significance were complete tumour regression after completion of induction treatment (at 8 months), complete regression of inflammatory symptoms after 3 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited erythema at presentation and, less significantly, complete regression of inflammatory symptoms at 8 months and tumour regression at 3 months. In conclusion, patients who achieved a rapid and complete remission had a better prognosis than patients who had an incomplete response to chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy and reversal or prevention of drug resistance will be evaluated in future trials. Detailed information on the biology of this disease should allow the design of new strategies aiming to improve patient management.

Prognostic factors for survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: the role of clinical response

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess predictive factors for clinical response to preoperative chemotherapy and prognostic factors for survival. From 1981 to 1992, 936 patients with T2-T3, N0-N1 breast cancer who received 2-6 months (median 4) of preoperative chemotherapy were selected from the Institute Curie database. Preoperative treatment was followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 8.5 years (range 7-211 months). The objective response rate before surgery and/or radiotherapy was 58.3%. In stepwise multivariate analysis (Cox model), favourable prognostic factors for survival were the absence of pathological axillary lymph node involvement (Relative Risk (RR) 1.54; P=0.0004), low histological tumour grade (RR=1.54; P=0.0017), clinical response to preoperative chemotherapy (RR=1.45, P=0.0013), positive progesterone receptor (PR) status (RR=1.56; P=0.0001), smaller tumour size (RR=1.37; P=0.005) and lack of clinical lymph node involvement (RR=1.42; P=0.007). The association of clinical tumour response with survival is independent of the baseline characteristics of the tumour. Clinical response could be used as a surrogate marker for evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before assessment of the pathological response.

[CCAFU Recommendations 2013: Prostate cancer].

INTRODUCTION The sub Comittee prostate of the CCAFU established guidelines for diagnostic, treatment, evaluation and standart of care of prostate cancer. METHODS Guidelines 2010 were updated based on systematic literature search performed by the sub-Comittee in Medline and PubMed databases to evaluate references, levels of evidence and grade of recommandation. RESULTS Pathological examination of the tissue specimens was defined specifically for Gleason score according to ISP 2005 recommandations. Prostate and pelvis RMN became the reference in terms of radiological exam. Individual and early diagnosis of prostate cancer was defined and role of PSA was precised. Active surveillance became one of the standart of care of low-risk tumors, radical prostatectomy remained one of the options for all risk group tumors, length of hormonotherapy in association with radiotherapy was precised according to the risk group. Side effects of hormonotherapy treament needed specific supervision ; hormonotherapy had no indication in case of non metastatic tumors and intermittent hormonotherapy in metastatic tumors. New hormonal drugs in pre and post chemotherapy and bone target drugs opened new therapeutics pathways. CONCLUSION From 2010 to 2013, standarts of care of prostate cancer were modified because of results of prospective studies and new therapeutics. They allowed precise treatments for each specific clinical situation. In the future, multidisciplinary treatments for high risk tumors, time of adjuvant treatment and sequencies of new hormonal treatment had to be defined.

Cell cycle modifications of breast cancers during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a flow cytometry study on fine needle aspirates

Breast cancer cells from 92 patients were obtained by repeated fine needle sampling and analysed by flow cytometry for cell cycle modifications during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Modifications of the histograms were observed for 47 of the 71 informative cases (66%), the most frequent concerning S-phase (increase or decrease) and G2M accumulation. These modifications correlated well with the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy (P < 0.0001). A significant relationship between clinical regression and pretreatment proliferative activity was also observed, with 31/35 (89%) responders in the high proliferation group (S-phase fraction > 5% or BrdU labelling index > 3.3%) compared to 20/36 (56%) in the low proliferation group (P < 0.002). For patients undergoing chemotherapy including doxorubicin, a high incidence of G2M accumulation was observed (33%), a modification which was rare (4.5%) for a regimen with no anthracycline, for which S-phase was the most frequently modified cell cycle compartment (64%). The measurement of the pretreatment tumour proliferative activity as well as the early kinetic modifications, as indicators of response, may prove interesting parameters for the future management of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

ERBB2 overexpression in breast carcinomas : no positive correlation with complete pathological response to preoperative high-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy

The predictive value of ERBB2 amplification/expression to doxorubicin use is controversial. Preoperative chemotherapy, followed by the pathological assessment of tumour response to treatment provide optimal conditions for the evaluation of the predictive value of biological parameters. We report here data on the predictive value of ERBB2 in a series of 54 cases of breast cancer treated by preoperative high-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Our series consisted of 26 women presenting an inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and of 28 women with poor prognosis primary cancer (PPPC). Patients received a total of four cycles with doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2) for IBC or 70 mg/m(2) for PPPC) and cyclophosphamide (6 g/m(2) for IBC or 1400 mg/m(2) for PPPC), every 21 days. ERBB2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (clone CB11) performed on a tumour biopsy taken before chemotherapy. All patients underwent surgery as a second step of treatment, and the tumour response was assessed on pathological specimens. A complete pathological response was observed in 24 of the 54 cases (44%) (95% confidence interval (CI), 31-57). Pathological complete response was positively correlated with high histological grade (P=0. 02) and with the absence of oestrogen (P=0.003) or progesterone (P=0. 02) receptor expression. ERBB2 overexpression was found in 18 of the 54 cases (33%). A complete pathological response was observed in 33% of these cases (6/18). This figure was not significantly different from the 50% rate of complete response observed for tumours with no detectable ERBB2 expression (18/36). In this small series, ERBB2 overexpression was not a significant predictive marker of the pathological response to high-dose doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: correlation between response and relapse?

The aim of this analysis was to assess how the clinical response to chemotherapy corresponded to long-term prognosis in patients of less than 35 years of age. A retrospective analysis was made of response and survival data of 609 premenopausal patients who had been treated by four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into three age groups (group 1, < or = 35 years; group 2, 35-40 years; group 3, > or = 41 years). Objective and complete clinical response rates were significantly higher in the youngest patients (below 35 yrs: P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively) in stark contrast to a particularly poor outcome of this subpopulation. Five-year local recurrence rates were 31% in the youngest patients, compared with 26% and 16% in groups 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.0007). Group 1 patients also had significantly higher 5-year metastatic relapse rates (41% versus 35% and 28%; P = 0.007) and 5-year survival figures were 70%, 82% and 84% for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P = 0.002). Finally, stratification by age and by response revealed that, whilst the outcome of the youngest patients was highly dependent on their response to primary chemotherapy, complete responders showed disease-free survival rates at 5 years that were lower than these of older patients, whatever their response. Despite a seemingly better control of the primary tumour by chemotherapy, the patients in the youngest age group remained at a high risk for local and metastatic relapse. This apparent paradox may be in part attributable to rapid disease progression of micrometastatic tumour subpopulations that are refractory to chemotherapy.

Predictive factors of response to first-line chemotherapy in 1426 women with metastatic breast cancer.

Since response to chemotherapy is a major determinant of survival in metastatic breast cancer, the purpose of our study was to analyse the predictive factors of response. 1426 patients enrolled into eight consecutive randomised trials of anthracycline-based first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, between 1977 and 1992, were analysed. A forward stepwise logistic regression analysis was used. The objective response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy in the total population was 63.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 61.5-67.7). The complete response rate was 17.5%. Multivariate analysis defined adjuvant chemotherapy, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Karnofsky index (KI), and pleural and lung metastases to be the five main variables correlated with ORR. A predictive score was calculated using the coefficient of these five variables, The score was established as follows: -1.32+0.54 (if prior adjuvant chemotherapy) +0.80 (low KI) +0.75 (raised LDH) +0.49 (lung metastases) +0.51 (pleural metastases). A low score (less than -0.78) was associated with an ORR greater than 70.0%, representing 41.2% of our population. An intermediate score (between -0.78 and 0) was associated with an ORR of 50 to 70%, representing 37.5% of our population and a positive score was associated with an ORR of less than 50%, representing 21.3% of our population. This score can be used to predict objective response rates to first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy. This method now needs to be evaluated prospectively in phase II trials. Identification of various risk groups may also be useful for interpretation and design of clinical trials.

Is primary chemotherapy useful for all patients with primary invasive breast cancer

Chemotherapy dose intensification in breast tumours is being evaluated in many multicentre trials, its indication being based on a clinical response in high-risk patients, thus selecting for tumours with rapid proliferation and low resistance. However, results from randomized trials are still pending. Clinical and pathological responses to therapy are valuable surrogate endpoints following primary chemotherapy. They will make it possible to distinguish at an early stage between patients who still retain an apoptotic response to chemotherapy and those patients whose disease will progress rapidly due to resistance mechanisms. For practical purposes, patients at risk and capable of responding represent the population of choice for primary systemic chemotherapy. Thus, by investigating mechanisms of response and resistance during the first courses of treatment we may target chemotherapy at those patients likely to benefit most from this treatment. A number of immunotherapy and vaccination trials are being conducted in many different centres. There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that cancer vaccines could help patients, but little yet in the way of solid, reproducible clinical data. Best responses to clinical testing would ideally be expected in early-stage disease because there is less tumour bulk and the patients immune system is still able to respond. Patients with early breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrence and who have failed to respond to primary chemotherapy might be given the option of participating in adjuvant vaccination trials following the completion of local therapy.