Patrizia Dell'Era

Nitric Oxide Promotes Proliferation and Plasminogen Activator Production by Coronary Venular Endothelium Through Endogenous bFGF

We reported previously that NO is responsible for the angiogenesis produced by endothelium-dependent vasodilating peptides. To investigate the mechanisms by which NO controls angiogenesis, NO was assessed for the ability to affect cell proliferation and upregulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) induced by basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) when added exogenously to or when produced endogenously by coronary venular endothelial cells (CVECs). The treatment of the cells with the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (NaNp) induced uPA upregulation and cell proliferation, which were prevented by anti-bFGF antibodies. Similarly, the NO-dependent mitogenic activity of the vasodilating peptide substance P (SP) was blocked by anti-bFGF antibodies, thus implicating endogenous bFGF in the NO-induced response. NaNp and SP induced bFGF expression as measured by Western blot analysis of CVEC extracts and by differential reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of bFGF mRNA. SP-induced upregulation of bFGF was prevented by the NO synthase inhibitor N omega-monomethyl-L-arginine. We conclude that NO promotes cell proliferation and uPA upregulation in CVECs by inducing endogenous bFGF and that this pathway mediates the angiogenetic response to the vasoactive neuropeptide SP. This signaling paradigm may provide an important link between shear rate, NO, bFGF, and coronary angiogenesis.

Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor–Induced Angiogenic Phenotype in Mouse Endothelium: A Study of Aortic and Microvascular Endothelial Cell Lines

The mouse is the most commonly used species for in vivo studies on angiogenesis related to tumor development. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, very few reports on the in vitro interaction of the angiogenic basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) with mouse endothelial cells are available. Three mouse endothelial cell lines originated from aorta (MAECs), brain capillaries (MBECs), and heart capillaries (MHECs) were characterized for endothelial phenotypic markers, in vivo tumorigenic activity, and the capacity to respond in vitro to bFGF. These cells express angiotensin-converting enzyme, acetylated LDL receptor, constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and bind Griffonia simplicifolia-I lectin. When injected subcutaneously in nude mice, MAECs induced the appearance of slow-growing vascular lesions reminiscent of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, whereas MBEC xenografts grew rapidly, showing Kaposis sarcoma-like morphological features. No lesions were induced by injection of MHECs. MAECs, MBECs, and MHECs expressed both low-affinity heparan sulfate bFGF-binding sites and high-affinity tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFRs) on their surfaces. In particular, MAECs expressed FGFR-2/bek mRNA, whereas microvascular MBECs and MHECs expressed FGFR-1/flg mRNA. Accordingly, bFGF induced a mitogenic response and the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 in all the cell lines. In contrast, upregulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression was observed in bFGF-treated microvascular MBECs and MHECs but not in MAECs. Also, bFGF-treated MBECs and MHECs but not MAECs invaded a three-dimensional fibrin gel and formed hollow, capillary-like structures. The relevance of the modifications of the fibrinolytic balance of mouse microvascular endothelium in bFGF-induced angiogenesis was validated in vivo by a gelatin-sponge assay in which the plasmin inhibitors tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid given to mice in the drinking water inhibited neovascularization induced by the growth factor. In conclusion, differences in response to bFGF exist between large-vessel MAECs and microvascular MBECs and MHECs. Both in vitro and in vivo data point to a role of the profibrinolytic phenotype induced by bFGF in microvascular endothelial cells during mouse angiogenesis. Our observations make these endothelial cell lines suitable for further studies on mouse endothelium during angiogenesis and in angioproliferative diseases.

Osteopontin (Eta-1) and fibroblast growth factor-2 cross-talk in angiogenesis

The cytokine/extracellular matrix protein osteopontin (OPN/Eta-1) is an important component of cellular immunity and inflammation. It also acts as a survival, cell-adhesive, and chemotactic factor for endothelial cells. Here, subtractive suppression hybridization showed that serum-deprived murine aortic endothelial (MAE) cells transfected with the angiogenic fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) overexpress OPN compared with parental cells. This was confirmed by Northern blotting and Western blot analysis of the conditioned media in different clones of endothelial cells overexpressing FGF2 and in endothelial cells treated with the recombinant growth factor. In vivo, FGF2 caused OPN expression in newly formed endothelium of the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) and of murine s.c. Matrigel plug implants. Recombinant OPN (rOPN), the fusion protein GST-OPN, and the deletion mutant GST-ΔRGD-OPN were angiogenic in the CAM assay. Angiogenesis was also triggered by OPN-transfected MAE cells grafted onto the CAM. OPN-driven neovascularization was independent from endothelial αvβ3 integrin engagement and was always paralleled by the appearance of a massive mononuclear cell infiltrate. Accordingly, rOPN, GST-OPN, GST-ΔRGD-OPN, and the conditioned medium of OPN-overexpressing MAE cells were chemotactic for isolated human monocytes. Also, rOPN triggered a proangiogenic phenotype in human monocytes by inducing the expression of the angiogenic cytokines TNF-α and IL-8. OPN-mediated recruitment of proangiogenic monocytes may represent a mechanism of amplification of FGF2-induced neovascularization during inflammation, wound healing, and tumor growth.

Deregulated FGFR3 mutants in multiple myeloma cell lines with t(4;14): comparative analysis of Y373C, K650E and the novel G384D mutations

The t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) chromosomal translocation occurs in approximately 20% of multiple myelomas (MM) and leads to the apparent deregulation of two genes located on 4p16.3: the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and the putative transcription factor WHSC1/MMSET. Interestingly, FGFR3 mutations known to be associated with autosomal dominant human skeletal disorders have also been found in some MM cell lines with t(4;14) but their pathogenetic role in MM is still controversial. Since cell lines may represent useful models for investigating the effects of deregulated FGFR3 mutants in MM, we analysed the expression, activation, signaling pathways and oncogenic potential of three mutants identified so far: the Y373C and K650E in the KMS-11 and OPM-2 cell lines respectively, and the novel G384D mutation here identified in the KMS-18 cell line. All of the cell lines present a heterozygous FGFR3 gene mutation and transcribe the mutated allele; unlike KMS-11 and OPM-2 (which express the IIIc isoform), the KMS-18 cell line expresses prevalently the isoform IIIb. We demonstrated that, under serum-starved conditions, KMS-11 and OPM-2 cells express appreciable levels of phosphorylated FGFR3 mutants indicating a constitutive activation of the Y373C and K650E receptors; the addition of the aFGF ligand further increased the level of receptor phosphorylation. Conversely, the FGFR3 mutant in KMS-18 does not seem to be constitutively activated since it was phosphorylated only in the presence of the ligand. In all three MM cell lines, ligand-stimulated FGFR3 mutants activated the MAP kinase signaling pathway but did not apparently involve either the STAT1 or STAT3 cascades. However, when transfected in 293T cells, G384D, like Y373C and K650E, was capable of activating MAPK, STAT1 and STAT3 under serum-starved condition. Finally, a focus formation assay of NIH3T3 cells transfected with FGFR3-expressing plasmid vectors showed that Y373C and K650E (albeit at different levels) but not G384D or the wild-type receptor, can induce transformed foci. Overall, our results support the idea that FGFR3 mutations are graded in terms of their activation capability, thus suggesting that they may play a critical role in the tumor progression of MM patients with t(4;14).

Cell membrane GM1 ganglioside is a functional coreceptor for fibroblast growth factor 2.

Free gangliosides bind fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), thus preventing cell interaction and biological activity of the growth factor in endothelial cells. Here we investigated the role of cell-associated gangliosides in mediating the biological activity of FGF2. Treatment of endothelial cells of different origin with the ganglioside biosynthesis inhibitors fumonisin B1, D-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol or D-1-threo-1-phenyl-2-hexa-decanoylamino-3-pyrrolidino-1-propanol-HCl, impairs their capacity to proliferate when exposed to FGF2. Also, the mitogenic activity of FGF2 is inhibited by the GM1-binding cholera toxin B subunit (CTB). Conversely, overloading of endothelial GM 7373 cell membranes with exogenous GM1 causes a 10-fold increase of the mitogenic potency of FGF2. 125I-FGF2 binds to cell membrane GM1 (Kd = 3 nM) in complex ganglioside/heparan sulfate-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1-pgsA745 cell mutants that were overloaded with exogenous GM1. Moreover, FGF2 competes with FITC-CTB for the binding to cell membrane GM1 in different CHO cell lines independently of their capacity to express heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Conversely, CTB inhibits cell proliferation triggered by FGF2 in CHO cells overexpressing the tyrosine kinase FGF receptor 1. Finally, GM1-overloading confers to FGF receptor 1-transfected, complex ganglioside-deficient CHO-K1 cell mutants the capacity to proliferate when stimulated by FGF2. This proliferation is inhibited by CTB. Cell proliferation triggered by serum or by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate is instead independent of the cell membrane ganglioside milieu. In conclusion, cell membrane GM1 binds FGF2 and is required for the mitogenic activity of the growth factor. Our data indicate that cell-associated gangliosides may act as functional FGF2 co-receptors in different cell types.

Shedding of Membrane Vesicles Mediates Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Release from Cells

Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), a polypeptide with regulatory activity on cell growth and differentiation, lacks a conventional secretory signal sequence, and its mechanism of release from cells remains unclear. We characterized the role of extracellular vesicle shedding in FGF-2 release. Viable cells released membrane vesicles in the presence of serum. However, in serum-free medium vesicle shedding was dramatically down-regulated, and the cells did not release FGF-2 activity into their conditioned medium. Addition of serum to serum-starved cells rapidly induced intracellular FGF-2 clustering under the plasma membrane and into granules that colocalized with patches of the cell membrane with typical features of shed vesicle membranes. Shed vesicles carried three FGF-2 isoforms (18, 22, 24 kDa). Addition of vesicles to endothelial cells stimulated chemotaxis and urokinase plasminogen activator production, which were blocked by anti-FGF-2 antibodies. Treatment of intact vesicles with 2.0 m NaCl or heparinase, which release FGF-2 from membrane-bound proteoglycans, did not abolish their stimulatory effect on endothelial cells, indicating that FGF-2 is carried inside vesicles. The comparison of the stimulatory effects of shed vesicles and vesicle-free conditioned medium showed that vesicles represent a major reservoir of FGF-2. Thus, FGF-2 can be released from cells through vesicle shedding.

Fibroblast Growth Factors and Their Receptors in Hematopoiesis and Hematological Tumors

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) belong to a family of pleiotropic heparin-binding growth factors. They exert multiple functions on various cell types of mesodermal and neuroectodermal origin, affecting cell proliferation, motility, survival, and differentiation. FGFs exert their activity by interacting with tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFRs) and cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. This article reviews recent studies on the role of the FGF/FGFR system in embryonic hematopoietic development, hematopoiesis, and hematological tumors. FGFs exert both autocrine and paracrine functions in these biological processes by acting on blood cells and their precursors and accessory cells in the bone marrow, including stromal and endothelial cells.

Biological activity of substrate-bound basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2): Recruitment of FGF receptor-1 in endothelial cell adhesion contacts

Substrate-bound FGF2 promotes endothelial cell adhesion by interacting with αvβ3 integrin. Here, endothelial GM7373 cells spread and organize focal adhesion plaques on immobilized FGF2, fibronectin (FN), and vitronectin (VN). αvβ3 integrin, paxillin, focal adhesion kinase, vinculin and pp60src localize in cell-substratum contact sites on FGF2, FN or VN. However, only immobilized FGF2 induces a long-lasting activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases1/2 (ERK1/2) and cell proliferation that was inhibited by the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD 098059 and the tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor tyrphostin 23, pointing to the engagement of FGF receptor (FGFR) at the basal side of the cell. To assess this hypothesis, GM7373 cells were transfected with a dominant negative TK−-ΔFGFR1 mutant (GM7373-ΔFGFR1 cells) or with the full-length receptor (GM7373-FGFR1 cells). Both transfectants adhere and spread on FGF2 but GM7373-ΔFGFR1 cells do not proliferate. Also, parental and GM7373-FGFR1 cells, but not GM7373-ΔFGFR1 cells, undergo morphological changes and increased motility on FGF2-coated plastic. Finally, FGFR1, but not TK−-ΔFGFR1, localizes in cell adhesion contacts on immobilized FGF2. In conclusion, substrate-bound FGF2 induces endothelial cell proliferation, motility, and the recruitment of FGFR1 in cell-substratum contacts. This may contribute to the cross talk among intracellular signaling pathways activated by FGFR1 and αvβ3 integrin in endothelial cells.

Nuclear localization of endogenous basic fibroblast growth factor in cultured endothelial cells

Indirect immunofluorescence using anti-human placental bFGF antibodies demonstrates the presence of bFGF-like reactivity in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus of adult bovine aortic endothelial cells and of normal and transformed fetal bovine aortic endothelial AG 7680 and GM 7372 cells. Biologically active immunoreactive Mr 18,000 bFGF can be isolated by heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography from the extract of GM 7372 cell nuclei. Quantitation of bFGF content by biological and immunological methods indicates that 100,000 bFGF molecules per nucleus are present in GM 7372 cells, with nuclear bFGF corresponding to 25-30% of total cellular bFGF. Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that the nuclear localization of newly synthesized bFGF occurs when GM 7372 cells are biosynthetically labeled both in the absence and in the presence of suramin, a molecule that inhibits the binding of bFGF to its plasma membrane receptor. Thus the data indicate that endogenous bFGF undergoes an intracellular sorting to the nucleus of the endothelial cell.

Paracrine and autocrine effects of fibroblast growth factor-4 in endothelial cells.

Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-4 (FGF4) and FGF2 induce extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 activation and DNA synthesis in murine aortic endothelial (MAE) cells. These cells co-express the IIIc/Ig-3 loops and the novel glycosaminoglycan-modified IIIc/Ig-2 loops isoforms of FGF receptor-2 (FGFR2). The affinity of FGF4/FGFR2 interaction is 20–30 times lower than that of FGF2 and is enhanced by heparin. Overexpression of FGF2 or FGF4 cDNA in MAE cells results in a transformed phenotype and increased proliferative capacity, more evident for FGF2 than FGF4 transfectants. Both transfectants induce angiogenesis when applied on the top of the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. However, in contrast with FGF2-transfected cells, FGF4 transfectants show a limited capacity to growth under anchorage-independent conditions and lack the ability to invade 3D fibrin gel and to undergo morphogenesis in vitro. Also, they fail to induce hemangiomas when injected into the allantoic sac of the chick embryo. In conclusion, although exogenous FGF2 and FGF4 exert a similar response in MAE cells, significant differences are observed in the biological behavior of FGF4 versus FGF2 transfectants, indicating that the expression of the various members of the FGF family can differently affect the behavior of endothelial cells and, possibly, of other cell types, including tumor cells.