Peisong Ma

Restricted epithelial proliferation by lacritin via PKCα-dependent NFAT and mTOR pathways

Renewal of nongermative epithelia is poorly understood. The novel mitogen “lacritin” is apically secreted by several nongermative epithelia. We tested 17 different cell types and discovered that lacritin is preferentially mitogenic or prosecretory for those types that normally contact lacritin during its glandular outward flow. Mitogenesis is dependent on lacritins C-terminal domain, which can form an α-helix with a hydrophobic face, as per VEGFs and PTHLPs respective dimerization or receptor-binding domain. Lacritin targets downstream NFATC1 and mTOR. The use of inhibitors or siRNA suggests that lacritin mitogenic signaling involves Gαi or Gαo–PKCα-PLC–Ca2+–calcineurin–NFATC1 and Gαi or Gαo–PKCα-PLC–phospholipase D (PLD)–mTOR in a bell-shaped, dose-dependent manner requiring the Ca2+ sensor STIM1, but not TRPC1. This pathway suggests the placement of transiently dephosphorylated and perinuclear Golgi–translocated PKCα upstream of both Ca2+ mobilization and PLD activation in a complex with PLCγ2. Outward flow of lacritin from secretory cells through ducts may generate a proliferative/secretory field as a different unit of cellular renewal in nongermative epithelia where luminal structures predominate.

Heparanase deglycanation of syndecan-1 is required for binding of the epithelial-restricted prosecretory mitogen lacritin

Cell surface heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans are carbohydrate-rich regulators of cell migratory, mitogenic, secretory, and inflammatory activity that bind and present soluble heparin-binding growth factors (e.g., fibroblast growth factor, Wnt, Hh, transforming growth factor β, amphiregulin, and hepatocyte growth factor) to their respective signaling receptors. We demonstrate that the deglycanated core protein of syndecan-1 (SDC1) and not HS chains nor SDC2 or -4, appears to target the epithelial selective prosecretory mitogen lacritin. An important and novel step in this mechanism is that binding necessitates prior partial or complete removal of HS chains by endogenous heparanase. This limits lacritin activity to sites where heparanase appears to predominate, such as sites of exocrine cell migration, secretion, renewal, and inflammation. Binding is mutually specified by lacritins C-terminal mitogenic domain and SDC1s N terminus. Heparanase modification of the latter transforms a widely expressed HS proteoglycan into a highly selective surface-binding protein. This novel example of cell specification through extracellular modification of an HS proteoglycan has broad implications in development, homeostasis, and disease.

Regulating thrombus growth and stability to achieve an optimal response to injury

Summary.  An optimal platelet response to injury can be defined as one in which blood loss is restrained and haemostasis is achieved without the penalty of further tissue damage caused by unwarranted vascular occlusion. This brief review considers some of the ways in which thrombus growth and stability can be regulated so that an optimal platelet response can be achieved in vivo. Three related topics are considered. The first focuses on intracellular mechanisms that regulate the early events of platelet activation downstream of G protein coupled receptors for agonists such as thrombin, thromboxane A2 and ADP. The second considers the ways in which signalling events that are dependent on stable contacts between platelets can influence the state of platelet activation and thus affect thrombus growth and stability. The third focuses on the changes that are experienced by platelets as they move from their normal environment in freely‐flowing plasma to a very different environment within the growing haemostatic plug, an environment in which the narrowing gaps and junctions between platelets not only facilitate communication, but also increasingly limit both the penetration of plasma and the exodus of platelet‐derived bioactive molecules.

RGS/Gi2α interactions modulate platelet accumulation and thrombus formation at sites of vascular injury

Although much is known about extrinsic regulators of platelet function such as nitric oxide and prostaglandin I(2) (PGI(2)), considerably less is known about intrinsic mechanisms that prevent overly robust platelet activation after vascular injury. Here we provide the first evidence that regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins serve this role in platelets, using mice with a G184S substitution in G(i2α) that blocks RGS/G(i2) interactions to examine the consequences of lifting constraints on G(i2)-dependent signaling without altering receptor:effector coupling. The results show that the G(i2α)(G184S) allele enhances platelet aggregation in vitro and increases platelet accumulation after vascular injury when expressed either as a global knock-in or limited to hematopoietic cells. Biochemical studies show that these changes occur in concert with an attenuated rise in cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels in response to prostacyclin and a substantial increase in basal Akt activation. In contrast, basal cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, agonist-stimulated increases in [Ca(++)](i), Rap1 activation, and α-granule secretion were unaffected. Collectively, these observations (1) demonstrate an active role for RGS proteins in regulating platelet responsiveness, (2) show that this occurs in a pathway-selective manner, and (3) suggest that RGS proteins help to prevent unwarranted platelet activation as well as limiting the magnitude of the normal hemostatic response.

A newly identified complex of spinophilin and the tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1, modulates platelet activation by regulating G protein–dependent signaling

Platelets are essential for normal hemostasis, but close regulation is required to avoid the destructive effects of either inappropriate platelet activation or excessive responses to injury. Here, we describe a novel complex comprising the scaffold protein, spinophilin (SPL), and the tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1, and show that it can modulate platelet activation by sequestering RGS10 and RGS18, 2 members of the regulator of G protein signaling family. We also show that SPL/RGS/SHP1 complexes are present in resting platelets where constitutive phosphorylation of SPL(Y398) creates an atypical binding site for SHP-1. Activation of the SHP-1 occurs on agonist-induced phosphorylation of SHP-1(Y536), triggering dephosphorylation and decay of the SPL/RGS/SHP1 complex. Preventing SHP-1 activation blocks decay of the complex and produces a gain of function. Conversely, deleting spinophilin in mice inhibits platelet activation. It also attenuates the rise in platelet cAMP normally caused by endothelial prostacyclin (PGI(2)). Thus, we propose that the role of the SPL/RGS/SHP1 complex in platelets is time and context dependent. Before injury, the complex helps maintain the quiescence of circulating platelets by maximizing the impact of PGI(2). After injury, the complex gradually releases RGS proteins, limiting platelet activation and providing a mechanism for temporal coordination of pro thrombotic and antithrombotic inputs.

Ontogeny of α-Amylase Gene Expression in Sea Bass Larvae (Lates calcarifer)

Abstract: The enzymatic activities of α-amylase and its corresponding messenger RNA levels in developing sea bass (Lates calcarifer) larvae were studied from hatching until 27 days post hatching (dph). An increasing activity of amylase enzyme was measured until 5 dph, and the activity gradually decreased thereafter and reached a constant level by 12 dph. To achieve a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying amylase expression, we have cloned and sequenced a 318-bp fragment of α-amylase complementary DNA. Based on this sequence, a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction technique to monitor the changes in the mRNA levels in the larvae was developed. A correlation between enzymatic activity and mRNA level of α-amylase could be demonstrated during the early development of sea bass larvae. This suggests that the changes in α-amylase are controlled at least at the transcriptional level during early larval development of sea bass.

Modulating platelet reactivity through control of RGS18 availability

Most platelet agonists activate platelets by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors. We have shown previously that a critical node in the G-protein signaling network in platelets is formed by a scaffold protein, spinophilin (SPL), the tyrosine phosphatase, Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1), and the regulator of G-protein signaling family member, RGS18. Here, we asked whether SPL and other RGS18 binding proteins such as 14-3-3γ regulate platelet reactivity by sequestering RGS18 and, if so, how this is accomplished. The results show that, in resting platelets, free RGS18 levels are relatively low, increasing when platelets are activated by thrombin. Free RGS18 levels also rise when platelets are rendered resistant to activation by exposure to prostaglandin I2 (PGI2) or forskolin, both of which increase platelet cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels. However, the mechanism for raising free RGS18 is different in these 2 settings. Whereas thrombin activates SHP-1 and causes dephosphorylation of SPL tyrosine residues, PGI2 and forskolin cause phosphorylation of SPL Ser94 without reducing tyrosine phosphorylation. Substituting alanine for Ser94 blocks cAMP-induced dissociation of the SPL/RGS/SHP-1 complex. Replacing Ser94 with aspartate prevents formation of the complex and produces a loss-of-function phenotype when expressed in mouse platelets. Together with the defect in platelet function we previously observed in SPL(-/-) mice, these data show that (1) regulated sequestration and release of RGS18 by intracellular binding proteins provides a mechanism for coordinating activating and inhibitory signaling networks in platelets, and (2) differential phosphorylation of SPL tyrosine and serine residues provides a key to understanding both.

Dissociation of SHP-1 from Spinophilin during Platelet Activation Exposes an Inhibitory Binding Site for Protein Phosphatase-1 (PP1)

We have recently shown that a critical regulatory node in the platelet signaling network lies immediately downstream of platelet receptors for thrombin and TxA2. This node is comprised of a scaffold protein (spinophilin, SPL), a protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP-1), and either of the two members of the Regulators of G protein Signaling family predominantly expressed in platelets (RGS10 or RGS18). The SPL/RGS/SHP-1 complex is present in resting platelets, dissociating when thrombin or TxA2, but not ADP or collagen, activate SHP-1 and release RGS10 and RGS18 to dampen signaling. Here we demonstrate an additional regulatory role for spinophilin, showing that dissociation of SHP-1 from spinophilin is followed by an increase in the binding of spinophilin to PP1, a serine/threonine phosphatase whose binding site maps to a region close to the SHP-1 binding site. The increase in PP1 binding to spinophilin is limited to platelet agonists that cause dissociation of the complex and is selective for the α and γ isoforms of PP1. Studies in cell culture show that SHP-1 and PP1 can compete for binding to spinophilin and that binding inhibits PP1 activity since over-expression of wild type spinophilin, but not spinophilin with a disabled PP1 binding site, causes an increase in the phosphorylation of myosin light chain, a well-characterized PP1 substrate. Collectively, these results indicate that in addition to regulating RGS protein availability in resting platelets, spinophilin can serve as a time-dependent, agonist- and isoform-selective regulator of PP1, inhibiting its activity when decay of the SPL/RGS/SHP-1 complex releases SHP-1 from spinophilin, exposing a binding site for PP1.

Applying the brakes to platelet activation

In this issue of Blood , Gegenbauer and colleagues provide a new insight into the regulatory mechanisms that allow platelets to produce an optimal response to vascular injury.[1][1] “Optimal responsiveness” in the context of hemostasis means preventing circulating platelets from activating

A Systems Approach to the Platelet Signaling Network and the Hemostatic Response to Injury

An essential part of the hemostatic response to injury is a well-calibrated accumulation of activated platelets. Here we will consider, first, how individual signaling and regulatory pathways in platelets combine to produce a flexible signaling network that can respond appropriately to injury under conditions that range from the macro- to the microcirculation and, second, how the piling up of platelets at a site of injury reshapes the local environment in ways that help to limit continued platelet accumulation. Using a systems biology perspective, we will examine the interrelationships between the platelet signaling network, the distribution of platelet agonists, and thrombus structure. The model that this produces moves beyond the behavior of any single platelet to consider the emergent properties of the platelet mass, thereby helping to explain why a multiplicity of agonists and signaling pathways are needed to produce an optimal hemostatic response.