Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter A. Politzer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter A. Politzer.


Nuclear Fusion | 2005

Development, Physics Basis, and Performance Projections for Hybrid Scenario Operation in ITER on DIII-D

M.R. Wade; T. C. Luce; R. J. Jayakumar; Peter A. Politzer; A. W. Hyatt; J. R. Ferron; C. M. Greenfield; M. Murakami; C. C. Petty; R. Prater; J. C. DeBoo; R. J. La Haye; P. Gohil; T.L. Rhodes

A potential new standard in stationary tokamak performance is emerging from experiments on DIII-D. These experiments have demonstrated the ability to operate near the free boundary, n = 1 stability limit with good confinement quality under stationary conditions. The normalized fusion performance is at or above that projected for Qfus = 10 operation in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) design over a wide operating range in both edge safety factor (2.8–4.7) and plasma density (35–70% of the Greenwald density). Projections to ITER based on this data are uniformly positive and indicate that a wide range of operating options may be available on ITER, including the possibility of sustained ignition. Recent experiments have demonstrated the importance of a small m = 3, n = 2 neoclassical tearing mode in avoiding sawteeth and the effect of edge localized modes on tearing mode stability at an edge safety factor near 3. Transport studies using the GLF23 turbulence transport code suggest that E × B shear stabilization is important in reproducing the measured profiles in the simulation. Yet, even in cases in which the toroidal rotation is moderate, confinement quality is robustly better than the standard H-mode confinement scalings.


Nuclear Fusion | 2005

100% noninductive operation at high beta using off-axis ECCD in DIII-D

M. Murakami; C. M. Greenfield; M. R. Wade; T. C. Luce; J. R. Ferron; H. E. St. John; M. A. Makowski; M. E. Austin; S. L. Allen; D. P. Brennan; K. H. Burrell; T. A. Casper; J. C. DeBoo; E. J. Doyle; A. M. Garofalo; P. Gohil; I. A. Gorelov; R. J. Groebner; J. Hobirk; A. W. Hyatt; R. J. Jayakumar; K. Kajiwara; Charles Kessel; J. E. Kinsey; R. J. La Haye; Jung-soo Kim; L. L. Lao; J. Lohr; J. E. Menard; C. C. Petty

The Advanced Tokamak (AT) program on DIII-D is developing the scientific basis for steady-state, high-performance operation in future devices. The key element of the program is to demonstrate sustainment of 100% noninductive current for several seconds at high beta. Guided by integrated modeling, recent experiments using up to 2.5 MW of off-axis electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) and up to 15 MW neutral beam injection (NBI) with q95 ≈ 5 have sustained ≈100% of the plasma current noninductively for 1 s at high beta (β ≈ 3.6%, βN ≈ 3.4, above the no-wall limit) with qmin ≥ 1.5 and good confinement (H89 ≈ 2.3). Integrated modeling using both empirical and theory-based models is used to design experiments and to interpret their results. These experiments have achieved the parameters required for the ITER Q=5 steady-state scenario, and the same modeling tools are applied to ITER AT scenario development.


Fusion Science and Technology | 2003

Feasibility study of a compact ignition tokamak based upon gyrobohm scaling physics

Clinton Craig Petty; James Craig DeBoo; Robert J La Haye; Timothy Charles Luce; Peter A. Politzer; C.P.C. Wong

The design of a reduced size (R = 4.45 m, BT = 5.04 T) ignition tokamak (Q = ∞) with superconducting coils using a standard ELMing H-mode plasma appears to be feasible. This effective size (BT2/3R5/6) is smaller than current proposals for Q = 10 burning (D-T) plasma experiments. The good confinement required for ignition with this small effective size is obtained by operating along a gyroBohm scaling path starting from the existing tokamak database at high beta (β = 4.1%) so that the loss power from core transport exceeds the H-mode threshold power. Using a design that can achieve a high normalized current (Ip/aBT = 1.63) also helps to decrease the size of the machine. The design of this relatively compact ignition tokamak satisfies reasonable engineering constraints on the superconducting toroidal field coils and central solenoid, and allows for a sufficiently long burn time for the plasma current to relax to its final state.


Physics of Plasmas | 2004

High performance advanced tokamak regimes in DIII-D for next-step experiments

C. M. Greenfield; M. Murakami; J. R. Ferron; M. R. Wade; T. C. Luce; C. C. Petty; J. E. Menard; T. W. Petrie; S. L. Allen; K. H. Burrell; T. A. Casper; J. C. DeBoo; E. J. Doyle; A. M. Garofalo; I. A. Gorelov; R. J. Groebner; J. Hobirk; A. W. Hyatt; R. J. Jayakumar; Charles Kessel; R. J. La Haye; G. L. Jackson; J. Lohr; M. A. Makowski; R. I. Pinsker; Peter A. Politzer; R. Prater; E. J. Strait; T. S. Taylor; W. P. West

Advanced Tokamak (AT) research in DIII-D [K. H. Burrell for the DIII-D Team, in Proceedings of the 19th Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon, France, 2002 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2002) published on CD-ROM] seeks to provide a scientific basis for steady-state high performance operation in future devices. These regimes require high toroidal beta to maximize fusion output and poloidal beta to maximize the self-driven bootstrap current. Achieving these conditions requires integrated, simultaneous control of the current and pressure profiles, and active magnetohydrodynamic stability control. The building blocks for AT operation are in hand. Resistive wall mode stabilization via plasma rotation and active feedback with nonaxisymmetric coils allows routine operation above the no-wall beta limit. Neoclassical tearing modes are stabilized by active feedback control of localized electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD). Plasma shaping and profile control provide further improvements. Under these condi...


20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference | 2005

100% noninductive operation at high beta using off-axis ECCD

M. Murakami; C. M. Greenfield; M. R. Wade; T. C. Luce; J. R. Ferron; H. E. St. John; M. A. Makowski; M. E. Austin; S. L. Allen; D. P. Brennan; K. H. Burrell; T. A. Casper; J. C. DeBoo; E. J. Doyle; A. M. Garofalo; P. Gohil; I. A. Gorelov; R. J. Groebner; J. Hobirk; A. W. Hyatt; R. J. Jayakumar; K. Kajiwara; Charles Kessel; J. E. Kinsey; R. J. LaHaye; Jung-soo Kim; L. L. Lao; J. Lohr; J. E. Menard; C. C. Petty


Archive | 2009

Progress in Developing ITER Operational Scenarios on DIII-D

E. J. Doyle; J. C. Deboo; J.R. Ferron; R.J. La Haye; Jon E. Kinsey; T.C. Luce; Peter A. Politzer


Archive | 2003

Comparison of Sawteeth in Ovals and Beans

E. A. Lazarus; Michael R. Wade; M. E. Austin; F. L. Waelbrock; Keith H. Burrell; M. S. Chu; A.W. Hyatt; T.C. Luce; T.H. Osborne; C. C. Petty; Peter A. Politzer; R. Prater; J. T. Scoville; R. J. Jayakumar; Michael A. Makowski; H. Reimerdes


Archive | 2003

Existence Domain of Stationary, High Performance Discharges in DIII-D

Michael R. Wade; T.C. Luce; J.R. Ferron; A.W. Hyatt; Peter A. Politzer; A. C. C. Sips


Archive | 2003

High Bootstrap Fraction, Transformerless, Quasi-Stationary Operation of DIII-D

Peter A. Politzer; A.W. Hyatt; T.C. Luce; M. Ali Mahdavi; C. C. Petty; R. Prater; Alan D. Turnbull; J.R. Ferron; R.J. La Haye; M. Murakamai; E. A. Lazarus; Francis Perkins; T. A. Casper; R. J. Jayakumar


Archive | 2002

Comparison of Measured and Calculated beta Limits in DIII-D Steady-State Scenario Discharges

J.R. Ferron; C. M. Greenfield; T.C. Luce; Peter A. Politzer; Alan D. Turnbull; A. M. Garofalo; Masami Murakami; Michael R. Wade

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter A. Politzer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael R. Wade

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. J. Jayakumar

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. A. Casper

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge