Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter H. Zwart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter H. Zwart.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2010

PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution

Paul D. Adams; Pavel V. Afonine; Gábor Bunkóczi; Vincent B. Chen; Ian W. Davis; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Li-Wei Hung; Gary J. Kapral; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Robert D. Oeffner; Randy J. Read; David C. Richardson; Jane S. Richardson; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Peter H. Zwart

The PHENIX software for macromolecular structure determination is described.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2012

Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine.

Pavel V. Afonine; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Nigel W. Moriarty; Marat Mustyakimov; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Alexandre Urzhumtsev; Peter H. Zwart; Paul D. Adams

phenix.refine is a program within the PHENIX package that supports crystallographic structure refinement against experimental data with a wide range of upper resolution limits using a large repertoire of model parameterizations. This paper presents an overview of the major phenix.refine features, with extensive literature references for readers interested in more detailed discussions of the methods.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2008

Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard

Thomas C. Terwilliger; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Nigel W. Moriarty; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung; Randy J. Read; Paul D. Adams

The highly automated PHENIX AutoBuild wizard is described. The procedure can be applied equally well to phases derived from isomorphous/anomalous and molecular-replacement methods.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2009

Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: the PHENIX AutoSol wizard

Thomas C. Terwilliger; Paul D. Adams; Randy J. Read; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung

Ten measures of experimental electron-density-map quality are examined and the skewness of electron density is found to be the best indicator of actual map quality. A Bayesian approach to estimating map quality is developed and used in the PHENIX AutoSol wizard to make decisions during automated structure solution.


Methods | 2011

The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures.

Paul D. Adams; Pavel V. Afonine; Gábor Bunkóczi; Vincent B. Chen; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Li-Wei Hung; Swati Jain; Gary J. Kapral; Ralf W. Grosse Kunstleve; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Robert D. Oeffner; Randy J. Read; David C. Richardson; Jane S. Richardson; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Peter H. Zwart

X-ray crystallography is a critical tool in the study of biological systems. It is able to provide information that has been a prerequisite to understanding the fundamentals of life. It is also a method that is central to the development of new therapeutics for human disease. Significant time and effort are required to determine and optimize many macromolecular structures because of the need for manual interpretation of complex numerical data, often using many different software packages, and the repeated use of interactive three-dimensional graphics. The Phenix software package has been developed to provide a comprehensive system for macromolecular crystallographic structure solution with an emphasis on automation. This has required the development of new algorithms that minimize or eliminate subjective input in favor of built-in expert-systems knowledge, the automation of procedures that are traditionally performed by hand, and the development of a computational framework that allows a tight integration between the algorithms. The application of automated methods is particularly appropriate in the field of structural proteomics, where high throughput is desired. Features in Phenix for the automation of experimental phasing with subsequent model building, molecular replacement, structure refinement and validation are described and examples given of running Phenix from both the command line and graphical user interface.


Methods of Molecular Biology | 2008

Automated Structure Solution with the PHENIX Suite

Peter H. Zwart; Pavel V. Afonine; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Li-Wei Hung; Thomas R. Ioerger; Airlie J. McCoy; Erik McKee; Nigel W. Moriarty; Randy J. Read; James C. Sacchettini; Nicholas K. Sauter; Laurent C. Storoni; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Paul D. Adams

Significant time and effort are often required to solve and complete a macromolecular crystal structure. The development of automated computational methods for the analysis, solution, and completion of crystallographic structures has the potential to produce minimally biased models in a short time without the need for manual intervention. The PHENIX software suite is a highly automated system for macromolecular structure determination that can rapidly arrive at an initial partial model of a structure without significant human intervention, given moderate resolution, and good quality data. This achievement has been made possible by the development of new algorithms for structure determination, maximum-likelihood molecular replacement (PHASER), heavy-atom search (HySS), template- and pattern-based automated model-building (RESOLVE, TEXTAL), automated macromolecular refinement (phenix. refine), and iterative model-building, density modification and refinement that can operate at moderate resolution (RESOLVE, AutoBuild). These algorithms are based on a highly integrated and comprehensive set of crystallographic libraries that have been built and made available to the community. The algorithms are tightly linked and made easily accessible to users through the PHENIX Wizards and the PHENIX GUI.


Structure | 2011

A New Generation of Crystallographic Validation Tools for the Protein Data Bank

Randy J. Read; Paul D. Adams; W. Bryan Arendall; Axel T. Brunger; Paul Emsley; Robbie P. Joosten; Gerard J. Kleywegt; Eugene Krissinel; Thomas Lütteke; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Anastassis Perrakis; Jane S. Richardson; William Sheffler; Janet L. Smith; Ian J. Tickle; Gert Vriend; Peter H. Zwart

Summary This report presents the conclusions of the X-ray Validation Task Force of the worldwide Protein Data Bank (PDB). The PDB has expanded massively since current criteria for validation of deposited structures were adopted, allowing a much more sophisticated understanding of all the components of macromolecular crystals. The size of the PDB creates new opportunities to validate structures by comparison with the existing database, and the now-mandatory deposition of structure factors creates new opportunities to validate the underlying diffraction data. These developments highlighted the need for a new assessment of validation criteria. The Task Force recommends that a small set of validation data be presented in an easily understood format, relative to both the full PDB and the applicable resolution class, with greater detail available to interested users. Most importantly, we recommend that referees and editors judging the quality of structural experiments have access to a concise summary of well-established quality indicators.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2008

Iterative-build OMIT maps: map improvement by iterative model building and refinement without model bias

Thomas C. Terwilliger; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Nigel W. Moriarty; Paul D. Adams; Randy J. Read; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung

An OMIT procedure is presented that has the benefits of iterative model building density modification and refinement yet is essentially unbiased by the atomic model that is built.


Journal of Applied Crystallography | 2010

phenix.model_vs_data: a high-level tool for the calculation of crystallographic model and data statistics

Pavel V. Afonine; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Vincent B. Chen; Jeffrey J. Headd; Nigel W. Moriarty; Jane S. Richardson; David C. Richardson; Alexandre Urzhumtsev; Peter H. Zwart; Paul D. Adams

Application of phenix.model_vs_data to the contents of the Protein Data Bank shows that the vast majority of deposited structures can be automatically analyzed to reproduce the reported quality statistics. However, the small fraction of structures that elude automated re-analysis highlight areas where new software developments can help retain valuable information for future analysis.


Science | 2016

De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network-mediated specificity

Zibo Chen; Benjamin Groves; Robert A. Langan; Gustav Oberdorfer; Alex Ford; Jason Gilmore; Chunfu Xu; Frank DiMaio; Jose H. Pereira; Banumathi Sankaran; Georg Seelig; Peter H. Zwart; David Baker

Building with designed proteins General design principles for protein interaction specificity are challenging to extract. DNA nanotechnology, on the other hand, has harnessed the limited set of hydrogen-bonding interactions from Watson-Crick base-pairing to design and build a wide range of shapes. Protein-based materials have the potential for even greater geometric and chemical diversity, including additional functionality. Boyken et al. designed a class of protein oligomers that have interaction specificity determined by modular arrays of extensive hydrogen bond networks (see the Perspective by Netzer and Fleishman). They use the approach, which could one day become programmable, to build novel topologies with two concentric rings of helices. Science, this issue p. 680; see also p. 657 Protein oligomers with designed arrays of hydrogen bond networks enable programming of interaction specificity. In nature, structural specificity in DNA and proteins is encoded differently: In DNA, specificity arises from modular hydrogen bonds in the core of the double helix, whereas in proteins, specificity arises largely from buried hydrophobic packing complemented by irregular peripheral polar interactions. Here, we describe a general approach for designing a wide range of protein homo-oligomers with specificity determined by modular arrays of central hydrogen-bond networks. We use the approach to design dimers, trimers, and tetramers consisting of two concentric rings of helices, including previously not seen triangular, square, and supercoiled topologies. X-ray crystallography confirms that the structures overall, and the hydrogen-bond networks in particular, are nearly identical to the design models, and the networks confer interaction specificity in vivo. The ability to design extensive hydrogen-bond networks with atomic accuracy enables the programming of protein interaction specificity for a broad range of synthetic biology applications; more generally, our results demonstrate that, even with the tremendous diversity observed in nature, there are fundamentally new modes of interaction to be discovered in proteins.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter H. Zwart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul D. Adams

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas C. Terwilliger

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Banumathi Sankaran

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nigel W. Moriarty

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pavel V. Afonine

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Li-Wei Hung

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey J. Headd

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Billy K. Poon

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge