Philippe Perré

Average Adherence to Boosted Protease Inhibitor Therapy, rather than the Pattern of Missed Doses, as a Predictor of HIV RNA Replication

Consecutive missed doses may differentially impact the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy associated with the use of a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI). In a cohort of 72 subjects receiving a boosted PI, average adherence to dosage was a better predictor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication than was the duration or frequency of treatment interruption. In contrast with an NNRTI, consecutive missed doses of a boosted PI did not emerge as a major risk factor for HIV replication.

Substitution of a Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor for a Protease Inhibitor in the Treatment of Patients with Undetectable Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA

Seventy-three patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) were enrolled in a prospective observational study to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of substituting a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for a protease inhibitor (PI) in patients whose plasma viral load (pVL) was controlled by a PI regimen. After a median follow-up of 52 weeks, 63 patients (86.3%) had undetectable pVLs. The incidence of virological breakthrough at 12 months of follow-up was 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1-20) among patients who had been antiretroviral naive before receiving HAART and 19.2% (95% CI, 6-34) among patients who had been treated with antiretroviral drugs before receiving the PI regimen (P=.10).

Multicentre experience using daclatasvir and sofosbuvir to treat hepatitis C recurrence – The ANRS CUPILT study

BACKGROUND & AIMSnHCV recurrence remains a major issue in the liver transplant field, as it has a negative impact on both graft and patient survival. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of treating HCV recurrence with sofosbuvir (SOF) and daclatasvir (DCV) combination therapy.nnnMETHODSnFrom October 2013 to March 2015, 559 liver recipients were enrolled in the prospective multicentre France REcherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites (ANRS) Compassionate use of Protease Inhibitors in viral C Liver Transplantation cohort. We selected 137 patients with an HCV recurrence receiving SOF and DCV, whatever the genotype or fibrosis stage. The use of ribavirin and the duration of therapy were at the investigators discretion. The primary efficacy end point was a sustained virological response (SVR) 12weeks after the end of treatment.nnnRESULTSnThe SVR rate 12weeks after completing treatment was 96% under the intention-to treat analysis and 99% when excluding non-virological failures. Only two patients experienced a virological failure. The serious adverse event (SAE) rate reached 17.5%. Four patients (3%) stopped their treatment prematurely because of SAEs. Anaemia was the most common AE, with significantly more cases in the ribavirin group (56% vs. 18%; p<0.0001). A slight but significant reduction in creatinine clearance was reported. No clinically relevant drug-drug interactions were noted, but 52% of patients required a change to the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTreatment with SOF plus DCV was associated with a high SVR12 and low rates of serious adverse events among liver recipients with HCV recurrence.nnnLAY SUMMARYnThe recurrence of hepatitis C used to be the first cause of graft failure in infected liver transplanted recipients. Our study demonstrates the great efficacy of one combination of new all-oral direct-acting antiviral, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, to treat the recurrence of hepatitis C on the graft. Ninety-six per cent of recipients were cured. The safety profile of this combination seemed to be good, especially no relevant drug-drug interaction with immunosuppressive drugs.

Influence of tenofovir, nevirapine and efavirenz on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients

ObjectiveThe influence of nevirapine, efavirenz and tenofovir co-administration on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir pharmacokinetics was investigated in HIV (human immunodeficiency virus)-infected patients.MethodsA population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in the context of therapeutic drug monitoring (87 patients, 121 samples).ResultsA significant increase of atazanavir clearance (Cl/F) was found when either tenofovir (group B), efavirenz (group C), or nevirapine (group D) were co administered with atazanavir/ritonavir in comparison with patients treated with atazanavir/ritonavir and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (group A): 6.24±0.36 l h−1 (group A) versus 7.42±0.25 l h−1 (group B) versus 9.60±0.27 l h−1 (group C) versus 17.53±0.57 l h−1 (group D) (P<0.001). However, the decrease of the mean trough plasma concentration of atazanavir was significant only in group D: 1.02±0.86xa0mg/l (group A) versus 0.21±013xa0mg/l (group D) (P<0.001).ConclusionThe increase in atazanavir clearance when it is used in combination with nevirapine, efavirenz and/or tenofovir suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring of atazanavir should be performed in such circumstances.

Comparison of liver fibrosis blood tests developed for HCV with new specific tests in HIV/HCV co-infection

BACKGROUND & AIMSnWe compared 5 non-specific and 2 specific blood tests for liver fibrosis in HCV/HIV co-infection.nnnMETHODSnFour hundred and sixty-seven patients were included into derivation (n=183) or validation (n=284) populations. Within these populations, the diagnostic target, significant fibrosis (Metavir F > or = 2), was found in 66% and 72% of the patients, respectively. Two new fibrosis tests, FibroMeter HICV and HICV test, were constructed in the derivation population.nnnRESULTSnUnadjusted AUROCs in the derivation population were: APRI: 0.716, Fib-4: 0.722, Fibrotest: 0.778, Hepascore: 0.779, FibroMeter: 0.783, HICV test: 0.822, FibroMeter HICV: 0.828. AUROCs adjusted on classification and distribution of fibrosis stages in a reference population showed similar values in both populations. FibroMeter, FibroMeter HICV and HICV test had the highest correct classification rates in F0/1 and F3/4 (which account for high predictive values): 77-79% vs. 70-72% in the other tests (p=0.002). Reliable individual diagnosis based on predictive values > or = 90% distinguished three test categories: poorly reliable: Fib-4 (2.4% of patients), APRI (8.9%); moderately reliable: Fibrotest (25.4%), FibroMeter (26.6%), Hepascore (30.2%); acceptably reliable: HICV test (40.2%), FibroMeter HICV (45.6%) (p<10(-3) between tests). FibroMeter HICV classified all patients into four reliable diagnosis intervals (< or =F1, F1+/-1, > or =F1, > or =F2) with an overall accuracy of 93% vs. 79% (p<10(-3)) for a binary diagnosis of significant fibrosis.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTests designed for HCV infections are less effective in HIV/HCV infections. A specific test, like FibroMeter HICV, was the most interesting test for diagnostic accuracy, correct classification profile, and a reliable diagnosis. With reliable diagnosis intervals, liver biopsy can therefore be avoided in all patients.

No relationship between high nevirapine plasma concentration and hepatotoxicity in HIV-1-infected patients naive of antiretroviral treatment or switched from protease inhibitors

ObjectiveA prospective population pharmacokinetic study of nevirapine (NVP) was performed to test the relationship between hepatotoxicity and NVP trough plasma concentration and to identify which covariates could influence NVP pharmacokinetics.MethodsAll patients [77 HIV-1 (human immunodeficiency virus type 1)-infected patients (128 samples)] were either on first-line antiretroviral therapy or switched from successful therapy containing protease inhibitor. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a non-linear mixed-effect modelling method. Hepatotoxicity was evaluated by ASAT (aspartate aminotransferase) plasma level.ResultsNo correlation was found between high NVP trough plasma concentration and high ASAT level or the increase of ASAT level on NVP therapy. Age and Caucasian race were found to be significant covariates of NVP clearance (Cl/F). Population pharmacokinetic parameters (rate absorption constant=1.04xa0h−1; Cl/F=3.31xa0h−1; apparent volume of distribution=92xa0l) are consistent with previous studies.ConclusionHigh NVP trough plasma concentrations are not correlated with hepatotoxicity in our population. NVP clearance is decreased in the elderly patients, suggesting a potential increase of NVP plasma level and the interest of therapeutic drug monitoring for this population.

Long-term assessment of nevirapine-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients: 3-year follow-up of the VIRGO study

Data on the durability of antiretroviral regimens over a 3‐year period have only rarely been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long‐term efficacy and safety of one or two daily doses of nevirapine (NVP), in combination with stavudine (d4T) and didanosine (ddI), in HIV‐infected patients.

Influence of darunavir coadministration on nevirapine pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients: a population approach.

The influence of ritonavir‐boosted darunavir coadministration on nevirapine pharmacokinetics was investigated in HIV‐infected patients using a population‐based approach.

Optimizing the virological success of tenofovir DF/FTC/rilpivirine in HIV-infected naive and virologically suppressed patients through strict clinical and virological selection*

Abstract Background: Tenofovir DF/FTC/rilpivirine (TDF/FTC/RPV) is a single tablet regimen considered as safe and efficacious in HIV population as long as food requirements, concomitant PPI administration, and compromised antiviral activity have been carefully reviewed. We evaluated TDF/FTC/RPV in a real-life setting with focus on clinical and virological outcomes. Methods: OCEAN II is a prospective, two-centre observational study. From September 2012 to December 2013, antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV RNA <100,000 copies/mL or wishing to switch for simplification were considered for TDF/FTC/RPV. A systematic review of potential obstacles to TDF/FTC/RPV administration was undertaken during a multidisciplinary meeting, including DNA genotyping to detect archived RPV and/or NRTI-associated resistance mutations if historical RNA resistance testing was lacking. Results: TDF/FTC/RPV was considered for 480 patients, however was not offered to 194 patients (40%), mainly because of risk of insufficient virological efficacy, issues on adherence, patient refusal, meal constraint, or PPI therapy. A total of 286 patients (269 in maintenance; 17 ART-naive) received TDF/FTC/RPV. After a median follow-up of 30 months, virological failure occurred in five patients (1.7%) without the emergence of resistance mutations. Discontinuation of TDF/FTC/RPV occurred in 98 patients, due to adverse events in 43 patients (44%) and non-safety reasons in 55 patients (56%). No grade three-fourth adverse events occurred. Conclusion: In this real-life experience, cohort consisting primarily of virologically suppressed patients, TDF/FTC/RPV usually maintained virologic suppression. Discontinuation of therapy because of intolerability was due to mild adverse events. Strict clinical and virological screening probably explained the low rate of virological failure.

The effects of a maintenance therapy with peg-interferon alpha-2a on liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVEnWe hypothesized that, in Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis C Virus (HIV/HCV) co-infected patients who did not respond to peg-interferon and ribavirin, a maintenance therapy with peg-interferon could induce fibrosis regression.nnnMETHODSnThis was a randomized study with two parallel groups. HIV/HCV co-infected patients received peg-interferon α-2a at 180 μg/week or remained on observation for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who experienced a decrease of at least one point in their Metavir fibrosis score between initial and final liver biopsies. Secondary endpoints included plasma fibrosis markers at week 96, occurrence of HCV-related complications, and survival.nnnRESULTSnA total of 52 patients were randomized (peg-interferon: 25; control: 27) including 18 with cirrhosis. The median (interquartile range) age was 44 (40-46) years, and 69% were male. A total of 64% had ALT levels >1.5 normal values, and the CD4 cell count was 391 (296-537) cells/mm(3); 67% of patients had HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at entry. The main endpoint was assessed in 41 patients. Response rates were 3/20 (15%) and 4/21 (19%) in the peg-interferon and control groups, respectively (p = 0.99). There was no significant difference between peg-interferon and control groups on plasma fibrosis markers at the final visit. Severe liver-related complications were observed in 2 and 5 patients in peg-interferon and control groups, respectively. Three deaths were observed, all in the control group.nnnCONCLUSIONSnA maintenance therapy with peg-interferon α-2a over 96 weeks in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, who were non-responders to HCV treatment, did not change liver fibrosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00122616.