Qingming Ding

GPR30 Expression Is Required for the Mineralocorticoid Receptor–Independent Rapid Vascular Effects of Aldosterone

It has been increasingly appreciated that steroids elicit acute vascular effects through rapid, so-called nongenomic signaling pathways. Though aldosterone, for example, has been demonstrated to mediate rapid vascular effects via both mineralocorticoid receptor–dependent and –independent pathways, the mechanism(s) of this mineralocorticoid receptor–independent effect of aldosterone is yet to be determined. For estrogen, its rapid effects have been reported to be, at least in part, mediated via the 7-transmembrane–spanning, G protein–coupled receptor GPR30. Previous studies have demonstrated common response outcomes in response to both aldosterone and estrogen on GPR30 expression, ie, activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase–dependent contraction and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in vascular smooth muscle cells. The present studies were undertaken to test the hypothesis that the rapid response to aldosterone in smooth muscle is dependent on the availability of a GPR30-dependent signaling pathway. These findings not only reconcile differences in the literature for aldosterone response in freshly isolated versus cultured aortic smooth muscle cells but also suggest alternative therapeutic strategies for modulating aldosterone actions on the vasculature in vivo.

miR-146a–Mediated Extracellular Matrix Protein Production in Chronic Diabetes Complications

OBJECTIVE microRNAs (miRNAs), through transcriptional regulation, modulate several cellular processes. In diabetes, increased extracellular matrix protein fibronectin (FN) production is known to occur through histone acetylator p300. Here, we investigated the role of miR-146a, an FN-targeting miRNA, on FN production in diabetes and its relationship with p300. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS miR-146a expressions were measured in endothelial cells from large vessels and retinal microvessels in various glucose levels. FN messenger RNA expression and protein levels with or without miR-146a mimic or antagomir transfection were examined. A luciferase assay was performed to detect miR-146a’s binding to FN 3′–untranslated region (UTR). Likewise, retinas from type 1 diabetic rats were studied with or without an intravitreal injection of miR-146a mimic. In situ hybridization was used to localize retinal miR-146a. Cardiac and renal tissues were analyzed from type 1 and type 2 diabetic animals. RESULTS A total of 25 mmol/L glucose decreased miR-146a expression and increased FN expression compared with 5 mmol/L glucose in both cell types. miR-146a mimic transfection prevented such change, whereas miR-146a antagomir transfection in the cells in 5 mmol/L glucose caused FN upregulation. A luciferase assay confirmed miR-146a’s binding to FN 3′-UTR. miR-146a was localized in the retinal endothelial cells and was decreased in diabetes. Intravitreal miR-146a mimic injection restored retinal miR-146a and decreased FN in diabetes. Additional experiments showed that p300 regulates miR-146a. Similar changes were seen in the retinas, kidneys, and hearts in type 1 and type 2 diabetic animals. CONCLUSIONS These studies showed a novel, glucose-induced molecular mechanism in which miR-146a participates in the transcriptional circuitry regulating extracellular matrix protein production in diabetes.

Aldosterone mediates its rapid effects in vascular endothelial cells through GPER activation

The importance of the rapid vascular effects of aldosterone is increasingly appreciated. Through these rapid pathways, aldosterone has been shown to regulate vascular contractility, cell growth, and apoptosis. In our most recent studies, we demonstrated the effects of aldosterone on cell growth and contractility in vascular smooth muscle cells. We showed that these effects could occur via activation of the classic mineralocorticoid receptor, as well the recently characterized G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), initially characterized as an estrogen-specific receptor. However, the mechanisms underlying aldosterones endothelium-dependent actions are unknown. Furthermore, the ERK regulatory and proapoptotic effects of aldosterone mediated by GPER activation in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells were only apparent when GPER was reintroduced into these cells by gene transfer. Whether GPER activation via aldosterone might be an important regulator in native vascular cells has been questioned. Therefore, to determine the role of GPER in mediating aldosterones effects on cell growth and vascular reactivity in native cells, we examined rat aortic vascular endothelial cells, a model characterized by persistent robust expression of GPER, but without detectable mineralocorticoid receptor expression. In these endothelial cells, the GPER agonist G1 mediates a rapid increase in ERK phosphorylation that is wholly GPER-dependent, paralleling the actions of aldosterone. The effects of G1 and aldosterone to stimulate ERK phosphorylation paralleled their proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects. In previous studies, we reported that aldosterone mediates a rapid endothelium-dependent vasodilatory effect, antagonistic to its direct vasoconstrictor effect in endothelium-denuded preparations. Using a rat aortic ring/organ bath preparation to determine the GPER dependence of aldosterones endothelium-dependent vasodilator effects, we demonstrate that aldosterone inhibits phenylephrine-mediated contraction. This vasodilator effect parallels the actions of the GPER agonist G1. Furthermore, the effects of aldosterone were completely ablated by the GPER antagonist G15. These data support an important role of GPER activation in aldosterone-mediated regulation of endothelial cell growth, as well as in aldosterones endothelium-mediated regulation of vasoreactivity.

Estradiol-mediated ERK phosphorylation and apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells requires GPR 30

Recent studies suggest that the rapid and nongenomic effects of estradiol may be mediated through the G protein-coupled receptor dubbed GPR30 receptor. The present study examines the role of GPR30 versus a classical estrogen receptor (ERalpha) in mediating the growth regulatory effects of estradiol. GPR30 is readily detectable in freshly isolated vascular tissue but barely detectable in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). In freshly isolated aortic tissue, estradiol stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) phosphorylation. In contrast, in cultured VSMC, where GPR30 expression is significantly reduced, estradiol inhibits ERK phosphorylation. Transfer of the genes encoding GPR30 led to estradiol stimulation of ERK phosphorylation, which is opposite the effects of estradiol in the primary culture of VSMCs. Transduction of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) had no effect on estradiol effects on ERK. Estradiol-mediated stimulation of ERK subsequent to heterologous GPR30 expression was pertussis toxin sensitive and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) dependent; under these conditions, estradiol also inhibited protein kinase A (PKA). In contrast, in the absence of GPR30 expression in cultured VSMC, estradiol stimulated PKA activity and inhibited ERK phosphorylation. To determine the functional effect of GPR30 (vs. estrogen receptor expression), we assessed estradiol-mediated apoptosis. In the absence of GPR30 expression, estradiol inhibited apoptosis. This effect was enhanced with ERalpha expression. In contrast, with GPR30 expression, estradiol stimulated apoptosis in an ERK-dependent manner. Thus the effect of estradiol on vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis is likely dependent on the balance between ER-mediated PKA activation and GPR30-mediated PKA inhibition and PI3 kinase activation. Taken together, we postulate that modulation of GPR30 expression or activity may be an important determinant of the effects of estradiol in the vasculature.

Adenylyl Cyclase Isoform–Selective Regulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Proliferation and Cytoskeletal Reorganization

Compartmentation of cAMP signaling been demonstrated to be attributable to the structural association of protein kinase A (PKA) (via association with A-kinase anchoring proteins [AKAPs]) with phosphodiesterase and AKAP-dependent effector molecules. However, other mechanisms contributing to compartmentalization have not been rigorously explored, including the possibility that different isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (AC) may be functionally “compartmentalized” because of differential association with tethering or signaling molecules. To this end, we examined the effect of adenoviral transduction of representative AC isoforms (AC1, AC2, AC5, and AC6) on cellular cAMP production, PKA activation, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, cell doubling and proliferation, as well as arborization responses (an index of cAMP-mediated cytoskeletal re-organization) in vascular smooth muscle cells. When isoforms were expressed at levels to achieve comparable forskolin-stimulated AC activity, only gene transfer of AC6 significantly enhanced PKA-dependent vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and arborization responses. Treatment of control cells, which express AC6 endogenously, as well as vascular smooth overexpressing the AC6 isoform with small interfering RNA directed against AC6, significantly suppressed both isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP accumulation and arborization. Notably, the selective effects of AC6 expression were abrogated in the presence of phosphodiesterase suppression. In contrast, only the expression of AC1 enhanced forskolin-stimulated association of ERK with AC, demonstrated by coimmuno-isolation of ERK with Flag-tagged AC1, but not with Flag-tagged AC6. To determine whether these isoform-selective effects of AC were unique to differentiated and morphologically compartmentalized vascular smooth muscle cells or were a general property of these isoforms, we examined the consequence of expression of these various isoforms in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells. Indeed, we observed similar isoform-dependent association of AC1 with ERK, activation of ERK by stimulation of AC1 with forskolin, and AC1-dependent lengthening of doubling time, indicating that these properties of AC1 are cell autologous and likely result from AC1-dependent protein-protein interactions. In aggregate, these findings suggest that isoform-selective signaling complexes likely contribute to various functional consequences of cAMP elevation in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Phosphorylation-independent regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 desensitization and internalization by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in neurons.

The uncoupling of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) from heterotrimeric G proteins represents an essential feedback mechanism that protects neurons against receptor overstimulation that may ultimately result in damage. The desensitization of mGluR signaling is mediated by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Unlike mGluR1, the attenuation of mGluR5 signaling in HEK 293 cells is reported to be mediated by a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism. However, the mechanisms regulating mGluR5 signaling and endocytosis in neurons have not been investigated. Here we show that a 2-fold overexpression of GRK2 leads to the attenuation of endogenous mGluR5-mediated inositol phosphate (InsP) formation in striatal neurons and siRNA knockdown of GRK2 expression leads to enhanced mGluR5-mediated InsP formation. Expression of a catalytically inactive GRK2-K220R mutant also effectively attenuates mGluR5 signaling, but the expression of a GRK2-D110A mutant devoid in Gαq/11 binding increases mGluR5 signaling in response to agonist stimulation. Taken together, these results indicate that the attenuation of mGluR5 responses in striatal neurons is phosphorylation-independent. In addition, we find that mGluR5 does not internalize in response to agonist treatment in striatal neuron, but is efficiently internalized in cortical neurons that have higher levels of endogenous GRK2 protein expression. When overexpressed in striatal neurons, GRK2 promotes agonist-stimulated mGluR5 internalization. Moreover, GRK2-mediated promotion of mGluR5 endocytosis does not require GRK2 catalytic activity. Thus, we provide evidence that GRK2 mediates phosphorylation-independent mGluR5 desensitization and internalization in neurons.

A common hypofunctional genetic variant of GPER is associated with increased blood pressure in women

AIMS Activation of vascular GPER has been linked to vasodepressor effects in animals. However, the significance of GPER regulation on chronic blood pressure control in humans is unknown. METHODS To examine this question we determined the functional significance of expression of a common missense single nucleotide variant of GPER, P16L in vascular smooth muscle cells, and its association with blood pressure in humans. Further, to validate the importance of carrying GPER P16L in the development of hypertension we assessed allele frequency in a cohort of hard-to-treat hypertensive patients referred to a tertiary care clinic. RESULTS Expression of the GPER P16L variant (V) vs. wild type (WT) in rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, was associated with a significant decrease in G1 (1 μm, a GPER agonist)-mediated ERK phosphorylation (slope of the function of G1-stimulated ERK phosphorylation: GPER content WT: 16.2, 95% CI 9.9, 22.6; V: 5.0, 95% CI 1.0, 9.0; P < 0.005) and apoptosis (slope of the function of G1-stimulated apoptosis: GPER content: WT: 4.4, 95% CI: 3.4, 5.4; V: 2.5, 95% CI 1.6, 2.3 P < 0.005). Normotensive female subjects, but not male subjects, carrying this hypofunctional variant (allele frequency 22%) have increased blood pressure [mean arterial pressure: P16/P16: 80 ± 1 mmHg (n = 204) vs. P16L carriers: 82 ± 1 mmHg (n = 127), 95% CI for difference: 0.6, 4.0 mmHg, P < 0.05], [systolic blood pressure: P16/P16: 105 ± 1 mmHg vs. P16L carriers: 108 ± 1 mmHg, 95% CI for difference:1.0, 5.1 mmHg, P < 0.05], [diastolic blood pressure: P16/P16: 66 ± 0.5 mmHg vs. P16L carriers 68 ± 0.7, 95% CI for difference: 0.2, 3.6 mmHg, P < 0.05]. Further, the P16L allele frequency was almost two-fold higher in female vs. male hypertensive patients (31% vs. 16%, allele ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.32, 0.76, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The common genetic variant, GPER P16L, is hypofunctional and female carriers of this allele have increased blood pressure. There was an increased prevalence in a population of hard-to-treat hypertensive female patients. Cumulatively, these data suggest that in females, impaired GPER function might be associated with increased blood pressure and risk of hypertension.

G-Protein Estrogen Receptor as a Regulator of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Metabolism Cellular and Population Genetic Studies

Objective—Estrogen deficiency is linked with increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The hormone receptor mediating this effect is unknown. G-protein estrogen receptor (GPER) is a recently recognized G-protein–coupled receptor that is activated by estrogens. We recently identified a common hypofunctional missense variant of GPER, namely P16L. However, the role of GPER in LDL metabolism is unknown. Therefore, we examined the association of the P16L genotype with plasma LDL cholesterol level. Furthermore, we studied the role of GPER in regulating expression of the LDL receptor and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9. Approach and Results—Our discovery cohort was a genetically isolated population of Northern European descent, and our validation cohort consisted of normal, healthy women aged 18 to 56 years from London, Ontario. In addition, we examined the effect of GPER on the regulation of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 and LDL receptor expression by the treatment with the GPER agonist, G1. In the discovery cohort, GPER P16L genotype was associated with a significant increase in LDL cholesterol (mean±SEM): 3.18±0.05, 3.25±0.08, and 4.25±0.33 mmol/L, respectively, in subjects with CC (homozygous for P16), CT (heterozygotes), and TT (homozygous for L16) genotypes (P<0.05). In the validation cohort (n=339), the GPER P16L genotype was associated with a similar increase in LDL cholesterol: 2.17±0.05, 2.34±0.06, and 2.42±0.16 mmol/L, respectively, in subjects with CC, CT, and TT genotypes (P<0.05). In the human hepatic carcinoma cell line, the GPER agonist, G1, mediated a concentration-dependent increase in LDL receptor expression, blocked by either pretreatment with the GPER antagonist G15 or by shRNA-mediated GPER downregulation. G1 also mediated a GPER- and concentration-dependent decrease in proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 expression. Conclusions—GPER activation upregulates LDL receptor expression, probably at least, in part, via proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 downregulation. Furthermore, humans carrying the hypofunctional P16L genetic variant of GPER have increased plasma LDL cholesterol. In aggregate, these data suggest an important role of GPER in the regulation of LDL receptor expression and consequently LDL metabolism.

G-Protein Estrogen Receptor as a Regulator of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Metabolism

Objective—Estrogen deficiency is linked with increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The hormone receptor mediating this effect is unknown. G-protein estrogen receptor (GPER) is a recently recognized G-protein–coupled receptor that is activated by estrogens. We recently identified a common hypofunctional missense variant of GPER, namely P16L. However, the role of GPER in LDL metabolism is unknown. Therefore, we examined the association of the P16L genotype with plasma LDL cholesterol level. Furthermore, we studied the role of GPER in regulating expression of the LDL receptor and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9. Approach and Results—Our discovery cohort was a genetically isolated population of Northern European descent, and our validation cohort consisted of normal, healthy women aged 18 to 56 years from London, Ontario. In addition, we examined the effect of GPER on the regulation of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 and LDL receptor expression by the treatment with the GPER agonist, G1. In the discovery cohort, GPER P16L genotype was associated with a significant increase in LDL cholesterol (mean±SEM): 3.18±0.05, 3.25±0.08, and 4.25±0.33 mmol/L, respectively, in subjects with CC (homozygous for P16), CT (heterozygotes), and TT (homozygous for L16) genotypes (P<0.05). In the validation cohort (n=339), the GPER P16L genotype was associated with a similar increase in LDL cholesterol: 2.17±0.05, 2.34±0.06, and 2.42±0.16 mmol/L, respectively, in subjects with CC, CT, and TT genotypes (P<0.05). In the human hepatic carcinoma cell line, the GPER agonist, G1, mediated a concentration-dependent increase in LDL receptor expression, blocked by either pretreatment with the GPER antagonist G15 or by shRNA-mediated GPER downregulation. G1 also mediated a GPER- and concentration-dependent decrease in proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 expression. Conclusions—GPER activation upregulates LDL receptor expression, probably at least, in part, via proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 downregulation. Furthermore, humans carrying the hypofunctional P16L genetic variant of GPER have increased plasma LDL cholesterol. In aggregate, these data suggest an important role of GPER in the regulation of LDL receptor expression and consequently LDL metabolism.

Increased Enzyme Activity and β-Adrenergic–Mediated Vasodilation in Subjects Expressing a Single-Nucleotide Variant of Human Adenylyl Cyclase 6

Objective—cAMP is a critical regulator of metabolic and cardiovascular function. However, the role of genetic variability in the regulation of cAMP-mediated effects is unclear. Therefore, we assessed the effect of the expression of a recently identified missense genetic variant of adenylyl cyclase isoform 6 (ADCY6 S674). Methods and Results—In rat vascular smooth muscle cells, gene transfer of ADCY6 S674 increased adenylyl cyclase activity and arborization to a greater extent than gene transfer of ADCY6 A674. Similarly, in adherent mononuclear leukocyte cells isolated from ADCY6 S674-expressing human subjects, both adenylyl cyclase activity and adenylyl cyclase–mediated cell retraction were significantly increased. Additionally, in dorsal hand vein LVDT studies, subjects expressing the hyper-functional ADCY6 S674 variant had significantly greater vascular sensitivity to the &bgr;-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol as assessed by both a greater potency and greater maximal effect than subjects expressing the ADCY6 A674 enzyme. Conclusion—These data indicate that the expression of a novel, relatively common variant of ADCY6 parallels an increase in adenylyl cyclase activity and adenylyl cyclase–mediated function in humans.