Radka Antalikova
Aalborg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Radka Antalikova.
Nordic Psychology | 2011
Radka Antalikova; Tia G. B. Hansen; Knut Arild Gulbrandsen; Manuel L. de la Mata; Andrés Santamaría
The relationship between autobiographical memories and self is important in many theories. Promising recent approaches from cross-cultural psychology use a concept of self-construal”, in which reference to others can be as important as indicators of autonomy. However, these studies typically ask for earliest memories only, whereas we would expect the roles of others to change over the course of development. Taking as a premise that adolescents" life unfolds in three concurrent settings - family, school, and friendship - we asked 66 adolescents (22 Norwegians in Study 1, and 40 Slovaks in Study 2) for a meaningful memory from each of these settings. The memories they selected from the family setting were oldest, school memories intermediate and friend memories most recent, suggesting a developmental trajectory in which the three settings have changed in importance. Memories from the friendship setting were also most frequently on their mind. Furthermore, family memories referred most to other people, friend memories marginally less and school memories least, suggesting different contributions of these settings to self-construal. We conclude that characteristics of adolescents" meaningful memories reflect shifting settings" dominance during development and complementary roles of family, school and friends for adolescents" current self-construal.
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior | 2016
Kuba Krys; C. Melanie Vauclair; Colin A. Capaldi; Vivian Miu-Chi Lun; Michael Harris Bond; Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa; Claudio Vaz Torres; Ottmar V. Lipp; L. Sam S. Manickam; Cai Xing; Radka Antalikova; Vassilis Pavlopoulos; Julien Teyssier; Taekyun Hur; Karolina Hansen; Piotr Szarota; Ramadan A. Ahmed; Eleonora Burtceva; Ana Chkhaidze; Enila Cenko; Patrick Denoux; Márta Fülöp; Arif Hassan; David O. Igbokwe; İdil Işık; Gwatirera Javangwe; María del Carmen Malbrán; Fridanna Maricchiolo; Hera Mikarsa; Lynden K. Miles
Smiling individuals are usually perceived more favorably than non-smiling ones—they are judged as happier, more attractive, competent, and friendly. These seemingly clear and obvious consequences of smiling are assumed to be culturally universal, however most of the psychological research is carried out in WEIRD societies (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) and the influence of culture on social perception of nonverbal behavior is still understudied. Here we show that a smiling individual may be judged as less intelligent than the same non-smiling individual in cultures low on the GLOBE’s uncertainty avoidance dimension. Furthermore, we show that corruption at the societal level may undermine the prosocial perception of smiling—in societies with high corruption indicators, trust toward smiling individuals is reduced. This research fosters understanding of the cultural framework surrounding nonverbal communication processes and reveals that in some cultures smiling may lead to negative attributions.
Journal of Social Psychology | 2018
Radka Antalikova; Tia G. B. Hansen; Manuel L. de la Mata; Rafael J. Martínez
ABSTRACT Some evidence suggests prevalence of collectivist values and interdependent self in post-communist Europe. However, research on social representations identifies a possible divide between Eastern Europeans’ appreciation of their immediate social environment on the one hand and their suspicion toward impersonal collectives on the other. The current study aimed to capture this divide by investigating two types of interdependent self, namely relational and collective. Specifically, we compared self-descriptions in two Slovak samples—“old” with a communist experience (n = 80) and “young” without it (n = 80)—and used a country that has never been communist (Denmark; n = 80 x 2) to control for age effects. Results showed predominance of independent self in all groups, higher relational self in both old groups, and highest collective self among the young Slovaks. This indicates no association between communist experience and interdependent self, but a possible post-communist effect is suggested. Theoretically, the study substantiated the importance of disentangling interdependence.
Memory | 2018
Manuel L. de la Mata; Eva Trigo; Mercedes Cubero; Samuel Arias; Radka Antalikova; Tia G. B. Hansen; Marcia L. Ruiz
ABSTRACT Cross-cultural differences in autobiographical memory (AM) are associated with cultural variations. In models of the self and parental reminiscing style, but not many studies have analysed the relationship between AM and specific cultural practices such as formal schooling. Theoreticians like [Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting. pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 401–418. doi:10.1037/a0014726; Kağitçibaşi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context. Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422. doi:10.1177/0022022105275959] and [Keller, H. (2007). Children development across cultures. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates] have considered formal schooling as an engine towards the model of independence; however, the empirical evidence in this regard is inconclusive: while some studies found evidence of a relation between formal schooling and characteristics of AM, others did not. To solve this inconsistency, the present study compared orally narrated childhood memories of Mexican adults with three different levels of education (from rudimentary literacy to university). Results support a relationship between formal schooling and AM in the predicted direction: More educated participants reported longer, more specific and more self-oriented memories than those with less schooling experience did. Some gender differences were also observed, with males generally reporting more individually and less socially oriented memories than females, except for university level participants. We conclude that these results support Greenfield’s theory about formal schooling as a sociocultural factor that promotes the cultural pathway to independence, as well as complexity and context-boundedness of gender differences in AM.
International Journal of Psychology | 2018
Kuba Krys; Colin A. Capaldi; Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg; Ottmar V. Lipp; Michael Harris Bond; C. Melanie Vauclair; L. Sam S. Manickam; Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa; Claudio Vaz Torres; Vivian Miu-Chi Lun; Julien Teyssier; Lynden K. Miles; Karolina Hansen; Joonha Park; Wolfgang Wagner; Angela Arriola Yu; Cai Xing; Ryan Wise; Chien-Ru Sun; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Radwa Salem; Muhammad Rizwan; Vassilis Pavlopoulos; Martin Nader; Fridanna Maricchiolo; María del Carmen Malbrán; Gwatirera Javangwe; İdil Işık; David O. Igbokwe; Taekyun Hur
Inequalities between men and women are common and well-documented. Objective indexes show that men are better positioned than women in societal hierarchies-there is no single country in the world without a gender gap. In contrast, researchers have found that the women-are-wonderful effect-that women are evaluated more positively than men overall-is also common. Cross-cultural studies on gender equality reveal that the more gender egalitarian the society is, the less prevalent explicit gender stereotypes are. Yet, because self-reported gender stereotypes may differ from implicit attitudes towards each gender, we reanalysed data collected across 44 cultures, and (a) confirmed that societal gender egalitarianism reduces the women-are-wonderful effect when it is measured more implicitly (i.e. rating the personality of men and women presented in images) and (b) documented that the social perception of men benefits more from gender egalitarianism than that of women.
International Journal of Psychology | 2017
Kuba Krys; Colin A. Capaldi; Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg; Ottmar V. Lipp; Michael Harris Bond; C. Melanie Vauclair; L. Sam S. Manickam; Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa; Claudio Vaz Torres; Vivian Miu-Chi Lun; Julien Teyssier; Lynden K. Miles; Karolina Hansen; Joonha Park; Wolfgang Wagner; Angela Arriola Yu; Cai Xing; Ryan Wise; Chien-Ru Sun; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Radwa Salem; Muhammad Rizwan; Vassilis Pavlopoulos; Martin Nader; Fridanna Maricchiolo; María del Carmen Malbrán; Gwatirera Javangwe; İdil Işık; David O. Igbokwe; Taekyun Hur
Inequalities between men and women are common and well-documented. Objective indexes show that men are better positioned than women in societal hierarchies-there is no single country in the world without a gender gap. In contrast, researchers have found that the women-are-wonderful effect-that women are evaluated more positively than men overall-is also common. Cross-cultural studies on gender equality reveal that the more gender egalitarian the society is, the less prevalent explicit gender stereotypes are. Yet, because self-reported gender stereotypes may differ from implicit attitudes towards each gender, we reanalysed data collected across 44 cultures, and (a) confirmed that societal gender egalitarianism reduces the women-are-wonderful effect when it is measured more implicitly (i.e. rating the personality of men and women presented in images) and (b) documented that the social perception of men benefits more from gender egalitarianism than that of women.
International Journal of Psychology | 2017
Kuba Krys; Colin A. Capaldi; Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg; Ottmar V. Lipp; Michael Harris Bond; C. Melanie Vauclair; L. Sam S. Manickam; Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa; Claudio Vaz Torres; Vivian Miu-Chi Lun; Julien Teyssier; Lynden K. Miles; Karolina Hansen; Joonha Park; Wolfgang Wagner; Angela Arriola Yu; Cai Xing; Ryan Wise; Chien-Ru Sun; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Radwa Salem; Muhammad Rizwan; Vassilis Pavlopoulos; Martin Nader; Fridanna Maricchiolo; María del Carmen Malbrán; Gwatirera Javangwe; İdil Işık; David O. Igbokwe; Taekyun Hur
Inequalities between men and women are common and well-documented. Objective indexes show that men are better positioned than women in societal hierarchies-there is no single country in the world without a gender gap. In contrast, researchers have found that the women-are-wonderful effect-that women are evaluated more positively than men overall-is also common. Cross-cultural studies on gender equality reveal that the more gender egalitarian the society is, the less prevalent explicit gender stereotypes are. Yet, because self-reported gender stereotypes may differ from implicit attitudes towards each gender, we reanalysed data collected across 44 cultures, and (a) confirmed that societal gender egalitarianism reduces the women-are-wonderful effect when it is measured more implicitly (i.e. rating the personality of men and women presented in images) and (b) documented that the social perception of men benefits more from gender egalitarianism than that of women.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology | 2014
Joel R. Anderson; Radka Antalikova
12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence | 2010
Radka Antalikova; Knut Arild Gulbrandsen; Tia G. B. Hansen; Manuel Luis de la Mata Benítez
International Conference on Memory | 2016
Manuel Luis de la Mata Benítez; Radka Antalikova; Andrés Santamaría; Mercedes Cubero; Samuel Arias Sánchez; Tia G. B. Hansen