Rebecca J. Leary
Johns Hopkins University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rebecca J. Leary.
Science | 2008
D. Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Lin; Rebecca J. Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L. Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger E. McLendon; B. Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen T. Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A. Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug Smith; Robert L. Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J. Riggins; Darell D. Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and lethal type of brain cancer. To identify the genetic alterations in GBMs, we sequenced 20,661 protein coding genes, determined the presence of amplifications and deletions using high-density oligonucleotide arrays, and performed gene expression analyses using next-generation sequencing technologies in 22 human tumor samples. This comprehensive analysis led to the discovery of a variety of genes that were not known to be altered in GBMs. Most notably, we found recurrent mutations in the active site of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) in 12% of GBM patients. Mutations in IDH1 occurred in a large fraction of young patients and in most patients with secondary GBMs and were associated with an increase in overall survival. These studies demonstrate the value of unbiased genomic analyses in the characterization of human brain cancer and identify a potentially useful genetic alteration for the classification and targeted therapy of GBMs.
Science | 2007
Laura D. Wood; D. Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Jimmy Lin; Tobias Sjöblom; Rebecca J. Leary; Dong Shen; Simina M. Boca; Thomas D. Barber; Janine Ptak; Natalie Silliman; Steve Szabo; Zoltan Dezso; Vadim Ustyanksky; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Rachel Karchin; Paul Wilson; Joshua S. Kaminker; Zemin Zhang; Randal Croshaw; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; Michail Shipitsin; James K V Willson; Saraswati Sukumar; Kornelia Polyak; Ben Ho Park; Charit L. Pethiyagoda; P.V. Krishna Pant
Human cancer is caused by the accumulation of mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. To catalog the genetic changes that occur during tumorigenesis, we isolated DNA from 11 breast and 11 colorectal tumors and determined the sequences of the genes in the Reference Sequence database in these samples. Based on analysis of exons representing 20,857 transcripts from 18,191 genes, we conclude that the genomic landscapes of breast and colorectal cancers are composed of a handful of commonly mutated gene “mountains” and a much larger number of gene “hills” that are mutated at low frequency. We describe statistical and bioinformatic tools that may help identify mutations with a role in tumorigenesis. These results have implications for understanding the nature and heterogeneity of human cancers and for using personal genomics for tumor diagnosis and therapy.
Nature | 2010
Shinichi Yachida; Siân Jones; Ivana Bozic; Tibor Antal; Rebecca J. Leary; Baojin Fu; Mihoko Kamiyama; Ralph H. Hruban; James R. Eshleman; Martin A. Nowak; Victor E. Velculescu; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue
Metastasis, the dissemination and growth of neoplastic cells in an organ distinct from that in which they originated, is the most common cause of death in cancer patients. This is particularly true for pancreatic cancers, where most patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease and few show a sustained response to chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Whether the dismal prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer compared to patients with other types of cancer is a result of late diagnosis or early dissemination of disease to distant organs is not known. Here we rely on data generated by sequencing the genomes of seven pancreatic cancer metastases to evaluate the clonal relationships among primary and metastatic cancers. We find that clonal populations that give rise to distant metastases are represented within the primary carcinoma, but these clones are genetically evolved from the original parental, non-metastatic clone. Thus, genetic heterogeneity of metastases reflects that within the primary carcinoma. A quantitative analysis of the timing of the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer was performed, indicating at least a decade between the occurrence of the initiating mutation and the birth of the parental, non-metastatic founder cell. At least five more years are required for the acquisition of metastatic ability and patients die an average of two years thereafter. These data provide novel insights into the genetic features underlying pancreatic cancer progression and define a broad time window of opportunity for early detection to prevent deaths from metastatic disease.
Science Translational Medicine | 2014
Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J. Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M. Alani; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis; Nilofer Saba Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L. Cameron; Clarence Lee; Leslie A. Fecher; Gary L. Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L. Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D. Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H. Juhl; Jenny J. Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A. Laheru
Circulating tumor DNA can be used in a variety of clinical and investigational settings across tumor types and stages for screening, diagnosis, and identifying mutations responsible for therapeutic response and drug resistance. Circulating Tumor DNA for Early Detection and Managing Resistance Cancer evolves over time, without any warning signs. Similarly, the development of resistance to therapy generally becomes apparent only when there are obvious signs of tumor growth, at which point the patient may have lost valuable time. Although a repeat biopsy may be able to identify drug-resistant mutations before the tumor has a chance to regrow, it is usually not feasible to do many repeat biopsies. Now, two studies are demonstrating the utility of monitoring the patients’ blood for tumor DNA to detect cancer at the earliest stages of growth or resistance. In one study, Bettegowda and coauthors showed that sampling a patient’s blood may be sufficient to yield information about the tumor’s genetic makeup, even for many early-stage cancers, without a need for an invasive procedure to collect tumor tissue, such as surgery or endoscopy. The authors demonstrated the presence of circulating DNA from many types of tumors that had not yet metastasized or released detectable cells into the circulation. They could detect more than 50% of patients across 14 tumor types at the earliest stages, when these cancers may still be curable, suggesting that a blood draw could be a viable screening approach to detecting most cancers. They also showed that in patients with colorectal cancer, the information derived from circulating tumor DNA could be used to determine the optimal course of treatment and identify resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade. Meanwhile, Misale and colleagues illustrated a way to use this information to overcome treatment resistance. These authors also found that mutations associated with EGFR inhibitor resistance could be detected in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer. In addition, they demonstrated that adding MEK inhibitors, another class of anticancer drugs, can successfully overcome resistance when given in conjunction with the EGFR inhibitors. Thus, the studies from Bettegowda and Misale and their colleagues show the effectiveness of analyzing circulating DNA from a variety of tumors and highlight the potential investigational and clinical applications of this novel technology for early detection, monitoring resistance, and devising treatment plans to overcome resistance. The development of noninvasive methods to detect and monitor tumors continues to be a major challenge in oncology. We used digital polymerase chain reaction–based technologies to evaluate the ability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect tumors in 640 patients with various cancer types. We found that ctDNA was detectable in >75% of patients with advanced pancreatic, ovarian, colorectal, bladder, gastroesophageal, breast, melanoma, hepatocellular, and head and neck cancers, but in less than 50% of primary brain, renal, prostate, or thyroid cancers. In patients with localized tumors, ctDNA was detected in 73, 57, 48, and 50% of patients with colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast adenocarcinoma, respectively. ctDNA was often present in patients without detectable circulating tumor cells, suggesting that these two biomarkers are distinct entities. In a separate panel of 206 patients with metastatic colorectal cancers, we showed that the sensitivity of ctDNA for detection of clinically relevant KRAS gene mutations was 87.2% and its specificity was 99.2%. Finally, we assessed whether ctDNA could provide clues into the mechanisms underlying resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in 24 patients who objectively responded to therapy but subsequently relapsed. Twenty-three (96%) of these patients developed one or more mutations in genes involved in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Together, these data suggest that ctDNA is a broadly applicable, sensitive, and specific biomarker that can be used for a variety of clinical and research purposes in patients with multiple different types of cancer.
Science | 2011
D. Williams Parsons; Meng Li; Xiaosong Zhang; Siân Jones; Rebecca J. Leary; Jimmy Lin; Simina M. Boca; Hannah Carter; Josue Samayoa; Chetan Bettegowda; Gary L. Gallia; George I. Jallo; Zev A. Binder; Yuri Nikolsky; James Hartigan; Doug Smith; Daniela S. Gerhard; Daniel W. Fults; Scott R. VandenBerg; Mitchel S. Berger; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Carlos Clara; Peter C. Phillips; Jane E. Minturn; Jaclyn A. Biegel; Alexander R. Judkins; Adam C. Resnick; Phillip B. Storm; Tom Curran
Genomic analysis of a childhood cancer reveals markedly fewer mutations than what is typically seen in adult cancers. Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant brain tumor of children. To identify the genetic alterations in this tumor type, we searched for copy number alterations using high-density microarrays and sequenced all known protein-coding genes and microRNA genes using Sanger sequencing in a set of 22 MBs. We found that, on average, each tumor had 11 gene alterations, fewer by a factor of 5 to 10 than in the adult solid tumors that have been sequenced to date. In addition to alterations in the Hedgehog and Wnt pathways, our analysis led to the discovery of genes not previously known to be altered in MBs. Most notably, inactivating mutations of the histone-lysine N-methyltransferase genes MLL2 or MLL3 were identified in 16% of MB patients. These results demonstrate key differences between the genetic landscapes of adult and childhood cancers, highlight dysregulation of developmental pathways as an important mechanism underlying MBs, and identify a role for a specific type of histone methylation in human tumorigenesis.
Science Translational Medicine | 2010
Rebecca J. Leary; Isaac Kinde; Frank Diehl; Kerstin Schmidt; Chris Clouser; Cisilya Duncan; Alena A. Antipova; Clarence Lee; Kevin McKernan; Francisco M. De La Vega; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Luis A. Diaz; Victor E. Velculescu
Rapid detection of specific aberrant rearrangements in tumors from individuals yields a well-poised technological advance toward personalized oncology. PARE Personalizes Cancer Genetics A diagnosis of cancer shatters the view of the world in an individual’s mind. A world that once moved as comfortably as the pace of one’s own life suddenly moves all too quickly. The individual starts asking questions and searching for possible remedies, and soon learns about the shockingly slow pace of successful cancer research. In the case of solid tumors, conventional surgical excision blanketed with “one size fits all” drug treatments simply fails to be universally effective in the long term. Cancer research has begun to shift to a more focused, personal approach that involves tailoring therapies directly to the complexity inherent in each individual—an area that holds considerable promise. But the differences among individuals are not the only layer of complexity hindering effective treatment. The intrinsic differences that accumulate over the course of tumor progression among similar tumor types hold the key to unlocking a truly personal remedy, a barcode, to cancer. Now, Leary et al. make use of a massively parallel sequencing technique—personalized analysis of rearranged ends (PARE)—to home in on the unique DNA rearrangements present in tumors that differ from the rearrangements present in nontumor DNA from a small subset of individuals. They provide evidence for a highly sensitive, reliable, and cost-effective method, a foundation from which the annotation of large numbers of such tumor signatures will yield a personal cancer code. In an arena that takes small steps, PARE offers a leap forward in the clinical management and treatment of solid tumors, revealing true biomarkers that enable monitoring of individual tumor progression, tailoring of response to therapeutic treatment, and identification of residual disease at a level previously undetectable by current methods. Clinical management of human cancer is dependent on the accurate monitoring of residual and recurrent tumors. The evaluation of patient-specific translocations in leukemias and lymphomas has revolutionized diagnostics for these diseases. We have developed a method, called personalized analysis of rearranged ends (PARE), which can identify translocations in solid tumors. Analysis of four colorectal and two breast cancers with massively parallel sequencing revealed an average of nine rearranged sequences (range, 4 to 15) per tumor. Polymerase chain reaction with primers spanning the breakpoints was able to detect mutant DNA molecules present at levels lower than 0.001% and readily identified mutated circulating DNA in patient plasma samples. This approach provides an exquisitely sensitive and broadly applicable approach for the development of personalized biomarkers to enhance the clinical management of cancer patients.
Science Translational Medicine | 2012
Rebecca J. Leary; Mark Sausen; Isaac Kinde; Nickolas Papadopoulos; John D. Carpten; David Craig; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Luis A. Diaz; Victor E. Velculescu
Massively parallel sequencing directly detects tumor-derived chromosomal alterations in plasma DNA from cancer patients. Getting Harder to Hide It might be challenging, but game players can usually answer the question: “Where’s Waldo?” After all, we’ve met the traveler before and can comb the baroque illustrations for his characteristic striped ensemble and walking stick. But if we didn’t know what Waldo looked like, it would take a powerful detective and at least a clue or two to find him in a crowd. Now, Leary et al. use a well-characterized clue—the universal nature of chromosomal alterations in human cancer—along with powerful DNA sequencing technology to pinpoint tumor-specific chromosomal aberrations in the circulation of patients without knowing, in advance, precisely what the edited DNA looks like. The authors compared circulating cell-free DNA from 10 late-stage colorectal and breast cancer patients and 10 healthy individuals using massively parallel whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and detected chromosomal aberrations—copy number changes and rearrangements—present only in plasma DNA from patients. Two known cancer driver genes were amplified in the patients: ERBB2, which encodes HER2/Neu, the protein target of the anticancer drug trastuzumab, and a cell-cycle regulatory gene, CDK6. For three colorectal cancer cases where both tumor and blood samples were analyzed by WGS, the copy number patterns observed in blood samples resembled those of the resected tumor. The authors quantified the ability of their approach to discriminate between cancer patients and healthy subjects by analyzing simulated mixtures of varying concentrations of tumor and control DNA. Under certain defined conditions, tumor DNA concentrations of ≥0.75% could be detected in the circulation of breast and colorectal cancer patients with a sensitivity >90% and a specificity >99%. Leary et al. outline several current limitations of their method. For example, the patients studied were all in the late stages of cancer progression, and the sensitivity and specificity parameters were dependent on the amount of sequence data obtained. As the cost of WGS falls, this new approach may provide a powerful way to detect cancers in a noninvasive and unbiased manner even without prior knowledge of disease. Clinical management of cancer patients could be improved through the development of noninvasive approaches for the detection of incipient, residual, and recurrent tumors. We describe an approach to directly identify tumor-derived chromosomal alterations through analysis of circulating cell-free DNA from cancer patients. Whole-genome analyses of DNA from the plasma of 10 colorectal and breast cancer patients and 10 healthy individuals with massively parallel sequencing identified, in all patients, structural alterations that were not present in plasma DNA from healthy subjects. Detected alterations comprised chromosomal copy number changes and rearrangements, including amplification of cancer driver genes such as ERBB2 and CDK6. The level of circulating tumor DNA in the cancer patients ranged from 1.4 to 47.9%. The sensitivity and specificity of this approach are dependent on the amount of sequence data obtained and are derived from the fact that most cancers harbor multiple chromosomal alterations, each of which is unlikely to be present in normal cells. Given that chromosomal abnormalities are present in nearly all human cancers, this approach represents a useful method for the noninvasive detection of human tumors that is not dependent on the availability of tumor biopsies.
Nature Medicine | 2015
Hui Gao; Joshua Korn; Stephane Ferretti; John E. Monahan; Youzhen Wang; Mallika Singh; Chao Zhang; Christian Schnell; Guizhi Yang; Yun Zhang; O Alejandro Balbin; Stéphanie Barbe; Hongbo Cai; Fergal Casey; Susmita Chatterjee; Derek Y. Chiang; Shannon Chuai; Shawn M Cogan; Scott D Collins; Ernesta Dammassa; Nicolas Ebel; Millicent Embry; John Green; Audrey Kauffmann; Colleen Kowal; Rebecca J. Leary; Joseph Lehar; Ying Liang; Alice Loo; Edward Lorenzana
Profiling candidate therapeutics with limited cancer models during preclinical development hinders predictions of clinical efficacy and identifying factors that underlie heterogeneous patient responses for patient-selection strategies. We established ∼1,000 patient-derived tumor xenograft models (PDXs) with a diverse set of driver mutations. With these PDXs, we performed in vivo compound screens using a 1 × 1 × 1 experimental design (PDX clinical trial or PCT) to assess the population responses to 62 treatments across six indications. We demonstrate both the reproducibility and the clinical translatability of this approach by identifying associations between a genotype and drug response, and established mechanisms of resistance. In addition, our results suggest that PCTs may represent a more accurate approach than cell line models for assessing the clinical potential of some therapeutic modalities. We therefore propose that this experimental paradigm could potentially improve preclinical evaluation of treatment modalities and enhance our ability to predict clinical trial responses.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2008
Rebecca J. Leary; Jimmy Lin; Jordan M. Cummins; Simina M. Boca; Laura D. Wood; D. Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Tobias Sjöblom; Ben Ho Park; Ramon Parsons; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; James K V Willson; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Levy Kopelovich; Nick Papadopoulos; Len A. Pennacchio; Tian Li Wang; Sanford D. Markowitz; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E. Velculescu
We have performed a genome-wide analysis of copy number changes in breast and colorectal tumors using approaches that can reliably detect homozygous deletions and amplifications. We found that the number of genes altered by major copy number changes, deletion of all copies or amplification to at least 12 copies per cell, averaged 17 per tumor. We have integrated these data with previous mutation analyses of the Reference Sequence genes in these same tumor types and have identified genes and cellular pathways affected by both copy number changes and point alterations. Pathways enriched for genetic alterations included those controlling cell adhesion, intracellular signaling, DNA topological change, and cell cycle control. These analyses provide an integrated view of copy number and sequencing alterations on a genome-wide scale and identify genes and pathways that could prove useful for cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Nature Genetics | 2013
Mark Sausen; Rebecca J. Leary; Siân Jones; Jian Wu; C. Patrick Reynolds; Xueyuan Liu; Amanda Blackford; Giovanni Parmigiani; Luis A. Diaz; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W. Kinzler; Victor E. Velculescu; Michael D. Hogarty
Neuroblastomas are tumors of peripheral sympathetic neurons and are the most common solid tumor in children. To determine the genetic basis for neuroblastoma, we performed whole-genome sequencing (6 cases), exome sequencing (16 cases), genome-wide rearrangement analyses (32 cases) and targeted analyses of specific genomic loci (40 cases) using massively parallel sequencing. On average, each tumor had 19 somatic alterations in coding genes (range of 3–70). Among genes not previously known to be involved in neuroblastoma, chromosomal deletions and sequence alterations of the chromatin-remodeling genes ARID1A and ARID1B were identified in 8 of 71 tumors (11%) and were associated with early treatment failure and decreased survival. Using tumor-specific structural alterations, we developed an approach to identify rearranged DNA fragments in sera, providing personalized biomarkers for minimal residual disease detection and monitoring. These results highlight the dysregulation of chromatin remodeling in pediatric tumorigenesis and provide new approaches for the management of patients with neuroblastoma.