Richard D. A. Newton
University of Manchester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Richard D. A. Newton.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
Federico Sembolini; Gustavo Yepes; Frazer R. Pearce; Alexander Knebe; Scott T. Kay; Chris Power; Weiguang Cui; Alexander M. Beck; Stefano Borgani; Claudio Dalla Vecchia; Romeel Davé; Pascal J. Elahi; Sean February; Shuiyao Huang; Alex Hobbs; Neal Katz; Erwin T. Lau; Ian G. McCarthy; Guiseppe Murante; Daisuke Nagai; Kaylea Nelson; Richard D. A. Newton; Valentin Perret; Ewald Puchwein; Justin I. Read; A. Saro; Joop Schaye; Romain Teyssier; Robert J. Thacker
We have simulated the formation of a galaxy cluster in a Ʌ cold dark matter universe using 13 different codes modelling only gravity and non-radiative hydrodynamics (RAMSES, ART, AREPO, HYDRA and nine incarnations of GADGET). This range of codes includes particle-based, moving and fixed mesh codes as well as both Eulerian and Lagrangian fluid schemes. The various GADGET implementations span classic and modern smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) schemes. The goal of this comparison is to assess the reliability of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of clusters in the simplest astrophysically relevant case, that in which the gas is assumed to be non-radiative. We compare images of the cluster at z = 0, global properties such as mass and radial profiles of various dynamical and thermodynamical quantities. The underlying gravitational framework can be aligned very accurately for all the codes allowing a detailed investigation of the differences that develop due to the various gas physics implementations employed. As expected, the mesh-based codes RAMSES, ART and AREPO form extended entropy cores in the gas with rising central gas temperatures. Those codes employing classic SPH schemes show falling entropy profiles all the way into the very centre with correspondingly rising density profiles and central temperature inversions. We show that methods with modern SPH schemes that allow entropy mixing span the range between these two extremes and the latest SPH variants produce gas entropy profiles that are essentially indistinguishable from those obtained with grid-based methods.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
Simon R. Pike; Scott T. Kay; Richard D. A. Newton; Peter A. Thomas; Adrian Jenkins
We present results from a new set of 30 cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters, including the effects of radiative cooling, star formation, supernova feedback, black hole growth and AGN feedback. We first demonstrate that our AGN model is capable of reproducing the observed cluster pressure profile at redshift, z ≃ 0, once the AGN heating temperature of the targeted particles is made to scale with the final virial temperature of the halo. This allows the ejected gas to reach larger radii in higher mass clusters than would be possible had a fixed heating temperature been used. Such a model also successfully reduces the star formation rate in brightest cluster galaxies and broadly reproduces a number of other observational properties at low redshift, including baryon, gas and star fractions, entropy profiles outside the core and the X-ray luminosity–mass relation. Our results are consistent with the notion that the excess entropy is generated via selective removal of the densest material through radiative cooling; supernova and AGN feedback largely serve as regulation mechanisms, moving heated gas out of galaxies and away from cluster cores. However, our simulations fail to address a number of serious issues; for example, they are incapable of reproducing the shape and diversity of the observed entropy profiles within the core region. We also show that the stellar and black hole masses are sensitive to numerical resolution, particularly the gravitational softening length; a smaller value leads to more efficient black hole growth at early times and a smaller central galaxy.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013
Richard D. A. Newton; Scott T. Kay
We perform high resolution N-body+SPH simulations of isolated Milky-Way-like galaxies and major mergers between them, to investigate the effect of feedback from both an active galactic nucleus (AGN) and supernovae on the galaxys evolution. Several AGN methods from the literature are used independently and in conjunction with supernova feedback to isolate the most important factors of these feedback processes. We find that in isolated galaxies, supernovae dominate the suppression of star formation but the star formation rate is unaffected by the presence of an AGN. In mergers the converse is true when models with strong AGN feedback are considered, shutting off star formation before a starburst can occur. AGN and supernovae simulated together suppress star formation only slightly more than if they acted independently. This low-level interaction between the feedback processes is due to AGN feedback maintaining the temperature of a hot halo of gas formed by supernovae. For each of the feedback processes the heating temperature is the dominant parameter rather than the overall energy budget or timing of heating events. Finally, we find that the black hole mass is highly resolution dependent, with more massive black holes found in lower resolution simulations.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
Federico Sembolini; Pascal J. Elahi; Frazer R. Pearce; Chris Power; Alexander Knebe; Scott T. Kay; Weiguang Cui; Gustavo Yepes; Alexander M. Beck; Stefano Borgani; Daniel Cunnama; Romeel Davé; Sean February; Shuiyao Huang; Neal Katz; Ian G. McCarthy; Giuseppe Murante; Richard D. A. Newton; Valentin Perret; Ewald Puchwein; A. Saro; Joop Schaye; Romain Teyssier
We have simulated the formation of a massive galaxy cluster (M
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2017
N. R. P. Harris; Lucy J. Carpenter; James Lee; G. Vaughan; Michal T. Filus; Roderic L. Jones; Bin Ouyang; J. A. Pyle; A. D. Robinson; Stephen J. Andrews; Alastair C. Lewis; Jamie Minaeian; Adam Vaughan; J. R. Dorsey; Martin Gallagher; M. Le Breton; Richard D. A. Newton; Carl J. Percival; Hugo Ricketts; S. J.-B. Bauguitte; G. J. Nott; Axel Wellpott; M. J. Ashfold; Johannes Flemming; Robyn Butler; Paul I. Palmer; Paul H. Kaye; C. Stopford; Charles Chemel; Hartmut Boesch
_{200}^{\rm crit}
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Richard D. A. Newton; G. Vaughan; Hugo Ricketts; Laura L. Pan; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Charles Chemel
= 1.1
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2015
Richard D. A. Newton; G. Vaughan; Hugo Ricketts; Laura L. Pan; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Charles Chemel
\times
Astronomische Nachrichten | 2013
Simon R. Pike; Scott T. Kay; Richard D. A. Newton
10
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017
Richard D. A. Newton; G. Vaughan; E. J. Hintsa; Michal T. Filus; Laura L. Pan; Shawn B. Honomichl; Elliot Atlas; Stephen J. Andrews; Lucy J. Carpenter
^{15}h^{-1}M_{\odot}
Archive | 2015
Richard D. A. Newton; G. Vaughan; Hugo Ricketts; Laura L. Pan; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Charles Chemel
) in a