Rita T. Lawlor
University of Verona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rita T. Lawlor.
Nature | 2015
Nicola Waddell; Marina Pajic; Ann-Marie Patch; David K. Chang; Karin S. Kassahn; Peter Bailey; Amber L. Johns; David Miller; Katia Nones; Kelly Quek; Michael Quinn; Alan Robertson; Muhammad Z.H. Fadlullah; Timothy J. C. Bruxner; Angelika N. Christ; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Suzanne Manning; Craig Nourse; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Shivangi Wani; Peter J. Wilson; Emma Markham; Nicole Cloonan; Matthew J. Anderson; J. Lynn Fink; Oliver Holmes; Stephen Kazakoff; Conrad Leonard; Felicity Newell
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal of malignancies and a major health burden. We performed whole-genome sequencing and copy number variation (CNV) analysis of 100 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Chromosomal rearrangements leading to gene disruption were prevalent, affecting genes known to be important in pancreatic cancer (TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, ARID1A and ROBO2) and new candidate drivers of pancreatic carcinogenesis (KDM6A and PREX2). Patterns of structural variation (variation in chromosomal structure) classified PDACs into 4 subtypes with potential clinical utility: the subtypes were termed stable, locally rearranged, scattered and unstable. A significant proportion harboured focal amplifications, many of which contained druggable oncogenes (ERBB2, MET, FGFR1, CDK6, PIK3R3 and PIK3CA), but at low individual patient prevalence. Genomic instability co-segregated with inactivation of DNA maintenance genes (BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2) and a mutational signature of DNA damage repair deficiency. Of 8 patients who received platinum therapy, 4 of 5 individuals with these measures of defective DNA maintenance responded.
Nature Genetics | 2013
Yuchen Jiao; Timothy M. Pawlik; Robert A. Anders; Florin M. Selaru; Mirte M. Streppel; Donald J. Lucas; Noushin Niknafs; Violeta Beleva Guthrie; Anirban Maitra; Pedram Argani; G. Johan A. Offerhaus; Juan Carlos Roa; Lewis R. Roberts; Gregory J. Gores; Irinel Popescu; Sorin Alexandrescu; Simona Dima; Matteo Fassan; Michele Simbolo; Andrea Mafficini; Paola Capelli; Rita T. Lawlor; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Filippo de Braud; Aldo Scarpa; William R. Jarnagin; David S. Klimstra; Rachel Karchin
Through exomic sequencing of 32 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, we discovered frequent inactivating mutations in multiple chromatin-remodeling genes (including BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1), and mutation in one of these genes occurred in almost half of the carcinomas sequenced. We also identified frequent mutations at previously reported hotspots in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes encoding metabolic enzymes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. In contrast, TP53 was the most frequently altered gene in a series of nine gallbladder carcinomas. These discoveries highlight the key role of dysregulated chromatin remodeling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
The Journal of Pathology | 2014
Eliana Amato; Marco Dal Molin; Andrea Mafficini; Jun Yu; Giuseppe Malleo; Borislav Rusev; Matteo Fassan; Davide Antonello; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Paola Castelli; Giuseppe Zamboni; Anirban Maitra; Roberto Salvia; Ralph H. Hruban; Claudio Bassi; Paola Capelli; Rita T. Lawlor; Michael Goggins; Aldo Scarpa
Intraductal neoplasms are important precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer and provide an opportunity to detect and treat pancreatic neoplasia before an invasive carcinoma develops. The diagnostic evaluation of these lesions is challenging, as diagnostic imaging and cytological sampling do not provide accurate information on lesion classification, the grade of dysplasia or the presence of invasion. Moreover, the molecular driver gene mutations of these precursor lesions have yet to be fully characterized. Fifty‐two intraductal papillary neoplasms, including 48 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and four intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs), were subjected to the mutation assessment in 51 cancer‐associated genes, using ion torrent semiconductor‐based next‐generation sequencing. P16 and Smad4 immunohistochemistry was performed on 34 IPMNs and 17 IPMN‐associated carcinomas. At least one somatic mutation was observed in 46/48 (96%) IPMNs; 29 (60%) had multiple gene alterations. GNAS and/or KRAS mutations were found in 44/48 (92%) of IPMNs. GNAS was mutated in 38/48 (79%) IPMNs, KRAS in 24/48 (50%) and these mutations coexisted in 18/48 (37.5%) of IPMNs. RNF43 was the third most commonly mutated gene and was always associated with GNAS and/or KRAS mutations, as were virtually all the low‐frequency mutations found in other genes. Mutations in TP53 and BRAF genes (10% and 6%) were only observed in high‐grade IPMNs. P16 was lost in 7/34 IPMNs and 9/17 IPMN‐associated carcinomas; Smad4 was lost in 1/34 IPMNs and 5/17 IPMN‐associated carcinomas. In contrast to IPMNs, only one of four ITPNs had detectable driver gene (GNAS and NRAS) mutations. Deep sequencing DNA from seven cyst fluid aspirates identified 10 of the 13 mutations detected in their associated IPMN. Using next‐generation sequencing to detect cyst fluid mutations has the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic stratification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Michele Simbolo; Marisa Gottardi; Vincenzo Corbo; Matteo Fassan; Andrea Mafficini; Giorgio Malpeli; Rita T. Lawlor; Aldo Scarpa
Histopathological samples are a treasure-trove of DNA for clinical research. However, the quality of DNA can vary depending on the source or extraction method applied. Thus a standardized and cost-effective workflow for the qualification of DNA preparations is essential to guarantee interlaboratory reproducible results. The qualification process consists of the quantification of double strand DNA (dsDNA) and the assessment of its suitability for downstream applications, such as high-throughput next-generation sequencing. We tested the two most frequently used instrumentations to define their role in this process: NanoDrop, based on UV spectroscopy, and Qubit 2.0, which uses fluorochromes specifically binding dsDNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used as the reference technique as it simultaneously assesses DNA concentration and suitability for PCR amplification. We used 17 genomic DNAs from 6 fresh-frozen (FF) tissues, 6 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues, 3 cell lines, and 2 commercial preparations. Intra- and inter-operator variability was negligible, and intra-methodology variability was minimal, while consistent inter-methodology divergences were observed. In fact, NanoDrop measured DNA concentrations higher than Qubit and its consistency with dsDNA quantification by qPCR was limited to high molecular weight DNA from FF samples and cell lines, where total DNA and dsDNA quantity virtually coincide. In partially degraded DNA from FFPE samples, only Qubit proved highly reproducible and consistent with qPCR measurements. Multiplex PCR amplifying 191 regions of 46 cancer-related genes was designated the downstream application, using 40 ng dsDNA from FFPE samples calculated by Qubit. All but one sample produced amplicon libraries suitable for next-generation sequencing. NanoDrop UV-spectrum verified contamination of the unsuccessful sample. In conclusion, as qPCR has high costs and is labor intensive, an alternative effective standard workflow for qualification of DNA preparations should include the sequential combination of NanoDrop and Qubit to assess the purity and quantity of dsDNA, respectively.
International Journal of Cancer | 2014
Katia Nones; Nic Waddell; Sarah Song; Ann Marie Patch; David Miller; Amber L. Johns; Jianmin Wu; Karin S. Kassahn; David L. A. Wood; Peter Bailey; Lynn Fink; Suzanne Manning; Angelika N. Christ; Craig Nourse; Stephen Kazakoff; Darrin Taylor; Conrad Leonard; David K. Chang; Marc D. Jones; Michelle Thomas; Clare Watson; Mark Pinese; Mark J. Cowley; Ilse Rooman; Marina Pajic; Giovanni Butturini; Anna Malpaga; Vincenzo Corbo; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi
The importance of epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation in tumorigenesis is increasingly being appreciated. To define the genome‐wide pattern of DNA methylation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), we captured the methylation profiles of 167 untreated resected PDACs and compared them to a panel of 29 adjacent nontransformed pancreata using high‐density arrays. A total of 11,634 CpG sites associated with 3,522 genes were significantly differentially methylated (DM) in PDAC and were capable of segregating PDAC from non‐malignant pancreas, regardless of tumor cellularity. As expected, PDAC hypermethylation was most prevalent in the 5′ region of genes (including the proximal promoter, 5′UTR and CpG islands). Approximately 33% DM genes showed significant inverse correlation with mRNA expression levels. Pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of aberrantly methylated genes involved in key molecular mechanisms important to PDAC: TGF‐β, WNT, integrin signaling, cell adhesion, stellate cell activation and axon guidance. Given the recent discovery that SLIT‐ROBO mutations play a clinically important role in PDAC, the role of epigenetic perturbation of axon guidance was pursued in more detail. Bisulfite amplicon deep sequencing and qRT‐PCR expression analyses confirmed recurrent perturbation of axon guidance pathway genes SLIT2, SLIT3, ROBO1, ROBO3, ITGA2 and MET and suggests epigenetic suppression of SLIT‐ROBO signaling and up‐regulation of MET and ITGA2 expression. Hypomethylation of MET and ITGA2 correlated with high gene expression, which was associated with poor survival. These data suggest that aberrant methylation plays an important role in pancreatic carcinogenesis affecting core signaling pathways with potential implications for the disease pathophysiology and therapy.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
David K. Chang; Nigel B. Jamieson; Amber L. Johns; Christopher J. Scarlett; Marina Pajic; Angela Chou; Mark Pinese; Jeremy L. Humphris; Marc D. Jones; Christopher W. Toon; Adnan Nagrial; Lorraine A. Chantrill; Venessa T. Chin; Andreia V. Pinho; Ilse Rooman; Mark J. Cowley; Jianmin Wu; R. Scott Mead; Emily K. Colvin; Jaswinder S. Samra; Vincenzo Corbo; Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Rita T. Lawlor; Stefano Crippa; Nicola Sperandio; Samantha Bersani; Euan J. Dickson; Mohamed Mohamed; Karin A. Oien
PURPOSE Individuals with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater demonstrate a broad range of outcomes, presumably because these cancers may arise from any one of the three epithelia that converge at that location. This variability poses challenges for clinical decision making and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed the potential clinical utility of histomolecular phenotypes defined using a combination of histopathology and protein expression (CDX2 and MUC1) in 208 patients from three independent cohorts who underwent surgical resection for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. RESULTS Histologic subtype and CDX2 and MUC1 expression were significant prognostic variables. Patients with a histomolecular pancreaticobiliary phenotype (CDX2 negative, MUC1 positive) segregated into a poor prognostic group in the training (hazard ratio [HR], 3.34; 95% CI, 1.69 to 6.62; P < .001) and both validation cohorts (HR, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.77 to 11.5; P < .001 and HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.17; P = .0119) compared with histomolecular nonpancreaticobiliary carcinomas. Further stratification by lymph node (LN) status defined three clinically relevant subgroups: one, patients with histomolecular nonpancreaticobiliary (intestinal) carcinoma without LN metastases who had an excellent prognosis; two, those with histomolecular pancreaticobiliary carcinoma with LN metastases who had a poor outcome; and three, the remainder of patients (nonpancreaticobiliary, LN positive or pancreaticobiliary, LN negative) who had an intermediate outcome. CONCLUSION Histopathologic and molecular criteria combine to define clinically relevant histomolecular phenotypes of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater and potentially represent distinct diseases with significant implications for current therapeutic strategies, the ability to interpret past clinical trials, and future trial design.
Journal of Proteome Research | 2012
Claudia Napoli; Nicola Sperandio; Rita T. Lawlor; Aldo Scarpa; Henriette Molinari; Michael Assfalg
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis and is highly chemoresistant. Early detection is the only means to impact long-term survival, but screening methods are lacking. Given the complex and heterogeneous nature of pancreatic cancer, unbiased analytical methods such as metabolomics by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy show promise to identify disease-specific molecular fingerprints. NMR profiles constitute a fingerprint of the biofluid, reporting quantitatively on all detectable small biomolecules. NMR spectroscopy was applied to investigate the urine metabolome of PDAC patients (n = 33) and to detect altered metabolic profiles in comparison with healthy matched controls (n = 54). The spectral data were analyzed using multivariate statistical techniques. Statistically significant differences were found between urine metabolomic profiles of PDAC and control individuals (p < 10(-5)). Group discrimination was possible due to average concentration differences of several metabolite signals, pointing to a multimolecular signature of the disease. The robustness of the determined statistical model is confirmed by its predictive performance (sensitivity = 75.8%, specificity = 90.7%). Additionally, the method allowed for a neat separation between spectral profiles of individuals with intermediate and advanced pathologic staging, as well as for the discrimination of samples based on tumor localization. NMR spectroscopy analysis of urinary metabolic profiles proved successful in identifying a complex molecular signature of PDAC. Furthermore, results of a descriptive-level analysis show the possibility to follow disease evolution and to carry out tumor site mapping. Given the high reproducibility and the noninvasive nature of the analytical procedure, the described method bears potential to impact large-scale screening programs.
Gastroenterology | 2017
Jeremy L. Humphris; Ann-Marie Patch; Katia Nones; Peter Bailey; Amber L. Johns; Skye McKay; David K. Chang; David Miller; Marina Pajic; Karin S. Kassahn; Michael Quinn; Timothy J. C. Bruxner; Angelika N. Christ; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Suzanne Manning; Craig Nourse; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Andrew Stone; Peter J. Wilson; Matthew Anderson; J. Lynn Fink; Oliver Holmes; Stephen Kazakoff; Conrad Leonard; Felicity Newell; Nick Waddell; Scott Wood; Ronald S. Mead; Qinying Xu
Pancreatic cancer is molecularly diverse, with few effective therapies. Increased mutation burden and defective DNA repair are associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in several other cancer types. We interrogated 385 pancreatic cancer genomes to define hypermutation and its causes. Mutational signatures inferring defects in DNA repair were enriched in those with the highest mutation burdens. Mismatch repair deficiency was identified in 1% of tumors harboring different mechanisms of somatic inactivation of MLH1 and MSH2. Defining mutation load in individual pancreatic cancers and the optimal assay for patient selection may inform clinical trial design for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer.
Cancer Discovery | 2015
Anguraj Sadanandam; Stephan Wullschleger; Costas A. Lyssiotis; Carsten Grötzinger; Stefano Barbi; Samantha Bersani; Jan L. Körner; Ismael Wafy; Andrea Mafficini; Rita T. Lawlor; Michele Simbolo; John M. Asara; Hendrik Bläker; Lewis C. Cantley; Bertram Wiedenmann; Aldo Scarpa; Douglas Hanahan
UNLABELLED Seeking to assess the representative and instructive value of an engineered mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) for its cognate human cancer, we profiled and compared mRNA and miRNA transcriptomes of tumors from both. Mouse PanNET tumors could be classified into two distinctive subtypes, well-differentiated islet/insulinoma tumors (IT) and poorly differentiated tumors associated with liver metastases, dubbed metastasis-like primary (MLP). Human PanNETs were independently classified into these same two subtypes, along with a third, specific gene mutation-enriched subtype. The MLP subtypes in human and mouse were similar to liver metastases in terms of miRNA and mRNA transcriptome profiles and signature genes. The human/mouse MLP subtypes also similarly expressed genes known to regulate early pancreas development, whereas the IT subtypes expressed genes characteristic of mature islet cells, suggesting different tumorigenesis pathways. In addition, these subtypes exhibit distinct metabolic profiles marked by differential pyruvate metabolism, substantiating the significance of their separate identities. SIGNIFICANCE This study involves a comprehensive cross-species integrated analysis of multi-omics profiles and histology to stratify PanNETs into subtypes with distinctive characteristics. We provide support for the RIP1-TAG2 mouse model as representative of its cognate human cancer with prospects to better understand PanNET heterogeneity and consider future applications of personalized cancer therapy.
The Journal of Pathology | 2017
Michele Simbolo; Andrea Mafficini; Katarzyna Otylia Sikora; Matteo Fassan; Stefano Barbi; Vincenzo Corbo; Luca Mastracci; Borislav Rusev; Federica Grillo; Caterina Vicentini; Roberto Ferrara; Sara Pilotto; Federico Davini; Giuseppe Pelosi; Rita T. Lawlor; Marco Chilosi; Giampaolo Tortora; Emilio Bria; Gabriella Fontanini; Marco Volante; Aldo Scarpa
Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) was applied to 148 lung neuroendocrine tumours (LNETs) comprising the four World Health Organization classification categories: 53 typical carcinoid (TCs), 35 atypical carcinoid (ACs), 27 large‐cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and 33 small‐cell lung carcinomas. A discovery screen was conducted on 46 samples by the use of whole‐exome sequencing and high‐coverage targeted sequencing of 418 genes. Eighty‐eight recurrently mutated genes from both the discovery screen and current literature were verified in the 46 cases of the discovery screen, and validated on additional 102 LNETs by targeted NGS; their prevalence was then evaluated on the whole series. Thirteen of these 88 genes were also evaluated for copy number alterations (CNAs). Carcinoids and carcinomas shared most of the altered genes but with different prevalence rates. When mutations and copy number changes were combined, MEN1 alterations were almost exclusive to carcinoids, whereas alterations of TP53 and RB1 cell cycle regulation genes and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes were significantly enriched in carcinomas. Conversely, mutations in chromatin‐remodelling genes, including those encoding histone modifiers and members of SWI–SNF complexes, were found at similar rates in carcinoids (45.5%) and carcinomas (55.0%), suggesting a major role in LNET pathogenesis. One AC and one TC showed a hypermutated profile associated with a POLQ damaging mutation. There were fewer CNAs in carcinoids than in carcinomas; however ACs showed a hybrid pattern, whereby gains of TERT, SDHA, RICTOR, PIK3CA, MYCL and SRC were found at rates similar to those in carcinomas, whereas the MEN1 loss rate mirrored that of TCs. Multivariate survival analysis revealed RB1 mutation (p = 0.0005) and TERT copy gain (p = 0.016) as independent predictors of poorer prognosis. MEN1 mutation was associated with poor prognosis in AC (p = 0.0045), whereas KMT2D mutation correlated with longer survival in SCLC (p = 0.0022). In conclusion, molecular profiling may complement histology for better diagnostic definition and prognostic stratification of LNETs.