Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert F. Jeffers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert F. Jeffers.


Nuclear Technology | 2010

VERIFIABLE FUEL CYCLE SIMULATION MODEL (VISION): A TOOL FOR ANALYZING NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE FUTURES

Jacob J. Jacobson; A. M. Yacout; Gretchen Matthern; Steven J. Piet; David Shropshire; Robert F. Jeffers; Tyler Schweitzer

Abstract The nuclear fuel cycle consists of a set of complex components that are intended to work together. To support the nuclear renaissance, it is necessary to understand the impacts of changes and timing of events in any part of the fuel cycle system such as how the system would respond to each technological change, a series of which moves the fuel cycle from where it is to a postulated future state. The system analysis working group of the United States research program on advanced fuel cycles (formerly called the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative) is developing a dynamic simulation model, VISION, to capture the relationships, timing, and changes in and among the fuel cycle components to help develop an understanding of how the overall fuel cycle works. This paper is an overview of the philosophy and development strategy behind VISION. The paper includes some descriptions of the model components and some examples of how to use VISION. For example, VISION users can now change yearly the selection of separation or reactor technologies, the performance characteristics of those technologies, and/or the routing of material among separation and reactor types—with the model still operating on a PC in <5 min.


Archive | 2009

VISION User Guide - VISION (Verifiable Fuel Cycle Simulation) Model

Jacob J. Jacobson; Robert F. Jeffers; Gretchen Matthern; Steven J. Piet; Benjamin A. Baker; Joseph Grimm

The purpose of this document is to provide a guide for using the current version of the Verifiable Fuel Cycle Simulation (VISION) model. This is a complex model with many parameters; the user is strongly encouraged to read this user guide before attempting to run the model. This model is an RD this model represents a dynamic rather than steady-state approximation of the nuclear fuel system. VISION models the nuclear cycle at the system level, not individual facilities, e.g., “reactor types” not individual reactors and “separation types” not individual separation plants. Natural uranium can be enriched, which produces enriched uranium, which goes into fuel fabrication, and depleted uranium (DU), which goes into storage. Fuel is transformed (transmuted) in reactors and then goes into a storage buffer. Used fuel can be pulled from storage into either separation of disposal. If sent to separations, fuel is transformed (partitioned) into fuel products, recovered uranium, and various categories of waste. Recycled material is stored until used by its assigned reactor type. Note that recovered uranium is itself often partitioned: some RU flows with recycled transuranic elements, some flows with wastes, and the rest is designated RU. RU comes out of storage if needed to correct the U/TRU ratio in new recycled fuel. Neither RU nor DU are designated as wastes. VISION is comprised of several Microsoft Excel input files, a Powersim Studio core, and several Microsoft Excel output files. All must be co-located in the same folder on a PC to function. We use Microsoft Excel 2003 and have not tested VISION with Microsoft Excel 2007. The VISION team uses both Powersim Studio 2005 and 2009 and it should work with either.


ieee international conference on technologies for homeland security | 2009

Modeling and simulating blast effects on electric substations

Lyle G. Roybal; Robert F. Jeffers; Kent E. McGillivary; Tony D. Paul; Ryan Jacobson

A software simulation tool was developed at Idaho National Laboratory to estimate the fragility of electric substation components subject to an explosive blast. Damage caused by explosively driven fragments on a generic electric substation was estimated by using a ray-tracing technique to track and tabulate fragment impacts and penetrations of substation components. This technique is based on methods used for assessing vulnerability of military aircraft and ground vehicles to explosive blasts. An open-source rendering and ray-trace engine was used for geometric modeling and interactions between fragments and substation components. Semi-empirical material interactions models were used to calculate blast parameters and simulate high-velocity material interactions between explosively driven fragments and substation components. Finally, a Monte Carlo simulation was added to model the random nature of fragment generation allowing a skilled analyst to predict failure probabilities of substation components.


Energy Policy | 2013

Dynamic analysis of policy drivers for bioenergy commodity markets

Robert F. Jeffers; Jacob J. Jacobson; Erin Searcy


Archive | 2013

Feedstock Pathways for Bio-Oil and Syngas Conversion Pathways

David J. Muth; Jacob J. Jacobson; Kara G. Cafferty; Robert F. Jeffers


Archive | 2015

Dynamic Supply and Demand: A Market Modeling Method with Application to Rare Earth Elements.

Robert F. Jeffers; Kara G. Cafferty


Archive | 2015

Simulating the Neodymium Supply Chain Using Explicit Dynamic Supply and Demand.

Robert F. Jeffers; Kara G. Cafferty; Braeton J. Smith; Max Brown; Roderick G. Eggert


The 31st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society,Cambridge, MA,07/21/2013,07/25/2013 | 2013

Using System Dynamics to Define, Study, and Implement Smart Control Strategies on the Electric Power Grid

Lyle G. Roybal; Robert F. Jeffers


2013 International System Dynamics Conference,Boston Ma,07/21/2013,07/25/2013 | 2013

Bioenergy market competition for biomass: A system dynamics review of current policies

Jacob J. Jacobson; Robert F. Jeffers


Archive | 2011

User Guide for VISION 3.4.7 (Verifiable Fuel Cycle Simulation) Model

Jacob J. Jacobson; Robert F. Jeffers; Gretchen Matthern; Steven J. Piet; Wendell D. Hintze

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert F. Jeffers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven J. Piet

Idaho National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lyle G. Roybal

Idaho National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. M. Yacout

Argonne National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Muth

Idaho National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erin Searcy

Idaho National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge