Robert J. Ames

The posterior pedicle screw construct: 5-year results for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves

OBJECT Several studies of the outcomes of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with thoracolumbar and lumbar curves after treatment with posterior pedicle screws have been reported, but most of these studies reported only 2-year follow-up. The authors analyzed the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar curves treated with posterior pedicle screws after 5 years of follow-up. METHODS A multicenter database was retrospectively queried to identify patients with AIS who underwent spinal fusion for Lenke 3C, 5C, and 6C curves. Radiographs from the following times were compared: preoperative, first follow-up visit, 1-year follow-up visit, 2-year follow-up visit, and 5-year follow-up visit. Chart review included scoliometer measurements, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaires, and complications requiring return to the operating room. RESULTS Among 26 patients with Lenke 3C, 5C, and 6C curves, the mean (± SD) age was 14.6 ± 2.1 years. From the time of the preoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean coronal lumbar Cobb angles (p < 0.0001), and from the time of the first postoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, the lumbar curve remained stable (p = 0.14). From the time of the preoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean coronal thoracic Cobb angles (p < 0.0001), and from the time of the first postoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, the thoracic curve remained stable (p = 0.10). From the first postoperative visit to the 5-year follow-up visit, the thoracic kyphosis (T5-12) remained stable (p = 0.10), and from the time of the preoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, the lumbar lordosis (T-12 to top of sacrum) remained stable (p = 0.44). From the preoperative visit to the 5-year follow-up visit, the coronal balance improved significantly (p < 0.05) and remained stable from the first postoperative visit to the 5-year follow-up visit (p = 0.20). The SRS-22 total scores improved significantly from before surgery to 5 years after surgery (p < 0.0001). No patients required reoperation because of complications. CONCLUSIONS Correction of the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes in this cohort of patients was maintained from the first follow-up measurements to 5 years after surgery. In addition, at 5 years after surgery total SRS-22 scores and inclinometer readings were improved from preoperative scores and measurements.

Comparison of 5-year outcomes between pedicle screw and hybrid constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

OBJECT Pedicle screw fixation has been theorized to provide better correction of scoliotic deformity, but controversy over the benefits of pedicle screw-only constructs remains, and the longer-term impact of pedicle screw fixation as compared with hybrid constructs is unclear. In this study, a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted to determine the longer-term impact of pedicle screw fixation as compared with hybrid constructs in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed a multicenter database of pediatric patients (ages ≤ 18) from 1995 to 2006 and identified 127 patients with Lenke Type 1-4 AIS curves with a minimum 5 years of follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on whether they had undergone pedicle screw fixation or fixation with hybrid constructs. RESULTS The mean main thoracic curvature of 56.1° ± 13.0°, which corrected to 14.9° ± 9.3°, translated into a mean correction of 73% (p < 0.01). The curve was 19.4° ± 10.6° at 2-year follow-up and 20.5° ± 10.4° at 5 years. When comparing preoperative parameters between the groups, differences were noted in the magnitude of the main thoracic curve (p = 0.04), flexibility of the main thoracic curve (p = 0.02), coronal balance (p = 0.04), T2-12 kyphosis (p = 0.02), and sex (p = 0.02). The pedicle screw cohort had fewer spinal segments instrumented (p < 0.01), fewer anterior releases performed (p = 0.02), and fewer thoracoplasties performed (p < 0.01). By 5 years of follow-up, significant differences were apparent between the two cohorts with respect to upper thoracic curvature (p = 0.01), T2-12 (p = 0.02) and T5-12 (p = 0.02) kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (p < 0.01), and sagittal balance (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Although some preoperative differences did exist, outcomes were comparable between hybrid and screw constructs at 2 and 5 years. However, hybrid constructs required more concurrent anterior releases and thoracoplasties to achieve similar results.

Reversible Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Alerts in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND Confidence in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) data can allow scoliosis surgeons to proceed with surgery even after a monitoring alert, assuming the recovery of signals. We sought to determine the outcomes of surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after a notable IONM alert. METHODS We identified 676 patients who underwent arthrodesis with use of IONM for the treatment of AIS. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who experienced a lower-extremity IONM alert and those who did not. An alert was defined as a notable change in IONM data, specifically, a ≥50% drop in somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and/or in transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs). RESULTS Of the 676 patients, 36 (5.3%) experienced IONM alerts. Those patients had a larger preoperative major Cobb angle (mean of 61° ± 13° compared with 55° ± 12° for the no-alert group; p < 0.01), a greater number of levels fused (mean of 12 ± 2 compared with 11 ± 2; p < 0.01), a longer operative duration (mean of 357 ± 157 minutes compared with 298 ± 117 minutes; p < 0.01), a higher estimated blood loss (1,857 ± 1,323 mL compared with 999 ± 796 mL; p < 0.01), and a greater volume of autologous blood transfused (mean of 527 ± 525 mL compared with 268 ± 327 mL; p < 0.01). Among patients who experienced an alert and had a completed operation (34 of 36 patients), mean postoperative radiographic measurements were similar to those of the no-alert group in terms of the percentage of correction of the major Cobb angle (alert, 66% ± 13%; no alert, 64% ± 19%; p = 0.53) and of rib prominence (alert, 49% ± 36%; no alert, 47% ± 46%; p = 0.83) and measurement of thoracic kyphosis (alert, 23° ± 10°; no alert, 22° ± 2°; p = 0.58). The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 outcome scores were also similar between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Notable IONM changes occurred in 5.3% of the patients who underwent arthrodesis for AIS. Those patients had larger preoperative deformity, a longer operative duration, a greater number of levels fused, a higher estimated blood loss, and a greater volume of autologous blood transfused. Return of IONM data guided the surgeon to safely complete the procedure in 34 of 36 patients, with correction similar to that of patients who did not experience an alert. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of patients with syringomyelia undergoing spine deformity surgery: do large syrinxes behave differently from small?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT A paucity of data exists studying outcomes of patients with syringomyelia undergoing spinal deformity correction. The literature does not stratify patients by syrinx size, which is likely a major contributor to outcomes. PURPOSE The study aimed to compare differences in outcomes between patients with large (≥4 mm) and small syrinxes (<4 mm) undergoing spinal deformity correction. DESIGN This is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE The sample included 28 patients (11 with large syrinx [LS, >4 mm] and 17 with small syrinx [SS, <4 mm]). OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures were radiographic, operative, and neurophysiological measures. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients with syringomyelia who underwent spine deformity surgery with 2-year follow-up. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were collected and compared preoperatively and at 2 years. RESULTS The LS group (11 patients) trended toward more left-sided thoracic curves (36% vs. 18%, p=.38) and was more likely to have had a Chiari decompression (45% vs. 12%, p=.08). The LS patients had larger preoperative major curves (LS=66° vs. SS=57°, p=.05), more thoracic kyphosis (LS=42°, SS=24°, p<.01), and greater rib prominences (LS=16°, SS=13°, p=.04). The LS patients had more levels fused (LS=12.2, SS=11.2, p=.05), higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (LS=1068 cc, SS=832 cc, p=.04), and a trend toward less percent correction of the major curve (LS=57%, SS=65%, p=.18). Four of 11 LS patients (36%) did not have somatosensory evoked potentials, and one of these also did not have motor evoked potentials. Neuromonitoring changes occurred in 3 of 11 (27%) LS patients and in none of the SS patients, with no postoperative deficits. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of patients with syringomyelia undergoing spine deformity surgery are dependent on the size of the syrinx. Those with large syringomyelia are fused longer with more EBL and less correction. Spine surgeons should be aware that these patients are more likely to have less reliable neuromonitoring, with a higher chance of experiencing a change.

Management of spinal cord injury–related scoliosis using pedicle screw–only constructs

OBJECT Almost all pediatric patients who incur a spinal cord injury (SCI) will develop scoliosis, and younger patients are at highest risk for curve progression requiring surgical intervention. Although the use of pedicle screws is increasing in popularity, their impact on SCI-related scoliosis has not been described. The authors retrospectively reviewed the radiographic outcomes of pedicle screw-only constructs in all patients who had undergone SCI-related scoliosis correction at a single institution. METHODS Medical records and radiographs from Shriners Hospital for Children-Philadelphia for the period between November 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients, whose mean age at the index surgery was 14.91±3.29 years, were identified. The cohort had a mean follow-up of 33.2±22.8 months. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angle was 65.5°±25.7°, which corrected to 20.3°±14.4°, translating into a 69% correction (p<0.05). The preoperative coronal balance was 24.4±22.6 mm, with a postoperative measurement of 21.6±20.7 mm (p=1.00). Preoperative pelvic obliquity was 12.7°±8.7°, which corrected to 4.1°±3.8°, translating into a 68% correction (p<0.05). Preoperative shoulder balance, as measured by the clavicle angle, was 8.2°±8.4°, which corrected to 2.7°±3.1° (67% correction, p<0.05). Preoperatively, thoracic kyphosis measured 44.2°±23.7° and was 33.8°±11.5° postoperatively. Thoracolumbar kyphosis was 18.7°±12.1° preoperatively, reduced to 8.1°±7.7° postoperatively, and measured 26.8°±20.2° at the last follow-up (p<0.05). Preoperatively, lumbar lordosis was 35.3°±22.0°, which remained stable at 35.6°±15.0° postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Pedicle screw constructs appear to provide better correction of coronal parameters than historically reported and provide significant improvement of sagittal kyphosis as well. Although pedicle screws appear to provide good radiographic results, correlation with clinical outcomes is necessary to determine the true impact of pedicle screw constructs on SCI-related scoliosis correction.

Anterior Vertebral Body Stapling for the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis

The standard of care for moderate idiopathic scoliosis (20°–45°) typically involves observation and bracing to prevent further curve progression. However, several studies suggest that bracing is only effective when worn >12 h a day and may create psychosocial stresses resulting in limited compliance (Rahman et al., J Pediatr Orthop 25(4):420–422, 2005; Katz et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(6):1343–1352, 2010; Helfenstein et al., Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):339–344, 2006; Weinstein et al., N Engl J Med 369(16):1512–1521, 2013; Misterska et al., Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(14):1218–1223, 2012; Cheung et al., Int Orthop 31:507–511, 2007; Misterska et al., Med Sci Monit 17(2):CR83–CR90, 2011). Furthermore, in patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis with curves between 20° and 30° at the onset of puberty, it has been shown that there is a 75% risk of requiring a spinal fusion, and in curves >30°, there is a 100% risk of fusion (Dimeglio et al., J Pediatr Orthop 31(1 Suppl):S28-S36, 2011). In a subset of skeletally immature patients with progressive idiopathic scoliosis and significant growth remaining, surgical spinal growth modulation is an alternative to bracing for the treatment of moderate idiopathic scoliosis. Spinal growth modulation relies upon the Hueter-Volkmann principle to slow growth on the convexity of the curve and allow growth on the concavity of the curve, resulting in gradual correction of the deformity. Several devices are currently utilized including vertebral body stapling (VBS) and vertebral body tethering (VBT). The potential advantages of these techniques are curve correction through a minimally invasive thoracoscopic or a mini-open retroperitoneal approach, a quicker recovery, and preservation of motion.