Robyn P. Angliss
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robyn P. Angliss.
Conservation Biology | 2015
Kristin L. Laidre; Harry L. Stern; Kit M. Kovacs; Lloyd F. Lowry; Sue E. Moore; Eric V. Regehr; Steven H. Ferguson; Øystein Wiig; Peter L. Boveng; Robyn P. Angliss; Erik W. Born; D Litovka; Lori T. Quakenbush; Christian Lydersen; Dag Vongraven; Fernando Ugarte
Abstract Arctic marine mammals (AMMs) are icons of climate change, largely because of their close association with sea ice. However, neither a circumpolar assessment of AMM status nor a standardized metric of sea ice habitat change is available. We summarized available data on abundance and trend for each AMM species and recognized subpopulation. We also examined species diversity, the extent of human use, and temporal trends in sea ice habitat for 12 regions of the Arctic by calculating the dates of spring sea ice retreat and fall sea ice advance from satellite data (1979–2013). Estimates of AMM abundance varied greatly in quality, and few studies were long enough for trend analysis. Of the AMM subpopulations, 78% (61 of 78) are legally harvested for subsistence purposes. Changes in sea ice phenology have been profound. In all regions except the Bering Sea, the duration of the summer (i.e., reduced ice) period increased by 5–10 weeks and by >20 weeks in the Barents Sea between 1979 and 2013. In light of generally poor data, the importance of human use, and forecasted environmental changes in the 21st century, we recommend the following for effective AMM conservation: maintain and improve comanagement by local, federal, and international partners; recognize spatial and temporal variability in AMM subpopulation response to climate change; implement monitoring programs with clear goals; mitigate cumulative impacts of increased human activity; and recognize the limits of current protected species legislation.
Archive | 2010
B. M. Allen; Robyn P. Angliss; Paul R. Wade; Michael A. Perez; Lowell W. Fritz; David J. Rugh; Marilyn E. Dahlheim; Janice M. Waite; Phil Clapham; Rolf R. Ream; Kim E. W. Shelden; Brian S. Fadely; Roderick C. Hobbs; Rodney G. Towell; Brenda K. Rone; G. R. Lewis; Sally A. Mizroch; Alexandre N. Zerbini
NOTE – March 2008: In areas outside of Alaska, studies have shown that stock structure is more fine-scale than is reflected in the Alaska Stock Assessment Reports. At this time, no data are available to reflect stock structure for harbor porpoise in Alaska. However, based on comparisons with other regions, smaller stocks are likely. Should new information on harbor porpoise stocks become available, the harbor porpoise Stock Assessment Reports will be updated.
Archive | 2007
Robyn P. Angliss; R. B. Outlaw; Paul R. Wade; Michael A. Perez; Phil Clapham; Lowell W. Fritz; David J. Rugh; Kim E. W. Shelden; Roderick C. Hobbs; Rodney G. Towell; Sally A. Mizroch; Alexandre N. Zerbini
STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE The humpback whale is distributed worldwide in all ocean basins. In winter, most humpback whales occur in the subtropical and tropical waters of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Humpback whales in the high latitudes of the North Pacific are seasonal migrants that feed on euphausiids and small schooling fishes (Nemoto 1957; 1959, Clapham and Mead 1999). The humpback whale population was considerably reduced as a result of intensive commercial exploitation during the 20 century. A large-scale study of humpback whales throughout the North Pacific was conducted in 2004-06 (the Structure of Populations, Levels of Abundance, and Status of Humpbacks, or SPLASH, project). Initial results from this project (Calambokidis et al. 2008), including abundance estimates and movement information, are used in this report. Genetic results, which may provide a more comprehensive understanding of humpback whale population structure in the North Pacific, should be available in the near future. Figure 38. Approximate distribution of humpback whales in the western North Pacific (shaded area). Feeding and wintering grounds are presented above (see text). Area within the hash lines is a probable distribution area based on sightings in the Beaufort Sea. See Figure 39 for humpback whale distribution in the eastern North Pacific.
Archive | 2002
Robyn P. Angliss; K. L. Lodge; Brian S. Fadely; Roderick C. Hobbs; Thomas R. Loughlin; Sally A. Mizroch; Sue E. Moore; M. Muto; Michael A. Perez; David J. Rugh; John L. Sease; Kim E. W. Shelden; Rodney G. Towell; Anne E. York
STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE Steller sea lions range along the North Pacific Rim from northern Japan to California (Loughlin et al. 1984), with centers of abundance and distribution in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands, respectively. The species is not known to migrate, but individuals disperse widely outside of the breeding season (late May-early July), thus potentially intermixing with animals from other areas. Despite the wide-ranging movements of juveniles and adult males in particular, exchange between rookeries by breeding adult females and males (other than between adjoining rookeries) appears low (NMFS 1995). Loughlin (1997) considered the following information when classifying stock structure based on the phylogeographic approach of Dizon et al. (1992): 1) Distributional data: geographic distribution continuous, yet a high degree of natal site fidelity and low (<10%) exchange rate of breeding animals between rookeries; 2) Population response data: substantial differences in population dynamics (York et al. 1996); 3) Phenotypic data: unknown; and 4) Genotypic data: substantial differences in Figure 1. Approximate distribution of Steller sea lions in the North Pacific. Major U.S. haulouts and rookeries (50 CFR 226.202, 27 August 1993) and active Asian haulouts and rookeries (Burkanov and Loughlin, 2005) are depicted (points). Black dashed line (144° W) indicates stock boundary (Loughlin 1997). Note: Haulouts and rookeries in British Columbia are not shown.
Archive | 2016
M. Muto; V. T. Helker; Robyn P. Angliss; Brian A. Allen; Peter L. Boveng; Jeffrey Mark Breiwick; Michael F. Cameron; Phil Clapham; Shawn Patrick Dahle; Marilyn E. Dahlheim; Brian S. Fadely; Megan C. Ferguson; Lowell W. Fritz; Roderick C. Hobbs; Yulia V. Ivashchenko; Amy S. Kennedy; Josh M. London; Sally A. Mizroch; Rolf R. Ream; E. L. Richmond; Kim E. W. Shelden; Rodney G. Towell; Paul R. Wade; Janice M. Waite; Alexandre N. Zerbini
NOTE – NMFS is in the process of reviewing humpback whale stock structure under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) in light of the 14 Distinct Population Segments established under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (81 FR 62259, 8 September 2016). A complete revision of the humpback whale stock assessments will be postponed until this review is complete. In the interim, new information on humpback whale mortality and serious injury is provided within this report.
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology | 2016
Erica Fleishman; Bill Streever; Robyn P. Angliss; Christopher W. Clark; William T. Ellison; Adam S. Frankel; Jason Gedamke; Matthias Leu; Megan F. McKenna; Roberto Racca; Samantha E. Simmons; Robert Suydam
There are no standards for assessment of the cumulative effects of underwater sound. Quantitative assessments typically consider a single source, whereas qualitative assessments may include multiple sources but rarely identify response variables. As a step toward understanding the cumulative effects of underwater sound, we assessed the aggregated sounds of multiple sources received by migrating bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus). The quantitative method models the sound field from multiple sources and simulates movement of a population through it. The qualitative method uses experts to assess the responses of individuals and populations to sound sources and identify the potential mechanisms. These methods increase the transparency of assessments.
Archive | 2002
Margaret M. Krahn; Michael J. Ford; William F. Perrin; Paul R. Wade; Robyn P. Angliss; M. Bradley Hanson; Barbara Louise Taylor; Gina M. Ylitalo; Marilyn E. Dahlheim; John E. Stein; Robin S. Waples
Archive | 2011
B. M. Allen; Robyn P. Angliss; Paul R. Wade
Archive | 2004
Robyn P. Angliss; K. L. Lodge; Roderick C. Hobbs; Thomas R. Loughlin; Sue E. Moore; Michael A. Perez; David J. Rugh; John L. Sease; Kim E. W. Shelden; Anne E. York
Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems | 2016
Kathryn L. Sweeney; V. T. Helker; Wayne L. Perryman; Donald J. LeRoi; Lowell W. Fritz; Tom Gelatt; Robyn P. Angliss