Roland S. Johansson

Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects

SummaryTo be successful, precision manipulation of small objects requires a refined coordination of forces excerted on the object by the tips of the fingers and thumb. The present paper deals quantitatively with the regulation of the coordination between the grip force and the vertical lifting force, denoted as the load force, while small objects were lifted, positioned in space and replaced by human subjects using the pinch grip. It was shown that the grip force changed in parallel with the load force generated by the subject to overcome various forces counteracting the intended manipulation. The balance between the two forces was adapted to the friction between the skin and the object providing a relatively small safety margin to prevent slips, i.e. the more slippery the object the higher the grip force at any given load force. Experiments with local anaesthesia indicated that this adaptation was dependent on cutaneous afferent input. Afferent information related to the frictional condition could influence the force coordination already about 0.1 s after the object was initially gripped, i.e. approximately at the time the grip and load forces began to increase in parallel. Further, “secondary”, adjustments of the force balance could occur later in response to small short-lasting slips, revealed as vibrations in the object. The new force balance following slips was maintained, indicating that the relationship between the two forces was set on the basis of a memory trace. Its updating was most likely accounted for by tactile afferent information entering intermittently at inappropriate force coordination, e.g. as during slips. The latencies between the onset of such slips and the appearance of the adjustments (0.06–0.08 s) clearly indicated that the underlying neural mechanisms operated highly automatically.

Factors influencing the force control during precision grip

SummaryA small object was gripped between the tips of the index finger and thumb and held stationary in space. Its weight and surface structure could be changed between consecutive lifting trials, without changing its visual appearance. The grip force and the vertical lifting force acting on the object, as well as the vertical position of the object were continuously recorded. Likewise, the minimal grip force necessary to prevent slipping, was measured. The difference between this minimal force and the employed grip force, was defined as the safety margin to prevent slipping.It was found that the applied grip force was critically balanced to optimize the motor behaviour so that slipping between the skin and the gripped object did not occur and the grip force did not reach exeedingly high values. To achieve this motor control, the nervous system relied on a mechanism that measured the frictional condition between the surface structure of the object and the fingers. Experiments with local anaesthesia indicated that this mechanism used information from receptors in the fingers, most likely skin mechanoreceptors. In addition to friction, the control of the grip force was heavily influenced by the weight of the object and by a safety margin factor related to the individual subject. The frictional conditions during the previous trial could also, to some extent, influence the grip force.

Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks

During object manipulation tasks, the brain selects and implements action-phase controllers that use sensory predictions and afferent signals to tailor motor output to the physical properties of the objects involved. Analysis of signals in tactile afferent neurons and central processes in humans reveals how contact events are encoded and used to monitor and update task performance.

Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip

SummarySmall objects were lifted from a table, held in the air, and replaced using the precision grip between the index finger and thumb. The adaptation of motor commands to variations in the objects weight and sensori-motor mechanisms responsible for optimum performance of the transition between the various phases of the task were examined. The lifting movement involved mainly a flexion of the elbow joint. The grip force, the load force (vertical lifting force) and the vertical position were measured. Electromyographic activity (e.m.g.) was recorded from four antagonist pairs of hand/arm muscles primarily influencing the grip force or the load force. In the lifting series with constant weight, the force development was adequately programmed for the current weight during the loading phase (i.e. the phase of parallel increase in the load and grip forces during isometric conditions before the lift-off). The grip and load force rate trajectories were mainly single-peaked, bell-shaped and roughly proportional to the final force. In the lifting series with unexpected weight changes between lifts, it was established that these force rate profiles were programmed on the basis of the previous weight. Consequently, with lifts programmed for a lighter weight the object did not move at the end of the continuous force increase. Then the forces increased in a discontinous fashion until the force of gravity was overcome. With lifts programmed for a heavier weight, the high load and grip force rates at the moment the load force overcame the force of gravity caused a pronounced positional overshoot and a high grip force peak, respectively. In these conditions the erroneous programmed commands were automatically terminated by somatosensory signals elicited by the start of the movement. A similar triggering by somatosensory information applied to the release of programmed motor commands accounting for the unloading phase (i.e. the parallel decrease in the grip and load forces after the object contacted the table following its replacement). These commands were always adequately programmed for the weight.

Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip

SummaryWhile human subjects lift small objects using the precision grip between the tips of the fingers and thumb the ratio between the grip force and the load force (i.e. the vertical lifting force) is adapted to the friction between the object and the skin. The present report provides direct evidence that signals in tactile afferent units are utilized in this adaptation. Tactile afferent units were readily excited by small but distinct slips between the object and the skin revealed as vibrations in the object. Following such afferent slip responses the force ratio was upgraded to a higher, stable value which provided a safety margin to prevent further slips. The latency between the onset of the a slip and the appearance of the ratio change (74 ±9 ms) was about half the minimum latency for intended grip force changes triggered by cutaneous stimulation of the fingers. This indicated that the motor responses were automatically initiated. If the subjects were asked to very slowly separate their thumb and the opposing finger while the object was held in air, grip force reflexes originating from afferent slip responses appeared to counteract the voluntary command, but the maintained upgrading of the force ratio was suppressed. In experiments with weak electrical cutaneous stimulation delivered through the surfaces of the object it was established that tactile input alone could trigger the upgrading of the force ratio. Although, varying in responsiveness, each of the three types of tactile units which exhibit a pronounced dynamic sensitivity (FA I, FA II and SA I units) could reliably signal these slips. Similar but generally weaker afferent responses, sometimes followed by small force ratio changes, also occurred in the FA I and the SA I units in the absence of detectable vibrations events. In contrast to the responses associated with clear vibratory events, the weaker afferent responses were probably caused by localized frictional slips, i.e. slips limited to small fractions of the skin area in contact with the object. Indications were found that the early adjustment to a new frictional condition, which may appear soon (ca. 0.1–0.2 s) after the object is initially gripped, might depend on the vigorous responses in the FA I units during the initial phase of the lifts (see Westling and Johansson 1987). The role of the tactile input in the adaptation of the force coordination to the frictional condition is discussed.

Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation

We analyzed the coordination between gaze behavior, fingertip movements, and movements of the manipulated object when subjects reached for and grasped a bar and moved it to press a target-switch. Subjects almost exclusively fixated certain landmarks critical for the control of the task. Landmarks at which contact events took place were obligatory gaze targets. These included the grasp site on the bar, the target, and the support surface where the bar was returned after target contact. Any obstacle in the direct movement path and the tip of the bar were optional landmarks. Subjects never fixated the hand or the moving bar. Gaze and hand/bar movements were linked concerning landmarks, with gaze leading. The instant that gaze exited a given landmark coincided with a kinematic event at that landmark in a manner suggesting that subjects monitored critical kinematic events for phasic verification of task progress and subgoal completion. For both the obstacle and target, subjects directed saccades and fixations to sites that were offset from the physical extension of the objects. Fixations related to an obstacle appeared to specify a location around which the extending tip of the bar should travel. We conclude that gaze supports hand movement planning by marking key positions to which the fingertips or grasped object are subsequently directed. The salience of gaze targets arises from the functional sensorimotor requirements of the task. We further suggest that gaze control contributes to the development and maintenance of sensorimotor correlation matrices that support predictive motor control in manipulation.

Reflex origin for the slowing of motoneurone firing rates in fatigue of human voluntary contractions

During fatigue from a sustained maximal voluntary contraction (m.v.c.) the mean motoneurone discharge rates decline. In the present experiments we found no recovery of firing rates after 3 min of rest if the fatigued muscle was kept ischaemic, but near full recovery 3 min after the blood supply was restored. Since 3 min is thus sufficient time for recovery of any central changes in excitability, the results support the hypothesis that, during fatigue, motoneurone firing rates may be regulated by a peripheral reflex originating in response to fatigue‐induced changes within the muscle.

Action plans used in action observation.

How do we understand the actions of others? According to the direct matching hypothesis, action understanding results from a mechanism that maps an observed action onto motor representations of that action. Although supported by neurophysiological and brain-imaging studies, direct evidence for this hypothesis is sparse. In visually guided actions, task-specific proactive eye movements are crucial for planning and control. Because the eyes are free to move when observing such actions, the direct matching hypothesis predicts that subjects should produce eye movements similar to those produced when they perform the tasks. If an observer analyses action through purely visual means, however, eye movements will be linked reactively to the observed action. Here we show that when subjects observe a block stacking task, the coordination between their gaze and the actors hand is predictive, rather than reactive, and is highly similar to the gaze–hand coordination when they perform the task themselves. These results indicate that during action observation subjects implement eye motor programs directed by motor representations of manual actions and thus provide strong evidence for the direct matching hypothesis.

Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand.

The human hand and the brain are close partners in two important and closely interconnected functions, i.e. to explore the physical world and to reshape selected segments of it according to mans intentions. Both these functions are highly dependent on accurate descriptions of mechanical events when objects are brought in contact with the hand. A key role in providing such information is played by the population of mechanoreceptive afferent units innervating the hairless skin of the volar aspect of the hand, i.e. the glabrous skin. Recently it became possible to explore the characteristics of these units in man and to elucidate their role in perception as well as in motor functions.

Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans.

SummaryImpulses in single tactile units innervating the human glabrous skin were recorded percutaneously from the median nerve using tungsten electrodes. The units were classified as belonging to one of the four categories: fast adapting with small receptive fields (FA I), fast adapting with large receptive fields (FA II), slowly adapting with small fields (SA I), and slowly adapting with large fields (SA II). A small test object was lifted, positioned in space and replaced using the precision grip between fingers and thumb. The grip force, the load force (vertical lifting force), the vertical movements of the object and vibrations (accelerations) in the object were recorded. After being virtually silent between lifts, the FA I units whose fields contacted the object became highly active during the initial period of grip force increase (initial response). This was also true for most SA I units. Accordingly, most of the skin deformation changes took place at low grip forces (below ca. 1 N). Later, while the load and grip forces increased in parallel during isometric conditions, the FA I and SA I units continued firing but generally at declining impulse rates. As long as the object was held in the air, the SA I units generally maintained firing with a tendency to adaptation. A minority of the FA I unit also discharged, especially during periods of pronounced physiological muscle tremor. The SA I units usually became silent when the grip and load forces in parallel declined to zero during isometric conditions after the object had contacted the table. However, during the very release of the grip the FA I units and some SA I units showed brief burst discharges (release response). The FA II units responded distinctly to the mechanical transients associated with the start of the vertical movement and especially with the sudden cessation of movement at the terminal table contact. FA II units whose end organs were remotely located in relation to the skin areas in contact with the object also responded. Most FA II units also discharged at the initial touch and at the release of the object, albeit less reliably than the type I units. In addition to weak dynamic responses during the phase of isometric force increase, the SA II units showed comparatively strong tonic responses while the object was held during static conditions. High firing rates also were maintained during long-lasting lifts. Moreover, it was established that the signals in SA II afferents were related to the three dimensional force profile in the grip. The results are discussed with regard to the possible implications for the control of precise manipulative movements.