Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Samantha G. Maliha is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Samantha G. Maliha.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2015

Risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study

Alexis Ogdie; YiDing Yu; Kevin Haynes; Thorvardur Jon Love; Samantha G. Maliha; Yihui Jiang; Andrea B. Troxel; Sean Hennessy; Stephen E. Kimmel; David J. Margolis; Hyon K. Choi; Nehal N. Mehta; Joel M. Gelfand

Objectives We aimed to quantify the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis without known PsA compared with the general population after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Methods A population-based longitudinal cohort study from 1994 to 2010 was performed in The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a primary care medical record database in the UK. Patients aged 18–89 years of age with PsA, RA or psoriasis were included. Up to 10 unexposed controls matched on practice and index date were selected for each patient with PsA. Outcomes included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents and the composite outcome (MACE). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the HRs for each outcome adjusted for traditional risk factors. A priori, we hypothesised an interaction between disease status and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use. Results Patients with PsA (N=8706), RA (N=41 752), psoriasis (N=138 424) and unexposed controls (N=81 573) were identified. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, the risk of MACE was higher in patients with PsA not prescribed a DMARD (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.49), patients with RA (No DMARD: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.50, DMARD: HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.70), patients with psoriasis not prescribed a DMARD (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15) and patients with severe psoriasis (DMARD users: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.73). Conclusions Cardiovascular risk should be addressed with all patients affected by psoriasis, PsA or RA.


Rheumatology | 2017

Cause-specific mortality in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Alexis Ogdie; Samantha G. Maliha; D.B. Shin; Thorvardur Jon Love; Joshua F. Baker; Yihui Jiang; Hyon K. Choi; Joel M. Gelfand

Objective The objective of this study was to examine cause-specific mortality in patients with PsA compared with the general population and compared with patients with RA. Methods A cohort study was performed using The Health Improvement Network among patients aged 18-89 years with data from 1994 to 2010. PsA and RA were defined by medical codes, and up to 10 unexposed controls were matched on practice and start date within the practice. Cause of death was classified using categories from UK death statistics. Each death was manually reviewed to ensure appropriate classification. Age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable adjusted HRs were calculated using competing risks survival regression. Results Among patients with PsA (8706), RA (41 752) and unexposed controls (81 573), 470, 7004 and 5269 deaths were observed, respectively. The most common causes of death among all patients were cardiovascular disease, followed by malignancy, respiratory deaths and infection. Cause of death was unknown in ∼25%. Among PsA patients, cardiovascular (1.09, 0.91-1.32), respiratory (0.97, 0.79-1.20), malignancy (1.03, 0.86-1.25) and infection deaths (1.05, 0.79-1.39) were not elevated. Among patients with RA, cardiovascular (1.55, 1.44-1.66), respiratory (1.85, 1.72-2.01), malignancy (1.18, 1.08-1.28) and infection deaths (2.21, 2.00-2.44) were significantly elevated compared with population controls. Although less common, suicide deaths were elevated in PsA and RA (HR 3.03 and 2.47, respectively). Conclusion Overall mortality and cause-specific mortality risk were not elevated among patients with PsA except for suicide deaths. Patients with RA were at increased risk of deaths from cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and infectious diseases.


Aesthetic Surgery Journal | 2018

Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Does the Literature Support the Longevity of This Procedure?

Stelios C. Wilson; David A Daar; Samantha G. Maliha; Salma A. Abdou; Steven M. Levine; Daniel C. Baker

Background Lower eyelid blepharoplasty has continued to evolve with ongoing debate regarding optimal techniques. Despite large case series publishing excellent results and minimal complications, the true longevity of these procedures remains unclear. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine how thoroughly the aesthetic surgery literature assesses the longevity of lower blepharoplasty. Methods A 20-year comprehensive literature review from 1997 to 2017 was conducted. The titles and abstracts of 180 articles were reviewed, yielding 86 potential publications; 49 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Results A total of 10,698 patients were included for analysis. Reported follow-up ranged between 1 week and 192 months. Mean follow-up was 14.8 months for the 29 studies (59.2%) that reported these data. Pooled analysis of complication rates demonstrated 0.77% (n = 82) reoperation, 0.37% (n = 39) scleral show, 0.25% (n = 27) lid malposition, and 0.24% (n = 25) ectropion rates, among others. Forty-four studies (89.8%) published postoperative photographs with a total of 141 unique postoperative time points that were supported with photographic evidence (mean: 15.3 months; range: 1 week-192 months). In this series, for only 10 patients (0.094%) were postoperative photographs available at time points beyond 24 months. Conclusions Lower eyelid blepharoplasty is a powerful procedure with seemingly minimal morbidity despite its technical demands. The longevity of this procedure is poorly supported with photographic evidence in the literature. Studies do not adequately report or represent their follow-up to capture long-lasting results. Standardized reporting of results is needed to ensure that anyone seeking this treatment can be adequately counseled. Level of Evidence 4


Aesthetic Surgery Journal | 2018

In-House Manufacture of Sterilizable, Scaled, Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Models for Rhinoplasty

Jonathan M. Bekisz; Hannah A. Liss; Samantha G. Maliha; Lukasz Witek; Paulo G. Coelho; Roberto L. Flores

BACKGROUND Rhinoplasty relies on clear patient communication and precise execution of a three-dimensional (3D) plan to achieve optimal results. As 3D imaging and printing continue to grow in popularity within the medical field, rhinoplasty surgeons have begun to leverage these resources as an aid to preoperative planning, patient communication, and the technical performance of this challenging operation. OBJECTIVES Utilizing departmentally available resources and open-access 3D imaging platforms, we have developed an affordable, reproducible protocol for rapid in-house virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent manufacture of 3D-printed rhinoplasty models. METHODS Preoperative 3D photographic images underwent virtual rhinoplasty using a freely available 3D imaging and sculpting program (BlenderTM [Version 2.78, Amsterdam, The Netherlands]). Once the ideal postoperative result was digitally achieved, scaled, sterilizable, and patient-specific 3D models of the preoperative and ideal postoperative result were manufactured in-house using a departmentally owned 3D printer. RESULTS 3D-printed models have successfully been manufactured and employed for 12 patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The average time to prepare a set of pre- and postoperative models was 3 hours, while the printing process required 18 to 24 hours per model. Each set of surgical models can be manufactured at a total materials cost of approximately


Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2018

Abstract: Noninvasive Body Contouring Techniques

Stelios C. Wilson; Salma A. Abdou; Samantha G. Maliha; David A. Daar; Steven M. Levine

5.00. CONCLUSIONS We describe an affordable means to construct sterilizable, scaled, patient-specific 3D-printed models for rhinoplasty. This technique may become of increasing interest to academic and cosmetic centers as hardware costs of 3D printers continue to fall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4


Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2018

Abstract: Precision Rhinoplasty Using Virtual Surgical Planning and Departmentally-Manufactured, 3D-Printed, Sterilizable, Patient-Specific Anatomic Models

Samantha G. Maliha; Jonathan M. Bekisz; Hannah A. Liss; Lukasz Witek; Paulo G. Coelho; Roberto L. Flores


Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2018

Abstract: Single-Stage Primary Cleft Lip and Palate Repair

Rami S. Kantar; Michael J. Cammarata; William J. Rifkin; Samantha G. Maliha; Scott J. Farber; J. Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Roberto L. Flores


Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2018

Abstract: Textbook Versus Digital Simulation for Cleft Surgery Education

Rami S. Kantar; Natalie M. Plana; William J. Rifkin; Joshua A. David; Samantha G. Maliha; J. Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Roberto L. Flores


Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2018

Abstract: 3D-Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds for Induction of Osteogenesis in the Immature Skeleton

Samantha G. Maliha; Madison E. Cox; Juliana Gomez; Sejndi Rusi; Alan Meskin; Jonathan M. Bekisz; Christopher D. Lopez; Lukasz Witek; Paulo G. Coelho; Roberto L. Flores


Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open | 2018

Abstract 101: Bone Tissue Engineering of the Pediatric Calvarium and Alveolus using Dipyridamole-coated 3D-Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds

Samantha G. Maliha; Christopher D. Lopez; Madison E. Cox; Lukasz Witek; Fady G. Gendy; Andrea Torroni; Bruce N. Cronstein; Roberto L. Flores; Paulo G. Coelho

Collaboration


Dive into the Samantha G. Maliha's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott J. Farber

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexis Ogdie

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge