Sang Kee Min

Prevention of propofol-induced pain in children: combination of alfentanil and lidocaine vs alfentanil or lidocaine alone

BACKGROUND Pain from a propofol injection is a common side-effect in paediatric patients. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of a combined pretreatment of alfentanil with lidocaine on the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain in children. METHODS After obtaining parental consent, 120 paediatric patients were allocated randomly into one of the three groups (n=40, in each). The patients in the alfentanil group received alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1) 90 s before the propofol injection. The patients in the lidocaine group received propofol 3 mg kg(-1) premixed with lidocaine 0.1% over a 15 s period. The patients in the combination group received both alfentanil and lidocaine. RESULTS The incidence of propofol injection pain (severity 2 or more) in the combination group (2.6%) was significantly lower than that in the alfentanil and lidocaine groups (30% and 38.5%, respectively) (P=0.001 and <0.001, respectively). No patient in the combination group complained of moderate or severe pain from propofol injection. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that the combination treatment of two different analgesic modalities, alfentanil and lidocaine, could prevent the moderate and severe pain on propofol injection, and reduce the incidence of mild pain compared with each drug alone.

Optimal bolus dose of alfentanil for successful tracheal intubation during sevoflurane induction with and without nitrous oxide in children

BACKGROUND The goals of this study were to determine the effective bolus dose of alfentanil required for successful tracheal intubation during inhalation induction using sevoflurane 5% without neuromuscular block in children, and whether nitrous oxide reduces these doses. METHODS Fifty paediatric patients, aged 3-10 yr, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Subjects received either sevoflurane 5% in oxygen 100% (O(2) group, n=25) or sevoflurane 5% in oxygen 40% and nitrous oxide 60% (N(2)O group, n=25) through a face mask. One minute after inhalation induction, a predetermined dose of alfentanil was injected over 15 s. The alfentanil dose was determined using Dixons up-and-down method, starting from alfentanil 14 microg kg(-1). The trachea was intubated 3 min after inducing anaesthesia. RESULTS The ED(50) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of alfentanil for successful tracheal intubation was 11.5 (9.9-13.1) and 8.6 (7.4-9.8) microg kg(-1) in the O(2) and N(2)O groups, respectively. The ED(50) of the N(2)O group was significantly lower than that of the O(2) group (P=0.0146)(.) From isotonic regression, 50% effective dose (ED(50)) (95% CI) of alfentanil in the O(2) and N(2)O groups was 11.4 (9.9-13.0) and 6.5 (5.0-8.1) microg kg(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The effective bolus dose of alfentanil for successful tracheal intubation was 11.5 microg kg(-1) in 50% of children during inhalation induction using sevoflurane 5% without neuromuscular blocking agent. Addition of nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen reduced the effective alfentanil dose by 25%.

Acute pulmonary edema after local infiltration of epinephrine during mastoidectomy - A case report -

A mixture of local anesthetic and epinephrine provides hemostasis for ear microsurgery. However, epinephrine has adverse cardiovascular effects, such as arrhythmia, pulmonary edema, and even cardiac arrest. We have experienced catecholamine-induced cardiovascular crisis, with severe hypertension, tachycardia, and acute pulmonary edema, after subcutaneous infiltration with a 2% lidocaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine solution. The patient recovered without any apparent sequelae after intensive care, including diuretics, steroids, and nitroglycerin for the hypertension and pulmonary edema, and a vasopressor for the subsequent hypotension.

Reduction of Microemulsion Propofol-Induced Injection Pain via Target-Controlled Remifentanil Infusion

The intravenous injection of microemulsion propofol to induce anaesthesia causes more intense and frequent pain than lipid emulsion propofol. This study investigated whether different target effect-site concentrations of remifentanil could prevent pain due to microemulsion propofol injection. In total, 96 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving target effect-site concentrations of remifentanil 0 (control group), 4 or 6 ng/ml, followed by injection with microemulsion propofol. Remifentanil pretreatment significantly reduced the incidence and severity of injection pain compared with the control group. Although no difference in pain reduction between the two remifentanil-treated groups was observed, those receiving a target effect-site concentration of 6 ng/ml exhibited an increased rate of complications, compared with those receiving 4 ng/ml. In conclusion, prior administration of remifentanil at a target effect-site concentration of 4 ng/ml is a useful strategy to decrease the injection pain of microemulsion propofol.