Sarah De Jaegere
Ghent University Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sarah De Jaegere.
Human Mutation | 2010
Frauke Coppieters; Ingele Casteels; Françoise Meire; Sarah De Jaegere; Sally Hooghe; Nicole Van Regemorter; Hilde Van Esch; Aušra Matulevičienė; Luís Nunes; Valerie Meersschaut; Sophie Walraedt; L Standaert; Paul Coucke; Heidi Hoeben; Hester Y. Kroes; Johan Vande Walle; Thomy de Ravel; Bart P. Leroy; Elfride De Baere
Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA), the most severe inherited retinal dystrophy, is genetically heterogeneous, with 14 genes accounting for 70% of patients. Here, 91 LCA probands underwent LCA chip analysis and subsequent sequencing of 6 genes (CEP290, CRB1, RPE65, GUCY2D, AIPL1and CRX), revealing mutations in 69% of the cohort, with major involvement of CEP290 (30%). In addition, 11 patients with early‐onset retinal dystrophy (EORD) and 13 patients with Senior‐Loken syndrome (SLS), LCA‐Joubert syndrome (LCA‐JS) or cerebello‐oculo‐renal syndrome (CORS) were included. Exhaustive re‐inspection of the overall phenotypes in our LCA cohort revealed novel insights mainly regarding the CEP290‐related phenotype. The AHI1 gene was screened as a candidate modifier gene in three patients with the same CEP290 genotype but different neurological involvement. Interestingly, a heterozygous novel AHI1 mutation, p.Asn811Lys, was found in the most severely affected patient. Moreover, AHI1 screening in five other patients with CEP290‐related disease and neurological involvement revealed a second novel missense variant, p.His758Pro, in one LCA patient with mild mental retardation and autism. These two AHI1 mutations might thus represent neurological modifiers of CEP290‐related disease.
Human Mutation | 2008
Diane Beysen; Sarah De Jaegere; David J. Amor; Philippe Bouchard; Sophie Christin-Maitre; Marc Fellous; Philippe Touraine; Arthur W. Grix; Raoul C. M. Hennekam; Françoise Meire; Nina Øyen; Louise C. Wilson; Dalit Barel; Jill Clayton-Smith; Thomy de Ravel; Christian Decock; Patricia Delbeke; Regina Ensenauer; Friedrich Ebinger; Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach; Yvonne Hendriks; Virginia E. Kimonis; Rachel Laframboise; Paul Laissue; Kathleen A. Leppig; Bart P. Leroy; David T. Miller; David Mowat; Luitgard M. Neumann; Astrid S. Plomp
Blepharophimosis syndrome (BPES) is caused by loss‐of‐function mutations in the single‐exon forkhead transcription factor gene FOXL2 and by genomic rearrangements of the FOXL2 locus. Here, we focus on 92 new intragenic FOXL2 mutations, 34 of which are novel. Specifically, we found 10 nonsense mutations (11%), 13 missense mutations (14%), 40 deletions or insertions leading to a frameshift (43%), and 29 in‐frame changes (32%), of which 28 (30%) lead to a polyalanine expansion. This study confirms the existence of two previously described mutational hotspots. Moreover, we gained novel insights in genotype‐phenotype correlations, emphasizing the need to interpret genotype‐phenotype correlations individually and always in the context of further clinical observations.
Human Mutation | 2015
Miriam Bauwens; Julie De Zaeytijd; Nicole Weisschuh; Susanne Kohl; Françoise Meire; Karin Dahan; Fanny Depasse; Sarah De Jaegere; Thomy de Ravel; Marjan De Rademaeker; Bart Loeys; Frauke Coppieters; Bart P. Leroy; Elfride De Baere
Autosomal‐recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1) is hallmarked by a large proportion of patients with a single heterozygous causative variant in the disease gene ABCA4. Braun et al. ( ) reported deep intronic variants of ABCA4 in STGD1 patients with one coding variant, prompting us to perform an augmented screen in 131 Belgian STGD1 patients with one or no ABCA4 variant to uncover deep intronic causal ABCA4 variants. This revealed a second variant in 28.6% of cases. Twenty‐six percent of these carry the same causal variant c.4539+2001G>A (V4). Haplotyping in V4 carriers showed a common region of 63 kb, suggestive of a founder mutation. Genotype–phenotype correlations suggest a moderate‐to‐severe impact of V4 on the STGD1 phenotype. In conclusion, V4 occurs in a high fraction of Belgian STGD1 patients and represents the first deep intronic founder mutation in ABCA4. This emphasizes the importance of augmented molecular genetic testing of ABCA4 in Belgian STGD1.
Genetics in Medicine | 2017
Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Kristof Van Schil; Robrecht Cannoodt; Miriam Bauwens; Thalia Van Laethem; Sarah De Jaegere; Wouter Steyaert; Tom Sante; Björn Menten; Bart P. Leroy; Frauke Coppieters; Elfride De Baere
Purpose:Our goal was to design a customized microarray, arrEYE, for high-resolution copy number variant (CNV) analysis of known and candidate genes for inherited retinal dystrophy (iRD) and retina-expressed noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs).Methods:arrEYE contains probes for the full genomic region of 106 known iRD genes, including those implicated in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) (the most frequent iRD), cone–rod dystrophies, macular dystrophies, and an additional 60 candidate iRD genes and 196 ncRNAs. Eight CNVs in iRD genes identified by other techniques were used as positive controls. The test cohort consisted of 57 patients with autosomal dominant, X-linked, or simplex RP.Results:In an RP patient, a novel heterozygous deletion of exons 7 and 8 of the HGSNAT gene was identified: c.634-408_820+338delinsAGAATATG, p.(Glu212Glyfs*2). A known variant was found on the second allele: c.1843G>A, p.(Ala615Thr). Furthermore, we expanded the allelic spectrum of USH2A and RCBTB1 with novel CNVs.Conclusion:The arrEYE platform revealed subtle single-exon to larger CNVs in iRD genes that could be characterized at the nucleotide level, facilitated by the high resolution of the platform. We report the first CNV in HGSNAT that, combined with another mutation, leads to RP, further supporting its recently identified role in nonsyndromic iRD.Genet Med 19 4, 457–466.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Frauke Coppieters; Dimitri Roels; Sarah De Jaegere; Helena Flipts; Julie De Zaeytijd; Sophie Walraedt; Charlotte Claes; Erik Fransen; Guy Van Camp; Fanny Depasse; Ingele Casteels; Thomy de Ravel; Bart P. Leroy; Elfride De Baere
Purpose Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) is characterized by an extensive genetic heterogeneity, implicating 27 genes, which account for 50 to 70% of cases. Here 86 Belgian probands with possible adRP underwent genetic testing to unravel the molecular basis and to assess the contribution of the genes underlying their condition. Methods Mutation detection methods evolved over the past ten years, including mutation specific methods (APEX chip analysis), linkage analysis, gene panel analysis (Sanger sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing or whole exome sequencing), high-resolution copy number screening (customized microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization). Identified variants were classified following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendations. Results Molecular genetic screening revealed mutations in 48/86 cases (56%). In total, 17 novel pathogenic mutations were identified: four missense mutations in RHO, five frameshift mutations in RP1, six mutations in genes encoding spliceosome components (SNRNP200, PRPF8, and PRPF31), one frameshift mutation in PRPH2, and one frameshift mutation in TOPORS. The proportion of RHO mutations in our cohort (14%) is higher than reported in a French adRP population (10.3%), but lower than reported elsewhere (16.5–30%). The prevalence of RP1 mutations (10.5%) is comparable to other populations (3.5%-10%). The mutation frequency in genes encoding splicing factors is unexpectedly high (altogether 19.8%), with PRPF31 the second most prevalent mutated gene (10.5%). PRPH2 mutations were found in 4.7% of the Belgian cohort. Two families (2.3%) have the recurrent NR2E3 mutation p.(Gly56Arg). The prevalence of the recurrent PROM1 mutation p.(Arg373Cys) was higher than anticipated (3.5%). Conclusions Overall, we identified mutations in 48 of 86 Belgian adRP cases (56%), with the highest prevalence in RHO (14%), RP1 (10.5%) and PRPF31 (10.5%). Finally, we expanded the molecular spectrum of PRPH2, PRPF8, RHO, RP1, SNRNP200, and TOPORS-associated adRP by the identification of 17 novel mutations.
Genetics in Medicine | 2018
Kristof Van Schil; Sarah Naessens; Stijn Van De Sompele; Marjolein Carron; Alexander Aslanidis; Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Anja Kathrin Mayer; Mattias Van Heetvelde; Miriam Bauwens; Hannah Verdin; Frauke Coppieters; Michael E. Greenberg; Marty G. Yang; Marcus Karlstetter; Thomas Langmann; Katleen De Preter; Susanne Kohl; Timothy J. Cherry; Bart P. Leroy; James R. Lupski; Claudia M.B. Carvalho; Max van Min; Petra Klous; Sarah De Jaegere; Sally Hooghe; Elfride De Baere
PurposePart of the hidden genetic variation in heterogeneous genetic conditions such as inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) can be explained by copy-number variations (CNVs). Here, we explored the genomic landscape of IRD genes listed in RetNet to identify and prioritize those genes susceptible to CNV formation.MethodsRetNet genes underwent an assessment of genomic features and of CNV occurrence in the Database of Genomic Variants and literature. CNVs identified in an IRD cohort were characterized using targeted locus amplification (TLA) on extracted genomic DNA.ResultsExhaustive literature mining revealed 1,345 reported CNVs in 81 different IRD genes. Correlation analysis between rankings of genomic features and CNV occurrence demonstrated the strongest correlation between gene size and CNV occurrence of IRD genes. Moreover, we identified and delineated 30 new CNVs in IRD cases, 13 of which are novel and three of which affect noncoding, putative cis-regulatory regions. Finally, the breakpoints of six complex CNVs were determined using TLA in a hypothesis-neutral manner.ConclusionWe propose a ranking of CNV-prone IRD genes and demonstrate the efficacy of TLA for the characterization of CNVs on extracted DNA. Finally, this IRD-oriented CNV study can serve as a paradigm for other genetically heterogeneous Mendelian diseases with hidden genetic variation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Barbara D'haene; Françoise Meire; Ilse Claerhout; Hester Y. Kroes; Astrid S. Plomp; Yvonne Arens; Thomy de Ravel; Ingele Casteels; Sarah De Jaegere; Sally Hooghe; Wim Wuyts; Jenneke van den Ende; Françoise Roulez; Hermine E. Veenstra-Knol; Rogier A. Oldenburg; Jacques C. Giltay; Johanna B.G.M. Verheij; Jan Tjeerd H.N. de Faber; Björn Menten; Anne De Paepe; Philippe Kestelyn; Bart P. Leroy; Elfride De Baere
European Human Genetics conference 2018 (ESHG 2018) | 2018
Stijn Van De Sompele; Kristof Van Schil; Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Toon Rosseel; Sarah De Jaegere; Thalia Van Laethem; Irina Balikova; Bart P. Leroy; Frauke Coppieters; Elfride De Baere
18th Annual BeSHG meeting: The epigenome in development and disease | 2018
Stijn Van De Sompele; Kristof Van Schil; Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Toon Rosseel; Sarah De Jaegere; Thalia Van Laethem; Irina Balikova; Bart P. Leroy; Elfride De Baere; Frauke Coppieters
18th Annual BeSHG meeting: The epigenome in development and disease | 2018
Kristof Van Schil; Sarah Naessens; Stijn Van De Sompele; Nuria Gruartmoner Roura; Marjolein Carron; Katharina Dannhausen; Sarah De Jaegere; Maxim Vanpanteghem; Frauke Coppieters; Marcus Karlstetter; Bryan Tsou; Thomas Langmann; Françoise Meire; Reza Maroofian; Andrew H. Crosby; Irina Balikova; Michel van Lint; Andrew R. Webster; Michel Michaelides; Bart P. Leroy; Elfride De Baere