Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Saranyaphat Boonmee is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Saranyaphat Boonmee.


Fungal Diversity | 2013

Families of Dothideomycetes

Kevin D. Hyde; E. B. Gareth Jones; Jian Kui Liu; Hiran A. Ariyawansa; Eric Boehm; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Uwe Braun; Putarak Chomnunti; Pedro W. Crous; Dong Qin Dai; Paul Diederich; Asha J. Dissanayake; Mingkhuan Doilom; Francesco Doveri; Singang Hongsanan; Ruvishika S. Jayawardena; James D. Lawrey; Yan Mei Li; Yong Xiang Liu; Robert Lücking; Jutamart Monkai; Lucia Muggia; Matthew P. Nelsen; Ka-Lai Pang; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Indunil C. Senanayake; Carol A. Shearer; Satinee Suetrong; Kazuaki Tanaka; Kasun M. Thambugala

Dothideomycetes comprise a highly diverse range of fungi characterized mainly by asci with two wall layers (bitunicate asci) and often with fissitunicate dehiscence. Many species are saprobes, with many asexual states comprising important plant pathogens. They are also endophytes, epiphytes, fungicolous, lichenized, or lichenicolous fungi. They occur in terrestrial, freshwater and marine habitats in almost every part of the world. We accept 105 families in Dothideomycetes with the new families Anteagloniaceae, Bambusicolaceae, Biatriosporaceae, Lichenoconiaceae, Muyocopronaceae, Paranectriellaceae, Roussoellaceae, Salsugineaceae, Seynesiopeltidaceae and Thyridariaceae introduced in this paper. Each family is provided with a description and notes, including asexual and asexual states, and if more than one genus is included, the type genus is also characterized. Each family is provided with at least one figure-plate, usually illustrating the type genus, a list of accepted genera, including asexual genera, and a key to these genera. A phylogenetic tree based on four gene combined analysis add support for 64 of the families and 22 orders, including the novel orders, Dyfrolomycetales, Lichenoconiales, Lichenotheliales, Monoblastiales, Natipusillales, Phaeotrichales and Strigulales. The paper is expected to provide a working document on Dothideomycetes which can be modified as new data comes to light. It is hoped that by illustrating types we provide stimulation and interest so that more work is carried out in this remarkable group of fungi.


Fungal Diversity | 2015

The Faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts

Subashini C. Jayasiri; Kevin D. Hyde; Hiran A. Ariyawansa; Jayarama D. Bhat; Bart Buyck; Lei Cai; Yu-Cheng Dai; Kamel A. Abd-Elsalam; Damien Ertz; Iman Hidayat; Rajesh Jeewon; E. B. Gareth Jones; Ali H. Bahkali; Samantha C. Karunarathna; Jian-Kui Liu; J. Jennifer Luangsa-ard; H. Thorsten Lumbsch; Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura; Eric H. C. McKenzie; Jean-Marc Moncalvo; Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad; Henrik R. Nilsson; Ka-Lai Pang; O. L. Pereira; Alan J. L. Phillips; Olivier Raspé; Adam W. Rollins; Andrea I. Romero; Javier Etayo; Faruk Selçuk

Taxonomic names are key links between various databases that store information on different organisms. Several global fungal nomenclural and taxonomic databases (notably Index Fungorum, Species Fungorum and MycoBank) can be sourced to find taxonomic details about fungi, while DNA sequence data can be sourced from NCBI, EBI and UNITE databases. Although the sequence data may be linked to a name, the quality of the metadata is variable and generally there is no corresponding link to images, descriptions or herbarium material. There is generally no way to establish the accuracy of the names in these genomic databases, other than whether the submission is from a reputable source. To tackle this problem, a new database (FacesofFungi), accessible at www.facesoffungi.org (FoF) has been established. This fungal database allows deposition of taxonomic data, phenotypic details and other useful data, which will enhance our current taxonomic understanding and ultimately enable mycologists to gain better and updated insights into the current fungal classification system. In addition, the database will also allow access to comprehensive metadata including descriptions of voucher and type specimens. This database is user-friendly, providing links and easy access between taxonomic ranks, with the classification system based primarily on molecular data (from the literature and via updated web-based phylogenetic trees), and to a lesser extent on morphological data when molecular data are unavailable. In FoF species are not only linked to the closest phylogenetic representatives, but also relevant data is provided, wherever available, on various applied aspects, such as ecological, industrial, quarantine and chemical uses. The data include the three main fungal groups (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Basal fungi) and fungus-like organisms. The FoF webpage is an output funded by the Mushroom Research Foundation which is an NGO with seven directors with mycological expertise. The webpage has 76 curators, and with the help of these specialists, FoF will provide an updated natural classification of the fungi, with illustrated accounts of species linked to molecular data. The present paper introduces the FoF database to the scientific community and briefly reviews some of the problems associated with classification and identification of the main fungal groups. The structure and use of the database is then explained. We would like to invite all mycologists to contribute to these web pages.


Fungal Diversity | 2014

Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names

Nalin N. Wijayawardene; Pedro W. Crous; Paul M. Kirk; David L. Hawksworth; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Uwe Braun; Dong Qin Dai; Melvina J. D’souza; Paul Diederich; Asha J. Dissanayake; Mingkhuan Doilom; Singang Hongsanan; E. B. Gareth Jones; Johannes Z. Groenewald; Ruvishika S. Jayawardena; James D. Lawrey; Jian Kui Liu; Robert Lücking; Hugo Madrid; Dimuthu S. Manamgoda; Lucia Muggia; Matthew P. Nelsen; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Satinee Suetrong; Kazuaki Tanaka; Kasun M. Thambugala; Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe; Saowanee Wikee; Ying Zhang; André Aptroot

Article 59.1, of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICN; Melbourne Code), which addresses the nomenclature of pleomorphic fungi, became effective from 30 July 2011. Since that date, each fungal species can have one nomenclaturally correct name in a particular classification. All other previously used names for this species will be considered as synonyms. The older generic epithet takes priority over the younger name. Any widely used younger names proposed for use, must comply with Art. 57.2 and their usage should be approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). In this paper, we list all genera currently accepted by us in Dothideomycetes (belonging to 23 orders and 110 families), including pleomorphic and non-pleomorphic genera. In the case of pleomorphic genera, we follow the rulings of the current ICN and propose single generic names for future usage. The taxonomic placements of 1261 genera are listed as an outline. Protected names and suppressed names for 34 pleomorphic genera are listed separately. Notes and justifications are provided for possible proposed names after the list of genera. Notes are also provided on recent advances in our understanding of asexual and sexual morph linkages in Dothideomycetes. A phylogenetic tree based on four gene analyses supported 23 orders and 75 families, while 35 families still lack molecular data.


Fungal Diversity | 2015

Fungal diversity notes 1–110: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species

Jian Kui Liu; Kevin D. Hyde; E. B. Gareth Jones; Hiran A. Ariyawansa; Darbhe J. Bhat; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura; Eric H. C. McKenzie; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Chayanard Phukhamsakda; Belle Damodara Shenoy; Mohamed A. Abdel-Wahab; Bart Buyck; Jie Chen; K. W. Thilini Chethana; Chonticha Singtripop; Dong Qin Dai; Yu Cheng Dai; Dinushani A. Daranagama; Asha J. Dissanayake; Mingkwan Doilom; Melvina J. D’souza; Xin Lei Fan; Ishani D. Goonasekara; Kazuyuki Hirayama; Sinang Hongsanan; Subashini C. Jayasiri; Ruvishika S. Jayawardena; Samantha C. Karunarathna; Wen-Jing Li

This paper is a compilation of notes on 110 fungal taxa, including one new family, 10 new genera, and 76 new species, representing a wide taxonomic and geographic range. The new family, Paradictyoarthriniaceae is introduced based on its distinct lineage in Dothideomycetes and its unique morphology. The family is sister to Biatriosporaceae and Roussoellaceae. The new genera are Allophaeosphaeria (Phaeosphaeriaceae), Amphibambusa (Amphisphaeriaceae), Brunneomycosphaerella (Capnodiales genera incertae cedis), Chaetocapnodium (Capnodiaceae), Flammeascoma (Anteagloniaceae), Multiseptospora (Pleosporales genera incertae cedis), Neogaeumannomyces (Magnaporthaceae), Palmiascoma (Bambusicolaceae), Paralecia (Squamarinaceae) and Sarimanas (Melanommataceae). The newly described species are the Ascomycota Aliquandostipite manochii, Allophaeosphaeria dactylidis, A. muriformia, Alternaria cesenica, Amphibambusa bambusicola, Amphisphaeria sorbi, Annulohypoxylon thailandicum, Atrotorquata spartii, Brunneomycosphaerella laburni, Byssosphaeria musae, Camarosporium aborescentis, C. aureum, C. frutexensis, Chaetocapnodium siamensis, Chaetothyrium agathis, Colletotrichum sedi, Conicomyces pseudotransvaalensis, Cytospora berberidis, C. sibiraeae, Diaporthe thunbergiicola, Diatrype palmicola, Dictyosporium aquaticum, D. meiosporum, D. thailandicum, Didymella cirsii, Dinemasporium nelloi, Flammeascoma bambusae, Kalmusia italica, K. spartii, Keissleriella sparticola, Lauriomyces synnematicus, Leptosphaeria ebuli, Lophiostoma pseudodictyosporium, L. ravennicum, Lophiotrema eburnoides, Montagnula graminicola, Multiseptospora thailandica, Myrothecium macrosporum, Natantispora unipolaris, Neogaeumannomyces bambusicola, Neosetophoma clematidis, N. italica, Oxydothis atypica, Palmiascoma gregariascomum, Paraconiothyrium nelloi, P. thysanolaenae, Paradictyoarthrinium tectonicola, Paralecia pratorum, Paraphaeosphaeria spartii, Pestalotiopsis digitalis, P. dracontomelon, P. italiana, Phaeoisaria pseudoclematidis, Phragmocapnias philippinensis, Pseudocamarosporium cotinae, Pseudocercospora tamarindi, Pseudotrichia rubriostiolata, P. thailandica, Psiloglonium multiseptatum, Saagaromyces mangrovei, Sarimanas pseudofluviatile, S. shirakamiense, Tothia spartii, Trichomerium siamensis, Wojnowicia dactylidicola, W. dactylidis and W. lonicerae. The Basidiomycota Agaricus flavicentrus, A. hanthanaensis, A. parvibicolor, A. sodalis, Cantharellus luteostipitatus, Lactarius atrobrunneus, L. politus, Phylloporia dependens and Russula cortinarioides are also introduced. Epitypifications or reference specimens are designated for Hapalocystis berkeleyi, Meliola tamarindi, Pallidocercospora acaciigena, Phaeosphaeria musae, Plenodomus agnitus, Psiloglonium colihuae, P. sasicola and Zasmidium musae while notes and/or new sequence data are provided for Annulohypoxylon leptascum, A. nitens, A. stygium, Biscogniauxia marginata, Fasciatispora nypae, Hypoxylon fendleri, H. monticulosum, Leptosphaeria doliolum, Microsphaeropsis olivacea, Neomicrothyrium, Paraleptosphaeria nitschkei, Phoma medicaginis and Saccotheciaceae. A full description of each species is provided with light micrographs (or drawings). Molecular data is provided for 90 taxa and used to generate phylogenetic trees to establish a natural classification for species.


Fungal Diversity | 2011

Astrosphaeriella is polyphyletic, with species in Fissuroma gen. nov., and Neoastrosphaeriella gen. nov.

Jian-Kui Liu; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; E. B. Gareth Jones; Ying Zhang; Thida Win Koko; Hong-Li Hu; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Mingkhuan Doilom; Ekachai Chukeatirote; Ali H. Bahkali; Yong Wang; Kevin D. Hyde

Collections of fungi from bamboo and palm plants in Thailand resulted in the identification of several species of Astrosphaeriella, including the type species A. fusispora, which is a synonym of A. stellata. Species of Astrosphaeriella have been previously circumscribed on the basis of morphology and, to a lesser extent, on host affiliation. In order to obtain a phylogenetic understanding of the genus, eleven strains of Astrosphaeriella sensu lato were sequenced in this study. Molecular analyses based on a combined dataset of 18S and 28S nrDNA sequences were carried out to infer the phylogenetic placement of these strains in the Pleosporales. The phylogenetic analyses showed that Astrosphaeriella is polyphyletic, with Astrosphaeriella species clustering in four clades, two clades, including species with slit-like ostioles, clustered in Aigialaceae; the clade that includes the generic type clustered together with Delitschia; and A. Africana, which has striate ascospores, deviated from these three clades and had a basal position in the Pleosporales. A new combination in Fissuroma gen. nov. and new genus Neoastrosphaeriella are introduced in Aigialaceae to include the species with slit-like ascomata.


Fungal Diversity | 2016

Families of Sordariomycetes

Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura; Kevin D. Hyde; E. B. Gareth Jones; Eric H. C. McKenzie; Jayarama D. Bhat; Monika C. Dayarathne; Shi Ke Huang; Chada Norphanphoun; Indunil C. Senanayake; Rekhani H. Perera; Qiu Ju Shang; Yuan-Pin Xiao; Melvina J. D’souza; Sinang Hongsanan; Ruvishika S. Jayawardena; Dinushani A. Daranagama; Sirinapa Konta; Ishani D. Goonasekara; Wen Ying Zhuang; Rajesh Jeewon; Alan J. L. Phillips; Mohamed A. Abdel-Wahab; Abdullah M. Al-Sadi; Ali H. Bahkali; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Nattawut Boonyuen; Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon; Asha J. Dissanayake; Ji-Chuan Kang; Qi Rui Li

Sordariomycetes is one of the largest classes of Ascomycota that comprises a highly diverse range of fungi characterized mainly by perithecial ascomata and inoperculate unitunicate asci. The class includes many important plant pathogens, as well as endophytes, saprobes, epiphytes, coprophilous and fungicolous, lichenized or lichenicolous taxa. They occur in terrestrial, freshwater and marine habitats worldwide. This paper reviews the 107 families of the class Sordariomycetes and provides a modified backbone tree based on phylogenetic analysis of four combined loci, with a maximum five representative taxa from each family, where available. This paper brings together for the first time, since Barrs’ 1990 Prodromus, descriptions, notes on the history, and plates or illustrations of type or representative taxa of each family, a list of accepted genera, including asexual genera and a key to these taxa of Sordariomycetes. Delineation of taxa is supported where possible by molecular data. The outline is based on literature to the end of 2015 and the Sordariomycetes now comprises six subclasses, 32 orders, 105 families and 1331 genera. The family Obryzaceae and Pleurotremataceae are excluded from the class.


Fungal Diversity | 2011

Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis

Saranyaphat Boonmee; Ying Zhang; Putarak Chomnunti; Ekachai Chukeatirote; Clement K. M. Tsui; Ali H. Bahkali; Kevin D. Hyde

In this paper we revisit the family Tubeufiaceae with notes on genera that we have re-examined where possible. Generic type specimens of Acanthophiobolus, Kamalomyces, Podonectria, Thaxteriella and Thaxteriellopsis were re-examined, described and illustrated and shown to belong to Tubeufiaceae. Notes are provided on Acanthostigma, Chaetosphaerulina, Thaxterina and Tubeufia, which are retained in Tubeufiaceae; however, we were unable to locate the types of these genera during the time frame of this study. Allonecte is excluded from the Tubeufiaceae, as the ascospores are fusiform-ellipsoidal, grey-brown and 1-septate and the asci are cylindrical, all of which are features more typical of Pleosporaceae, where it is transferred. Byssocallis has yellow to orange ascomata and clavate ascospores which is atypical of Tubeufiaceae. Thus its taxonomic status needs to be reevaluated. Lentendraeopsis has an endophytic habit, cylindro-clavate asci and two-celled ascospores more typical of Pleosporales, where it is transferred. Taphrophila has small ascomata, a thin peridium, branching setae around the apex of the ascomata, clavate to saccate asci and lacks pseudoparaphyses. These are features atypical of the Tubeufiaceae, and Taphrophila should be placed in the Dothideomycetes incertae cedis. Twelve new collections of Tubeufiaceae from Thailand were isolated, and their DNA was extracted. The sequence data of LSU, SSU and ITS rDNA were amplified and analyzed using parsimony and likelihood methods. The results of phylogenetic analysis was used to establish the inter-generic relationships in Tubeufiaceae. Thaxteriellopsis lignicola, epitypified in this investigation, is a sister taxon in the family Tubeufiaceae based on phylogenetic analysis of rRNA sequence data. Chlamydotubeufia is introduced as a new genus based on the production of dictyochlamydosporous anamorphs, including two new species. Three new species, one each in Acanthostigma, Tubeufia and Thaxteriella are also described and illustrated. The phylogenetic placement of these genera is also discussed.


Fungal Diversity | 2014

Tubeufiales, ord. nov., integrating sexual and asexual generic names

Saranyaphat Boonmee; Amy Y. Rossman; Jian-Kui Liu; Wen-Jing Li; Don-Qing Dai; Jayarama D. Bhat; E. B. Gareth Jones; Eric H. C. McKenzie; Jianchu Xu; Kevin D. Hyde

Tubeufiaceae is based on the generic type Tubeufia, which is characterized by superficial, oval and bright ascomata, bitunicate asci, mostly long fusiform to filiform, transeptate ascospores and hyphomycetous asexual states with helicosporous conidia. Most species in this family are saprobic on terrestrial woody substrates and some are aquatic. Their distinct morphology as well as combined LSU, SSU and TEF1 sequence analysis show that Tubeufiaceae should be accommodated in a new order Tubeufiales, which is introduced in this paper. Phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU and ITS sequences were used to resolve genera and species within the family Tubeufiaceae. In this study, we examine and incorporate sexual and asexual states of genera in Tubeufiales to provide a modern treatment, based on single names. An epitype for Tubeufia javanica, the type species of Tubeufia, is designated and represents Tubeufia sensu stricto. The genera Acanthophiobolus, Acanthostigma, Boerlagiomyces, Chlamydotubeufia, Kamalomyces, Podonectria, Thaxteriella and Thaxteriellopsis are accepted, Acanthostigmina is reinstated, and the asexual genera Aquaphila, Helicoma, Helicomyces, Helicosporium and Tamhinispora are accepted in Tubeufiaceae. Three new genera Acanthohelicospora, Helicangiospora and Neoacanthostigma are introduced. The genus Bifrontia is added to the family based on morphological similarity. The incongruous morphological genera Acanthostigmella, Amphinectria, Chaetocrea, Chaetosphaerulina, Glaxoa, Malacaria, Melioliphila, Paranectriella, Puttemansia, Rebentischia and Uredinophila are excluded from Tubeufiaceae despite having characteristic ascomata with setae and multiseptate long spores. A key to genera accepted in Tubeufiaceae is provided.


Fungal Diversity | 2011

A reappraisal of Microthyriaceae

Hai X. Wu; Conrad L. Schoch; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Ali H. Bahkali; Putarak Chomnunti; Kevin D. Hyde

The family Microthyriaceae sensu Lumbsch and Huhndorf 2010 is a poorly known but interesting family comprising 50 genera consisting of foliar epiphytes or saprobes on dead leaves and stems. We re-visited the family based on examinations of generic types where possible. Members are distributed in Aulographaceae, Asterinaceae, Microthyriaceae, Micropeltidaceae and Palmulariaceae and notes are provided on each of these families. Nine genera are transferred from Microthyriaceae to Asterinaceae, and two to Aulographaceae based on the splitting or dissolving nature of the thyriothecia to release ascospores. New sequence data for a number of species and genera are provided. Microthyriaceous members growing on other fungi and lichens differ from Microthyriaceae sensu stricto and the family Trichothyriaceae is reinstated to accommodate these taxa. Other genera of Microthyriaceae belong in Rhytismataceae, Stictidaceae, Venturiales incertae cedis, Dothideomyetes genera incertae cedis,Hypocreales incertae cedis and Ascomycota genera incertae cedis. The family Microthyriaceae is reduced to seven genera characterised by superficial, flattened thyriothecia, with the cells of the upper wall radiating in parallel arrangement from the distinct central ostiolar opening, while the lower peridium is generally poorly developed. Sequence data is provided for five species with thyriothecia and Paramicrothyrium and Neomicrothyrium are described as new genera and Micropeltis zingiberacicola is introduced as a new species. Our phylogenetic analysis underscores the high genetic diversity for thyriotheciate species and there is no clear clade that can be well defined as Microthyriales. Nuclear ribosomal data support multiple polyphyletic lineages within Microthyriaceae and Micropeltidaceae. Some unexpected DNA based phylogenetic relationships such as those between Muyocopron and Saccardoella will require corroboration with more complete taxon sampling as well as additional non ribosomal markers. There are few differences between Aulographaceae, Asterinaceae and Palmulariaceae and these families may need synonymising.


Fungal Diversity | 2015

Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Pleosporaceae

Hiran A. Ariyawansa; Kasun M. Thambugala; Dimuthu S. Manamgoda; Ruvishika S. Jayawardena; Erio Camporesi; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Singang Hongsanan; Chonticha Singtripop; Ekachai Chukeatirote; Ji-Chuan Kang; E. B. Gareth Jones; Kevin D. Hyde

The family Pleosporaceae includes numerous saprobic, opportunistic human, and plant pathogenic taxa. The classification of genera and species Pleosporaceae has been a major challenge due to the lack of a clear understanding of the importance of the morphological characters used to distinguish taxa as well as the lack of reference strains. Recent treatments concluded that Pleospora and some other genera in Pleosporaceae are likely polyphyletic. In order to establish the evolutionary relationships and to resolve the polyphyletic nature of Pleospora and allied genera, we sequenced the 18S nrDNA, 28S nrDNA, ITS, GAPDH, RPB2 and TEF1-alpha gene regions of Pleosporaceae species and phylogenetically analysed this data. Multigene phylogenies strongly support the monophyletic nature of Pleosporaceae among the other families in Pleosporales, and the acceptance of the genera Alternaria, Bipolaris, Clathrospora, Comoclathris, Curvularia, Dactuliophora, Decorospora, Diademosa, Exserohilum, Extrawettsteinina, Gibbago, Neocamarosporium, Paradendryphiella, Platysporoides, Pleospora, Porocercospora, Pseudoyuconia and Pyrenophora. Austropleospora, Dendryphion, Edenia and Macrospora are excluded from the family based on morphology coupled with molecular data. Two novel species, Alternaria murispora in this paper and Comoclathris sedi are introduced. The sexual morph of Alternaria alternata is re-described and illustrated using modern concepts from fresh collections. The paraphyletic nature of Pleospora is resolved based on the available morpho-molecular data, but further sampling with fresh collections, reference or ex-type strains and molecular data are needed to obtain a natural classification of genera and the family.

Collaboration


Dive into the Saranyaphat Boonmee's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin D. Hyde

Mae Fah Luang University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jian-Kui Liu

Mae Fah Luang University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erio Camporesi

Mae Fah Luang University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge