Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sergey S. Marchenko is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sergey S. Marchenko.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011

High‐resolution mapping of ecosystem carbon storage and potential effects of permafrost thaw in periglacial terrain, European Russian Arctic

Gustaf Hugelius; Tarmo Virtanen; D. A. Kaverin; A. V. Pastukhov; Felix Rivkin; Sergey S. Marchenko; Vladimir E. Romanovsky; Peter Kuhry

This study describes detailed partitioning of phytomass carbon (C) and soil organic carbon (SOC) for four study areas in discontinuous permafrost terrain, Northeast European Russia. The mean aboveg ...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2009

Interactions between soil thermal and hydrological dynamics in the response of Alaska ecosystems to fire disturbance

Shuhua Yi; A. David McGuire; Jennifer W. Harden; Eric S. Kasischke; Kristen L. Manies; Larry D. Hinzman; Anna Liljedahl; James T. Randerson; Heping Liu; Vladimir E. Romanovsky; Sergey S. Marchenko; Yongwon Kim

Soil temperature and moisture are important factors that control many ecosystem processes. However, interactions between soil thermal and hydrological processes are not adequately understood in cold regions, where the frozen soil, fire disturbance, and soil drainage play important roles in controlling interactions among these processes. These interactions were investigated with a new ecosystem model framework, the dynamic organic soil version of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model, that incorporates an efficient and stable numerical scheme for simulating soil thermal and hydrological dynamics within soil profiles that contain a live moss horizon, fibrous and amorphous organic horizons, and mineral soil horizons. The performance of the model was evaluated for a tundra burn site that had both preburn and postburn measurements, two black spruce fire chronosequences (representing space-for-time substitutions in well and intermediately drained conditions), and a poorly drained black spruce site. Although space-for-time substitutions present challenges in model-data comparison, the model demonstrates substantial ability in simulating the dynamics of evapotranspiration, soil temperature, active layer depth, soil moisture, and water table depth in response to both climate variability and fire disturbance. Several differences between model simulations and field measurements identified key challenges for evaluating/improving model performance that include (1) proper representation of discrepancies between air temperature and ground surface temperature; (2) minimization of precipitation biases in the driving data sets; (3) improvement of the measurement accuracy of soil moisture in surface organic horizons; and (4) proper specification of organic horizon depth/properties, and soil thermal conductivity.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 2015

A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon–climate feedback

C. Koven; Edward A. G. Schuur; Christina Schädel; Theodore J. Bohn; Eleanor J. Burke; Guangsheng Chen; Xiaodong Chen; Philippe Ciais; Guido Grosse; Jennifer W. Harden; Daniel J. Hayes; Gustaf Hugelius; Elchin Jafarov; Gerhard Krinner; Peter Kuhry; David M. Lawrence; Andrew H. MacDougall; Sergey S. Marchenko; A. D. McGuire; Susan M. Natali; D. J. Nicolsky; David Olefeldt; Shushi Peng; Vladimir E. Romanovsky; Kevin Schaefer; Jens Strauss; Claire C. Treat; Merritt R. Turetsky

We present an approach to estimate the feedback from large-scale thawing of permafrost soils using a simplified, data-constrained model that combines three elements: soil carbon (C) maps and profiles to identify the distribution and type of C in permafrost soils; incubation experiments to quantify the rates of C lost after thaw; and models of soil thermal dynamics in response to climate warming. We call the approach the Permafrost Carbon Network Incubation–Panarctic Thermal scaling approach (PInc-PanTher). The approach assumes that C stocks do not decompose at all when frozen, but once thawed follow set decomposition trajectories as a function of soil temperature. The trajectories are determined according to a three-pool decomposition model fitted to incubation data using parameters specific to soil horizon types. We calculate litterfall C inputs required to maintain steady-state C balance for the current climate, and hold those inputs constant. Soil temperatures are taken from the soil thermal modules of ecosystem model simulations forced by a common set of future climate change anomalies under two warming scenarios over the period 2010 to 2100. Under a medium warming scenario (RCP4.5), the approach projects permafrost soil C losses of 12.2–33.4 Pg C; under a high warming scenario (RCP8.5), the approach projects C losses of 27.9–112.6 Pg C. Projected C losses are roughly linearly proportional to global temperature changes across the two scenarios. These results indicate a global sensitivity of frozen soil C to climate change (γ sensitivity) of −14 to −19 Pg C °C−1 on a 100 year time scale. For CH4 emissions, our approach assumes a fixed saturated area and that increases in CH4 emissions are related to increased heterotrophic respiration in anoxic soil, yielding CH4 emission increases of 7% and 35% for the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively, which add an additional greenhouse gas forcing of approximately 10–18%. The simplified approach presented here neglects many important processes that may amplify or mitigate C release from permafrost soils, but serves as a data-constrained estimate on the forced, large-scale permafrost C response to warming.


Environmental Research Letters | 2013

The effects of fire on the thermal stability of permafrost in lowland and upland black spruce forests of interior Alaska in a changing climate

Elchin Jafarov; Vladimir E. Romanovsky; Hélène Genet; A. D. McGuire; Sergey S. Marchenko

Fire is an important factor controlling the composition and thickness of the organic layer in the black spruce forest ecosystems of interior Alaska. Fire that burns the organic layer can trigger dramatic changes in the underlying permafrost, leading to accelerated ground thawing within a relatively short time. In this study, we addressed the following questions. (1) Which factors determine post-fire ground temperature dynamics in lowland and upland black spruce forests? (2) What levels of burn severity will cause irreversible permafrost degradation in these ecosystems? We evaluated these questions in a transient modeling‐sensitivity analysis framework to assess the sensitivity of permafrost to climate, burn severity, soil organic layer thickness, and soil moisture content in lowland (with thick organic layers, 80 cm) and upland (with thin organic layers, 30 cm) black spruce ecosystems. The results indicate that climate warming accompanied by fire disturbance could significantly accelerate permafrost degradation. In upland black spruce forest, permafrost could completely degrade in an 18 m soil column within 120 years of a severe fire in an unchanging climate. In contrast, in a lowland black spruce forest, permafrost is more resilient to disturbance and can persist under a combination of moderate burn severity and climate warming.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2016

Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009

A. David McGuire; Charles D. Koven; David M. Lawrence; Joy S. Clein; Jiangyang Xia; Christian Beer; Eleanor J. Burke; Guangsheng Chen; Xiaodong Chen; Christine Delire; Elchin Jafarov; Andrew H. MacDougall; Sergey S. Marchenko; D. J. Nicolsky; Shushi Peng; Annette Rinke; Kazuyuki Saito; Wenxin Zhang; Ramdane Alkama; Theodore J. Bohn; Philippe Ciais; Altug Ekici; Isabelle Gouttevin; Tomohiro Hajima; Daniel J. Hayes; Duoying Ji; Gerhard Krinner; Dennis P. Lettenmaier; Yiqi Luo; Paul A. Miller

A significant portion of the large amount of carbon (C) currently stored in soils of the permafrost region in the Northern Hemisphere has the potential to be emitted as the greenhouse gases CO2 and CH4 under a warmer climate. In this study we evaluated the variability in the sensitivity of permafrost and C in recent decades among land surface model simulations over the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009. The 15 model simulations all predict a loss of near-surface permafrost (within 3 m) area over the region, but there are large differences in the magnitude of the simulated rates of loss among the models (0.2 to 58.8 × 103 km2 yr−1). Sensitivity simulations indicated that changes in air temperature largely explained changes in permafrost area, although interactions among changes in other environmental variables also played a role. All of the models indicate that both vegetation and soil C storage together have increased by 156 to 954 Tg C yr−1 between 1960 and 2009 over the permafrost region even though model analyses indicate that warming alone would decrease soil C storage. Increases in gross primary production (GPP) largely explain the simulated increases in vegetation and soil C. The sensitivity of GPP to increases in atmospheric CO2 was the dominant cause of increases in GPP across the models, but comparison of simulated GPP trends across the 1982–2009 period with that of a global GPP data set indicates that all of the models overestimate the trend in GPP. Disturbance also appears to be an important factor affecting C storage, as models that consider disturbance had lower increases in C storage than models that did not consider disturbance. To improve the modeling of C in the permafrost region, there is the need for the modeling community to standardize structural representation of permafrost and carbon dynamics among models that are used to evaluate the permafrost C feedback and for the modeling and observational communities to jointly develop data sets and methodologies to more effectively benchmark models. (Less)


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017

Climate change damages to Alaska public infrastructure and the economics of proactive adaptation

April M. Melvin; Peter A. Larsen; Brent Boehlert; James E. Neumann; Paul Chinowsky; Xavier Espinet; Jeremy Martinich; Matthew S. Baumann; Lisa Rennels; Alexandra Bothner; D. J. Nicolsky; Sergey S. Marchenko

Significance Climate change in Alaska is causing widespread environmental change that is damaging critical infrastructure. As climate change continues, infrastructure may become more vulnerable to damage, increasing risks to residents and resulting in large economic impacts. We quantified the potential economic damages to Alaska public infrastructure resulting from climate-driven changes in flooding, precipitation, near-surface permafrost thaw, and freeze–thaw cycles using high and low future climate scenarios. Additionally, we estimated coastal erosion losses for villages known to be at risk. Our findings suggest that the largest climate damages will result from flooding of roads followed by substantial near-surface permafrost thaw-related damage to buildings. Proactive adaptation efforts as well as global action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions could considerably reduce these damages. Climate change in the circumpolar region is causing dramatic environmental change that is increasing the vulnerability of infrastructure. We quantified the economic impacts of climate change on Alaska public infrastructure under relatively high and low climate forcing scenarios [representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) and RCP4.5] using an infrastructure model modified to account for unique climate impacts at northern latitudes, including near-surface permafrost thaw. Additionally, we evaluated how proactive adaptation influenced economic impacts on select infrastructure types and developed first-order estimates of potential land losses associated with coastal erosion and lengthening of the coastal ice-free season for 12 communities. Cumulative estimated expenses from climate-related damage to infrastructure without adaptation measures (hereafter damages) from 2015 to 2099 totaled


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2018

Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change

A. David McGuire; David M. Lawrence; Charles D. Koven; Joy S. Clein; Eleanor J. Burke; Guangsheng Chen; Elchin Jafarov; Andrew H. MacDougall; Sergey S. Marchenko; D. J. Nicolsky; Shushi Peng; Annette Rinke; Philippe Ciais; Isabelle Gouttevin; Daniel J. Hayes; Duoying Ji; Gerhard Krinner; John C. Moore; Vladimir E. Romanovsky; Christina Schädel; Kevin Schaefer; Edward A. G. Schuur; Qianlai Zhuang

5.5 billion (2015 dollars, 3% discount) for RCP8.5 and


Permafrost and Periglacial Processes | 2010

Thermal state of permafrost in Russia

Vladimir E. Romanovsky; D. S. Drozdov; Naum Oberman; G. V. Malkova; A. L. Kholodov; Sergey S. Marchenko; Nataliya G Moskalenko; D. O. Sergeev; N. G. Ukraintseva; Andrey Abramov; D. Gilichinsky; A. A. Vasiliev

4.2 billion for RCP4.5, suggesting that reducing greenhouse gas emissions could lessen damages by


Permafrost and Periglacial Processes | 2010

Thermal state of permafrost and active layer in Central Asia during the international polar year

Lin Zhao; Qingbai Wu; Sergey S. Marchenko; N. Sharkhuu

1.3 billion this century. The distribution of damages varied across the state, with the largest damages projected for the interior and southcentral Alaska. The largest source of damages was road flooding caused by increased precipitation followed by damages to buildings associated with near-surface permafrost thaw. Smaller damages were observed for airports, railroads, and pipelines. Proactive adaptation reduced total projected cumulative expenditures to


The Cryosphere | 2012

Numerical modeling of permafrost dynamics in Alaska using a high spatial resolution dataset

Elchin Jafarov; Sergey S. Marchenko; Vladimir E. Romanovsky

2.9 billion for RCP8.5 and

Collaboration


Dive into the Sergey S. Marchenko's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vladimir E. Romanovsky

University of Alaska Fairbanks

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. J. Nicolsky

University of Alaska Fairbanks

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elchin Jafarov

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. David McGuire

University of Alaska Fairbanks

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Lawrence

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guangsheng Chen

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge