Shahid Butt

When is bilayer thin-film imaging suitable: comparison with single-layer resists

Silicon-containing bilayer thin-film imaging resists versus single layer resists for a variety of different mask types, from both a focus-expose window, etch selectivity, and process integration perspective are examined. Comparable lithographic performance is found for 248 nm single layer and bilayer resists for several mask levels including: a 135 nm dense contact/deep trench mask level, a 150 and 125 nm equal line space mask printed over trench topography, and dual damascene mask levels with both vias and line levels. The bilayer scheme is shown to significantly relax the dielectric to resist etch selectivity constraint for the case of a dense contact or trench hardmask level, where high aspect ratio dielectric features are required. Only a bilayer resist scheme in combination with a transfer etch process enables the line/space pattern transfer from the imaging layer to the bottom of a trench with a combined aspect ratio > 10. When the single layer resist depth of focus window is limited by both the topography and variations in the underlying dielectric stack thickness, as is the case for the dual damascene via and line levels, bilayer resist is shown to be a practical alternative.

Process dependencies of optical proximity corrections

Optical Proximity Correction has emerged as an industry standard technique to reproduce the desired shapes on wafers as pattern dimensions are approaching the optical resolution limits. However secondary effects, if not properly controlled, may impede successful application of this technique. In order to better assess these factors we have divided the overall pattern formation process into several obvious components: The illumination system, mask, projection optics, resist system and finally etch processes. Each one of these components influences the optical proximity effects observed in the final pattern. The dependence of optical proximity corrections on the type of illumination is fairly well known and will only be touched on. Variations in the mask manufacturing process such as deviations of the mask critical dimension from its nominal value will be discussed. The type of e-beam exposure tool used to write the mask was found to have profound impact on optical proximity correction and therefore specifying the type of mask writing tool and sometimes even its writing mode to ensure reproducible results is required. Lens aberrations in the optical exposure tool and their impact were studied using aerial image simulations. Examples of optical proximity curves from different first generation tools show significant differences even between tools of the same type. Resist effects and the variations induced by modifying etch processes were investigated emphasizing that a fairly detailed control of the overall pattern formation process is necessary to successfully implement any OPC approach.

Is model-based optical proximity correction ready for manufacturing? Study on 0.12- and 0.175-μm DRAM technology

Two full-chip OPC approaches, a traditional rule-based approach and a more recent model-based approach are compared on DRAM applications using both ArF and KrF lithography, with off-axis illumination and phase shift masks. The similarities and differences between these two OPC approaches are compared in detail with selected one- and two-dimensional layout situations. Our results from the model-based approach show good line width control for one- dimensional structures and improved line-end printing for two-dimensional structures; however, results also show severe process window limitations for some layouts. The cause of the process window limitations with the model-based approach are discussed. To address the process window limitations in the model-based approach, a rule-based pre- correction was used to ensure adequate process window at deviated dose and focus conditions. With pre-correction combined with the model-based approach, our wafer data shows good correction quality and process window.

Double exposure technique to reduce line shortening and improve pattern fidelity

A double exposure technique, so called nano-stepping, was investigated to evaluate its benefit for very dense features to reduce line shortening, improve pattern fidelity and resolution capability. The technique involves relaxing the pitch of dense patterns in one dimension and filling in the missing patterns by exposing the same reticle again, offset by an appropriate amount. This method suffers only small throughput loss compared to conventional dual reticle exposure techniques. For 1D patterns, 100 nm lines and spaces can be printed with a 248 nm exposure tool and a half tone mask. Dense 2D contacts with various length to width ratios can be achieved with minimum distance to adjacent neighbors.