Shehzad A. Naroo

A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients

Background: A new commercially available optical low coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit or Allegro Biograph, Wavelight) provides high-resolution non-contact measurements of ocular biometry. The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements compared with current clinical instrumentation. Method: Measurements were taken with the LenStar and IOLMaster on 112 patients aged 41–96 years listed for cataract surgery. A subgroup of 21 patients also had A-scan applanation ultrasonography (OcuScan) performed. Intersession repeatability of the LenStar measurements was assessed on 32 patients Results: LenStar measurements of white-to-white were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference 0.06 (SD 0.03) D; p = 0.305); corneal curvature measurements were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference −0.04 (0.20) D; p = 0.240); anterior chamber depth measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.10 (0.40) mm) and ultrasound (by 0.32 (0.62) mm; p<0.001); crystalline lens thickness measurements were similar to ultrasound (difference 0.16 (0.83) mm, p = 0.382); axial length measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.01 (0.02) mm) but shorter than ultrasound (by 0.14 (0.15) mm; p<0.001). The LensStar was unable to take measurements due to dense media opacities in a similar number of patients to the IOLMaster (9–10%). The LenStar biometric measurements were found to be highly repeatable (variability ⩽2% of average value). Conclusions: Although there were some statistical differences between ocular biometry measurements between the LenStar and current clinical instruments, they were not clinically significant. LenStar measurements were highly repeatable and the instrument easy to use.

REDUCTION IN INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE AFTER EXCIMER LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; CORRELATION WITH PRETREATMENT MYOPIA

PURPOSE The authors relate the observed reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) after excimer laser treatment to the degree of myopia treated. BACKGROUND Intraocular pressure, measured by both Goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometry, has been reported to decrease after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). However, IOP readings after excimer laser PRK might be inaccurate as a consequence of changes in both the thickness and curvature of the cornea. METHODS Baseline IOP readings were measured by noncontact tonometry in each eye of a group of 1320 patients at the time of their initial consultation. These were compared to readings obtained before treatment of the second eye, which took place a minimum of 4 months later. The untreated eyes served as controls. The paired Students t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS After PRK, a decrease was observed in the IOP of treated eyes that was related to the degree of myopia treated. A significant difference was observed between treated and untreated eyes (P < 0.0000). CONCLUSIONS The IOP measured after PRK for myopia may be reduced because of changes in corneal thickness (absence of Bowmans membrane and central thinning) and topography. This is of particular relevance when monitoring the IOP of those patients who are given steroid drops to prevent regression. It also may be of importance in the management of any future glaucoma.

Conact lens & anterior eye.

ING AND INDEXING

Evaluation of dry eye

Dry eye is a common yet complex condition. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors can cause dysfunction of the lids, lacrimal glands, meibomian glands, ocular surface cells, or neural network. These problems would ultimately be expressed at the tear film-ocular surface interface. The manifestations of these problems are experienced as symptoms such as grittiness, discomfort, burning sensation, hyperemia, and secondary epiphora in some cases. Accurate investigation of dry eye is crucial to correct management of the condition. Techniques can be classed according to their investigation of tear production, tear stability, and surface damage (including histological tests). The application, validity, reliability, compatibility, protocols, and indications for these are important. The use of a diagnostic algorithm may lead to more accurate diagnosis and management. The lack of correlation between signs and symptoms seems to favor tear film osmolarity, an objective biomarker, as the best current clue to correct diagnosis.

Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound

Purpose: To compare corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II (OII) and ultrasonic (US) pachymetry in normal and in keratoconic eyes. Setting: Eye Department, Heartlands and Solihull NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Methods: Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by means of OII and US pachymetry in 1 eye of 72 normal subjects and 36 keratoconus patients. The apical corneal thickness (ACT) in keratoconus patients was also evaluated using each method. The mean of the difference, standard deviation (SD), and 95% limits of agreement (LoA = mean ± 2 SD), with and without applying the default linear correction factor (LCF), were determined for each sample. The Student t test was used to identify significant differences between methods, and the correlation between methods was determined using the Pearson bivariate correlation. Bland‐Altman analysis was performed to confirm that the results of the 2 instruments were clinically comparable. Results: In normal eyes, the mean difference (± 95% LoA) in CCT was 1.04 &mgr;m ± 68.52 (SD) (P>.05; r = 0.71) when the LCF was used and 46.73 ± 75.40 &mgr;m (P = .0001; r = 0.71) without the LCF. In keratoconus patients, the mean difference (± 95% LoA) in CCT between methods was 42.46 ± 66.56 &mgr;m (P<.0001: r = 0.85) with the LCF, and 2.51 ± 73.00 &mgr;m (P>.05: r = 0.85) without the LCF. The mean difference (± 95% LoA) in ACT for this group was 49.24 ± 60.88 &mgr;m (P<.0001: r = 0.89) with the LCF and 12.71 ± 68.14 &mgr;m (P = .0077; r = 0.89) when the LCF was not used. Conclusions: This study suggests that OII and US pachymetry provide similar readings for CCT in normal subjects when an LCF is used. In keratoconus patients, OII provides a valid clinical tool for the noninvasive assessment of CCT when the LCF is not applied.

Changes in posterior corneal curvature after photorefractive keratectomy

Purpose: To determine whether myopic ablation by excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) affects only the anterior curvature of the cornea or whether changes also occur in the posterior corneal curvature. Setting: Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, and Optimax Laser Eye Clinic, Manchester, United Kingdom. Methods: Sixteen patients who presented for correction of myopia in 1 eye by excimer laser PRK were followed for 3 months. Only newly presenting patients were recruited, and the untreated eyes were used as controls. The patients were examined at the initial visit (0 week) and 6 and 12 weeks post‐PRK. Measurements included Orbscan topography and pachymetry, autokeratometry, and ultrasound pachymetry. Results: The mean patient age of the 8 men and 8 women was 29.6 years ± 8.6 (SD) (range 20 to 47 years). The attempted mean spherical equivalent correction was between −1.73 and −6.43 diopters. Anterior corneal curvature and corneal thickness in the treated eyes changed systematically in relation to the amount of ablation. Posterior corneal curvature steepened in relation to the dioptric power treated. There were systematic differences between the pachymetry values obtained with the Orbscan and the ultrasound pachymeter. Conclusions: The results suggest that after myopic PRK, the thinner, ablated cornea may bulge forward slightly to steepen both anterior and posterior curvatures. This may account for the regression toward myopia that is typically found in the first few days posttreatment. The forward bulging is similar to the corneal relaxation effects observed after radial keratotomy.

Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision

Purpose. To compare visual function with the Bausch & Lomb PureVision multifocal contact lens to monovision with PureVision single vision contact lenses. Methods. Twenty presbyopic subjects were fitted with either the PureVision multifocal contact lens or monovision with PureVision single vision lenses. After a 1-month trial, the following assessments of visual function were made: (a) distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity (VA); (b) reading ability; (c) distance and near contrast sensitivity function (CSF); (d) near range of clear vision; (e) stereoacuity; and (f) subjective evaluation of near vision ability with a standardized questionnaire. Subjects were then refitted with the alternative correction and the procedure was repeated. All measurements were compared between the two corrections, whereas the “low addition” multifocal lens was also compared with the “high addition” alternative. Results. Distance and near VA were significantly better with monovision than with the multifocal option (p < 0.05). Intermediate VA (p = 0.13) was similar with both corrections, whereas there was also no significant difference in distance and near CSF (p = 0.29 on both occasions). Reading speeds (p = 0.48) and the critical print size (p = 0.90) were not significantly different between the two contact lens corrections, but stereoacuity (p < 0.01) and the near range of clear vision (p < 0.05) were significantly better with the multifocal option than with monovision. Subjective assessment of near ability was similar for both types of contact lens (p = 0.52). The high addition multifocal lens produced significantly poorer distance and near CSF, near VA, and critical print size compared with the low addition alternative. Conclusions. Monovision performed better than a center-near aspheric simultaneous vision multifocal contact lens of the same material for distance and near VA only. The multifocal option provides better stereoacuity and near range of clear vision, with little differences in CSF, so a better balance of real-world visual function may be achieved due to minimal binocular disruption.

Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens

Aim: To determine whether eyes implanted with the Lenstec KH-3500 “accommodative” intraocular lenses (IOLs) have improved subjective and objective focusing performance compared to a standard monofocal IOLs. Methods: 28 participants were implanted monocularly with a KH-3500 “accommodative” IOL and 20 controls with a Softec1 IOL. Outcome measures of refraction, visual acuity, subjective amplitude of accommodation, objective accommodative stimulus response curve, aberrometry, and Scheimpflug imaging were taken at ∼3 weeks and repeated after 6 months. Results: Best corrected acuity with the KH-3500 was 0.06 (SD 0.13) logMAR at distance and 0.58 (0.20) logMAR at near. Accommodation was 0.39 (0.53) D measured objectively and 3.1 (1.6) D subjectively. Higher order aberrations were 0.87 (0.85) μm and lower order were 0.24 (0.39) μm. Posterior subcapsular light scatter was 0.95% (1.37%) greater than IOL clarity. In comparison, all control group measures were similar except objective (0.17 (0.13) D; p = 0.032) and subjective (2.0 (0.9) D; p = 0.009) amplitude of accommodation. Six months following surgery, posterior subcapsular scatter had increased (p<0.01) in the KH-3500 implanted subjects and near word acuity had decreased (p<0.05). Conclusions: The objective accommodating effects of the KH-3500 IOL appear to be limited, although the subjective and objective accommodative range is significantly increased compared to control subjects implanted with conventional IOLs. However, this “accommodative” ability of the lens appears to have decreased by 6 months post-surgery.

Excimer laser surface ablation - a review

Corneal surface laser ablation procedures for the correction of refractive error have enjoyed a resurgence of interest, especially in patients with a possible increased risk of complications after lamellar surgery. Improvements in the understanding of corneal biomechanical changes, the modulation of wound healing, laser technology including ablation profiles and different methods for epithelial removal have widened the scope for surface ablation. This article discusses photorefractive keratectomy, trans‐epithelial photorefractive keratectomy, laser‐assisted sub‐epithelial keratomileusis and epithelial‐laser‐assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Nidek OPD-scan analysis of normal, keratoconic, and penetrating keratoplasty eyes

PURPOSE To determine by wavefront analysis the difference between eyes considered normal, eyes diagnosed with keratoconus, and eyes that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty METHODS The Nidek OPD-Scan wavefront aberrometer was used to measure ocular aberrations out to the sixth Zernike order. One hundred and thirty eyes that were free of ocular pathology, 41 eyes diagnosed with keratoconus, and 8 eyes that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty were compared for differences in root mean square value. Three and five millimeter root mean square values of the refractive power aberrometry maps of the three classes of eyes were compared. Radially symmetric and irregular higher order aberration values were compared for differences in magnitude. RESULTS Root mean square values were lower in eyes free of ocular pathology compared to eyes with keratoconus and eyes that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty. The aberrations were larger with the 5-mm pupil. Coma and spherical aberration values were lower in normal eyes. CONCLUSION Wavefront aberrometry of normal, pathological, and eyes after surgery may help to explain the visual distortions encountered by patients. The ability to measure highly aberrated eyes allows an objective assessment of the optical consequences of ocular pathology and surgery. The Nidek OPD-Scan can be used in areas other than refractive surgery.