Sheryl Zelenitsky

New Lipoglycopeptides: A Comparative Review of Dalbavancin, Oritavancin and Telavancin

Dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin are semisynthetic lipoglycopeptides that demonstrate promise for the treatment of patients with infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Each of these agents contains a heptapeptide core, common to all glycopeptides, which enables them to inhibit transglycosylation and transpeptidation (cell wall synthesis). Modifications to the heptapeptide core result in different in vitro activities for the three semisynthetic lipoglycopeptides. All three lipoglycopeptides contain lipophilic side chains, which prolong their half-life, help to anchor the agents to the cell membrane and increase their activity against Gram-positive cocci. In addition to inhibiting cell wall synthesis, telavancin and oritavancin are also able to disrupt bacterial membrane integrity and increase membrane permeability; oritavancin also inhibits RNA synthesis. Enterococci exhibiting the VanA phenotype (resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin) are resistant to both dalbavancin and telavancin, while oritavancin retains activity. Dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin exhibit activity against VanB vancomycin-resistant enterococci. All three lipoglycopeptides demonstrate potent in vitro activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis regardless of their susceptibility to meticillin, as well as Streptococcus spp. Both dalbavancin and telavancin are active against vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), but display poor activity versus vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA). Oritavancin is active against both VISA and VRSA. Telavancin displays greater activity against Clostridium spp. than dalbavancin, oritavancin or vancomycin.The half-life of dalbavancin ranges from 147 to 258 hours, which allows for once-weekly dosing, the half-life of oritavancin of 393 hours may allow for one dose per treatment course, while telavancin requires daily administration. Dalbavancin and telavancin exhibit concentration-dependent activity and AUC/MIC (area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio) is the pharmacodynamic parameter that best describes their activities. Oritavancin’s activity is also considered concentration-dependent in vitro, while in vivo its activity has been described by both concentration and time-dependent models; however, AUC/MIC is the pharmacodynamic parameter that best describes its activity.Clinical trials involving patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) have demonstrated that all three agents are as efficacious as comparators. The most common adverse effects reported with dalbavancin use included nausea, diarrhoea and constipation, while injection site reactions, fever and diarrhoea were commonly observed with oritavancin therapy. Patients administered telavancin frequently reported nausea, taste disturbance and insomnia. To date, no drug-drug interactions have been identified for dalbavancin, oritavancin or telavancin. All three of these agents are promising alternatives for the treatment of cSSSIs in cases where more economical options such as vancomycin have been ineffective, in cases of reduced vancomycin susceptibility or resistance, or where vancomycin use has been associated with adverse events.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Pharmacodynamic investigations with antimicrobials define the relationship between the infecting organism and achievable drug concentrations with clinical outcome. OBJECTIVE: To examine this relationship for meropenem in a population of patients who are at high risk of infection-related morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of a multicenter, randomized, blinded clinical trial. A population-based predictive model was created using data from adults with febrile neutropenia and the nonparametric modeling program, NPEM. Patient age, body weight, and serum creatinine level were covariates in the model used to predict unbound concentrations for each patient. Pathogen susceptibility was estimated using product literature minimum inhibitory concentrations for effectiveness against 50% of microorganisms (MIC50) for specific organisms. The pharmacodynamic index of percent time above MIC (% T>MIC) was analyzed for its association with clinical outcome. RESULTS: A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model using patient covariates of body weight and renal function best described the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients. Sixty patients with confirmed gram-positive or -negative bacteremia were studied. An average of 83% T>MIC was identified for the 42 clinical responders compared with 59% T>MIC for the 18 nonresponders (p = 0.04). An 80% clinical response rate was evident when the % T>MIC for meropenem exceeded 75% of the dosing interval (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first published report of a relationship between a pharmacodynamic index and clinical outcome in a febrile neutropenic population. Based on this relationship, dosing with intravenous meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours is predicted to be comparable to the currently recommended 1 g every 8 hours for serious infections. Our model provides further justification for a prospective clinical trial to evaluate a pharmacodynamically targeted meropenem dosing schedule as to its ability to improve clinical outcome in these patients.

Ceftaroline: A Novel Broad-spectrum Cephalosporin with Activity against Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin currently under clinical investigation for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI), including those caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Ceftaroline has the ability to bind to penicillin-binding protein (PBP)2a, an MRSA-specific PBP that has low affinity for most other beta-lactam antibacterials. The high binding affinity of ceftaroline to PBP2a (median inhibitory concentration 0.90 microg/mL) correlates well with its low minimum inhibitory concentration for MRSA. Ceftaroline is active in vitro against Gram-positive cocci, including MRSA, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (not E. faecium). The broad-spectrum activity of ceftaroline includes many Gram-negative pathogens but does not extend to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing or AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae or most nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli. Ceftaroline demonstrates limited activity against anaerobes such as Bacteroides fragilis and non-fragilis Bacteroides spp. Limited data show that ceftaroline has a low propensity to select for resistant subpopulations. Ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug) is rapidly converted by plasma phosphatases to active ceftaroline. For multiple intravenous doses of 600 mg given over 1 h every 12 hours for 14 days, the maximum plasma concentration was 19.0 microg/mL and 21.0 microg/mL for first and last dose, respectively. Ceftaroline has a volume of distribution of 0.37 L/kg (28.3 L), low protein binding (<20%) and a serum half-life of 2.6 hours. No drug accumulation occurs with multiple doses and elimination occurs primarily through renal excretion (49.6%). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30-50 mL/min); no adjustment is needed for mild renal impairment. Currently, limited clinical trial data are available for ceftaroline. A phase II study randomized 100 patients with cSSSI to intravenous ceftaroline 600 mg every 12 hours or intravenous vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours with or without intravenous aztreonam 1 g every 8 hours (standard therapy) for 7-14 days. Clinical cure rates were 96.7% for ceftaroline compared with 88.9% for standard therapy. Adverse events were similar between groups and generally mild in nature. In a phase III trial, 702 patients with cSSSI were randomized to ceftaroline 600 mg or vancomycin 1 g plus aztreonam 1 g, each administered intravenously every 12 hours for 5-14 days. Ceftaroline was noninferior to vancomycin plus aztreonam in treating cSSSI caused by both Gram-positive and -negative pathogens. Adverse event rates were similar between groups. Ceftaroline is well tolerated, which is consistent with the good safety and tolerability profile of the cephalosporin class. In summary, ceftaroline is a promising treatment for cSSSI and CAP, and has potential to be used as monotherapy for polymicrobial infections because of its broad-spectrum activity. Further clinical studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline, and to define its role in patient care.

Antibiotic Pharmacodynamics in Surgical Prophylaxis: an Association between Intraoperative Antibiotic Concentrations and Efficacy

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to characterize the relationship between gentamicin concentrations during surgery and the development of wound infection following colorectal operations. Despite decades of research in surgical prophylaxis, the relationship between intraoperative antibiotic concentrations and postoperative infection and the concentrations required for effective prophylaxis have not been established. A pharmacodynamic analysis was conducted using data from a previous prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study which compared two dosage regimens of gentamicin plus metronidazole for prophylaxis in connection with elective colorectal surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for postoperative wound infection were conducted, and the relationship between intraoperative gentamicin concentrations and surgical outcome was characterized. The gentamicin concentration at the time of surgical closure was one of the strongest independent risk factors for infection (P = 0.02), along with the presence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.02), stoma (P = 0.04), and advanced age (P = 0.05). Gentamicin concentrations at closure of less than 0.5 mg/liter were associated with an infection rate of 80% (representing 8 of 10 patients with concentrations below that level) (P = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a critical closure concentration of 1.6 mg/liter for effective surgical prophylaxis (P = 0.002; sensitivity, 70.8%; specificity, 65.9%). This study provides new and important information on antibiotic pharmacodynamics in surgical prophylaxis. It demonstrates the critical effect of the antibiotic concentration at closure on wound infection and suggests a significant association between the concentration and other well-established risk factors, like the timing of preoperative antibiotic administration and surgery duration.

Comparison of the next-generation aminoglycoside plazomicin to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin

Plazomicin (formerly ACHN-490) is a next-generation aminoglycoside that was synthetically derived from sisomicin by appending a hydroxy-aminobutyric acid substituent at position 1 and a hydroxyethyl substituent at position 6′. Plazomicin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis and exhibits dose-dependent bactericidal activity. Plazomicin demonstrates activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including isolates harboring any of the clinically relevant aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. However, like older parenteral aminoglycosides, plazomicin is not active against bacterial isolates expressing ribosomal methyltransferases conferring aminoglycoside resistance. Plazomicin has been reported to demonstrate in vitro synergistic activity when combined with daptomycin or ceftobiprole versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus and against Pseudomonas aeruginosa when combined with cefepime, doripenem, imipenem or piperacillin-tazobactam. After intravenous administration of plazomicin to humans at a dose of 15 mg/ kg, the maximum concentraration was 113 μg/ml, the area under the curve0–24 was 239 h·μg/ml, the half-life was 4.0 h and the steady-state volume of distribution was 0.24 L/kg. Results from a Phase II randomized, double-blind study in patients with complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis including cases with concurrent bacteremia comparing plazomicin 15 mg/kg intravenously once daily for 5 days with levofloxacin 750 mg intravenously. for 5 days are anticipated in 2012. Human studies to date have not reported nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity, and lack of ototoxicity has been reported in the guinea pig model. Given reported increases in bacterial resistance to current antimicrobial agents and the lack of availability of new agents with novel mechanisms, plazomicin may become a welcomed addition to the antibacterial armamentarium pending positive results from large-scale clinical trials and other required clinical studies.

Enteric absorption and pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in critically ill patients with pandemic (H1N1) influenza

Background: Whether the enteric absorption of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir is impaired in critically ill patients is unknown. We documented the pharmacokinetic profile of oseltamivir in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) influenza. Methods: We included 41 patients 18 years of age and older with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) influenza who were admitted for ventilatory support to nine ICUs in three cities in Canada and Spain. Using tandem mass spectrometry, we assessed plasma levels of oseltamivir free base and its active metabolite carboxylate at baseline (before gastric administration of the drug) and at 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12 hours after the fourth or later dose. Results: Among the 36 patients who did not require dialysis, the median concentration of oseltamivir free base was 10.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.8–14.9) μg/L; the median concentration of the carboxylate metabolite was 404 (IQR 257–900) μg/L. The volume of distribution of the carboxylate metabolite did not increase with increasing body weight (R2 = 0.00, p = 0.87). The rate of elimination of oseltamivir carboxylate was modestly correlated with estimations of creatinine clearance (R2 = 0.27, p < 0.001). Drug clearance in the five patients who required continuous renal replacement therapy was about one-sixth that in the 36 patients with relatively normal renal function. Interpretation: Oseltamivir was well absorbed enterically in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) influenza. The dosage of 75 mg twice daily achieved plasma levels that were comparable to those in ambulatory patients and were far in excess of concentrations required to maximally inhibit neuraminidase activity of the virus. Adjustment of the dosage in patients with renal dysfunction requiring continuous renal replacement therapy is appropriate; adjustment for obesity does not appear to be necessary.

Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose, prolonged-infusion cefepime in adult critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

ABSTRACT A population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime was constructed from data from adult critical care patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). A total of 32 patients treated with high-dose cefepime, 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) or a renal function-adjusted equivalent dose, were randomized into two groups—26 for the initial model and 6 for model validation. Serum samples of cefepime were collected at steady state. Nonparametric adaptive grid population modeling was employed using a two-compartment Kslope pharmacokinetic model relating the elimination rate constant (K10) to renal function, as defined by creatinine clearance (CLCR), and central distribution volume (V1) to total body weight (TBW). The final model was described by the following equations: K10 = 0.0027 × CLCR + 0.071 h−1 and V1 = TBW × 0.21 liter/kg. The median intercompartmental transfer constants K12 and K21 were 0.780 h−1 and 0.472 h−1, respectively. Using these median parameter estimates, the bias, precision, and coefficient of determination for the initial model were 11.3 μg/ml, 24.0 μg/ml, and 26%, respectively. The independent validation group displayed a bias, precision, and coefficient of determination of −1.64 μg/ml, 17.1 μg/ml, and 62%, respectively. Time-concentration profiles were assessed for various dosing regimens, using 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations. Among the regimens, the likelihoods of 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) achieving free drug concentrations above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval were 91.8%, 78.1%, and 50.3% for MICs of 8, 16, and 32 μg/ml, respectively. This study provides a pharmacokinetic model capable of predicting cefepime concentrations in critically ill patients with VAP.

Vancomycin pharmacodynamics and survival in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-associated septic shock

Given the lack of clinical data to guide optimal dosing of vancomycin in critically ill patients with life-threatening infections, the objective was to characterise vancomycin pharmacodynamics in MRSA-associated septic shock. Cases were extracted from an observational, multicentre study in Canadian Intensive Care Units and included 35 adult patients with MRSA-associated septic shock who received vancomycin and had a measured serum concentration within the first 72 h of therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess variables predictive of in-hospital mortality. Patients who survived were significantly younger and had better renal function, lower probability of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, higher probability of intravenous drug use, lower probability of healthcare-associated infection and lower APACHE II score. Survivors also received higher vancomycin doses and had higher serum troughs and AUC₂₄/MIC values. The survival rate was 2.5-fold greater in patients who had vancomycin troughs ≥15 mg/L [70.6% (12/17) vs. 27.8% (5/18); P=0.001]. Two significant AUC₂₄/MIC thresholds for survival, ≥451 (P=0.006) and ≥578 (P=0.012), were identified by CART analysis. Only younger age (P=0.028) and higher vancomycin AUC₂₄/MIC (P=0.045) were significant in multivariate analyses of survival. This study of vancomycin in critically ill patients supports the current recommendation for serum troughs of at least 15 mg/L and, in patients with septic shock, an AUC₂₄/MIC threshold higher than the conventional 400. Improved survival was observed with the attainment of these pharmacodynamic targets.

Aminoglycoside-Induced Vestibular Injury: Maintaining a Sense of Balance

Objective To describe the mechanism and risk factors for the development of aminoglycoside-induced vestibular injury and discuss their implications for therapeutic monitoring of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Data Sources: A MEDLINE search (1975–January 2008) was performed to identify literature on aminoglycoside-induced vestibular injury and risk factors associated with this outcome and their impact on therapeutic drug monitoring. Additional references were identified through review of bibliographies of identified articles. Study Selection And Data Extraction: Data on the mechanisms of vestibular toxicity and its development in association with aminoglycoside exposure were extracted from identified references. Data Synthesis: The mechanism leading to the development of irreversible vestibular injury from exposure to aminoglycosides appears to be through the excessive production of oxidative free radicals. This production and subsequent toxicity appears to be a time-dependent process and is unrelated to dose or serum concentration. For similarly designed studies, the pooled incidence of vestibular toxicity is 10.9% for gentamicin, 7.4% for amikacin, 3.5% for tobramycin, and 1.1% for netilmicin. Current evidence suggests that this form of drug toxicity is not restricted to traditionally dosed systemic therapy, since intraperitoneal administration, high-dose once-daily administration, topical inhalation, and eardrop administration have all been associated with the development of this adverse outcome. Conclusions: Given the lack of association between serum concentrations and vestibulotoxicity, it is imperative for the pharmacist to interview the patient and not focus solely on maintaining target range drug concentrations. Minimizing the duration of exposure to aminoglycosides is recommended to reduce the risk from this form of drug toxicity.

Evaluating Ciprofloxacin Dosing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection by Using Clinical Outcome-Based Monte Carlo Simulations

ABSTRACT Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes serious infections whose outcome is highly dependent on antimicrobial therapy. The goal of this study was to predict the relative efficacies of three ciprofloxacin dosing regimens for P. aeruginosa infection using clinical outcome-based Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) with “real patient” demographics, pharmacokinetics, MICs, and pharmacodynamics (PDs). Each cohort consisted of 1,000 simulated study subjects. Three ciprofloxacin dosing regimens were studied, including (i) the recommended standard dose of 400 mg given intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h (q12h), (ii) the recommended high dose of 400 mg i.v. q8h, and (iii) a novel, PD-targeted regimen to attain a ƒAUC/MIC value of >86. Probability of target attainment (PTA) and probability of cure (POC) were determined for each regimen. POC with the standard dose was at least 0.90 if pathogen MICs were ≤0.25 μg/ml but only 0.59 or 0.27 if MICs were 0.5 or 1 μg/ml, respectively. Predicted cure rates in these MIC categories were significantly higher at 0.72 and 0.40 with the high dose and 0.91 and 0.72 with the PD-targeted regimen(P < 0.0001). Analyses based on the local susceptibility profile produced PTA and POC estimates of 0.44 and 0.74 with the standard ciprofloxacin dose, 0.58 and 0.81 with the high dose, and 0.84 and 0.93 with the PD-targeted regimen, respectively. In conclusion, as demonstrated by clinical outcome-based MCSs, the highest recommended ciprofloxacin dose of 400 mg i.v. q8h should be used in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection to improve PD target attainment and clinical cure. However, even this appears ineffective if pathogen MICs are 1 μg/ml, warranting the consideration of a lower MIC breakpoint, ≤0.5 μg/ml.