Shirish Jani

Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting

BACKGROUND In animal models of coronary restenosis, intracoronary radiotherapy has been shown to reduce the intimal hyperplasia that is a part of restenosis. We studied the safety and efficacy of catheter-based intracoronary gamma radiation plus stenting to reduce coronary restenosis in patients with previous restenosis. METHODS Patients with restenosis underwent coronary stenting, as required, and balloon dilation and were then randomly assigned to receive catheter-based irradiation with iridium-192 or placebo. Clinical follow-up was performed, with quantitative coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasonographic measurements at six months. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were enrolled; 26 were assigned to the iridium-192 group and 29 to the placebo group. Angiographic studies were performed in 53 patients (96 percent) at a mean (+/-SD) of 6.7+/-2.2 months. The mean minimal luminal diameter at follow-up was larger in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (2.43+/-0.78 mm vs. 1.85+/-0.89 mm, P=0.02). Late luminal loss was significantly lower in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (0.38+/-1.06 mm vs. 1.03+/-0.97 mm, P=0.03). Angiographically identified restenosis (stenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter at follow-up) occurred in 17 percent of the patients in the iridium-192 group, as compared with 54 percent of those in the placebo group (P= 0.01). There were no apparent complications of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary, short-term study of patients with previous coronary restenosis, coronary stenting followed by catheter-based intracoronary radiotherapy substantially reduced the rate of subsequent restenosis.

LOCALIZED INTRACORONARY GAMMA-RADIATION THERAPY TO INHIBIT THE RECURRENCE OF RESTENOSIS AFTER STENTING

BACKGROUND Although the frequency of restenosis after coronary angioplasty is reduced by stenting, when restenosis develops within a stent, the risk of subsequent restenosis is greater than 50 percent. We report on a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of intracoronary radiation therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. METHODS Of 252 eligible patients in whom in-stent restenosis had developed, 131 were randomly assigned to receive an indwelling intracoronary ribbon containing a sealed source of iridium-192, and 121 were assigned to receive a similar-appearing nonradioactive ribbon (placebo). RESULTS The primary end point, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and the need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion during nine months of follow-up, occurred in 53 patients assigned to placebo (43.8 percent) and 37 patients assigned to iridium-192 (28.2 percent, P=0.02). However, the reduction in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was determined solely by a diminished need for revascularization of the target lesion, not by reductions in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction. Late thrombosis occurred in 5.3 percent of the iridium-192 group, as compared with 0.8 percent of the placebo group (P=0.07), resulting in more late myocardial infarctions in the iridium-192 group (9.9 percent vs. 4.1 percent, P=0.09). Late thrombosis occurred in irradiated patients only after the discontinuation of oral antiplatelet therapy (with ticlopidine or clopidogrel) and only in patients who had received new stents at the time of radiation treatment. CONCLUSIONS Intracoronary irradiation with iridium-192 resulted in lower rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis, although it was also associated with a higher rate of late thrombosis, resulting in an increased risk of myocardial infarction. If the problem of late thrombosis within the stent can be overcome, intracoronary irradiation with iridium-192 may become a useful approach to the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Three-year clinical and angiographic follow-up after intracoronary radiation : results of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND Although several early trials indicate treatment of restenosis with radiation therapy is safe and effective, the long-term impact of this new technology has been questioned. The objective of this report is to document angiographic and clinical outcome 3 years after treatment of restenotic stented coronary arteries with catheter-based (192)Ir. METHODS AND RESULTS A double-blind, randomized trial compared (192)Ir with placebo sources in patients with previous restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Over a 9-month period, 55 patients were enrolled; 26 were randomized to (192)Ir and 29 to placebo. At 3-year follow-up, target-lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the (192)Ir group (15. 4% versus 48.3%; P<0.01). The dichotomous restenosis rate at 3-year follow-up was also significantly lower in (192)Ir patients (33% versus 64%; P<0.05). In a subgroup of patients with 3-year angiographic follow-up not subjected to target-lesion revascularization by the 6-month angiogram, the mean minimal luminal diameter between 6 months and 3 years decreased from 2.49+/-0.81 to 2.12+/-0.73 mm in (192)Ir patients but was unchanged in placebo patients. CONCLUSIONS The early clinical benefits observed after treatment of coronary restenosis with (192)Ir appear durable at late follow-up. Angiographic restenosis continues to be significantly reduced in (192)Ir-treated patients, but a small amount of late loss was observed between the 6-month and 3-year follow-up time points. No events occurred in the (192)Ir group to suggest major untoward effects of vascular radiotherapy. At 3-year follow-up, vascular radiotherapy continues to be a promising new treatment for restenosis.

Intravascular brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 60

Recent preclinical and clinical studies indicate that irradiation using ionizing radiation in the dose range of 15 to 30 Gy may reduce the occurrence of restenosis in patients who have undergone an angioplasty. Several delivery systems of intravascular brachytherapy have been developed to deliver radiation doses in this range with minimal normal tissue toxicity. In late 1995 the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed a task group to investigate these issues and to report the current state of the art of intravascular brachytherapy physics. The report of this task group is presented here.

Five-Year Clinical Follow-Up After Intracoronary Radiation Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background—Several clinical trials indicate that intracoronary radiation is safe and effective for treatment of restenotic coronary arteries. We previously reported 6-month and 3-year clinical and angiographic follow-up demonstrating significant decreases in target lesion revascularization (TLR) and angiographic restenosis after &ggr; radiation of restenotic lesions. The objective of this study was to document the clinical outcome 5 years after treatment of restenotic coronary arteries with catheter-based iridium-192 (192Ir). Methods and Results—A double-blind, randomized trail compared 192Ir to placebo sources in patients with restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Over a 9-month period, 55 patients were enrolled; 26 were randomized to 192Ir and 29 to placebo. At 5-year follow-up, TLR was significantly lower in the 192Ir group (23.1% versus 48.3%;P =0.05). There were 2 TLRs between years 3 and 5 in patients in the 192Ir group and none in patients in the placebo group. The 5-year event-free survival rate (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) was greater in 192Ir-treated patients (61.5% versus 34.5%;P =0.02). Conclusions—Despite apparent mitigation of efficacy over time, there remains a significant reduction in TLR at 5 years and an improvement in event-free survival in patients treated with intracoronary 192Ir. The early clinical benefits after intracoronary &ggr; radiation with 192Ir seem durable at 5-year clinical follow-up.

Two-Year Follow-Up After Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Coronary Restenosis

BACKGROUND Although early trials indicate the treatment of restenosis with radiation therapy is safe and effective, the long-term impact of this new technology has been questioned. The possibility of late untoward consequences, such as aneurysm formation, perforation, and accelerated vascular disease, is of significant concern. Furthermore, it is not known whether the beneficial effects of radiation therapy will be durable or whether radiation will only delay restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS A double-blind, randomized trial was undertaken to compare 192Ir with placebo sources in patients with previous restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.76-mm (0. 03-in) ribbon containing sealed sources of either 192Ir or placebo. All patients underwent repeat coronary angiography at 6 months. All living patients were contacted 24 months after their index study procedure. Patients were assessed with respect to the need for target-lesion revascularization or nontarget-lesion revascularization, occurrence of myocardial infarction, or death. Over a 9-month period, 55 patients were enrolled; 26 were randomized to 192Ir and 29 to placebo. Follow-up was obtained in 100% of living patients at a minimum of 24 months. Target-lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the 192Ir group (15.4% versus 44.8%; P<0. 01). Nontarget-lesion revascularization was similar in 192Ir and placebo patients (19.2% versus 20.7%; P=NS). There were 2 deaths in each group. The composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization was significantly lower in 192Ir-treated versus placebo-treated patients (23.1% versus 51.7%; P=0.03). No patient in the 192Ir group sustained a target-lesion revascularization later than 10 months. CONCLUSIONS At 2-year clinical follow-up, treatment with 192Ir demonstrates significant clinical benefit. Although further follow-up (including late angiography) will be necessary, no clinical events have occurred to date in the 192Ir group to suggest major untoward effects of vascular radiotherapy. At the intermediate follow-up time point, vascular radiotherapy continues to be a promising new treatment for restenosis.

A subgroup analysis of the scripps coronary radiation to inhibit proliferation poststenting trial

INTRODUCTION In the Scripps Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Proliferation Poststenting (SCRIPPS) Trial, 192Ir significantly reduced angiographic, ultrasonographic, and clinical endpoints of restenosis. The objective of this analysis was to quantitate the impact of patient, lesion and technical characteristics on late angiographic outcome. METHODS Patients with restenotic, stented coronary lesions were randomized to receive either 192Ir or placebo sources. Late luminal loss and loss index were calculated for several patient subgroups, including patients with diabetes, in-stent restenosis, multiple previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures, longer lesion lengths, saphenous vein grafts, small vessel diameters, and minimum dose exposures < 8.00 Gy. Two-factor analysis of variance was used to test for an interaction between patient characteristics and treatment effect. RESULTS In the treated group, late loss was particularly low in patients with diabetes (0.19 mm), in-stent restenosis (0.17 mm), reference vessel diameters < 3.0 mm (0.07 mm), and patients who received a minimum radiation dose to the entire adventitial border of at least 8.00 Gy. The loss index in each of these subgroups was similarly low at -0.02, 0.03, -0.02, and 0.03, respectively. By 2-factor analysis of variance, a significant interaction between subgroup characteristic and treatment effect (late loss) was found in patients with in-stent restenosis (p = 0.035), and patients receiving a minimum dose of 8.00 Gy to the adventitial border (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION In this pilot study, patient characteristics associated with a more aggressive proliferative response to injury appeared to confer an enhanced response to radiotherapy. Furthermore, a dose threshold response to 192Ir was found with an enhanced response occurring when the entire circumference of the adventitial border was exposed to at least 8.00 Gy.

Endovascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease

The most common cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States is vascular disease, which afflicts a wide spectrum of organs such as the heart (cardiovascular system), brain (cerebrovascular system), kidney (renal system), liver (hepatic system), and extremities (peripheral vascular system). The most common pathology of vascular diseases is occlusion. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) is currently the most common nonsurgical treatment for obstructive arteries. Unfortunately, the long-term effectiveness of PTA is limited by a high restenosis rate. Efforts to reduce post-PTA restenosis, including laser, mechanical atherectomy, intravascular stenting, and pharmacologic agents, have not been successful. With recent advances in the pathogenesis of restenosis, we have learned that the major problem is the intimal hyperplastic reaction in response to vessel injury. Encouraging animal data in the use of various radiotherapeutic approaches to prevent restenosis has led to a large number of multi-national, multicenter, randomized trials on coronary vascular systems. Because early results have been in favor of radiation therapy, and because the basic process of restenosis is similar for coronary and noncoronary vascular systems, many investigators extend the application of radiotherapy to the prevention of restenosis in peripheral vascular systems. However, the clinical scenarios are much different for peripheral vascular systems than for the coronary vascular system. This article discusses the current views of the pathophysiology of restenosis, major clinical trials, and perspectives on future studies. Experimental studies on animal models have documented the profound effects of endovascular brachytherapy in reducing restenosis caused by angioplasty and stenting. Early results of clinical trials are encouraging and confirm these positive results. Long-term follow-up data are needed to show that radiation does prevent, not merely delay, restenosis; Several areas of opportunity exist for both basic science research and clinical studies to enhance our knowledge of the pathophysiology. This would optimize the treatment strategy, maximizing the benefits and minimizing late complications.

Quality assurance for nonradiographic radiotherapy localization and positioning systems: Report of Task Group 147

New technologies continue to be developed to improve the practice of radiation therapy. As several of these technologies have been implemented clinically, the Therapy Committee and the Quality Assurance and Outcomes Improvement Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine commissioned Task Group 147 to review the current nonradiographic technologies used for localization and tracking in radiotherapy. The specific charge of this task group was to make recommendations about the use of nonradiographic methods of localization, specifically; radiofrequency, infrared, laser, and video based patient localization and monitoring systems. The charge of this task group was to review the current use of these technologies and to write quality assurance guidelines for the use of these technologies in the clinical setting. Recommendations include testing of equipment for initial installation as well as ongoing quality assurance. As the equipment included in this task group continues to evolve, both in the type and sophistication of technology and in level of integration with treatment devices, some of the details of how one would conduct such testing will also continue to evolve. This task group, therefore, is focused on providing recommendations on the use of this equipment rather than on the equipment itself, and should be adaptable to each users situation in helping develop a comprehensive quality assurance program.

Quantitative angiographic analysis of stent restenosis in the Scripps Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Intimal Proliferation Post Stenting (SCRIPPS) Trial.

To identify luminal dimension changes occurring within the stent alone and within the stent + margin segment, we reviewed the quantitative angiographic results obtained from the Scripps Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Proliferation Post Stenting (SCRIPPS) trial, a prospective randomized trial assessing the effect of iridium-192 (Ir-192) on the prevention of stent restenosis. Fifty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive Ir-192 or placebo sources after successful intervention. Procedural and 6-month follow-up cineangiograms were quantitatively reviewed in 52 patients to identify changes within the stent and the stent + margin segment. The percent diameter stenosis was lower within the stent than within the stent + margin segment after the procedure (6 +/- 22% vs 21+/- 15%, p <0.0001) and at follow-up (28 +/- 29% vs 42 +/- 21%, p <0.0001). As a result, a lower restenosis rate was found within the stent than within the stent + margin (25% vs 37%, p <0.0001); isolated stent margin restenosis occurred in 11.5% of lesions. Treatment with Ir-192 reduced restenosis within the stent (8% vs 39%; p = 0.010) and within the stent + margin segment (17% vs 54%; p = 0.010); the reduction in restenosis at the margin only (8.3% vs 14.3%, p = 0.503) was not significant. The lowest relative risk for restenosis resulting from Ir-192 occurred within the stent (0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.86) compared with the stent + margin segment (0.31; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.81) or the stent margin (0.58; 95% CI 0.12 to 2.91). In the SCRIPPS trial, 32% of restenosis occurred at the stent margins. Treatment with Ir-192 reduced restenosis primarily within the stent rather than the margin. Whether extending the treatment length to fully include the stent margins will further reduce restenosis requires further study.