Stephen A. Varvel

Evaluation of fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibition in murine models of emotionality

RationaleManipulations of the endocannabinoid/fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) signaling systems result in conflicting and paradoxical effects in rodent models of emotional reactivity.ObjectivesIn the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the inhibition of FAAH would elicit significant effects in murine models used to screen anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs.Materials and methodsFAAH (−/−) mice and wild-type mice treated with FAAH inhibitors (URB597 and OL-135) were evaluated in standard behavioral screening models for antidepressant (i.e., tail suspension and forced-swim tests) and anxiolytic (i.e., elevated plus maze) agents. The doses of URB597 and OL-135 selected were based on their ability to augment the pharmacological effects (i.e., analgesia, catalepsy, and hypothermia) of exogenously administered anandamide.ResultsFAAH (−/−) mice, anandamide-injected FAAH (−/−) mice, or wild-type mice injected with FAAH inhibitors or anandamide failed to exhibit significant effects in standard tests of emotional reactivity, although the antidepressant desipramine and the anxiolytic agent midazolam were active in the appropriate assays. FAAH- (−/−) and URB597-treated mice finally displayed significant effects in the tail suspension test when substantial methodological changes were made (i.e., altered ambient light and increased sample sizes).ConclusionsAlthough FAAH suppression can elicit significant effects under some instances in which consequential procedural modifications are made, the present results indicate that the pharmacological inhibition or genetic deletion of FAAH is ineffective in standard mouse models of emotional reactivity. It remains to be established whether the effects of FAAH inhibition in these modified tasks are predictive of their efficacy in treating emotional disorders.

Inhibition of Fatty-Acid Amide Hydrolase Accelerates Acquisition and Extinction Rates in a Spatial Memory Task

Recent reports have demonstrated that disruption of CB1 receptor signaling impairs extinction of learned responses in conditioned fear and Morris water maze paradigms. Here, we test the hypothesis that elevating brain levels of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide through either genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of its primary catabolic enzyme fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) will potentiate extinction in a fixed platform water maze task. FAAH (−/−) mice and mice treated with the FAAH inhibitor OL-135, did not display any memory impairment or motor disruption, but did exhibit a significant increase in the rate of extinction. Unexpectedly, FAAH-compromised mice also exhibited a significant increase in acquisition rate. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 (rimonabant) when given alone had no effects on acquisition, but disrupted extinction. Additionally, SR141716 blocked the effects of OL-135 on both acquisition and extinction. Collectively, these results indicate that endogenous anandamide plays a facilitatory role in extinction through a CB1 receptor mechanism of action. In contrast, the primary psychoactive constituent of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, failed to affect extinction rates, suggesting that FAAH is a more effective target than a direct acting CB1 receptor agonist in facilitating extinction. More generally, these findings suggest that FAAH inhibition represents a promising pharmacological approach to treat psychopathologies hallmarked by an inability to extinguish maladaptive behaviors, such as post-traumatic stress syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Exposure to Marijuana Smoke Impairs Memory Retrieval in Mice

Marijuana (Cannabis sativa) and its primary psychoactive component, δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), have long been known to disrupt cognition in humans. Although Δ9-THC and other cannabinoids disrupt performance in a wide range of animal models of learning and memory, few studies have investigated the effects of smoked marijuana in these paradigms. Moreover, in preclinical studies, cannabinoids are generally administered before acquisition, and because retention is generally evaluated soon afterward, it is difficult to distinguish between processes related to acquisition and retrieval. In the present study, we investigated the specific effects of marijuana smoke and injected Δ9-THC on acquisition versus memory retrieval in a mouse repeated acquisition Morris water-maze task. To distinguish between these processes, subjects were administered Δ9-THC or they were exposed to marijuana smoke either 30 min before acquisition or 30 min before the retention test. Inhalation of marijuana smoke or injected Δ9-THC impaired the ability of the mice to learn the location of the hidden platform and to recall the platform location once learning had already taken place. In contrast, neither drug impaired performance in a cued task in which the platform was made visible. Finally, the cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide HCl (rimonabant) blocked the memory disruptive effects of both Δ9-THC and marijuana. These data represent the first evidence demonstrating that marijuana impairs memory retrieval through a CB1 receptor mechanism of action and independently of its effects on sensorimotor performance, motivation, and initial acquisition.

Clozapine discrimination with a low training dose distinguishes atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs in rats

Abstract  Rationale: Previous drug discrimination studies with clozapine have not reliably distinguished between atypical and typical antipsychotics. Objectives: The present study was conducted to determine whether low-dose clozapine drug discrimination could distinguish atypical from typical antipsychotics. Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. Results: Generalization testing revealed full substitution with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine (90.3% maximum generalization), sertindole (99.8%), and risperidone (87.1%) and partial substitution for quetiapine (seroquel, 66.4%) and the typical antipsychotics haloperidol (56.8%) and thioridazine (74.3%). Remoxipride (23.1%) and the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine (27.9%) and fluphenazine (29.5%) did not reliably substitute for clozapine. Conclusions: In contrast to previous clozapine drug discrimination studies with higher training doses, the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole, and risperidone reliably substituted for clozapine while typical antipsychotics did not. These results suggest that low-dose clozapine drug discrimination may be a more sensitive assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs.

Differential behavioral responses to nicotine in Lewis and Fischer-344 rats.

Individual and strain variability in the effects of nicotine suggests the involvement of a genetic component in nicotinic cholinergic receptor (nAChR) function, which may help explain nicotines variable behavioral and pharmacological effects in different individuals. The present study evaluated differential responses to the discriminative stimulus (DS) and rewarding properties of nicotine in Lewis (LEW) and Fischer-344 (F-344) rats. Drug discrimination (DD) data suggest that the LEW rat is more sensitive to nicotine as LEW rats acquired the nicotine discrimination at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg, whereas F-344 rats acquired the dose of 0.9 mg/kg (all nicotine doses expressed as free base). Similarly, LEW rats exhibited nicotine-conditioned place preference (CPP) at 0.6 mg/kg, whereas the F-344 rats did not. Subsequent testing with a higher dose (0.9 mg/kg) failed to maintain the nicotine-CPP in the LEW rats. Conversely, nicotine-place preference in the F-344 rats was not changed at the higher dose. Taken together, these results suggest potential differences of sensitivities in LEW and F-344 rats to the rewarding and discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of nicotine. These findings support previous research by demonstrating that the F-344 rat is less sensitive to nicotine compared to the LEW rat.

Discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of nicotine in the C57BL/6 mouse

Previous research conducted in this and other laboratories has examined the role of genetic factors in determining sensitivity to (-)-nicotine in a variety of behavioral and physiological measures in the rat. More recent research further indicates that genetic factors can also influence the level of sensitivity to (-)-nicotine when serving as a discriminative stimulus (DS) in different rat strains. However, there has been little work examining the influence of genotype on the discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of (-)-nicotine in mice, a species that has played a major role in understanding the relationship between genetics and (-)-nicotine pharmacological effects. To further our understanding of the role of genetics and the ability of (-)-nicotine to exert DS control of behavior in the mouse, a group of C57BL/6 mice was trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg (-)-nicotine from saline using a two-lever operant procedure. (-)-Nicotines discriminative stimulus in C57BL/6 mice appears to be similar to that generated in the rat. Results from behavioral tests with other drugs indicated that d-amphetamine exhibited a partial generalization, while (+)-nicotine fully generalized with nicotine. Tests of antagonism with mecamylamine and scopolamine further showed the cholinergic specificity of the (-)-nicotine DS in the mouse; mecamylamine but not scopolamine completely antagonized the (-)-nicotine DS. This work lays the groundwork for future comparisons of different mouse strains sensitivities to (-)-nicotines discriminative stimulus as well as using this behavioral model to search for new nicotinic receptor agonists and antagonists.

The discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in rats

Abstract Rationale: Analysis of the preclinical behavioral effects of atypical antipsychotic agents will provide a better understanding of how they differ from typical antipsychotics and aid in the development of future atypical antipsychotic drugs. Objectives: The present study was designed to provide information about the discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (either 0.5 mg/kg OLZ or 0.25 mg/kg OLZ, i.p.) from vehicle in a two- lever drug discrimination procedure. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine fully substituted for olanzapine in both the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (99.3% drug lever responding [DLR]) and the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (99.9% DLR). The typical antipsychotic chlorpromazine also substituted for olanzapine in both the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (87.5% DLR) and in the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (98.9% DLR); whereas, haloperidol displayed partial substitution for olanzapine in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (56.1% DLR) and in the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (76.4% DLR). The 5.0-mg/kg dose of thioridazine produced olanzapine-appropriate responding in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (99.6% DLR), but only partial substitution was seen with the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ training dose (64.0% DLR). The atypical antipsychotics raclopride (53.9% DLR) and risperidone (60.1% DLR) displayed only partial substitution in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group. Both the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine (90.0% DLR) and the 5-HT2A/2C serotonergic antagonist ritanserin (86.0% DLR) fully substituted for olanzapine in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group. Conclusions: In contrast to previous discrimination studies with clozapine-trained rats, the typical antipsychotic agents chlorpromazine and thioridazine and the serotonin antagonist ritanserin substituted for olanzapine. These results demonstrate that there are differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine and olanzapine. Specifically, olanzapine’s discriminative stimulus properties appear to be meditated in part by both cholinergic and serotonergic mechanisms.

Mianserin as a discriminative stimulus in rats: asymmetrical cross-generalization with scopolamine

The present study was conducted to determine if the tetracyclic antidepressant mianserin could be established as a discrminative stimulus in rats. One group of rats was trained to discriminate mianserin (4.0 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure, and a second group of rats was trained to discriminate the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine (0.25 mg/kg, IP) from saline. Generalization testing with the training drugs yielded an ED50 of 0.502 mg/kg for the mianserin-trained rats and an ED50 of 0.048 mg/kg for the scopolamine-trained rats. Asymmetrical cross-generalization between mianserin and scopolamine was observed, because scopolamine produced mianserin-appropriate responding, but mianserin did not produce scopolamine-appropriate responding. This study is the first demonstration that rats can be trained to discriminate mianserin from saline and that antagonism of muscarinic cholinergic receptors is sufficient to produce mianserin-appropriate responding.

Chlorpromazine as a discriminative stimulus in rats: Generalization to typical and atypical antipsychotics

The discriminative stimulus properties of the typical antipsychotic chlorpromazine were examined in a two‐lever drug discrimination procedure for food reward. Six of nine rats readily acquired the discrimination between 1.0 mg/kg chlorpromazine (i.p.) and vehicle in a mean of 29.7 training sessions. The chlorpromazine generalization curve was dose‐dependent and yielded an ED50 of 0.305 mg/kg (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.201–0.463 mg/kg). The chlorpromazine cue generalized to the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (ED50 for the clozapine curve was 0.258 mg/kg [95% CI = 0.047–1.420 mg/kg]) and olanzapine (ED50 for the olanzapine curve was 0.199 mg/kg [95% CI = 0.076–0.522 mg/kg]) and to the typical antipsychotic thioridazine (ED50 for the thioridazine curve was 3.103 mg/kg [95% CI = 1.993–4.832 mg/kg]). Haloperidol (a typical antipsychotic) and raclopride (an atypical antipsychotic) did not substitute for chlorpromazine. It is clear from the present results that the discriminative stimulus properties of chlorpromazine share similarities both with the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine and with the typical antipsychotic thioridazine. The extent to which the discriminative stimulus properties of antipsychotic drugs reflect or are predictive of their therapeutic effects in schizophrenic patients remains unclear. Drug Dev. Res. 48:38–44, 1999.

∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-dependent mice undergoing withdrawal display impaired spatial memory

RationaleCannabis users display a constellation of withdrawal symptoms upon drug discontinuation, including sleep disturbances, irritability, and possibly memory deficits. In cannabinoid-dependent rodents, the CB1 antagonist rimonabant precipitates somatic withdrawal and enhances forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in cerebellum, an effect opposite that of acutely administered ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary constituent in cannabis.ObjectivesHere, we tested whether THC-dependent mice undergoing rimonabant-precipitated withdrawal display short-term spatial memory deficits, as assessed in the Morris water maze. We also evaluated whether rimonabant would precipitate adenylyl cyclase superactivation in hippocampal and cerebellar tissue from THC-dependent mice.ResultsRimonabant significantly impaired spatial memory of THC-dependent mice at lower doses than those necessary to precipitate somatic withdrawal behavior. In contrast, maze performance was near perfect in the cued task, suggesting sensorimotor function and motivational factors were unperturbed by the withdrawal state. Finally, rimonabant increased adenylyl cyclase activity in cerebellar, but not in hippocampal, membranes.ConclusionsThe memory disruptive effects of THC undergo tolerance following repeated dosing, while the withdrawal state leads to a rebound deficit in memory. These results establish spatial memory impairment as a particularly sensitive component of cannabinoid withdrawal, an effect that may be mediated through compensatory changes in the cerebellum.